The final weeks of the 2019 legislative Session in Hartford approach.
What has happened thus far in the Session? Or, as might be asked
by some who are familiar with goings-on in recent years in the
Legislature, what bills are still alive that may be a threat to Weston?
And although governmental finances are not a specialty of mine, I can’t
help but find it mesmerizing at times to follow how our State’s fiscal
crisis evolves. And seeing how Governor Lamont attempts to save
Connecticut from drowning in debt.
I can feel confident, though, in describing what is going on with bills
originating in the Legislature’s Planning and Development
Committee. Having a professional background in urban and municipal
planning, I follow their work closely.
The work of the Environment Committee and Transportation Committee also
interests me. As does the work of the Energy and Technology
Committee and the Housing Committee. Although following the
multitude of bills that can emerge from these committees, and the
subsequent labyrinthine paths they may follow, can certainly be
For example, it is not uncommon for a “strike all” amendment to appear
on the floor, as if from nowhere, that can change the whole complexion
of your bill in a flash!
A major focus of mine is with P&D action as “Committee of
Cognizance.” And with sixteen of the bills to which that Committee
has given “JF” (Joint Favorable) status during this Session.
Those bills, 8 from the House and 8 from the Senate, now seem to float
about like ping-pong balls. An analogy might be made with square
dancing calls, these bills awaiting the words “allemande your partner”
and “do-si-do.” In legislative terms that would mean “go to
another Committee and return to the floor.”
In these 16 bills we in effect have two square dance sets, one for the
House bills and another for the Senate bills. The trick to keeping track
of them is reviewing the House and Senate “Journals” just about every
These are usually published one day after the fact. There you can
see precisely what may have been proposed as an amendment. As well
as which legislators spoke, and when votes are called how each
legislator voted. Also, this year the entire debate of each bill
is being transcribed and published, although not soon enough for this
House and Senate bills of particular interest to me and other Westonites
include several that could work well for Weston. The bill numbers
appear on my website, www.aboutweston.com.
HB5229, involving attempts to return control of sign regulation to
Towns, and HB7368, involving regional sharing of some software
technology, look good. As does SB1071, concerning incentives for
aging in place. And likewise SB1077, regarding sharing of animal
Also of interest is SB1082, about developing incentives for
regionalization of “Public Safety Answering Points,” aka “PSAPs.”
But my favorite, although not in a positive sense, is HB6749. This
involves the affordable housing mandate. The subtitle of this
bill might be: “In case you didn’t understand, Weston, we are
warning you in plain English that you are deficient in your ‘affordable
NOTE:“About Town” is also a television
program.It appears on Fridays from 5:30
to 6 p.m. and on Saturdays from 10 to 10:30 a.m. on Cablevision Channel 88
(Public Access).Or see it at www.aboutweston.com.
WE CONTRIBUTE THIS COLUMN TO WESTON-TODAY
What can About Weston website do to keep everyone
informed? Not ever intended as a "newspaper" but more like a
research source, we will continue our website research/ as background for the column.
About Weston now attends the three major boards/commissions we care about:
Board of Selectmen
Board of Finance
Planning & Zoning
We post this our "opinion" column online here every Thursday
WHAT DOES THE LAW SAY? HERE IS WHAT IT SAYS ABOUT "TOWN MEETINGS"...
7-3. Warning of town and other meetings. The warning of each town
meeting, and of each meeting of a city, borough, school district or
other public community or of an ecclesiastical society, shall specify
the objects for which such meeting is to be held. Notice of a town
meeting shall be given by posting, upon a signpost or other exterior
place near the office of the town clerk of such town and at such other
place or places as may be designated as hereinafter provided, a printed
or written warning signed by the selectmen, or a majority of them, and
by publishing a like warning in a newspaper published in such town or
having a circulation therein, such posting and such publication to be at
least five days previous to holding the meeting, including the day that
notice is given and any Sunday and any legal holiday which may
intervene between such posting and such publication and the day of
holding such meeting, but not including the day of holding such meeting;
but any town may, at an annual meeting, designate any other place or
places, in addition to the signpost or other exterior place, at which
such warnings shall be set up. The selectmen shall, on or before the day
of such meeting, cause a copy of each such warning to be left with the
town clerk, who shall record the same. Notice of a meeting of a city or
borough shall be given by posting, upon a signpost or other exterior
place nearest to the office of the clerk of such city or borough or at
such place or places as may be designated by special charter provision, a
written or printed warning signed by the mayor or clerk in the case of a
city or by the warden or clerk in the case of a borough, and by
publishing a like warning in a newspaper published within the limits of
such city or borough, or having a circulation therein,
at least five days previous to holding the meeting, including the day
that notice is given and any Sunday and any legal holiday which may
intervene between such posting and such publication and the day of
holding such meeting, but not including the day of holding such meeting.
WHY CAN'T AN ONLINE ONLY PUBLICATION BE AN OFFICIAL PUBLISHER OF PUBLIC NOTICES?
WHAT'S BLACK AND WHITE AND "READ" ALL OVER? ABOUT TOWN.
You will find our videos on YouTube, but we do not use "social media" -
formal communication: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
ARTIST'S IMPRESSION OF HOW THE NORFIELD OAK TREE LOOKS NOW AFTER MAKING IT SOMEWHAT SAFER FOR SCHOOL BUS.
WILL THE SCHOOL BUS STILL COME TO A STOP? ACTUALLY, IT SHOULD
WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A CHILD GETTING ON OR OFF - JUST TO BE
Delivery trucks still must cross the yellow line (this was a truck from a
party-supply place); and on the right, coming down the hill
(westbound) the open wound of the missing mast.
INQUIRING MINDS WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF HIS POWERS EXTEND TO TRAFFIC CONTROL??? Answer: No, but the Police Commission/Police Chief is the last word. Planning Law case
- "Causby's Chickens" rule apply? (Chickens [The Tree] were there before the
airport [2016 traffic].) And don't forget the CT General Statutes ("C.G.A.") on the subject of Town Trees...
The Tree Warden states that it is in fine if not great shape but presents a traffic hazard - is it in his purview (link to C.G.A.) to order the removal of this tree for that reason? Well, maybe it is and maybe it isn't...he's in charge of the tree.
R E E W A R D E N P U B L I
C H E A R I N G A U G U S
T 5 , 1 9 9 8 IT AIN'T OVER 'TIL ITS OVER DEPARTMENT: OAK TREE ON NORFIELD ROAD THREATENED AGAIN?
For those who may remember, and for those who weren't around, including
the Town Administrator, who reported at the Board of Selectmen August
2016 that he had read the minutes of Tree Warden public hearing...About
Town spoke up about the matter (having attended all the meetings of the
Board of Selectmen since mid-1991).
Guess what! About Town has it (the Tree Warden Public Hearing) on
videotape (in our archives in the
basement). It is around one hour long and we just watched it - it is a
League of Women Voters of Weston Presents production. Below is a
"play-by-play" of the event - a "picture story" with the pictures being
screen shots! It had been broadcast on the Government Channel (not
run as a local channel then) as a public service from the League of
PUBLIC HEARINGBY TREE WARDENAUGUST 5, 1998
This was a Tree Warden Public Hearing August 5, 1998 in the Town Hall
Meeting Room. Jean Owens taking minutes. Jim Hoe (l) is the
Tree Warden. Public Works Director Joe Lametta ran the hearing,
calling on "yes" take the tree down group (above). P&Z had
tried to minimize curb cuts during subdivision process and come up with
this plan - which included a condition of approval that the tree be
taken down by the developer. Meanwhile, lawyer for the developer
reports two lots have already been sold. In addition, he points
out that the Town of Weston had turned down an offer to buy the
property. P&Z member sorry they couldn't find another way in
SIX LOT SUBDIVISION WITH WETLANDS AND STEEP SLOPES (SO WHAT ELSE IS NEW?).
Martha Gilson ("First Five" not shown) spoke first, another agreed, then a fellow who
loved the tree testified he
thought two stop signs would work. The next speaker (she is not shown) questioned
why they had to exit onto Norfield in the first place, and
another thought tree slowed people down! The runner proposed speed
bumps and stop signs (he had taken the time to do a time and motion study of a sort) measured the sight lines and couldn't see
any safe possibilities).
AH YES WHAT IS A TREE WORTH? Maybe he was abrupt, but he sure was spot on - destroy a 200 year
old tree for 6 building lots? Not, as we would say in the 21st
century, "The Weston Way." Next - why can't we find a way out?
Why? Most magnificent tree. Save the tree! The next
two speakers picked up on the question. "The tree is worth saving!" said one, and the other
wondered where we'd be if we didn't stand up for the natural environment and spare this tree.
SELECTMAN SHOWS WHY HE GETS ELECTED OVER AND OVER!
"Nobody ever complained before - all of a sudden this is an excuse to
take from the town our heritage" was a BIG applause line!!!
Another nail in the approved subdivision condition's future re: the tree...as this venerable
and always accurate voice stated it had never been a problem before...
AND THEN THE "CUT DOWN THAT TREE" SIDE CAME A CROPPER. OOPS! In response, the unwitting P&Z Chair announced that yes it had
been posted to be cut down a few years ago (no doubt testimony by the
applicant). Neighbor rises to report that it was CL&P who had it
posted, not the town, and implicitly we figure she got her way!!!
Then it was over (total @one hour).
Tree Warden repeats that there
will be a decision in three days. The tree is still standing as of August 2016,
but...Selectmen may be having second thoughts...
For reference, in addition to any other records, there are these "League
Lines" columns published in the FORUM that include references to this
very same tree:
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink" - effort
to get a secret ballot - which was the precursor to the Referendum that
a Charter Revision Commission made more than a decade later... FROM THE LWV OF WESTON WEBSITE: SPECIAL TOWN MEETING, JAN. 9, 2003, WESTON HIGH SCHOOL AUDITORIUM, 8PM
AGENDA 1. Call to order - First Selectman/done - @8:15pm
2. Introduce Head Table - First Selectman/done
3. Nomination and election of Moderator - First Selectman.
Moderator assumes leadership of the balance of the meeting/done.
4. Appoint Parliamentarian (Susan Moch) and identify Registrars of Voters by name and official counters by name/done.
5. Read statutes re Qualifications of voters and penalties for fraudulent voting/done.
6. Segregate non-voters/done.
7. Note that Town Clerk Cynthia Williams is Clerk of the Meeting/Donna Anastasia, Ass't. Town Clerk in this position.
8. Get motion and vote to waive reading of Call/done.
9. Instruct Clerk to enter Call in the minutes of the Meeting/done.
10. Explain votes to be taken, methods of voting, and method of amendments/done.
a. All votes by voice except for the following:
i. If Moderator cannot determine the prevailing side - take immediate standing vote.
ii. If at least seven (7) voters immediately challenge the Moderator's call of the outcome - take immediate standing vote.
iii.If, prior to taking a vote on a motion on the floor, the Meeting
itself upon a motion duly made and seconded, votes to take the vote on
the pending motion by some other
means (i.e. paper ballot).
11. Explain the rules for addressing the meeting/done:
a. Get recognized by the Moderator.
b. Identify yourself by name and street
c. Address remarks or questions to Moderator; be as brief as
possible; don't simply repeat what others have said; avoid
d. Any issues outside the scope of the Call, or not germane to the motion at hand, will be ruled out of order. 12. Any questions about procedure?/LWV of Weston calls for paper ballot,
voice vote taken ("NO" prevails according to Moderator); LWV
Co-President calls for a division of
the house--gets many more than seven voters to join this motion -
standing count not close (precise number to come)--LWV request fails. 13. Brief remarks re First Resolution - First Selectman/done.
14. Discussion and vote/many speakers against, some for--voice vote called "YES"--challenged; standing count not close.
15. Brief remarks re Second Resolution - First Selectman/done.
16. Discussion and vote/speakers equally divided, voice vote "YES" overwhelming--no call for standing count.