Transit taking a hit?   How about the spot the County Commissioners are in?  Commissioner on the left not returned to office in 2010.  Deception Pass like the Tappanzee - a magnet.

E-LAND USE PLANNING FOR WHIDBEY ISLAND, WASHINGTON (U.S.A.)
Best regional setting map; and the *traffic picture (webcam) from Mukilteo to Seattle; the WSF webcams;  the direct link to a super webcam!  Twice a week, newspapers for local flavor:  South Whidbey  RECORD  http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/swr/ and Whidbey News-Times http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/whidbey/wnt/


* = new
Tour of  Whidbey Island with "About Town"

Table of Contents: TOP STORY TODAY!

Introduction;  link to little known facts about Island County;

FINANCIAL CRISIS;

Growth Management: as revised...(is this something CT wants to do...in our lifetime?) "Growth Management Act";

Consultant contract extension for...Scenic Corridor Management Plan:

From Minutes of Dec. 6, 2004 Board of Island County Commissioners:  Supplemental Agreement No. 1 – PW-0320-102(A); Island County and Otak, Inc. for  Whidbey Island Scenic Corridor Management Plan... as recommended by Mr. Oakes (a Commissioner), the Board by unanimous motion approved Supplemental Agreement No. 1 [PW-0320-102(A)] with Otak, Inc. for  Whidbey Island Scenic Corridor Management Plan, for the purpose of extending completion date to  May 31, 2005(link to minutes)

Regionalism, State of Washington style.

Transportation to Seattle*

"RCW" - Revised Code of the State of Washington:  http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/

 "Growth Management" act links.

Who's in charge?  http://www.islandcounty.net/bicc/bicc.htm
Some Whidbey Island planning background: groundwater meetings
Groundwater protection laws, State of Washington practice.  LWV of Whidbey Island study HERE.This is a terrific study if you get to see it...but it was put on-line as a pdf of a flyer--two columns on each webversion page--please read it by PAGE NUMBER (at the bottom right of each column); Development issues:water study DRAFT findings; RIGHT TO KNOW: for the official code http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?dispo=true&cite=120;  comparison, in CT BEACHES:  Surface water quality - news story of testing program at 5 beaches this summer. Research sources - breaking news on the seismic front:   http://www.ess.washington.edu/SEIS/PNSN/

Whidbey News-Times: http://www.whidbeynewstimes.com/
South Whidbey RECORD: http://www.southwhidbeyrecord.com/
Everett, WA Herald: http://www.heraldnet.com/
University of Washington:
Earth and space science, specifically, click here;

Government:
Puget Sound: "State of the Sound"
OPEN GOVERNMENT DESK BOOK;  Open Government link, for State of Washington; Washington State WEBSITE: http://access.wa.gov/ Island County:  http://www.islandcounty.net/ Sno-Isle Libraries:  http://www.sno-isle.org/ Island Transit (free): http://www.islandtransit.org/  




INTRODUCTION on August 7-8, 2005, "About Town" was guided around Island County - conducting a "SR525 windshield survey"  from end to end (with detours) - Deception Pass to the wilds of unincorporated Clinton and lots inbetween;  we took walking tours of walkable areas, too, visiting the "cities" of Oak Harbor, Langley, County seat Coupeville; Ebey's Landing, Whidbey Institute, Bayville coop, inland lakes and REALLY BIG TREES - and some wonderful spots tucked away...we had arrived fresh from Seattle, the Blue Angels taking off from Boeing Field still fresh. So Whidbey NAS was a perfect tie-in...A-6 Intruders one of our favorite 'planes (great radar).

A virtual visit - or a real one - to Whidbey Island starts by getting off the Washington State Ferry HERE...
Or if you'd like a different view, try this webcam!
Now I know why the other end of Whidbey Island has a State Park called "Deception Pass"...it is where there is a bridge to get off Whidbey Island by heading toward...Canada!  A lot faster than the ferryboats can take you!
Whidbey Island, is a really big island, on Puget Sound:
http://www.gonorthwest.com/Washington/puget/whidbey/whidbey_island.htm
Front-burner items: are Whidbey Island and Weston CT so different?  Open space preservation is something both places put high on the list...Weston land use HERE;   story about upcoming Legislative Session in WA and Whidbey Island land trust...



Budget crisis cuts county office hours
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Today, 2:24 PM · UPDATED

Beginning in March, anyone going to the administration building of the Island County campus in Coupeville won’t be able to get in the door before 9 a.m. or after 4 p.m.

There will be “a nice big sign that announces the office is closed due to the budget crisis,” Island County Commissioner John Dean said Wednesday. Currently, the building that houses human resources, the treasurer, the assessor, the auditor and the commissioners’ office are open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The county offices in other buildings — including the sheriff, prosecutor, planning, health — will remain on the 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. schedule.

The move will allow the bare-bones staff in the administrative building departments to have “desk time” to finish paperwork before dealing with the public. County staff has been reduced by 31 positions with all of those employees leaving by the end of February, allowing the county’s $67.7 million 2009 budget to balance after a projected $2 million shortfall.

Now the county is facing an additional $1 million shortfall because of a drop in revenue from investments, which will likely result in more layoffs later in the year.

The commissioners, elected officials and department heads held a roundtable meeting Wednesday to discuss the change in hours.

In addition, they talked about whether to have a hiring freeze as neighboring counties have done. The commissioners ultimately decided against it, noting that replacing some positions may be “absolutely necessary,” Dean said.

“I don’t think we want to make a big blanket statement,” Commissioner Helen Price Johnson said.

The commission plans to hire a new planning director to replace Jeff Tate, who’s leaving at the end of the month. Wednesday morning, the commissioners discussed spending $10,000 on a consultant to do professional background checks on the candidates.




Click above to get the short version...or read about the latest Puget Sound Plans HERE!

Growth Management
Things start at the top in WA - check out WA  population estimates;
Articles relating to "growth" management issues will be organized here...this issue is THE one to explore for Whidbey Island, and should be of interest to all residents of Clinton as they approach major planning initiatives in Island County...be at this Public Hearing!

Whidbey’s census forecast: Gray and grayer
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
11 April 2011;  Today, 7:49 AM · UPDATED

Results from the 2010 Census show that Island County is graying faster than the state or the nation as a whole.  While the county’s total population continues to grow — though not at the rate predicted by the state — the number of people under 18 years old decreased significantly over the last decade.

It’s not a surprise to anyone in the county who pays attention to demographic trends, but it validates what some people consider a worrisome drift in the population — or at least one that has to be planned for.  Cheryn Weiser, the director of Senior Services of Island County, points out that the demographic shift toward more older people and fewer younger people is more pronounced in Island County, even compared to surrounding counties.

“It’s a daunting challenge,” she said. “We’re beginning a strategic planning process this year to deal precisely with this issue. I don’t think anyone has this figured out yet.”

It’s a trend that is supposed to continue. In 1986, about 25 percent of the county’s population was 50 years old and older. By 2025, 47 percent of the population will be over 50, the state Office of Financial Management predicts.  The trend over the last decade was reversed for people under 18. According to the census results, a total of 18,247 people under 18 lived in the county is 2000, but the number dipped to 16,294 in 2010. In other words, 25.5 percent of the 2000 population were minors while just 20.8 percent were minors in 2010.

The trend watchers point to a number of reasons for the change. On a national scale, the giant Baby Boomer generation is aging and people are living longer. At the same time, birth rates have dropped.

Officials pointed to the number of people retiring to Island County as one reason for the inflation of the older population. The mild weather, scenery, fishing and the Navy base are all big draws for the mature set.

On the other hand, schools on Whidbey Island are far from unique in having to deal with enrollment drops, which is an issue facing districts all over the nation. According to the census results, the number of people under 18 years old within the Oak Harbor School District decreased by 829 from 2000 to 2010. In 2010, there were 9,302 people under 18 in the district.

But Oak Harbor Superintendent Rick Schulte said the number of students in the Oak Harbor district has stabilized over the last couple of years after dropping earlier in the decade. He said Oak Harbor fared better than other school districts on Whidbey Island, enrollment-wise, partly due to the fact that Whidbey Island Naval Air Station is within the district. The Navy brings many families with school-aged children to the area.

Kim Martin, the public affairs officer for the base, said the number of people who work on the base, both active duty and civilians, has remained constant at about 10,000 over the decade.  But beyond the Navy base, many suggest that the economy on Whidbey isn’t strong or diverse enough to support many young workers. And the problem only got worse during the recession.

“It says something about what kind of economy we have on the island,” Weiser said, adding that it would be healthier economically for there to be a better balance between young families and retired folks.

An aging population brings with it plenty of challenges for the community, but also advantages. Oak Harbor Senior Center Director Mike McIntyre emphasized that the Baby Boom generation will likely remain very active and engaged as they age.

“It can be a real plus,” he said. “You have all these people with time on their hands and an interest in helping.”

The key, he said, is to harness all that energy and talent. It may take some investment from the community. The current Oak Harbor Senior Center, he said, just wasn’t designed with active older folks in mind. While the Depression-era generation still likes to play bingo and cards, the Baby Boomers are looking for more action, like trips to wineries and skiiing. In fact, McIntyre said studies have shown that the Baby Boomers bristle at the idea of going to a senior center, so much so that many centers are taking “senior” out of their names as well as changing their programs.

“They think they’re never going to get old,” he said.

Still, Weiser said a growing number of older people does present some challenges for the community. She’s especially concerned about the lack of appropriate places for older people to live. She said the island needs a wider range of housing options, from conventional senior housing to co-housing to low-income housing.

Of course, with an aging population comes increased pressure on health care. Trish Rose, the spokeswoman for Whidbey General Hospital, said hospital administration is well aware of the trend and it’s part of the reason for the proposed bond to expand the hospital. It isn’t so much an issue of capacity, she said, but of quality of care. The need for high-quality health care will only increase as the population ages.

To help the older generation, Rose said the hospital has also started new programs dedicated to helping senior citizens and lessening their need for medical help. A program called SAIL, which stands for Stay Active and Independent for Life, focuses senior citizens with the goal of improving medication safety and reducing falls.

“Generally, we’re reviewing our services and looking at ways to serve the older population in new ways,” she said.

Incorporation - another way WA "controls" growth...for example:

Comprehensive plan group shifts into high gear -  "About Town" asks:  How now brown cow?   No more farmers?
By MICHAELA MARX WHEATLEY
Mar 28 2007

LANGLEY — Halfway through the effort to update the city’s plan for growth, the Langley city council gave its volunteer planners a big thumbs up for the work they’ve accomplished so far.  Councilman Robert Gilman, the executive team leader for the comp plan, said reorganizing the planning group and implementing changes will be the name of the game in 2007. It’s now time to delve into the details, he said.

“We are about halfway through the comp plan process and work on shifting from a community-visioning phase to a phase that will be more directly focused on the specifics of the comp plan updates,” Gilman said.

The comp plan is the document that will guide growth and development in Langley over the next two decades. The goal of the next phase of the plan is to create a set of recommended updates for the council to review by September.  A numbers of committees will merge. “The major changes we are suggesting involve merging some of the committees to help provide the focus and coordination for this next phase,” Gilman said.

Also, in keeping with focusing on updating the comp plan, the work of the committees will shift to more specific research and data gathering, plus identifying how city regulations will be reworded.  In some cases, the committees will also look at implementation strategies, including identifying potential partners and sources of grants and other funding.

The number of committees will drop in the coming months. The Watersheds and Bluffs, Food and Agriculture, and Waterfront committees will be integrated into the Land-Use committee. The Arts, Culture and Education and the Economic Development committees will also merge.

Councilwoman Rene Neff was pleased. “From the Arts and Entertainment committee’s view, a lot of what we’re talking about goes well with the economic development (committee),” she said.  Another change will be made to the Parks and Open Space and the Energy committees, which will be focusing on preparing potential code and implementation strategies. The Parks and Open Space Committee has indicated the current comp plan goals and policies are pretty good, Gilman said.

The Energy Committee does have some comp plan suggestions, but those will be easily integrated into the sustainability element of the plan — a new addition to the comp plan.

“We see this as a short, summary element that has simple, high-level goals and policies drawn from most of the committees, with a special emphasis on energy,” Gilman said.  The land-use chapter of the plan needs much updating, however, due to changing trends, Gilman said.  An important part of this work will be to divide the city and Urban Growth Area up into subareas and develop standards that can be used in each of the subareas.

The economic development chapter of the plan is also new.  Gilman said the Economic Development Committee has already made significant progress on identifying material for this element. 

“To keep this manageable, we expect to focus on a vision similar to that which the committee described in their concept paper, and to leave more extensive analysis for coming years,” Gilman said. “There are grants we can only get if we have an economic development element.”

The goal is to diversify the economy, Langley officials said.

“It’s not wise to put all of our economic development eggs into one basket,” said Mayor Neal Colburn. “We need to keep an eye on growing the local economy.”

Colburn added that there are about 15,000 people living south of Classic Road, and Langley should be a shopping and business destination for people who live near the island’s traditional halfway point.  Much work has been already done for the housing section of the plan, and the team expects changes based on the housing report by former consultant Donna Keeler. Keeler identified the areas of town that have the most potential for development and identified what types of housing is needed.

“We want to answer how to serve the housing needs of the diverse population we want and have,” Gilman explained.

The transportation chapter of the growth plan was already updated late last year. Even so, the committee is continuing to examine parking issues and needed road connections.  Langley’s leaders agreed with the proposal to proceed, and the council voted to approve the road map for the planning process as presented.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

BOUNDARIES SET FOR CITY OF FREELAND

South Whidbey RECORD
By GAYLE SARAN
Feb 17 2007

FREELAND STORY VIA EVERETT HERALD — Useless Bay Colony has been chopped out of the proposed boundaries for the new city of Freeland.

What is included are the housing developments at Mutiny Bay, Mutiny Sands and the Holmes Harbor community.  After months of deliberations, proponents of the incorporation effort for Freeland have set the new city’s boundaries. Useless Bay Colony was not included because most people on the committee felt the golf course community south of Double Bluff Road was too far from the heart of Freeland.

The volunteer incorporation committee finalized the boundaries during a workshop Monday night.  Dean Enell, chairman of the incorporation group, said they wanted to be as realistic as possible.

“We shrunk the boundaries down from our previous working area,” he said, adding that the northeast boundary to East Harbor Road was also pulled back.

“The group also agreed to set the boundary closer to Freeland just north of the new housing development on East Harbor Road. Our original plan went out East Harbor Road to Goodell Road; we moved it closer to just beyond the housing development Whispering Firs, about one-quarter mile from the Freeland Post Office,” Enell said.

Also included are the 34 acres acquired by the Friends of Freeland near Scott and Newman roads. The property will serve as an urban preserve area.

“We are glad to be finished. We can move forward,” said Chet Ross, chairman of the boundary and services sub-committee.  Ross said county opposition led to the removal of Useless Bay from Freeland’s proposed city limits. 

Although the incorporation committee has established a boundary for the proposed city of Freeland, the Board of Island County Commissioners, as the boundary review board, will have the final say in where the boundaries are set.  Registered voters within those boundaries will determine whether Freeland is actually incorporated. Supporters are hoping to put Freeland cityhood on the November ballot.

Enell explained the committee’s criteria in establishing a boundary.

“We met with city administrators, council members and planning directors from the cities of Kenmore, LaConner, Shoreline Oak Harbor and Langley,” Enell said. Organizers also talked with Stan Finkelstein, executive director for the Association of Washington Cities.

“Our goal is to accommodate growth with a proactive plan that maintains and enhances that rural quality of life we enjoy here,” Enell said.

Setting the boundaries for the proposed city of Freeland was a necessary step before the idea could be taken to voters and county commissioners for approval.  Now that the boundaries are set, the committee will file a “notice of intent” with board of Island County commissioners, who will then be required to hold public meetings on the question of cityhood.

“The committee expects to file a notice of intent with the county in the next two weeks, and will have some specific budget figures for the proposed city within two to three weeks,” Ross said.  



INCORPORATION:  this is still done in places like State of Washington and Whidbey Island!
COUNTY PLANNING - read about County planning consultant HERE.

The Island County logo (version #2) - planning-related issues best source.  See enlarged automobile map of Whidbey Island...
What is the goal of this "About Town" study?  It is to secure the future for Whidbey Island as a natural haven.  The policies to achieve this goal focus on providing a balance between sensitive development and protected environment - all the time remembering that Island County is just that--separated from the mainland...

HOT OFF THE PRESS:  The County planners are hard at work - check out what they are up to now in Freeland!  South Whidbey next?
Is Clinton OK with a RAID?
South Whidbey RECORD
By STEPHEN MERCER
Mar 26 2005
Island County officials left no doubt about Clinton’s status with the county recently, but some South Whidbey residents still seem unhappy with an inability to directly influence change.
 

Seemingly displeased with the type of commercial development in Clinton, some South Whidbey residents recently requested the formation of a design review board to permit closer scrutiny of businesses trying to obtain licenses to open in the town. General opposition to a pending used recreational vehicle sales lot planned in the town’s commercially zoned area of the community received particular interest.

Jack Lynch — a Clinton resident and the former planner for the city of Langley — stated at a March 8 meeting of the Clinton Forum that people move to Clinton because it offers a rural setting.

“It deserves some planning attention with some assistance from the county,” he said.  Lynch suggested a closer partnership between Clinton and Island County during a meeting at which Island County officials confirmed Clinton as a rural area of intense development, or RAID. A nine-member sub-area planning board chose in 2001 to keep Clinton a RAID to ensure the community stays rural.

The possibility of a design review board or changing Clinton’s status under the county’s comprehensive plan were in response to a comment by Phil Bakke, Island County’s planning director. He said the only way county officials will change zoning laws and codes in a RAID is through the annual revisions of the county’s comprehensive plan.

Any changes to parking, architecture or other codes under the county’s comprehensive plan may only be made during annual reviews of the plan, he said.  The RAID designation put Clinton under set boundaries and growth requirements based on Island County’s comprehensive plan for the GMA, said Jeff Tate, Island County’s assistant planning director, several days after the meeting.

“A RAID is static,” he said. The community’s borders are unmovable and all new construction may only infill that area, Tate said.  So, while in a RAID, residents must approach the county commissioners for change, said Freeland’s Mitchell Streicher when summing up the situation.  According to one of the meeting’s organizers, however, the meeting’s main purpose had more to do with how the county legally views the community rather than how to change it.

Bob Effertz, president of the Clinton Forum, said forum members want verification from Island County that Clinton will remain a RAID. He said some Clinton residents are concerned the town remained a RAID due to efforts to make Freeland a non municipal area of intense development , or NMUGA. Both Clinton and Freeland’s sub area planning groups formed in 1999 to determine their community’s respective status. Clinton’s decision to stay a RAID reflected a desire to keep the community small.
Effertz said the forum members were satisfied with county commissioner Mike Shelton’s assurance that Clinton will remains a RAID, unless the forum or another grass roots organization forms a committee to change the classification.

“I think the impetus would have to come from the people of Clinton,” Shelton said.

Even with Shelton’s validation of Clinton’s status, though, audience members seemed to want more control over decisions than state law allows with RAID status. Ideas for change ranged from making Clinton a city to appointing a board to overview all permits for licenses. Both ideas were resisted by commissioner Shelton.

Jim Day of Clinton said making Clinton an incorporated city to give Clinton residents a greater ability to make changes. Shelton rebuffed the idea, pointing out that several incorporated cities are unable to survive financially and disincorporate.  Dean Enell of Langley said a design review board benefits the county because the design review board charges fees to review plans. It also benefits the community because it offers more control about what comes into the area. Langley, an incorporated city, uses a design review board.

“I personally would be opposed to a design review board,” commissioner Shelton said.  Not having a design review board guards against the “personal taste” board members might use in their decisions, he said.  Addressing criticism from some Clinton residents about a lack of feedback opportunities, Bakke said county keeps the rules specific for issues such as licenses and zoning. He said the county plans to hold public meetings in Coupeville throughout the year for discussion of the comprehensive plans.

Freeland’s planning group hopes to become the less restrictive NMUGA. Shelton said Freeland will remain a RAID until the county approves the community’s plan for the sewer, water and stormwater system required for NMUGA status.  If approved, Freeland’s NMUGA will allow four homes to be built per acre and will permit shifting of Freeland’s borders, Tate said. The NMUGA also allows more opportunity for local input, Bakke said.
WEB stuff and best overall link to the community:
http://www.islandweb.org/index.php
Homepage to Island County government (including telephone tree):
http://www.islandcounty.net/
Direct link to MAPS;
Planning & Zoning stuff...
http://www.islandcounty.net/Island_County_Code.htm
Economic study of Whidbey Island (report).
 
 
Pay for maps here...topos, etc.
http://county-map.digital-topo-maps.com/washington.shtml
Planning and Community Development homepage...same as Island County link above.
http://www.islandcounty.net/planning/index.htm



Power to the people?

Whidbey PUD issue polarizes Whidbey Island
By MICHAELA MARX WHEATLEY
South Whidbey Record Langley
Oct 22 2008 · UPDATED

The power struggle on Whidbey Island is heading into the home stretch. But despite thousands of dollars spent to inform voters about the measure to create a Whidbey-based utility and numerous and debates, many people on Whidbey say they still haven’t heard enough to make up their minds on the PUD question.

Voters will decide on Nov. 4 if they want to form a locally-owned and operated electric utility on the island, or if they want to remain with Puget Sound Energy as their provider.

The push to create a public agency for electrical services has sparked a vigorous debate between advocates of local control and supporters of private, regulated utilities like Puget Sound Energy.  At the center of the debate is the question of which approach would provide the best rates and service to the citizens. Each side has commissioned studies to promote its view, and these studies have come to different conclusions regarding the cost and availability of power.

“People For Yes on Whidbey PUD,” the group that started the effort for a Whidbey-based power company, has quoted $57 million for the takeover of Puget Sound Energy’s assets and an initial property tax increase of between $2.57 and $5.78 for a $300,000 home to get the PUD started, saying that customers will eventually see savings in their bills of 20 percent.

Puget Sound Energy and its consultants have said that the takeover could cost between $130 million and $200 million and could lead to 20-percent higher rates.

Taking on the big guys

“People For Yes on Whidbey PUD” burst onto the political scene in spring with the announcement that they were trying to get a measure to form a PUD on the November ballot. They collected thousands of signatures in three months and qualified for the ballot.  From the start, Dave Metheny, the campaign director, and Bob Kuehn, the treasurer, expected that Puget Sound Energy would not hand over its assets without a fight, pointing toward the utility’s long history of fighting PUDs since the 1930s.

But six months later they marvel at the magnitude of opposition.

“There is such a high amount of money involved,” Kuehn said, alluding to the $268,514 the company has contributed to the anti-PUD effort on Whidbey. “It makes so much noise it’s deafening. People can’t hear what we’re saying.”

The PUD proponents have only raised $20,952 to date.  What supporters are saying is that a PUD will provide lower rates, better reliability and create local jobs, and they point to the proposed sale of Puget Sound Energy to a foreign-based investor group as a high risk for local customers.

“A PUD is not foreign ownership. It’s not only U.S. ownership, it’s Whidbey ownership,” Metheny said.

PUD proponents stress the vote will not give the commissioners — who are elected at the same time — a blank check to raise property taxes to pay for start-up costs. Instead, it would allow them to advance the effort.  A yes vote only guarantees a feasibility study, Metheny said.  He also said that the initial investment by taxpayers would be fairly short-lived.

“That is not high taxes, even if it takes three years,” Metheny said.

The group also promises that the process to take over Puget Sound Energy’s assets on the island won’t be long and complicated.

“I’ve talked to the top condemnation litigation lawyers in Washington. Washington law is increasingly defined. In the worst case scenario it would be two years,” Metheny said.

“PSE can’t delay the settlement forever,” Kuehn said. “That’s why they are fighting so hard now.”

The group also claims that its $57 million estimate for the buyout of Puget Sound Energy is valid.  Mary Hollen, a supporter and accountant who has worked for the Bonneville Power Association, said the number is based on research, applicable case law and the company’s tax records, calling Puget Sound Energy’s $200 million estimate a negotiation ploy.

“Frankly, we have a hard time getting our lowest as low as it should be,” she said.

Hollen also said that the case law cited in the UtiliPoint study, the analysis funded by Puget Sound Energy, came up with the amount is outdated and not local.  Critics have said the PUD commissioners would have too much power, however, and point to their ability to raise taxes without a public vote after they are seated. Metheny said that’s simply not true. Besides public participation at meetings, residents have the option of recalling commissioners or voting them out of office.

The group has also designed a number of other safeguards. They have come up with a ratepayers bill of rights and a citizen advisory board.  Hollen said if Puget Sound Energy is sold to the investor group, residents will have no control whatsoever.  She pointed to the possibility that a foreign-owned company may be no longer regulated by the Washington Transportation and Utilities Commission.

“There is a potential for NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) to circumvent and they could change whatever they want,” she said. “They could use NAFTA to block condemnation.”

Critics have also doubted that the PUD would get the Bonneville Power allotment that the “People For Yes” study was based on.

“We will get the lower rates,” Metheny promised.

There are 250 average megawatts of low-cost electricity reserved for newly-formed PUDs, otherwise known as BPA’s cheaper Tier 1 power.  The electricity is part of the federal Columbia River hydroelectric system and has enough power to meet the needs of more than 250,000 residential customers. To qualify, PUDs must fulfill certain standards such as being able to pay for wholesale power and be in possession of the system by the time the PUD applies for the power.

Metheny said that the system would generate enough revenue to pay for improvements, investments into renewable energy or even undergrounding power lines.

“The possibilities exist. It’s based on what the community wants,” he said.

Keeping Whidbey

Puget Sound Energy wants to keep its 34,000 customers on the island.

“The residents of Whidbey Island have an important decision on election day regarding their electric utility,” said Gretchen Aliabadi, a spokeswoman for Puget Sound Energy. “PSE has served the Whidbey community for over 80 years and we plan to serve Whidbey for another 80 years plus.

“Are we perfect? No, but we strive every day to improve our customer service, distribution infrastructure system and investments in renewable generation,” she added.

Aliabadi said the company is fighting the effort because company officials believe that forming a new electric PUD is too costly and too risky for the citizens of Whidbey Island. Initial estimates of the cost to Whidbey Island residents range between $82 million and $200 million for a new PUD to take over the company’s electric system.

“Even with initial estimates, Whidbey Island residents will not know the true cost of the PUD takeover until a court rules on the cost — several years after you take your vote in November,” Aliabadi said. “Residents will not get another vote. Whidbey Island residents will not get the opportunity to vote again if the price is too high.”

Karen Waters, a spokeswoman for Strategies 360, the company that runs the “Whidbey Consumers for Affordable Energy” campaign, also took issue with the claims from “People For Yes.”

“The supporters of Whidbey PUD would have you believe that this is simply an informational or advisory vote,” she said. “The reality is that state law says there is no informational vote.”

If voters approve Whidbey PUD, the PUD is empowered to condemn Puget Sound Energy’s electric system, determine a purchase price, launch a legal battle that will cost millions of dollars, raise property taxes, create public debt and raise electric rates, Waters noted.

“All without another vote by the people,” Waters said.

“And what are we approving? Where is the plan? Isn’t fair to ask proponents of Whidbey PUD the following questions: What will it cost us? How much will our rates and taxes go up? How much debt will we have?” she asked.

“‘Whidbey Consumers for Affordable Energy’ is working hard to run a campaign that ensures the residents of Whidbey Island are given the facts on how this proposal would impact both their utility rates and pocketbooks,” she added.

Aliabadi said that one advantage of keeping Puget Sound Energy is the company’s extensive support structure. It offers its customers access to a 24-hour call center, green power, solar schools program, net metering, automated meter reading system, online billing, energy efficiency services and low-income assistance.

“None of these services were factored in the PUD’s cost study,” Aliabadi said.

“Currently, costs are shared by all of PSE’s 1.1 million electric customers and shareholders,” she added. “With a PUD, all costs will be paid for by just 34,000 customers on Whidbey Island.”

She also said that the Bellevue-based utility has already invested in reliability on Whidbey.

“We have a multi-year, multimillion dollar project,” Aliabadi said. “After the winter storms of 2006 we focused on existing transmission line corridors, focused on the number one cause of outages — trees — and developed a reliability plan for the south end of Whidbey.”

She also pointed to the $12 million substation upgrade and related transmission lines under construction off Coles Road.

“The transmission line between the new substation and our Langley substation will be completely rebuilt,” she said.

And the company has opened a new customer service office in Freeland.  Aliabadi also said that the company is leading in renewable generation.

“The proposed PUD does not have a plan and has not accounted for the costs of meeting its state-mandated renewable requirements,” she said.

“While a new PUD may have access to low-cost federal hydro power, the amount set aside for new PUDs is limited. A new PUD may not have enough to meet its load and would not have access to low-cost federal power for five to eight years.”

She said islanders may be left paying for expensive market-based power — causing rate increases upward of 58 percent in 2010.  The anti-PUD movement has found a number of outspoken supporters, including the largest chamber of commerce on the island. The Oak Harbor Chamber of Commerce urged its members to vote no on the PUD measure in September, calling it too risky for small businesses.

Report disagrees

Earlier this month, the Washington Policy Center weighed in. The group describes itself as a non-partisan independent policy research organization based in Seattle and Olympia.  After reviewing the ballot measures on Whidbey Island and in Jefferson and Skagit counties, the researchers came out against the PUD proposal.  The center concluded that Puget Sound Energy has a consistent record of providing reliable power to customers and at regulated rates.

Researchers also criticized that PUD rate increases are not subject to review and approval by the state Utilities and Transportation Commission, while Puget Sound Energy is regulated by the state agency.  They also wrote in their report that ratepayers under a PUD are exposed to more political risk and financial burden than ratepayers of a private utility.

“Often Washington citizens have accepted public power based on promises from public officials that they would receive low-cost power from a nonprofit public agency, only to find they are paying about the same as their neighbors who are served by a for-profit private company,” the report said.

Start-up costs for a new PUD, including eminent domain taking of Puget Sound Energy’s property or building new infrastructure, litigation costs, consultant fees and feasibility studies, will be high, the report added. 
The center analysts also warned that new PUDs will not have guaranteed access to Bonneville Power Administration power at the best rates, and the new PUDs would have to wait three years before they could apply to receive BPA’s best rate.

“In the past, voters created government-owned utilities when experience showed that private companies were failing to provide reliable electrical service at a reasonable price,” the report said. “In the modern regulated environment, however, the power provided by private utilities is highly reliable and favorably compares with the prices charged by public utilities.”

“Taking all the considerations discussed in this study together, it appears that creating new PUDs in Jefferson, Island and Skagit counties would not result in significant cost savings to homeowners and businesses,” the report concluded.

“It is possible that rates could increase, as the new PUDs take on the costs of litigation, property acquisitions, consultant fees and securing wholesale power sources. It is also possible residents in the three counties could receive lower-quality service, at least in the initial years, as managers of the new county PUDs get their operations up and running,” the study said.


PSE files complaint against PUD group
By MICHAELA MARX WHEATLEY
South Whidbey Record Langley
Today, 8:15 AM · UPDATED

Puget Sound Energy accused supporters of the effort to create a Whidbey-based electric company of breaking state law in their campaign to take over PSE’s territory on the island.

PSE has filed a complaint with the state Public Disclosure Commission against the Washington Public Utilities Association for paying a salary to Dave Metheny, director of the “People For Yes On Whidbey PUD” campaign.  The complaint, filed Sept. 12 by the law firm Perkins Coie of Bellevue, alleges that the trade organization violated state law when it paid Metheny stipends to act as a local liaison for the association.

The complaint cited news coverage by The Record as proof of the pro-PUD group’s alleged misdeeds.  PSE’s lawyers claim in the complaint that the Washington Public Utilities Association is the functional equivalent of a public agency and is therefore subject to the Public Disclosure Act, the state law that regulates campaigns. The company’s lawyers claim the association is a public agency because it serves a public purpose, is publicly funded, run by government officials and is created by government officials.

Based on that assumption, PSE lawyers claim that the Washington Public Utilities Association used “public funds and/or facilities, including the use of employees to promote a ballot measure” by paying Metheny’s salary.  Dean Boyer, a spokesman for the Washington Public Utility Districts Association, said the allegations lack substance.

“The PSE complaint apparently alleges that the Washington Public Utility District Association is a public agency and therefore precluded from contributing to the ‘Yes on Whidbey PUD’ campaign,” he said.

“We are not a public agency,” he said, adding that the organization is classified as a nonprofit trade association.

“This is an old and very tired attempt by Puget Sound Energy to eliminate any effort at countering the misinformation PSE is spreading about public power and the viability of public power districts on Whidbey Island and in Skagit and Jefferson counties,” Boyer added.

PSE’s lawyers also claim that the Washington Public Utilities Association used public funds to pay for monetary donations to the campaign, as well as for in-kind donations that paid for yard signs and staff time.

The complaint also alleges that public money was spent on political advertising, the group’s Web site and its newsletter.  PSE spokeswoman Gretchen Aliabadi said it’s now up to the Public Disclosure Commission to examine the issues.

“This is an issue of fundamental fairness. These laws are in place for a reason,” she said. “It’s now up to the PDC to take it from here.”



Both groups in PUD campaign funded by off-islanders
By MICHAELA MARX WHEATLEY
South Whidbey Record Langley
Sep 13 2008 · UPDATED


Campaign finance records show both sides of the hotly-debated ballot measure to form a Whidbey-based power company are being financed by off-island sources.

“Whidbey Consumers for Affordable Energy” is solely financed by Puget Sound Energy, while “People For Yes on Whidbey PUD” has gotten most of its cash from the Olympia-based trade-group Washington Public Utilities Association.

The anti-PUD group is being led by the political strategy firm Strategies 360, according to a review of records filed with the state Public Disclosure Commission. The campaign got $50,000 in cash from Puget Sound Energy and $505.44 in in-kind donations from the utility company.  The political action committee spent $1,409 on anti-PUD signs that were planted all across the island on Labor Day weekend.

According to the campaign’s records, $18,051 remains in the group’s campaign war chest.

“People For Yes” have amassed $16,873 in cash and in-kind donations, including $2,998 for yard signs and $910 in staff time that was paid for by the Washington Public Utilities Association. The association has also paid more than $5,000 in salary to Dave Metheny, the “People For Yes” campaign chairman.

Washington Public Utilities Association also paid for a number of newspaper ads to advertise the “People For Yes” Power Palooza forums.  Local donations have come in very small increments, including a $100 donation from a Clinton resident and $10 from a “People For Yes” fundraiser.  Metheny said while there has been lots of interest in the issue, fundraising has been going slowly.

“People For Yes” still has $2,727 in its campaign coffers.

On the anti-PUD side, campaign records did not reveal any surprises; there are no other contributors but PSE.  A spokeswoman for “Whidbey Consumers for Affordable Energy” stressed that neither money from PSE ratepayers was used to print the signs, nor will taxpayers have to pay for the removal of signs that were improperly placed.

“The money being used is shareholder money, not ratepayer money,” said Karen Waters of 360 Strategies.

“Washington state law prohibits utilities from using revenue from ratepayers to pay for political campaigns and lobbying,” added Martha Monfried of PSE.

“We adhere to the law. Puget Energy shareholder dollars pay for these expenses. They are never recovered in PSE customers rates, because our accounting keeps them separate,” she said.

Waters said PSE is backing the political committee because the company has strong concerns about the impact of municipalization on its business and on the consumers and taxpayers of Whidbey.  PSE also donated $70,000 to the “Skagit Committee for Reliable & Affordable Energy” for anti-PUD campaigns in that county, as well as $60,000 to “Jefferson County Citizens Against Prop. 1.”

Waters said the anti-PUD group will soon have local members.

“We are actively lining up supporters across the island who are concerned about giving a newly formed PUD a blank check,” she said.

The group also has a Web site, www.NoWhidbeyPUDdist1.org.  Information on the benefits of a PUD is available at www.whidbeypud.org.

The next updated financial campaign reports are due on Oct. 14.


----------------------------------
Energy independence day?  An idea from Whidbey Island, WA.

PUD measure qualifies for November ballot

MICHAELA MARX WHEATLEY, Langley, Island County
mmarxwheatley@southwhidbeyrecord.com
Published: July 03, 2008 4:00 PM
Updated: July 03, 2008 4:45 PM

It didn't take the Island County auditor long.

Only 27 hours after submitting a petition to form a local public utilities district, the auditor's office announced late Thursday that "People For Yes on Whidbey PUD" had collected enough signatures to qualify the measure for the November ballot.

Auditor staff, led by Michele Reagan, started counting and validating signatures immediately after the petitions were turned in Wednesday morning and notified "People For Yes on Whidbey PUD" today at 1:15 p.m. that the minimum number of 2,464 valid signatures had been reached.

As soon as the remainder of the petitions had been validated, Reagan notified the Island County board of commissioners so they can place a notification of a public hearing on the measure in local newspapers.

At the same time, the county prosecutor's office began writing the official language for the November ballot.

"It seems clear that Island County officials believe that this measure is something Whidbey Island deserves to vote on, and People For Yes on Whidbey PUD thank them for their expedient work to get this moving," said Ed Jenkins, a spokesman for "People For Yes on Whidbey PUD."

"This is an historical first step in gaining local control over our energy future. But we know the battle is far from over," he added.



*CRITICAL AREAS (story on how Island County revised its regs - finally done in March 2008)- HINT:  as in CT, it is the State that calls the shots...State of Washington environmental rules.

Wetlands ordinance closer to adoption
Whidbey News-Times
By Paul Boring
Dec 29 2007

The county’s proposed wetlands ordinance entered a new phase last week when the Island County Planning Commission voted to forward the amended document to the county commissioners with a recommendation to adopt.  The planning commission deliberated two days last week, poring over an ordinance — unchanged since 1984 — that had shifted shape as a result of considerable public input. The comment period closed Nov. 30.

“The staff filtered down the main themes,” said Planning Director Jeff Tate, who has grown accustomed to living and breathing wetlands. “The planning commission was given all of the comment letters.”

Commission members were provided with a multiple-page document in which planning staff highlighted the most substantive issues.

“We brought to them 18 recommended changes based on the comments we received,” Tate said. “Some were miniscule, like the difference between protecting trees 18 inches or 15 inches in diameter. Some were bigger. The planning commissioners tweaked them a little bit and put on their own fingerprint.”

Steve Erickson of the Whidbey Environmental Action Network was taken aback by the amount of time the public would reportedly be given to review the amended document before the county commissioners deliberate.

“The final version will be available on January 2nd and the commissioners might adopt it on the 7th,” the WEAN spokesman said. “Five days to review and comment on a fat pile of convoluted legalese is just a bit short.”

Tate responds that the core of the ordinance has remained static throughout the process. Items that were modified existed on the periphery, primarily to clarify the intent of the ordinance and to improve its readability.

“The core is rooted in the science,” he said. “We don’t have the option to change that. At least 95 percent of the words are the same as they have been.

“You have a public comment period, you have hearings, and then you give the planning commission time to respond to that. The documents have been available for six months. Each new draft has been the same strategy for protecting wetlands.”

Adoption could happen Jan. 7

Planning staff said the timeline is tentative, but the commissioners are aiming for a Jan. 7 meeting. When the board convenes, it will have the option under state law to immediately accept the planning commission’s recommendation. The commissioners may also opt to scrutinize the document further and solicit additional input during a public meeting.

“The board can’t change the recommendation without holding a public hearing,” Tate said.

Setting a process to determine wetland buffers was no easy — or short — task.

“All wetlands are protected, the question is to what degree,” Tate said. “How do you determine a buffer?”

The planning director said two factors are used in setting a buffer: Identifying the type of wetland and determining the level of development intensity.

“More intense development has a bigger buffer because the potential risk to wetlands is greater,” Tate said. “A low intensity development near a non-sensitive wetland can tolerate a smaller buffer. One size does not fit all.”

Estuaries, for example, are less sensitive than other wetlands like bogs or forested wetlands. Erickson complained that, as he sees it, “No conceivable development can ever be denied because of wetland damage.” The ordinance allows wetlands to be degraded, he added, assuming the damage can always be mitigated.

“Experience everywhere else shows that most mitigation is not successful,” Erickson said. “And even if the county admits the damage can’t be mitigated, developers can just pay some money to the county and call it square.”

Reasonable use of land allowed

The ordinance was designed to guarantee landowners reasonable use of their property,” Tate said.

“If a piece of property was created and subdivided long before there were wetland regulations, we’re going to figure out ways to allow them to use their property,” Tate said. “The planning commission and board do not think it’s reasonable to tell someone they can’t use their property. With that said, there are limitations. If you have property outside the buffer, you have to build there. Someone planning to build a 9,000-square-foot home may need to look at a more modest-sized house.”

Mitigation is possible by enhancing the area in other locations through the restoration of onsite or offsite degraded wetlands. Restoration priorities are designed to have a greater benefit on the new area. Although the mitigation would ideally take place somewhere else on the property, it can be performed on adjacent land or in the same watershed. If all avenues are exhausted, at the request of the state, the ordinance allows the county to develop a program whereby a fee is collected in lieu of mitigation.

“If there’s no other alternative, none at all that exists, we will be able to do that in the future,” Tate said. “You could take the impact on the piece of property and quantify it in a cost. The county would have to accept the fee to be used solely for mitigation. This program is not in place yet.”

Intensity was carefully defined by three factors back in October during the planning department’s workshop road show that took them all over Island County to help educate the public. The size of the parcel, the type of property, residential or commercial; and how much clearing is proposed on the property were all agreed on at the time as the primary factors.

The planning commission added a fourth factor.

“They decided that it now also depends on how much impervious surface you have on your property,” Tate said.

Erickson said the ordinance includes “dozens of possible buffers,” an unappealing component that he feels will only create confusion.

“It is so complicated and has so many loopholes that even developers are going to be scratching their heads as to what they can and can’t do,” he said.

For property owners to maintain a low intensity, Tate said buildings must be set back to the edge of the buffer.

“You can have a lawn in there, but you can’t build within the setback,” he explained.

The county will not dictate how much property owners can clear on their land, although there are incentives for clearing less. The WEAN spokesman was uncomfortable with an ordinance devoid of clearing limits.

“There are no limits on clearing, but the science is clear that wetlands and streams get trashed if there is extensive deforestation,” Erickson said. “Protecting wetlands and streams means protecting their watersheds. If most of the watershed is cleared, buffers right around the wetland don’t do a whole lot.”

Learning to manage cats, dogs

Property owners do have the option to participate in the Rural Stewardship Plan, which is essentially a contract between the county and landowner that establishes a more site-specific regulation on the property.

The new draft that has been forwarded to the county commissioners does not change any of the buffer regulations. It does, however, include information about the Public Benefit Rating System, a program that provides tax breaks for property owners who perform work on their property.

The issue of pets within the context of the elective stewardship plan made its way into the planning commission meeting. The county code stipulates that domesticated animals must be controlled in order for a property to be classified as low intensity.

“That’s possible with a dog, but how do you do that with a cat? We spoke with Fish and Wildlife and Ecology and they said we have the responsibility to tell someone it is a law to control their pet,” Tate said.

As a solution, the planning commission decided that people participating in the stewardship plan must formulate a pet management plan in order to qualify for the tax breaks.


------------------------------------------------------------------

Critical Areas Map of Clinton environs (we selected Clinton unincorporated place as a start point):  an the GLOSSARY OF TERMS (including the acronyms)...how about plans for  Scenic Roads etc?  AND CLINTON IS PART OF THIS!
 
Very interesting study...link to Health Department from here:
http://www.islandcounty.net/health/south.htm#Chapter 4
Organization you should contact first (for the "lay of the land" politically speaking): http://www.lwvwa.org/whidbey/
 
First thing you need for a land use or development-type plan is a map...is something fishy about this one?
http://www.visitwhidbey.com/image-map.html
Is Whidbey actually big enough to host a college (how big is Whidbey)?  Is any faculty available to assist in Land Use Planning? 
http://www.ccis.edu/nationwide/main.asp?Whidbey



ZONING CODES
Maps, maps and more maps!!!  Studies - ANNEXATION is something CT doesn't do!

CLICK TREE,  THEN CLICK ON THE NAME OF THE MAP YOU ARE INTERESTED IN...AND PRESTO!  UP COMES...YOUR LOT (EVENTUALLY...REALLY SLOW TO LOAD)!
WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE, NOR ANY DROP TO DRINK?
Saltwater intrusion study on Whidbey Island (80% private wells) - since Weston is high and dry, we only worry about groundwater (98% wells or more).
More maps:
For example...here is the link to South Whidbey--there are three more such area maps--Central Whidbey, North Whidbey and Cameno:  http://www.islandcounty.net/planning/ZoningMaps/south.htm

DEVELOPMENT ISSUES & HOW WESTON AND SOUTH WHIDBEY SHARE SOME...MACQUARIE BANK, LTD OF "DOWN UNDER" OWNS AQUARION AND NOW PUGET SOUND ENERGY!

Island County logo #3...Weston CT logo carved for bicentenial in 1987
Deeper into the community...CT eliminated County Government in 1959.
There appears to be similarity between Whidbey Island and its issues and Weston, CT.  According to the online Whidbey NEWS-TIMES: http://www.whidbeynewstimes.com/  and the http://www.southwhidbeyrecord.com/, which we read now,  searching for "planning" stuff, several matters have come up that Weston CT deals with, too.
See how the State of Washington implements "smart growth" in, appropriately named, a section of the Island called "Freeland."
ENVIRONMENT
The first is ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISM.
In Weston, because there is no County Planning, and for the most part, Towns do this themselves, Weston environmentalists took over government YEARS ago.  Our Planning and Zoning Commission never hired a professional planner;  they did it themselves, basing their less-is-more philosophy on expensive, commissioned professional studies and sparing no expense defending our ZONING policies.  The basic principle here is not permitting development that cannot support itself for water supply or septic disposal on its own individual property.  (Zero-incremental run-off policy for subdivisions.)
The Weston Conservation Commission is the "inland wetlands agency" and all applications for development, just about, must got through them first before Planning and Zoning sees anything.  They have staff.
ECONOMY:
TAXPAYERS GROUP AS POLITICAL FORCE
Second is people who say "NO" and form a taxpayers' alliance against anything happening.
Weston doesn't have one (we did, briefly, but the leaders moved out of town or switched sides when the fight was lost).  Apparently, Whidbey Island doesn't have a formal group either (?).  Whidbey Islanders just vote "no" on budgets/development projects.  Why is this?
Since Weston is not an island, people move out if they can't afford to pay the taxes.
Oh, yes, another thing about Connecticut is that Towns (169 of them) are permitted to have their own school systems.  In Weston, your tax bill now is @80% school-related expenses.  Economic Cost Sharing policy established after various law suits determines that the State of CT must equalize school taxes somewhat (the poorest cities get more money and construction assistance).
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER v. AUDITORIUM;  Renovation to old auditorium in progress 2007.
Third is school expansion for an auditorium-performing arts center.  Weston is stalled on this type of thing, too.
Weston Middle School was due for an upgrade for an auditorium/performing arts center--but it turned out that it cost much too much...but the issue is not yet dead, as the November 15, 2001 Bond Issue item #3 provided millions for an auditorium, but not enough for the full performing arts version.
SEWERS (use search function on newspaper site - type in "sewers")
Establishment of a sewer district to pay for sewers is the plan in parts of Whidbey...


COMMUNITY ANALYSIS:
Is Whidbey Island one place, or is it really a community of divided interests?  South Whidbey is most like Weston, CT, but other parts of the State of Washington (specifically Island County's neighbor Snohomish County) winks at "smart growth"...commercial development.
Tsunami election of 2008...2 women elected;  2010 puts in #3 - shown below, right.


HEADLINE IS TOTALLY CORRECT NOW IN 2011

Island County Commissioners put selves on Internet
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Aug 21 2011

They haven’t gone viral, at least not yet, but the Island County commissioners are now on the Internet.

The county commissioners are video recording their regular Monday meetings and have made the videos simple for the public to watch on their website at www.islandcounty.net/commissioners/video.The new service begins just in time for county budget meetings, which start Tuesday, Aug. 23. Video recordings of the hearings between commissioners and all the different departments will be available on the website as a “special series.”


The county commissioners have been pushing to have the meetings video recorded and broadcast for the last couple of years; Commissioner Angie Homola has even been videotaping the meetings herself, though she had nowhere to post the videos.

While the commissioners probably would have preferred a professional set-up and TV broadcast similar to what the city of Oak Harbor has, the county has neither the funding nor the TV access. Instead, Budget Director Elaine Marlow researched the options and found a relatively simple and inexpensive solution that can reach more members of the public than the city’s cable channel.

The county contracted with AV Capture All, which provides the software and the platform for streaming of the video. The recording is time-stamped and integrated with the council’s agenda, allowing people to simply “click” to the discussion of issue they’re most interested in, Marlow said.

She said the setup cost $4,800 for a new camera, a new PC and the cost of running cable. The AV Capture All service costs $200 a month.

Marlow said the commissioners are hoping to someday also videotape and stream additional meetings, including the Wednesday staff sessions, Council of Governments and Board of Health meetings. Homola has said she also hopes to have the meetings broadcast on local cable television channels.

The commissioners made moves toward transparency in the last couple of years by making the agenda available online, as well as audio recordings of meetings.


Women take over county

Whidbey News Times
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Nov 28 2008, 12:53 PM · UPDATED

Just after 3 o’clock Tuesday, Helen Price Johnson was sworn in as the first woman to serve as an Island County commissioner.  A crowd of county employees and well-wishers hoping to witness the historic moment overflowed into the halls of the Law and Justice Center and burst into cheers as Price Johnson finished her oath.  In an interview, Price Johnson said she was honored to be chosen by voters to break through this particular glass ceiling.

“It’s good to have reflective representation of the community on the board,” she said. “My grandmother would be very proud. She was 21 when women earned the right to vote. She always made it clear that the right was hard-earned and sacred.”

It also may be the first time in county history, or at least in memory, that the majority of the three-member board are Democrats. Several Island County old-timers say they can’t remember a time when Republicans didn’t dominate, though county officials couldn’t say whether it’s a first.  The history-making is likely not over. The Island County Auditor is conducting a manual recount in the extremely close contest between 16-year incumbent Commissioner Mac McDowell and challenger Angie Homola, who’s 50 votes ahead.  If Homola wins, she’ll be the second women to inhabit the board, which will be made up of three Democrats — Commissioners John Dean, Price Johnson and Homola. Without a doubt, it will be the first time the board has been all Democrats.

Price Johnson, along with Auditor Sheilah Crider, were sworn in immediately after election certification because they won positions that had been filled by appointees. The rest of the winning candidates will take office in the new year.

While Price Johnson and Homola admit that changes are in store for the county — especially if Homola is successful — they agree that most of the differences will have nothing to do with political parties or gender.  Both women say they were elected by people who want commissioners to be more open and to listen to their concerns.

“I bring a more community-oriented attitude toward leadership,” Price Johnson said. “That’s something John Dean has started and something Angie talked about in her campaign.”

In fact, Homola said she is considering donating a portion of her $78,500-a-year salary as commissioner to the county — if she wins — in order to fund video of the commissioners’ meetings, which could be accessible over the Internet. She points out that most people can’t attend meetings because they are during the workday.

“To have a truly open government, it has to be accessible,” she said.

Members of groups such as Whidbey Environmental Action Network have felt disenfranchised from county government in the past, but they are excited by the change in the board. Marianne Edain of WEAN said she hopes that the commissioners will listen to their concerns and avoid time-consuming litigation.  Homola is known for being an environmental activist, but she hasn’t proposed any sweeping changes or even re-opening controversial land-use ordinances, such as the accident potential zoning. All three Democrats said they would be cautious about making such a move.

Perhaps the biggest change coming will be forced by the budget deficit. Not only will the commissioners have to prioritize spending, but they will have limited resources to devote to projects or programs. Commissioners have already warned that layoff and spending cuts will translate to less service to the community.

With the turnover of commissioners, Commissioner Dean will suddenly become the “old man on the board” after just two years in office. It’s a role he said he’ll be comfortable with, though he also expects county government to be different in the future.

“I’m not exactly sure how this is going to play out,” he said. “Anytime you get fresh perspective and fresh faces, you’re going to get change. I think there will be a significant change in courthouse culture.”

With women in the majority, Dean will be the likely benefactor. Both Price Johnson and Homola have said, half-jokingly, that they plan to liven up the austere aesthetic of the commissioners’ hearing room with plenty of homemade cookies and flowers.  Dean expects land-use regulations to swing more toward environmental protection and for board appointments to reflect a wider range of interests. But he said people shouldn’t be concerned that Republicans will be shut out.

“It isn’t about Democrats taking over power,” he said. “It’s not like we’re going to stomp anyone who doesn’t feel the way we do. I think we will be able to find middle ground.”


Islanders in 12 precincts must now vote by mail
South Whidbey RECORD
Aug 07 2001

"People living in 12 Island County precincts won't be going to their polling places on election day any more.The Island County Auditor's Office last week mailed a notice to registered voters living in those precincts that beginning with this year's Sept. 18 primary election they will be voting exclusively by mail.

Island County Auditor Suzanne Sinclair said Thursday that the precincts chosen for mail-only ballots have 200 or fewer active registered voters, described as people who actually go to the polls to vote.

In Island County, about half the voters routinely vote by absentee ballot, Sinclair said. The figure in the 2000 election was 50.5 percent.

Sinclair said the move is a cost-cutting measure. The state law that allows the action has been on the books for several years, she said, estimating her cost savings at $2,000 each election.The savings come from not needing to hire three poll workers for each precinct, and not having to rent the polling places.

The precincts affected are: Langley 1, Clinton, Double Bluff, Freeland, Possession, Penn Cove, Scenic Heights, and Oak Harbor 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.

Voters in all other precincts will still have the option of requesting an absentee ballot or going to the polls.Sinclair expressed regret that voters in the 12 precincts no longer will be able to use a voting booth in their local polling place.

"I've tried to put it off, but I'm trying to squeeze more out of less" she said. "I like that community feeling, but I have to face the reality that it's costing me more to do that. "



TOP STORY TODAY...
FROM WHIDBEY ISLAND'S TWO BI-WEEKLY E-NEWSPAPERS...
OLDER NEWS, ISSUES, HERE


State parks on Whidbey lose half their staff
By NATHAN WHALEN
Whidbey News Times Staff reporter
December 10, 2011 · Updated 6:14 AM 

Budget cuts announced this week will decimate staff at state parks on Whidbey Island and elsewhere.  The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission said the parks system will be restructured to emphasize seasonal help during the summer.  Because of that change, about half of the park employees working at Whidbey’s state parks could lose their jobs. Pink slips are scheduled to go out Dec. 19.

Deception Pass Park Manager Jack Hartt said staffing levels at his park will dive from 15 employees to eight and the other manned parks on the island will suffer in the same fashion.

“Every park on the island will be affected similarly,” Hartt said, adding that some of the employees whose positions will be cut have 30 years of experience. The park manager jobs at Fort Ebey, Fort Casey and South Whidbey state parks will be consolidated into a single position.

The restructuring means 160 park employees statewide were notified their positions are at risk, said Virginia Painter, spokeswoman.  Hartt said instead of the permanent employees, seasonal staff will be hired to five-month positions and will likely be students rather than the experienced, permanent staff.  The state parks system is currently changing the way it receives money. Rather than being reliant on the state Legislature for funding, the Discover Pass was instituted last summer. Park users pay a vehicle fee of $10 per day or $30 per year.

The Legislature projected the fee would bring in $65 million, which would benefit the Washington State Parks, Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Department of Natural Resources. The park system would receive $54 million. The Legislature provided $17 million as bridging money until the Discover Pass gains in popularity. By the next biennium, the park system must be reliant on income received from fees and donations.

Unfortunately, only $7.2 million in Discover Pass revenue was collected through October, which obviously isn’t on pace to bring in the projected  $65 million. The park system has been working for months to develop a contingency plan should revenues fall short.

Park closures are not being considered. Officials say parks need to remain open to encourage people to purchase the Discover Pass.  To help make ends meet, the commission also approved lowering operating reserves to $8 million from $12 million, which is enough to fund two months of operations.  Downsizing staff during the slow season affects the maintenance that takes place then, Painter acknowledged.

Some workers notified that their position is at risk may still have jobs. Depending on their experience, they can take a different position and “bump” someone with less seniority.  Locally, Hartt said he’s negotiating to reduce the amount of seasonal help so he can add an additional yearly position to deal with continuing maintenance.

“We’re still reeling from the effects,” Hartt said. The parks staff will have difficulty providing other important services such as law enforcement and assisting with marine rescues.

Hartt emphasized that the remaining staff is still committed to the park and ensuring visitor stays are enjoyable.

“We’re doing our best with the money we are given to provide a service to the public,” Hartt said.


Some Island County citizens defend Emerson after ‘snub’
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
November 26, 2011 · Updated 6:13 AM

 A disagreement about who should be chairperson of the Island County Board of Commissioners escalated Monday after citizens complained about the perceived snub to Commissioner Kelly Emerson.

Commissioner Angie Homola, the current chairwoman, struggled to maintain control of the meeting at one point, exclaiming that she didn’t have her gavel, as her fellow commissioners interrupted and talked over each other.

The meeting began with 10 citizens voicing their opinions about the decision by commissioners Helen Price Johnson and Homola last week to turn down Commissioner Kelly Emerson’s request to be chairperson next year. By a 2-1 vote, the two Democratic commissioners chose Price Johnson as the next chairwoman, even though it was Emerson’s turn under a long-held tradition.

All but one of the speakers were critical of the perceived slight to Emerson, the sole Republican on the board.

Two residents on Camano Island, Dale Tyler and Ralph Ferguson, spoke at the meeting via video link from the Camano Annex. They asked Homola and Price Johnson to give detailed explanations of their decision, but then continually interrupted the meeting as Homola tried to explain that the commissioners would address the concerns after scheduled public hearings.

Oak Harbor resident Bill Strowbridge described Homola and Price Johnson’s comments at the last meeting concerning Emerson’s unreadiness to be chairperson as “petty, vile, personal attacks.”

“Kelly reports to the citizens, not to you two,” he said.

Resident Ed Drum said the commissioners should allow Emerson to do her job.

“I would like to see this bickering and cat fights stop,” he said.

Oak Harbor resident Bob Wolters, however, argued that it wouldn’t be appropriate to give Emerson the chair. He pointed out that she had unsuccessfully sued the county and county employees; he said county employees have not “healed” from the litigious assault. Also, he emphasized that Emerson has only been on the board for less than a year.

“I think the position of the chair is one where experience does matter,” he said. “I think leadership does matter.”

The commissioners addressed the issue at the end of the meeting, but the discussion quickly devolved into bickering.

Price Johnson said the decision about the chairmanship was neither politically motivated nor unprecedented. She read a quote from a former Republican commissioner, the late Gordon Koetje, who said the chairmanship shouldn’t be rotated just because it was the tradition.

In fact, a battle over who should be chairman of the Island County Board of Commissioners exactly 20 years ago was remarkably similar to the current argument. A News-Times article from 1991 states that commissioners Koetje and Dwain Colby “snubbed” Commissioner Dick Caldwell by not making him chairman, even though it was his turn under the unwritten tradition of rotating the chairmanship.

Even though all three commissioners were Republicans, Caldwell disagreed with the others in his opposition to increasing taxes and fees during a time of budget deficits. Likewise, Emerson has railed against taxes and fees during the current period of harsh budget cutting.

Twenty years ago, Colby complained about Caldwell’s improper relationship with county employees, saying that he had an “acid tongue.” Last week, Price Johnson complained about Emerson’s adversarial relationship with county employees.

On Monday, Price Johnson tried to give an explanation of her decision, but was interrupted by Emerson. Price Johnson started to say that Emerson was unavailable to staff, but Emerson interjected that personal remarks are out of order under Roberts Rules of Order. This sparked a feisty exchange with Emerson and Price Johnson talking over each other and Homola in the middle, trying to restore order.

“I hope this is being recorded. I can’t believe this,” Strowbridge exclaimed from the audience.

After bringing the meeting back to order, Homola said she doesn’t feel there’s a lot of animosity between the commissioners, as opposed to what was reported in the newspaper. She described the ways she tried to make Emerson feel welcome and help her with the job.

“I just honestly don’t see this as a vendetta, as any kind of political step,” she said of the decision not to elect Emerson as chairwoman.

But Emerson shot back that there is indeed animosity on the board, which she blamed on her Democratic colleagues. She said they “made it abundantly clear” in the months before she took office that they weren’t pleased with her election win.

“It’s been an adversarial relationship with the two of you long before I took office and you are being absolutely insincere in that regard,” she said to Homola.

Emerson accused her colleagues of directing the planning department to take actions against her in an ongoing dispute that started when her husband started building a sunroom without a permit. She claimed the inappropriate conversations took place in executive sessions that she wasn’t allowed to attend.

Homola denied this, saying she’s never met with the planning department on the issue and has never pushed anyone in the planning department in any direction. After the meeting, Price Johnson reiterated that they’ve never met with the planning director or anyone from the planning department in executive session; she said they’re not allowed to meet with anyone but attorneys behind closed doors.

But Emerson wasn’t convinced and essentially accused Homola of lying.

“We’ll have to take your opinion that you have not been involved directly in any of the planning department’s maneuvers because those were done in executive session which, of course, I wasn’t involved in,” she said. “Personally, I don’t take your opinion as truth.”

Emerson also accused Homola of doing a poor job as chairperson and allowed citizens at one meeting to make slanderous remarks about her.

“I just wanted to let you know there was a nasty comment made about tea bagging and I stepped in,” Homola reminded her.

Homola finally tried to bring the meeting to an end, but not before enjoining Emerson to come to work and put her time in. This sparked an angry response.

“I will do my duty as I see fit,” Emerson said.

During a Board of Health meeting afterward, Homola reached out an olive branch to Emerson and nominated her to be chairwoman, but Emerson declined.







HOW IS INFLATING A FOOTBALL LIKE GLOBAL POLITICS?
Big soccer ball v. itsy-bitsy football like the euro coin v. the devalued dollar?  And how about that renminbi...

Budget rises as top issue for South Whidbey parks candidates
By BEN WATANABE, South Whidbey Record Reporter
Oct 28 2011

CLINTON — Money and park use are the main issues for the Clinton candidates for the South Whidbey Parks & Recreation District board.

Both Joel Gerlach, 45, and Jean Streitler, 42, know the parks district is in a bind financially. Property values are down, and so are revenues for the parks. Both Gerlach and Streitler are frequent South Whidbey parks users.  In an early display of prudence, the candidates have avoided spending on a campaign, preferring to let their peers and community elect them to the four-year term based on name and deeds.

What separates them is how they see parks being used. They are on opposite sides of the football — or is it fútbol?  Gerlach is an avid soccer supporter. He’s been on the South Whidbey Youth Soccer Club board of directors and coached South Whidbey High School soccer for the past 18 years. He’s also worked with the parks district during the creation of the Sports Complex and the upper field at South Whidbey Community Park.

“I love the park, whether I’m playing soccer or I’m hiking around in there or enjoying other people’s events,” Gerlach said.

A Whidbey Island resident since 1990, Gerlach was a commissioner with the Scatchet Head Water District and served as president for two years. The experience from that position gave him the chance to look at budgets and planning, which he said will help him serve on the parks board.

“With less money, you have to be more conservative,” Gerlach said.

Prioritizing park facilities and resources is paramount to keeping the district’s budget intact, he said.

“One of the things I do really well is solve problems,” Gerlach said. “As in these boards where, whether it was restoring our hillside or as water commissioner dealing with new waterlines and towers, it’s looking at all the things, getting all the information and coming up with the best solution.”

That doesn’t mean the self-employed general contractor has any answers for the parks board now. He wants to see the state of the parks district before he sets goals.

“The first thing I’m going to do is listen and pay attention,” Gerlach said.

“You have to have all the facts before you make decisions, before you make big decisions,” he added.

Maintaining the condition and status of the parks is important to Gerlach. Since expansion seems financially burdensome, he proposed enhancing what exists and finding new ways to generate revenue.

“We have to look at what’s our budget, where’s it going and do we need to shift it into some direction to prioritize it,” Gerlach said. “There are the options of putting out some new levies or bonds to try to raise some funds that way. But there could also be where, potentially, you have to increase the fees for some things.”

“There are probably some places where we could save money, that we just haven’t looked at yet,” he added. “I’m not going to say ahead of time that we’re going to cut all this stuff, because I don’t know.”

He pointed to the diversity of programs the parks district offers; archery classes, dog training and dodgeball. Adding nature walks, mushroom hunting could help bolster the parks’ coffers.

“They have a lot of activities for a very diversified group,” Gerlach said. “Anything that breaks even or makes a profit for the park is great, and anything that doesn’t we may have to look to see if it’s feasible to continue to do it.”

The issues are similar for Streitler.  He sees the parks as places for South Whidbey youths to spend their time, and football is just one way they can.

“It seems like the majority of the people using the parks are kids,” he said.

“Anything that I could do that would bring more kids to the park and somehow keep kids out of trouble and give them something to do, I would be proactive at doing those types of things,” Streitler added. “Kids on South Whidbey need things to do.”

Streitler has been the South Whidbey Youth Football League board president for 15 years. In that time, he oversaw the league’s expansion to three teams and inclusion in the North Cascade Youth Football League.

“We’ve been able to grow from year to year,” Streitler said. “We’ve done well with the financing and fundraising to purchase some equipment for three teams.”

He made sure to credit his fellow football board members, too.

“I work with a board, and I’m just one small part of a big picture. For me to take credit for something is not really right, because we’re a team.”

“I see the parks and rec as the same thing. We’d be a team of people gathered together to accomplish some goals.”

Streitler is familiar with what the park district has to offer. His family uses South Whidbey Community Park for family outings, horse riding on the trails and throwing a Frisbee. Streitler, who manages Harbor Plumbing, said his passion for parks and the South Whidbey community led him to run for the position.

“There’s never really been anybody on the board that was any kind of a voice for football,” Streitler said. “The park is a pretty large facility, and I think there probably could be room for some football goal posts, maybe.”

Revenues and expenses were also a point of interest for Streitler. Learning from the community about what it values in the district’s programs and facilities is a priority, he said.

“I don’t know that it means cutting things,” he said. “It might mean finding ways to make money, finding ways to generate funds, rather than making cuts.”

Expansion in the district should be delayed, Streitler said, until the board’s revenues increase.

“I know there are other facilities that the county is wanting the parks to be part of and help maintain and that’s always a big stretch financially,” he said. “I would say they need to prioritize.”



Volunteer shortage mothballs Central Whidbey fire station
By JUSTIN BURNETT,
Whidbey News Times
Oct 27 2011

Faced with a shortage of manpower, Central Whidbey Fire and Rescue officials have decided to close the district’s oldest active fire station and will likely seek a levy-lid lift early next year.

Last week, the fire district’s board of commissioners voted to mothball Station 52, a three-bay pole barn building located on Morris Road. Built in 1986, the station currently houses a water tender and rescue truck and will shut down Nov. 15.

Due to the facility’s central location, both vehicles serve an important role as secondary response units, according to Fire Chief Ed Hartin. Though they will be redistributed to two of the district’s three remaining stations, Hartin worries that response time will suffer.

However, there is little choice in the matter.

“We’re kind of in a rock and a hard place,” Hartin said.

Although it lacks the big budgets of large urban departments, the fire district still has to provide 24-hour emergency response to about 10,000 people. While some of that is accomplished with full and part-time firefighters, the agency’s backbone has always been its volunteers.

Coming from all walks of life, they are asked to undergo massive amounts of training, wake up in the middle of the night to respond to calls and risk their lives in service to their community. And, of course, they do it all for free.

“They really are essential,” Hartin said.

However, their numbers are on the decline. In 1993, the district had a small army of 57 volunteers at its disposal. Today, while they still account for over 50 percent of Central Whidbey firefighters, their numbers have dwindled to about 20.

According to Hartin, that’s a big problem for facilities like Station 52, which should be manned by at least 12 volunteers. It’s currently served by just three and that’s too few to maintain an effective response.

The decline in volunteers isn’t just a local problem.

“The same challenge is being faced by departments across the country,” Hartin said.

While part of the problem in Central Whidbey may be due to rising median age of 51, the requirements of becoming a firefighter may also be taking a toll. Generally, it takes about one year to go from raw recruit to hardened firefighter, Hartin said. And it’s not cheap either.

“One thing people don’t realize is that volunteers aren’t really free,” he said.

Training, testing, and gear for each person costs the district about $5,000. To make up some of that money, and to fund new recruitment programs and two new paid firefighter positions, Hartin said the district will likely seek a levy hike this February.

While he doesn’t yet know just how much it will be, the information will be hammered out in time for a Nov. 17 special meeting. The board will discuss the issue in detail and take public comment.





By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Sep 02 2011

State Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen sat beside her husband, Basil Badley, in an Island County courtroom this week as attorneys battled over a politically charged lawsuit involving allegations of groping, mental illness and the consumption of large amounts of alcohol.

Coupeville resident Courtney Jones, Haugen’s former campaign manager, is suing Badley for sexual assault and battery. Jones claims Badley sexually assaulted her during a post-election dinner at the Democratic state senator’s Camano Island home on Dec. 2, 2008.

Jones took the stand Thursday and became emotional as she answered questions about the events that evening. She described how she tried to politely resist and deflect Badley’s sexual advances. She said at one point she reminded him of Sen. Haugen.

“He said it has nothing to do with Mary Margaret, it has everything to do with you and me,” she said.

The trial got off to a dramatic start Wednesday as sparring attorneys laid out their evidence and arguments in often ugly detail during opening statements.

On one side, the plaintiff’s attorney described Badley as a politically important man who used his position over Jones, physical force and promises of career help in an unsuccessful attempt to compel her to have sex with him. He described Jones as an emotionally fragile woman who had been victimized as a child and was devastated by Badley’s actions.

“You can’t touch someone sexually if they don’t want you to. It’s a universal principle,” attorney Thomas Breen said, adding that Badley violated the principle and needs to take responsibility.

On the other side, Badley’s attorney painted Jones as a woman with diagnosed mental health issues who had flattered an old man to further her own career and then greatly exaggerated an incident she regretted. The attorney characterized Badley as an old man who drank too much, but did nothing more than kiss a younger woman he had reason to believe welcomed his attention.

“This is a case of two people who had way too much to drink, exercised poor judgment and regretted it the next day,” said Tyna Ek, the attorney for Badley.

Breen asked the jury to award Jones $100,000 in damages. He said the amount may sound like a lot, but will seem reasonable by the end of the trial.

As Breen told it, Badley had invited Jones over to the house to pick up her things and have dinner on the night of Dec. 2, 2008, as her employment was drawing to a close. They were both aware that Haugen would be in Olympia, though Breen contended Jones had mainly worked with Badley on the campaign, so it made sense for her to meet with Badley. Breen emphasized that Jones was 28 and Badley was 72 years old at the time.

Breen described the alleged assault in detail. He claimed Badley repeatedly kissed her, licked her face and groped her breast and crotch as she physically and verbally resisted.

“She tells him, ‘I do not want to do this.’ He tells her it will be good for her,” Breen said. “She’s looking for a polite way out of this. He’s someone she knows and respects.”

Breen said Badley finally stopped after Jones pushed him off her and he saw the distress in her face.

“He sees that no matter how hard he tries, no matter how hard he pushes the issue, she is not going to give in,” Breen said.

Badley then told her to leave, which she did.  Badley sent an email to Jones the next day, apologizing and explaining that he’s “not a dirty old man.” Jones sent an email accepting the apology, saying she wanted to be friends and didn’t have any hard feelings.  Nevertheless, Breen said the incident weighed on Jones, who was especially vulnerable because of a childhood assault involving a dentist and an ongoing battle with depression. He said she was doing really well until Badley allegedly  assaulted her.

“Just as she’s climbing out, seeing the sun, that’s when Basil Badley pushed her right back down,” he said, adding that she went into a “tailspin.”

Breen said he would call Jones’ former counselor to testify as well as Jon Conte, a professor at the University of Washington and expert on the impact of sexual violence.  On the other side, Badley’s attorney, Tyna Ek, described a much different series of events. She pointed out that Jones brought a bottle of wine and a laptop computer with her resume´ to the dinner with Badley and admitted she hoped he would help her find a new job.

“She was hoping to convince Basil Badley to help her, maybe use a little influence,” she said.

Ek claimed that Jones drank the entire bottle of wine by herself and that Badley was also intoxicated from drinking.

“You will find that drinking is a recurring theme, sadly, for both of these parties,” she said.

Ek described a scene in which Jones was laughing at Badley’s jokes and flattering him as they sat close together on the couch. According to Ek, when Jones was asked during her deposition how she put up resistance to Badley’s advances, she said “sometimes I didn’t kiss him back.” Also during her deposition, Jones admitted she didn’t think Badley realized that she didn’t want him to kiss her.  Ek emphasized that Jones didn’t leave immediately, but managed to show Badley her resume´ and continually texted a friend during the alleged assault.

“How threatened did she really feel?” Ek asked rhetorically.

In addition, Ek disclosed that Jones had been diagnosed with a mental health issue and had stopped taking her medication, against medical advice, about a year before the incident.  The attorney claimed Jones had a history of conflict with other people since “going off her meds” and often mistakenly thought people were being “mean” to her. For example, she said Jones worked for state Sen. Jean Berkey of Everett after the Haugen campaign, but Jones felt the senator was unkind. Ek said Berkey will testify and the jury will see “she’s one of the nicest ladies you will ever meet.”

In the end, Ek argued, the jury will find that Badley’s actions did not remotely rise to the level of sexual assault and battery. She said it’s “a extremely steep and serious charge” and that there’s no evidence that Badley meant to cause Jones any harm, which she said is required to prove the accusation.

“Let’s be honest here. My client should have known better,” Ek said. “But frankly, so should have Courtney Jones.”



Archaeological work begins in Oak HarborArchaeological work on SE Pioneer Way in Oak Harbor began in earnest Tuesday.
Whidbey News-Times
Wednesday, 08/03/2011

According to Larry Cort, project manager for the city's $8.35 million downtown revitalization project, archaeologists arrived Monday to tour the area and begin setting up a base of operations. By the following morning, they were hard at work in locations from City Beach Street to the main dig site in front of Mike's Mini Mart and Oak Harbor Tavern.

Cort said about 11 specialists from the city's hired archaeological firm, SWCA Environmental Consultants and its Seattle-based division, Northwest Archaeological Associates, are involved. An expert representing the tribes, along with tribal monitors, are also participating.

While many of the specialists could be seen sifting dirt from sections of unpaved sidewalk on the western half of the project, those working on the main site were obscured from view by a fence cloaked in black cloth.

Cort said it was erected out of respect for the tribes.

"We're dealing with ancestral remains," Cort said. "For the tribes, it's a very solemn exercise."

The remains of four Native Americans were unearthed in June by an excavator. The one-way road project has been shut down ever since, but construction is about to resume following the approval of a state approved archaeological permit last week.

So far, Cort said no additional human remains have been uncovered. However, some cultural resources were discovered in exploratory holes at the intersection of City Beach Street and SE Pioneer Way.

"I'm not sure what it was but I know they were bagging a few items," he said.

Per conditions of the archaeological permit, the city has to probe areas of the project were work has already been completed before additional construction can take place. The city is also required to provide the state and affected tribes with daily updates on the archaeological work.

Limited construction has already begun. Cort said work on a cap for a retaining wall across from Whidbey Coffee is underway. As for major work, city officials will know more once they receive a two-week construction schedule from the project contractor, Bellingham-based Strider Construction. Cort said he expects to have it before the end of the week.





On an island in the State of Washington, charter revision confusion...
Prop. 1 supporters submit confusing statement for voters’ guide

South Whidbey RECORD
July 2nd, 2011 at Sat, 2nd, 2011 at 11:36 am by Brian Kelly

The statements that will be used in the Island County voters’ guide for Proposition 1, which would change the form of government in Langley to the council-manager model if approved by voters in the August Primary Election, have been submitted to the county.  Here they are below. The statement by supporters of Prop. 1, which would eliminate the position of an elected mayor, may be confusing to voters.

The “vote yes” statement implies Langley will keep its elected mayor if Prop. 1 is passed, which is actually the opposite of what will happen if Langley voters approve the proposal.

Daniel Prewitt, the Prop. 1 supporter who helped write the pro statement, said the wording was not meant to mislead voters.

“It’s not intentionally confusing,” he said.

Voters’ guide statements:

PRO: The council-city manager form of government provides the management experience needed for a $4.6 million, 17 staff, legally complex organization.

It makes our local government more democratic. It provides more meaningful accountability. It provides real checks and balances and empowers the elected city council to lead instead of following.

It is more effective. While an experienced professional manager may be well paid, the actual cost need be no greater than the $100,000 now budgeted for administration due to offsets in improved efficiency.

Professional management reduces the risk of litigation and other legal costs to the city. It increases the likelihood of grant funding.

It allows the elected mayor and council members to focus on community leadership and promote more meaningful citizen participation. While the manager tends to the day-to-day technical operations of the city, the elected mayor and council can work with the community on major issues that have gone untended such as economic development and bringing our codes into compliance.

Professional managers adhere to a common set of practices for managing staff. They insulate the staff from politics and they improve productivity and morale by providing a wide knowledge of resources and training opportunities.

CON: We urge you to vote “No” on Proposition 1.

Our mayor-council system works well and we have no need to change it.

The city is well-managed and the city budget has been significantly reduced in the last years. We can look for professional expertise from current and future department heads, and do not need a city manager hired by the city council.

City managers cost significantly more than the current Langley mayor. Manager salaries for small cities start around $80,000, before recruitment costs and benefits are figured in. No Washington city as small as Langley has a city manager and our city budget will not support increased costs without cutting something else.

An elected mayor will be more responsive to community needs and a more effective representative in important regional governmental bodies. In a mayor-council system there are more checks and balances and the community has more influence. For example, with a mayor-council the council approves department heads and can work with a mayor on budget.

With a city manager, the council by law does not approve department heads and can only approve, but not help, develop the budget.

Vote “No” on Proposition 1.



Slides continue in beleaguered Whidbey Shores neighborhood

By ROY JACOBSON
South Whidbey Record Reporter
Mar 16 2011, 9:39 AM

Smaller mudslides continued through the night Monday in the wake of a large slide this past weekend that blocked East Point Drive, hit two houses and damaged two vehicles in the Whidbey Shores waterfront neighborhood north of Langley.

“It kept sliding all last night,” said Dale Strickland, a South End excavator who has worked to clear the road since Saturday afternoon. He said he had been on the job on the lower portion of the road next to the beach until 8 p.m. Monday, and was heading back Tuesday afternoon.

“If we get another gully washer, we’re going to have more slides,” Strickland said Tuesday morning. “There’s nothing we can do but wait and see.”

The first, and largest, slide hit about noon on Saturday. Mud, sand and vegetation, including trees, tumbled from a rain-saturated steep bluff more than 300 feet high, blocking the road with a pile of material 100 feet wide and 10 feet tall in places.

The slide pushed around and damaged a station wagon and slammed into a pickup truck, and piled mud and debris against two houses on the other side of the road. A light pole on the slope side of the road had a chest-high coat of mud left in the wake of the slide. Paving stones and landscaping were washed away in a wave of debris that includes trees and other vegetation from the fallen hillside.

The slide also pushed over three large propane tanks in front of one of the houses, one of which sprung a leak in its connecter, said Deputy Chief Mike Cotton of Island County Fire District 3.

Cotton said the leak was sealed, and the tanks eventually were taken away by the propane vendor.

No one was injured in the slide, Cotton said Monday. He said the residents of the two houses struck by debris were made aware of the gas situation, but were not evacuated.

Pat Ehlers, her husband Ron and son Brett were on the lower level of their three-level house about noon on Saturday when the mud hit their propane tanks, and then the building.

“We heard a thud,” Pat Ehlers said Monday. “We went up there and looked, and there was a lot of the bank in our front yard.”

She said their house didn’t appear to be damaged, other than the yard.

By Monday, Strickland, whose company, Dirt Movers, operates out of the South End, had removed most of the slide material from the yard.

But with their power off and no propane, the Ehlerses decided to relocate to a motel in Freeland on Saturday night. Pat Ehlers said Monday that they will move into a friend’s cabin in the area until their house is usable again.

“It’s an experience one could live without, but nobody got hurt and we’re OK,” Ehlers said. “At least it wasn’t a tsunami like in Japan. I don’t have much to complain about.”

Meanwhile, Strickland, who has contracted with homeowners in the area for years, worked 20 hours straight clearing the mud from the road during the weekend. He was back Monday, finishing off the large blockage and trying to keep up with several smaller slides as the rain continued to fall.

Strickland said he has removed a huge amount of mud and debris from the road and has stockpiled it on any appropriate flat area he could find. He said he has kept the road mostly passable since Sunday.

He also said he has attempted to remove trees on the lower part of the bank that have been weakened by the slide and may pose a danger to power lines.

Strickland said the weather forecast calls for more rain, but with a drier spell expected later in the week.

“When it dries up, we’ll come in and clean up the mess,” he said.

Ehlers, who has lived at Whidbey Shores full-time for five years, said neighbors told her it was the worst slide in the area since 1997, when a mudslide pushed a house into the surf.

Mike Simmons, of the county’s Department of Emergency Management, said he visited Whidbey Shores on Saturday to make sure residents were OK.

Simmons said slides are not uncommon in areas where there are sand and gravel bluffs that become saturated with water during rainy periods.

“You expect it once in a while,” he said. “It’s just a fact of life on Whidbey Island.”


Whidbey Island sailors help in Japanese quake disaster

Sailors load food and water onto an HH-60H Seahawk helicopter on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan. - Photo courtesy of the Navy
By JUSTIN BURNETT
Whidbey News Times Staff reporter
Mar 16 2011, 2:25 PM · UPDATED

Nearly 200 Whidbey Island Naval Air Station sailors are participating in relief efforts off the east coast of Japan.

Electronic Attack Wing VAQ-139, the Cougars, deployed aboard the USS Ronald Reagan in January. The ship, which serves as the core of the Navy’s 7th Fleet carrier strike group, was in the area when a huge 9.0 earthquake, followed by a devastating tsunami, rocked eastern Japan Friday afternoon.

Speaking from the Reagan by telephone Tuesday morning, ship spokeswoman Lt. Cmdr. Kate Meadows said the strike group was now in its third day of operations, delivering items such as food, blankets and personal hygiene products to victims of the disaster.

Although flight operations have been suspended, effectively grounding Cougars pilots from their Prowler aircraft, the squadron’s support personnel have been assisting in the loading of helicopters shuttling emergency supplies to the coast.

“It’s a whole team effort aboard the ship,” Meadows said.

“When events like this happen, everyone pulls together,” she said.

As of Tuesday morning, a total of 29 sorties (helicopter missions) had delivered about 25 tons of supplies, assisting about 2,000 people. The missions have not been without risk, however. On Monday, the strike group repositioned itself after 17 Navy personnel were exposed to low levels of radiation.

The service members were aboard three helicopters that had flown through radioactive plumes from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant, which was damaged in the disaster, according to Lt. Anthony Falvo, a spokesman for the 7th Fleet.

The flight crews, along with the ship, underwent decontamination procedures, which are basically nothing more than scrubbing with soap and water. No one was injured as the level of contamination was equal to about 30 days’ exposure to the sun, he said.

“It’s not cause for alarm but something we have to watch very carefully,” Falvo said.

Meadows confirmed that no one aboard the Reagan was ever ill or has since shown signs of illness due to the exposure. It was only through the ship’s sophisticated onboard detection equipment that personnel were alerted to the presence of the radioactive particles.

The strike group, which was about 100 miles northeast of the power plant at the time, has since repositioned itself to avoid any further exposure. It’s simply a matter of monitoring the weather and watching for wind shifts, Meadows said.

There are currently nine ships in the strike group but another four are en route to the area. While the Reagon serves as the central hub of the Navy’s support wheel, the other ships — including cruisers, destroyers, and amphibious landing-craft — are all playing their own roles.

Some are searching the seas for survivors while others are transporting Japanese Defense Force personnel and support craft to critical areas. As the 7th Fleet is based in U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka, this mission has special significance for many sailors.

“Japan is home,” Falvo said. “This is where we’re stationed. Our own families are here.”

As for those on the Nimitz-class, nuclear-powered supercarrier, which calls San Diego home, Meadows said there is a very positive attitude among the ships complement of about 4,500. The crew knows the work they are doing is vital to the relief effort and that they are assisting thousands of people recover from one of Japan’s worst natural disasters.

“It makes us feel good we’re out here doing a good job,” Meadows said.






Land-use fines reach $37,000 against new Island County commissioner, husband
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Jan 10 2011, 9:11 AM · UPDATED

Island County Commissioner Kelly Emerson and her husband were assessed $37,000 by the county planning department this week for alleged violations of the county building code, critical areas ordinances and zoning ordinance.

The alleged violations in the backyard of the Emersons’ Camano Island home were discovered during the heat of last year’s campaign season and became a hot-button issue, erupting into campaign mailers and an unusual lawsuit.

The controversy arose after a neighbor complained that the Emersons were building a closed-in patio without a permit, but then inspectors found there was also a deck and wall built too close to a stream.

Emerson, a Republican, beat former Democratic County Commissioner John Dean in the general election, but the backyard construction matter is far from resolved.

County Code Enforcement Officer Andrew Hicks sent out a supplemental enforcement order to the Emersons this week after receiving no response from either an Oct. 1 notice of violation or a Nov. 1 initial enforcement order. The newest order assesses the Emersons for the initial $5,000 penalty, plus a $500-a-day fee for remaining out of compliance with the critical areas code for 64 days.

But Hicks said the department, at the direction of Planning Director Bob Pederson, may significantly reduce any penalty, or possibly eliminate it, if the Emersons follow the order. The letter to the Emersons reiterates this.

“Our goal is to get compliance,” he said. “It’s never the county’s intent to collect a boat load of money or a large amount of fees from anyone.”

Hicks said he’s exhausted the other remedies and the threat of civil penalty is the only option left to get a resolution. He said the department would have been more than willing to give the Emersons extra time to comply, if they had just communicated.

On the other side, Emerson said she and her husband didn’t ignore the county’s orders, but that the lawsuit was their response. She said she’s “not convinced” that there’s a wetland on her property or that the structures in her yard required permits to be built.

Moreover, Emerson’s attorney, Stephen Pidgeon of Everett, also emphasized that the Emersons responded with the lawsuit against Dean, Pederson and another planning department employee over the enforcement action. He claims the enforcement was directed for political reasons and that the action — including a county employee’s “trespass” onto the Emersons’ property — was a breach of Island County code, the state constitution and the U.S. constitution.

On Aug. 30, then-commissioner Dean received an email at his home from a resident complaining that the Emersons were building an enclosed room on their home without a permit. He forwarded the email to Pederson with the message “FYI.” Several hours later, a county employee went to the Emersons’ home and slapped a stop-work order on the project.

Subsequently, a county building official discovered that the Emersons had also built a deck without a permit and possibly within a buffer of a stream, which is a critical area. According to Hicks, the deck isn’t exempt from permit requirements because it was built on a grade. Also, the Emersons built a wall possibly within a stream buffer.

Hicks said he sent out a notice of violation on Oct. 1 giving the couple 30 days to voluntarily come into compliance with county code. He noted that the Emersons had previously been warned in writing that there was a critical area in their yard and that they would need a permit to build.

After receiving no response, Hicks followed up with an initial enforcement order on Nov. 1. It ordered the Emersons to submit a wetland report, prepared by a qualified professional, to the department within 30 days. The report was supposed to delineate the stream, wetlands and buffers. Also, the Emersons were ordered to submit a building permit for the deck. The letter warns about fines for not complying and explains the appeal process.

Also on Nov. 1, the day before the election, Kenneth and Kelly Emerson filed a lawsuit against Dean, Pederson and a building inspector, alleging civil rights violations, defamation and violations of the state’s Consumer Protection Acts. They asked for unspecified damages.

Part of the lawsuit was aimed at Dean for a campaign mailer he sent out to 20,000 residents that was critical of Emerson for building without a permit. The Emersons claimed it was defamatory and fraudulent.

Also, the lawsuit claimed that the planning department’s enforcement action against the Emersons was politically motivated and the action was contrary to the county’s policies and codes.

But Hicks disagrees.

“This violation has not been handled any different than any other violation,” he said.

Hicks said he normally sends out from three to five supplemental enforcement orders a year and the $37,000 penalty isn’t an unusual amount. He doubts anyone has ever had to pay the full assessment amount.

“We’ve made it clear that we’re willing to work with the landowner to resolve this problem,” he said.


SHOCK: Island County rejects another fee hike
By JUSTIN BURNETT
Whidbey News Times Staff reporter
Dec 30 2010, 9:57 AM · UPDATED

In a surprise move, the Island County Commissioners rejected a proposal Monday to increase development fees for the third time in less than two years.

Following a Dec. 27 public hearing in Coupeville, the Island County Board of Commissioners shot down by unanimous vote the recommendation of planning officials to increase the amount the department of Planning and Community Development charges for land use and building permits.

Representatives from the building industry protested the proposal with a strong and unified voice but many admitted after the meeting that they expected their concerns to fall on deaf ears.

“I was surprised,” said Jon Roberts, of Oak Harbor-based Cascade Custom Homes and Design. “I didn’t think that was the answer we’d get.”

“I pretty much expected them to go forward with the proposal,” echoed Ted Clifton, of Coupeville-based Clifton View Homes.

Island County Commissioner elect Kelly Emerson, who is also an electrician, attended the hearing and expressed similar surprise.

“I’m stunned,” Emerson said.

While the decision is akin to “kicking the can,” as it may only defer county budget problems until later, Emerson said it was the right decision to make and applauded the commissioners’ for sparing the building industry from additional financial obstacles.

The proposal would have increased what the county charges for land-use fees. Planning components of the existing fee schedule would have gone up 3 percent and public works elements by 2 percent. Some special permits, such as those concerning critical areas, were slated for a 25 percent hike.

Also proposed was increasing the cost of building permits. They were set to go up by a flat rate of 3 percent.

Planning and Community Development Director Bob Pederson said two previous fee changes in 2009 were the department’s attempt to meet the cost of reviewing and issuing permits. They were also meant to address inflation and to buy permit tracking software that would increase efficiency.  Many in the development industry, from representatives of building associations to private contractors, appeared at the numerous public hearings held in 2009 to protest the increases.

This latest round of fee schedule hikes was proposed largely for the same reason. While single family and commercial development did increase slightly in 2010, the planning department is still not recovering 100 percent of its costs for permit review and issuance, Pederson said.  Unlike most county departments, the planning department’s budget does not rely solely on the general fund. Rather, the bulk of its budget comes from permit revenue, which makes its bottom line sensitive to the overall health of growth and development.

The building industry has been hit particularly hard by the recession. The number of permits, for example, has fallen from 2,529 issued in 2006 to 1,180 issued in 2010. That equates to a drop in revenue from $2.69 million to $1.28 million this year. And things do not look like they are set to improve by next year.

“We’re anticipating a flat year in 2011,” Pederson said.

Even with the 2009 fee increases, the department needs another hike to cover the gap, he said. However, for varying reasons the commissioners were unwilling to support another round of hikes.  Apparently swayed by yet another roomful of concerned builders, Island County Commissioner John Dean said he agreed that the fee hikes may further hamper the recovery of a wallowing development industry. He supported waiting until the county has more information and knows for sure whether the fee increases are justified.

Dean’s political reality also affected his decision. A commissioner’s job is to “look out for Island County” and not private industry, he said. But because he won’t be here to deal with the financial repercussions of the decision, Dean said he was more willing to side with builders on the issue.

“If I was going to have to stay here next year, I’d probably vote the other way,” said Dean, who lost to Emerson and leaves office in January.

Island County Commissioner Helen Price Johnston voiced different reasons but also supported waiting until next year to increase fees. She said she was willing to “hold the line” for now but that she fully intends to revisit the issue after the permit tracking system is launched and produces more in-depth data.

Commissioner Angie Homola appeared to support the proposal. She said builders in Island County have long enjoyed perks, such as no building impact fees and generally lower rates, and that the proposed increases are needed now to keep the planning department solvent. She also questioned whether the rejection of fee increases fits with the county’s overall objectives.

“Is our goal to try and go out and build as many houses as possible when we have 48 months of houses sitting on the market?” Homola asked.

The proposed fee increases are too small to truly have an impact on the building industry and making a decision based on how the public may perceive the hikes is not fiscally responsible, she said.  Upon Homola’s request, Island County Budget Director Elaine Marlow did confirm that rejecting the fee increases could have a financial impact, from supplanting the planning department’s budget with general fund money to a layoff. Homola also asked Pederson to address the impact but he said only that, “We’ll do the best we can.”

Homola, who worked as an architect before entering politics, also said she would rather have a smaller incremental fee now than be faced with a sudden and larger hike in a year or two.

“We’re talking about somewhere around $75 a house,” Homola said. “It’s not going to make or break the house; it’s perceptions were making decisions on.”

Despite her concerns, Homola voted with Dean and Price Johnson to reject the fee proposals.




Sturdy, talented Oakes handed another hat by Island County
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Dec 23 2010, 10:08 AM · UPDATED

Slowly but surely, Bill Oakes is taking over Island County.

The public works director just got his fourth “hat” last week. Now he’s not only the director of the county’s largest department, he’s the county engineer, the parks director and the director of emergency management.

“It’s busy,” Oakes said in his famously understated way.

Oakes inherited his latest responsibility after Dave Hollett, the former director of Emergency Services, quit the county to take a job at the Navy hospital in Oak Harbor.

The department of emergency management was at the center of controversy a couple of years ago after the department was placed within the sheriff’s office. Two of the county commissioners blocked the sheriff’s plan to lay off Hollett and replace him with a deputy.

But then Hollett quit, leaving the county without a director for the beginning of the storm season. Although taking on the additional role wasn’t his idea, Oakes said it is logical. He has years of experience planning for and dealing with emergencies in his former job in King County and nine years in Island County.

On Thanksgiving, for example, he said he was out working with his crews “from 4 in the morning to 4 in the afternoon” on weather-related emergencies.

Of course, Oakes isn’t going to run the Emergency Management Department alone. He said the county will soon advertise for an emergency services coordinator, who will report to Oakes. The county contracts with Mike Simmons to do emergency management work on Camano Island.

Unfortunately for Oakes, all the extra responsibilities haven’t come with pay increases, although he has saved the county a significant amount of money by taking on the extra work.

Oakes started amassing extra titles when Dick Snyder, the former county engineer, left in 2006. The county is required by law to have a “county engineer” position filled. Oakes become public works director and county engineer, though he has an assistant county engineer, an assistant public works director and a public works manager to help with the load.

A couple of years ago, Oakes also became the parks director after the commissioners transferred the department into public works. That was about the time the parks department fell victim to the budget axe, leaving just a third of its funding for 2011. He now has one part-time person on each island handling all the maintenance in 67 parks and habitat areas.

“We’re below sustainable,” he said. “We can limp along like this for a little while, but eventually something has to change.”

If Island County ever opens a coal mine or procures a nuclear reactor, Oakes could easily take on even more responsibility. In his life before public works, Oakes worked his way through Penn State by laboring in a coal mine. He graduated with a degree in engineering with a mining specialty.

He then went to work in another windowless environment. He joined the Navy and worked on a nuclear-powered, fast attack submarine. When he left active duty after eight years, he was the assistant engineer and was qualified to run a nuclear reactor and a nuclear submarine.

His record for staying underwater in a submarine, on a mission that was apparently strictly hush-hush, was 89 days.

“It’s a different life,” he said.

After leaving active duty, Oakes spent 12 years in the Navy Reserves before retiring as a commander. He worked as an engineer in King County for a decade before coming to Island County.

And the rest, as they say, is history.




UPDATE: Deception Pass Bridge jumper’s body still missing
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Nov 19 2010, 2:35 PM · UPDATED

The search for the body of a man who jumped off Deception Pass Bridge Wednesday morning has been called off.

Detective Ed Wallace with the Island County Sheriff’s Office said the search in the waters surrounding Deception Pass has involved many boats from a number of agencies, but they came up with nothing. After two days of scouring the water and beaches, searchers called off the effort.

A number of people driving over Deception Pass Bridge at about 9 o’clock in the rainy and windy morning saw a man with a blue jacket leap off the bridge. The horrified witnesses got out of their cars and trucks and looked over the bridge to see the man float and then sink in the swirling waters below.

“He walked up the bridge and put one leg over and then the other and went over,” Detective Sgt. Mike Beech said. “There was no hesitation.”

A boat from Cornet Bay was at the pass just minutes after the man disappeared under the water, but the body was still lost. Wallace said there’s been a number of cases in which bodies were never recovered from the fast-moving currents and eddies of Deception Pass.

Beech said he’s in the process confirming the identify of the man, but it may be awhile before he releases a name. A car with a wallet and cell phone belonging to a Whidbey Island man were left in the parking lot of the bridge.

Deception Pass Bridge has been the site of numerous suicides over the years.




Island County commissioner candidate embroiled in permit allegations

By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Oct 18 2010, 12:59 PM · UPDATED

Island County Commissioner John Dean sent out about 20,000 copies of a mailer this week that his Republican opponent, Kelly Emerson, characterized as “a hit piece” and “mudslinging.”

But even more significant, perhaps, is the story behind the negative ad. The alleged county code violation by Emerson and her husband may be even more serious and long-standing than is indicated in the mailer, while she accuses Dean of inappropriately using his authority to pressure the planning department to pursue the issue.

The mailer criticizes Emerson, a Camano Island resident, for “knowing and willful violation” of county building codes for construction work that was being done on her home without a permit.

“We don’t need leaders who think they’re above the law. Island County can do better than Kelly Emerson,” the mailer concludes.

In response, Emerson issued a press release decrying the “attack mailer” as “the dirtiest piece I’ve seen.”

“I’m getting a lot of calls from people who think that it’s pathetic. These are people who planned to vote for John Dean, but now are switching sides,” she said Thursday afternoon.

In her press release, Emerson goes on to accuse Dean, a Democrat, of violating county regulations and protocols in manufacturing an “October surprise.” In an interview in September, she said Dean deviated from the standard process in effectively siccing the planning department on her.

“It was interesting to see how fast the planning department can go when politically motivated,” she said.

The controversy surrounds an enclosed patio that Emerson said her husband was building on the back of their Camano home. She explained that her husband, Kenneth, started work on the project before she got done with the drawings. She admits that he did “about 10 hours of work” before even beginning the necessary permitting process or paying the fee; he started the process the day before the stop-work order was issued.

At a candidates’ forum Thursday, Emerson said her husband did the unpermitted work when she was busy campaigning.

“From time to time, my husband needs adult supervision,” she said.

According to documents obtained by the News-Times, one of Emerson’s neighbors sent an email to Dean’s home email Aug. 30, complaining that the Emersons were adding onto their home without a building permit.

Emerson said it was astonishing that county planning staff was at her property the very same day, issuing a stop-work order.

Dean explained that the normal process when he receives such a complaint is to pass it on to the planning department; sometimes he even directs staff to take a certain action. But since the issue involved his opponent, he realized the political implications.

“In this case, a perceived conflict of interest clearly exists,” Dean wrote, then urged the woman to report the issue directly to the county’s code enforcement officer, effectively leaving himself out of the controversy.

And yet, Dean immediately forwarded the woman’s email and his response to County Planning Director Bob Pederson, along with his fellow commissioners and the administrative assistants in the commissioners’ office, with the message “FYI.” In an interview, Dean explained that he forwarded the complaint because he felt Pederson should know what was going on, plus he felt there should be a public record of the issue.

After receiving the forwarded email, Pederson said he immediately asked a member of his staff to look into the allegation that the Emersons were building without a permit. An Island County building official issued a stop-work order Aug. 30. The department didn’t receive a formal written complaint from the neighbor woman until Sept. 2.

Emerson pointed to the county planning department website, which clearly states complaints from citizens about code violations must be written on a formal complaint form and then mailed to the department. She said the speed of the planning department’s action — before a formal complaint — is suspicious to her and many others in the community; one woman told her she’s been complaining about a neighbor’s unpermitted project for more than a year without action by the county.

“That’s the kind of stuff I’m hearing,” Emerson said.

In a Sept. 13 email to the county building official, Kenneth Emerson questioned who filed the complaint against him. He wrote that he asked a member of county staff and the staff member replied, “The call came from Coupeville.”

Yet Pederson said the department’s long-standing policy is to immediately investigate and issue stop-work orders when the department receives any information about someone building without a permit. He said it’s easier on everyone involved if compliance checks on structures occur early on.

In investigating the construction, county Building Official Andy Griffin discovered that the Emersons may be knowingly building within a restricted wetland buffer. When the Emersons were issued a building permit for a garage in 2008, the permit states that “the building footprint as staked lies outside the 100 foot buffer. No objection to issuance of permit as long as footprint is not moved any closer. Further development/clearing in wetland buffer must be approved by ICPCD.”

Griffin concluded in a letter to Kenneth Emerson that the construction was “a knowing and willful violation” because he had been warned that any new construction in the wetland buffer required approval from the county.

Then in an Oct. 1 letter to Kenneth and Kelly Emerson, county Code Enforcement Officer Andrew Hicks wrote that county staff had discovered the couple had also built a covered porch, another structure and a wall within 50 feet of a stream and wetland feature, all possibly in violation of the county’s critical areas ordinance.

“Staff has also determined that structures have been constructed on the subject parcel without prior approval of required building permits,” the letter states.

Hicks continued that the Emersons can take actions to bring the property into compliance with county code and avoid formal enforcement action, which could amount to $5,000 for critical area violations, as well as a daily $500 fine for each day the violations continue unabated. The Emersons must submit a wetland report, prepared by a professional, within 30 days of receiving Hicks’ letter. The report will delineate the wetland and stream boundaries. In addition, they must submit building permits for all non-exempt structures within 21 days.

Emerson said she doesn’t believe a wetland even exists.

After learning about all of this, Dean said he felt compelled to tell the public about Emerson’s “lack of respect for government.” He admits to “thinking long and hard” about going negative, but ultimately decided it was a matter of fairness. If he had violated county code, he said, everyone would criticize him for being a hypocrite. He felt Emerson, as a candidate, should be held to the same standard.

“It is a big deal. An elected official or a candidate needs to follow the law,” he said.



Painful Island County cuts ready for public comment
By JESSIE STENSLAND,
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Sep 17 2010, 2:50 PM · UPDATED

Following a whirlwind week of meetings, the Island County commissioners finalized a budget, complete with $2 million in cuts, they will present to the public at an Oct. 4 hearing.

The commissioners took pains to emphasize that the document is not the final word on the budget cuts, but that a lot of fine tuning may occur after the public has their say.

“This year more than any other, it’s more of a living and breathing document and there is some room for flexibility,” Commissioner John Dean said.

The cuts in the budget are largely the same as commissioners had discussed in June, with some small changes. They decided, for example, to cut their contribution to senior services to 40 percent; the cut was originally set at 30 percent.

A nutrition program for women and babies, two maternity support programs, flu shots, six patrol deputies, three corrections deputies, a deputy prosecutor, a paralegal, the impaired driving impact panel, the 4-H coordinator and the Master Gardener coordinator are all on the proposed chopping block.

The process wasn’t just quick, but went relatively smoothly this year. Perhaps the most animated discussion was between the board and Prosecutor Greg Banks, who urged the commissioners to completely cut out lower priority spending rather than spread the pain around.

“What’s more important, prosecuting criminal law or donating to a private nonprofit with other funding sources?” he asked, referring to the $158,000 the county is set to contribute to senior services next year.

With his budget cuts, Banks said he may no longer prosecute many misdemeanor crimes, including marijuana possession and driving without a license.

Banks went on to suggest that the commissioners get rid of dog control instead of the flu vaccination program, which is set to be cut. When the commissioners argued that dog control is mandated, he shot back that so is prosecuting criminals and other programs the commissioners aren’t adequately funding.

“If you would rather have animal control enforcement than criminal law enforcement, that’s a decision you’ve made. That’s on you,” he said.

The next day, Commissioner Helen Price Johnson did what Banks suggested. She offered to transfer the $110,000 budget for animal control, which is handled by separate contractors on Whidbey and Camano islands, to the sheriff’s office. She said the sheriff’s office could handle dog-related issues instead — which they already do to a limited degree — though she realized it would be at a lower level of service than the animal control officers provide.

Sheriff Mark Brown, however, was hesitant to accept the responsibility, though he said he would look into the idea and get back to the commissioners next week. After the meeting, Undersheriff Kelly Mauck said it may not make sense to get rid of the two animal control officers, who are essentially deputies dedicated to animal issues, in order to save one deputy.

Also, Commissioner Angie Homola made it clear that she wasn’t in favor of the idea. She even invited Animal Control Officer Carol Barnes to describe the importance of her duties to the commissioners. Dean didn’t express a strong opinion.

During the discussion with the sheriff, Homola pushed him to look to his administration for cuts.

“I don’t see where your administration is affected,” she said, pointing out that the administration in nearly all the other departments took hits with furloughs, or in some cases, lost their positions.

Brown, however, said it is more important than ever to have a strong, fully funded administration with people who are “extremely knowledgeable” about labor relations, labor laws and other issues. His administration includes an undersheriff, a chief civil deputy and a chief administrative deputy in the jail. It’s one less person than he’s allowed to have under statute, he said. It’s one more than the last sheriff.

Undersheriff Mauck pointed out that members of the administration are exempt employees, so they can work long hours without accruing overtime pay. He, for example, can fill in with patrols and he won’t receive overtime.

“You can use them and abuse them a little more,” he said.

In a separate discussion, Homola also criticized the elected officials for a letter they presented to the commissioners last year, demanding that the commissioners cut all non-mandated spending before cutting into their budgets. She said she “didn’t appreciate” the strongly-worded document.

“That set a precedence that I think hurt us and hurt us through the levy lift process,” she said. Proposition 1, which would have raised $2 million in property taxes, was overwhelmingly turned down by voters in the primary.

During this budget cycle, the discussion about the issue was more subtle. Yet both Brown and Banks, who spearheaded the letter demanding non-mandated cuts, have still made it clear that they believe spending should be completely cut to senior services and WSU Extension. They pointed out that both have other sources of revenues and volunteer help galore.

The commissioners have made drastic cuts to both WSU Extension and senior services in the last two years. The draft 2011 current expense budget also has large decreases for both, but some funding still remains. There’s $158,000 for senior services and $95,000 for Extension.

The commissioners pointed out that the contributions leverage huge state and federal grants for the community. Also, they want to keep a safety net for the county’s most vulnerable seniors.

Near the end of the budget discussions, the commissioners and Budget Director Elaine Marlow made a final effort to scour the budget for money to restore to their highest priorities, which they identified as the health department, the sheriff’s office and the prosecutor. Homola also prioritized the treasurer’s office, which has major backlogs because of low staffing.

The commissioners made a final $61,000 in cuts over and beyond what was necessary, but placed it in a contingency fund where it could later be used to restore money to programs, perhaps based on public input.

The ongoing process is the fourth budget cut in two years. When it’s over, the commissioners will have cut $6.2 million of the current expense funds budget, which will be down to about $20 million next year.

Homola pointed out that the three Democratic commissioners have done nothing but cut spending. The county was run by Republican commissioners for decades and they increased spending year after year.

“The cliche of tax and spending just doesn’t go very far,” she said, referring to herself and her Democratic colleagues.



Whidbey mayors outpace their counterparts in pay
By BRIAN KELLY, South Whidbey Record Editor
Sep 03 2010, 5:04 PM · UPDATED

When it comes to pay, Langley Mayor Paul Samuelson towers above his counterparts at similar-sized cities across Washington state.

And in towns twice the size of the Village by the Sea, Samuelson is also head-and-shoulders above most other mayors across the state, according to a Record review of the salaries of the 50 top elected officials in those towns.

Samuelson’s pay has been the subject of intense scrutiny since early July, when controversy over the mayor’s compensation package spilled out of city hall.  It was then that public awareness of internal discord over the mayor’s pay became public. Langley City Treasurer Debbie Mahler had asked the county prosecutor to investigate alleged “improper actions” by Samuelson amid her concerns that he was getting paid for vacation time he had not earned.

The city council is expected to approve a revised pay ordinance for the mayor at the council’s meeting next week that spells out Samuelson’s pay and benefits package. An earlier ordinance that said Samuelson was entitled to the same benefits as city department heads left open the possibility that the mayor could accrue vacation days, comp time and sick leave — a scenario that attorneys outside the city deemed unlawful.

Langley council members later said they never intended to classify Samuelson as a city employee, despite such language in the ordinance they passed in November 2008.  The council has raised the pay for the mayor of Langley position five times since 2006. Samuelson’s current pay — budgeted at $53,532 — puts him at the top of the compensation list for all cities in Washington that have a population of 1,500 or less (Langley has an estimated population of 1,115).

He also leads all other mayors in pay in towns with a population two or three times the size of Langley, with just one exception: Coupeville, the town that served as a model for the Langley mayor’s compensation package.

Coupeville Mayor Nancy Conard has an annual salary of $63,756, according to the 2010 salary survey conducted by the Association of Washington Cities.  Samuelson and Conard are paid more because they are considered “full-time” mayors, and have taken over much of the duties of a paid city administrator or manager.

Langley already had a city administrator when Samuelson was elected in 2007.  Samuelson, however, announced a plan to restructure city hall during his first year in office, and said he would eliminate the city administrator’s position and handle much of the day-to-day chief executive duties when he took office in 2008, with the help of an administrative assistant.

In September 2008, the city council nearly doubled his pay to $31,000 from that earned by prior mayor Neil Colburn.

In November 2008, noting the many hours being worked by Samuelson and expressing concerns about possible burnout, the council increased the mayor’s pay to $51,513. The council used the base pay for its department heads when determining the mayor’s salary level, using the total budget for the administration as a guide. Without a city administrator still on staff, that left more funds available for the mayor’s pay.

Samuelson also currently receives a benefits package of roughly $18,000.

Not so in other cities

Beyond Langley and Coupeville, none of the mayors at the three dozen cities contacted by the Record receive benefits such as health insurance.

“He gets nothing else,” Millwood City Treasurer Debbie Matkin said of Millwood Mayor Dan Mork. “He gets to say he’s the mayor.”

Samuelson’s actual salary for 2010 is $50,855, due to reductions in employee pay that were made earlier because of Langley’s beleaguered budget.  Most mayors of small towns in Washington are paid much less.

Washington has 92 cities and towns with populations between 5,000 and 715, and only 17 mayors in those towns make more than $10,000. Six receive no pay at all for serving as mayor.

Though most of those mayors are considered “part-time,” interviews with officials at city halls in nearly three dozen cities with populations of fewer than 2,000 say their elected mayors put in more hours than those just allotted for city council sessions and other meetings.  Dee Roberts, clerk-treasurer for the city of South Bend, said Mayor Kirk Church was getting paid $400 a month before the council doubled his pay.

“He was retired, so he was able to devote himself to the job full-time,” Roberts said. “Over time, he eventually was working five days a week, at least 40 hours a week.”

The South Bend council decided to increase his pay in 2006.

“Because of his dedication and his hours at work, and his eagerness to attend to the meetings required of a mayor, they felt he deserved $800 a month,” she said.

A later grassroots effort to roll back the mayor’s pay — in case a new mayor would take office and not want to work full-time — fizzled.  People in the town of 1,740 expect their mayor to be at city hall, Roberts added.

“Believe me, people call here all hours of the day and night for him. Even on Saturday and Sunday,” Roberts said.

South Bend does not have a city administrator. But that’s true for most small cities in Washington.  According to the Association of Washington Cities, the city clerk handles much of the day-to-day administrative work in smaller towns and cities across the state.

In towns of fewer than 1,500 in Washington, only five have full-time city administrators.  A few small cities, such as Tieton and Roslyn, have part-time administrators.  In Roslyn, the city is now considering doing without an administrator.  Roslyn Clerk-Treasurer Amber Shallow said the town’s mayor decided to waive her stipend because of the city’s budget problems.

“We were facing a two-week furlough,” Shallow said.

Even with the mayor’s reduction in pay and other cuts, employees still needed to take a one-week furlough because of budget problems.  The next thing to go will likely be the city’s part-time administrator, she said.

“It’s very likely it will go away at the end of the year,” Shallow said.

Pay cut not on the table

The Langley City Council won’t be considering any decrease to the pay ordinance next week.  That’s because the state constitution forbids any decrease in pay during the current term of an elected official.  The new ordinance is expected to cover only the salary for Samuelson’s current term.

Some on South Whidbey, though, have asked the council to expand the pay provision to cover anyone who is elected as mayor of Langley, so the salary won’t be a special deal for Samuelson only.  People who think the arrangement smacks of favoritism, however, don’t understand the issue entirely, said City Councilman Robert Gilman.

Gilman said the pay structure that has been set up provides a base salary for a part-time mayor, and it gives the city “flexibility” no matter who is elected when Samuelson’s current term expires.

The only way to allow for the potential of either a full-time or a part-time mayor, he said, is “to create a system that resets to the base salary at the start of each term.”

The incoming mayor can then decide if the job will be full-time or part-time. If the council agrees, it can raise the pay to full-time compensation.  But that begs the question: What if someone runs hoping to land the pay of a full-time mayor, but the council doesn’t increase the pay after the election?

“The council either responds to that or they’re going against the sentiment of the people, and will pay the political price for that,” Gilman said.

In a recent memo to his fellow council members, Gilman said a broader discussion is needed on the role of the mayor. He would not say whether that discussion should happen now or much later.

“We’re not recommending one way or another. We want the full council to weigh in on that,” he said.


Deputies, mothers, babies targeted in Island Couny budget cuts
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Aug 20 2010, 3:38 PM

The Island County sheriff has come out fighting in response to voters’ overwhelming rejection of Proposition 1 in Tuesday’s primary, asking that county commissioners eliminate all funding for programs not specifically required by law.

By a 71 percent majority, voters refuted the property tax lid lift that would have filled in the funding gap and allowed commissioners to keep the $21 million current expense fund static.

The commissioners are quickly moving ahead with preparing a 2011 budget with $2 million in cuts. They are considering a mix of cuts, including a 10 percent reduction in law and justice funding, along with large reductions in non-mandated programs such as WSU Extension, parks, senior services and certain health department activities.

Sheriff Mark Brown reignited the debate over the funding of non-mandated programs in a tough-worded letter he sent to commissioners Friday. He asks them to first eliminate funding to all non-mandated services, which would amount to about $350,000, but he has acknowledged that cuts to law and justice may still be necessary.

“I want to make it perfectly clear that it is my opinion and strong belief that the failure of Proposition 1 was, in no way, a reflection that our Citizens do not support public safety or the Island County Sheriff’s Office,” he wrote. “Citizens have repeatedly commented to me that they felt as if the Sheriff’s Office was being used as a ‘pawn’ in an attempt to pass a tax hike and were not confident that the Board of County Commissioners would in fact support law and justice with money generated from Proposition 1.”

During a brief budget discussion Wednesday, the three commissioners directed Budget Director Elaine Marlow to send memos to all elected officials and department heads, asking them to submit proposed budgets based on the budget scenarios presented in June.

“Every department will be looked at very closely to see if we can find additional budget cuts,” Marlow said.

The commissioners hope to complete the budget early this year — by the end of October — so that everyone affected will have time to prepare.

Yet the process so far may not have strictly followed state law. Island County Prosecutor Greg Banks said that a “budget call” or statutory procedure for the start of the budget process was supposed to have occurred on or before the second Monday in July. Under state law, the county auditor or the designated chief financial officer was supposed to notify all elected officials and department heads in July to submit detailed budgets no later than the second Monday in August.

“I’m still waiting,” said Banks, who’s been a critic of the commissioners’ budget process in the past.

The cuts in the budget proposed by the commissioners include: a 10 percent reduction in the law and justice departments; elimination of funding for 4-H and Master Gardeners at WSU Extension; cutting all parks maintenance; elimination of the Children’s Commission and 40 to 50 percent of the current expense funding for the health department; 40 percent reduction of county funding to seniors services; a 10 percent reduction in dog control and a 5 percent cut in the animal shelter budget; a 5 percent reduction in budgets for the assessor, auditor and treasurer; and a 5 percent cut in emergency management.

Brown said a 10 percent cut to his office would mean laying off seven to 10 deputies.

Banks said the 10 percent cut would mean laying off a deputy prosecutor and a paralegal; to deal with the loss of staff, one option is to stop prosecuting most misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor crimes.

Health Director Keith Higman said the prescribed cuts would largely affect mothers and their children. They would spell the end of the county’s participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, commonly known as WIC, as well as a couple of programs in which nurses help new mothers.

Marlow said that the county is still negotiating the unions about changing health insurance to a less expensive plan. Last year, the county estimated that such a switch could save as much as $750,000 a year. Instead, the largest union chose to cut employees hours to save a comparable amount.

Without agreements from the union, finding more ways to cut the budget may be tough. From 2008 to 2010, commissioners cut 20 percent of the budget, which resulted in the layoffs of more than 50 positions.

It may not be pretty, but Marlow hopes the budget pruning process doesn’t get ugly.

“I would hope that the conversation stays professional,” she said. “We’re all in this together.”



Langley council asks for a do-over on mayor’s pay
By BRIAN KELLY, South Whidbey Record Editor
Aug 19 2010, 3:36 PM · UPDATED

LANGLEY — With legal questions still dogging the city’s attempts to pay Paul Samuelson for his full-time work as mayor for the Village by the Sea, the Langley City Council tabled an ordinance Monday night that was meant to end the ongoing brouhaha over the mayor’s pay.

Langley has been mired in public controversy over the mayor’s pay since early July, after city leaders learned City Treasurer Debbie Mahler had asked the county prosecutor to investigate alleged “improper actions” by Samuelson. At the time, Mahler said Samuelson was trying to get paid for working on the city’s behalf while on family vacations out of state.

On Monday, council members bemoaned the negative press accounts that have detailed the pay dispute and trumpeted Samuelson’s accomplishments since taking over in 2008.

But they also turned a more critical eye to a proposed ordinance that would clean up problems created by two earlier ordinances that made the mayor a full-time, paid official and gave him the same benefit package earned by city department heads.

Council members said they wanted to delete a section of the new ordinance that would let the mayor collect a state pension when he retires. Some also said they wanted to delete a carryover from the mayor’s previous pay ordinance — one that makes only Samuelson eligible for a $53,532 annual salary — so the next mayor would not receive the previous part-time pay of $21,000.

Several in the crowd at Monday’s meeting urged the council to abolish the special deal for Samuelson.

Jim Anderson reminded the council of the recent advice they had received from Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington, an organization that provides expert advice to cities. The city had asked lawyers to examine the ordinance adopted in November 2008 that deemed Samuelson a city employee.

The new ordinance, Anderson said, did not meet the criteria set out for the mayor’s role by the research center.

“You cannot create an ordinance that is exceptional for one person,” he said.

“The problem with this ordinance, the principal one, is it doesn’t meet this test,” Anderson said. “The council is once again wasting time, our resources and our money.”

Anderson said the council should craft an ordinance that sets the salary for anyone who becomes mayor, and not just the one in office now.

“Write an ordinance that endures over time. It is not driven by the personality of Paul; it’s driven by the weight of the office,” he said.

Anderson, and others, also said the work done on the latest ordinance by the city’s legal team shows they were, once again, not up to the task.

“The second thing is, what does this mean about our city attorneys? I think they are wholly incompetent. This is the fourth stab at this,” he said. “It’s a joke.”

The city has faced snowballing legal fees since concerns were raised in December by Mahler over the mayor’s vacation pay. The city spent more than $7,300 on legal fees for personnel issues during the five-month span of December 2009 through April 2010.

At Monday’s council meeting, city officials noted the July bill from Langley’s lawyers totaled $10,595. Added to earlier attorney bills this year, the city has spent $24,121 — well above the $12,108 the city set aside to cover legal expenses this year.

City council urged to ‘get it right’

Even so, some said an additional review of the mayor’s new pay ordinance would be money well spent.

“With all the conversation throughout the community, with the angst that everybody’s feeling; you’re in for a penny, you’re in for a pound,” said Craig Carty. “Go ahead and spend the extra hundred bucks, a thousand bucks, whatever it is. Get it right.”

Some on the council, too, criticized the work of the city attorneys on the mayor’s pay issue.

“I do need to say, I have some questions, some disappointments ... with the performance of the city attorney’s office,” said Councilman Robert Gilman.

Gilman recalled that Langley’s legal team had reviewed the issues over the mayor’s pay before the council adopted an ordinance in February that was meant to resolve concerns over the mayor’s vacation pay.

“I just wish the city attorney had found that stuff,” Gilman said. “We now have a whole trail of consequences that has come out of this and a lot of collateral damage to deal with.”

“I would love to know what the city attorney is willing to do to own up to their part in this whole [situation],” he said.

The problems with the mayor’s pay ordinances date back to October 2008, when the council adopted an ordinance that set the hours, duties, salaries and benefits for the mayor.

Council members later learned — after the county prosecutor declined to investigate the allegations made by the city treasurer — that they could not dictate the working hours of the mayor or legally make him a city employee.

A subsequent ordinance, adopted in November 2008, more than doubled the salary of the mayor and set out a 40-hour work week.

But it also gave him the benefits package equivalent to those received by department heads, and Mahler, the city treasurer, raised concerns after the mayor used up all of his vacation days but was still taking paid vacation days.

At Monday’s meeting, some on the council said Mahler should have said something about the vacation-pay issue much earlier.

Councilwoman Rene Neff said Mahler should have shared her concerns with the council.

“I’m very sad that you didn’t do that, because I feel like it’s caused a very huge problem for the city of Langley,” Neff said.

But Mahler, speaking at length for the first time publicly about the controversy, said it never became an issue until the mayor used up all of his allotted vacation days. That didn’t happen until the end of last year, she said.

“I didn’t have an issue of him not having time sheets,” Mahler said.

Instead, she was worried that Samuelson was taking more vacation time than what was allowed under his benefits package. The ordinance had clearly made him a city employee, with the benefits to match.

“It was when he exceeded those benefits, that I brought up the question,” she said.

She told the council she shared her concerns with the mayor and city attorney, but nothing changed.

“I went to the mayor and I went to the city attorney and I was shut down by both of them,” Mahler said.

She added that she didn’t bring her worries to the council because two other employees had been reprimanded earlier for sharing concerns with council members.

Council members mull over possible changes

Council members spent part of the meeting debating if they had the power to decrease the mayor’s salary once it had been set, and if his benefits package should be changed.

In response to a question from the council, Mahler said the city would have to make contributions into the mayor’s retirement pension — dating back to his first day as an elected official — if the provision were retained to have Samuelson eligible for the Washington State Public Employment Retirement System.

Neff said the inclusion of the pension benefit put the city in a “pickle” because of Langley’s budget problems. But Samuelson said he wasn’t interested in enrolling in the program, so council members agreed it should not be offered.

“We can’t afford it right now. And he doesn’t want it anyway,” Neff said.

Council praises work of mayor

Council members said they stood by their decision to make Samuelson a full-time mayor, noting the thousands of dollars he had saved while reorganizing city government. Recent press reports did not show the reality of what has been happening at city hall, some said.

Councilman Russell Sparkman praised Samuelson as an “agent of change.”

“He’s made the tough decisions; he’s made the tough decisions that you’d want your chief executive to make,” Sparkman said.

“I’m really glad of the decision we’ve made. I’m glad that Paul was there when the poop began to hit the fan with the economy last year and our budget,” Sparkman said.

Sparkman said his votes on the mayor’s pay ordinances were not influenced by the fact that he is one of the mayor’s tenants.

“I take this job really seriously,” Sparkman said.

“I take the fiduciary responsibility very seriously. If I thought Paul was a schmuck and not doing his job ... as mayor here, I wouldn’t be sitting here talking about my support for the work that he has done. I’m not a fool,” Sparkman said.

The spirited defense of the mayor, though, prompted criticism from some in the audience.

“It makes me very nervous as a citizen and a taxpayer, that you have separated yourself from that independence that I believe is very representative of our democracy and the way our government should operate,” said Kathleen Waters.

“Each one of you needs to think about us, the citizens, and how we feel we are being represented,” she said.

The council voted 4-1 to table the new ordinance to the next council meeting. Neff was the sole vote against




Woman's body recovered from water off of Whidbey Island
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Jul 31 2010, 7:27 PM · UPDATED

The Island County coroner has identified the body of a woman who may have jumped off Deception Pass Bridge Friday night.

Coroner Robert Bishop said Saturday night that the woman was 40-year-old Jessica Van Pelt of Burlington. Bishop said he was "very confident" that Van Pelt, who doesn't have relatives on Whidbey Island, went into the water at Deception Pass. Bishop said investigators suspect suicide, though an autopsy hasn't been completed yet.

The Marine Safety Unit of the Island County Sheriff’s Office recovered Van Pelt's body in the water about a half mile off of Whidbey's West Beach at about 12:30 p.m. Saturday.

Detective Ed Wallace with the sheriff’s office said that boaters in the area first saw the body and alerted the sheriff’s office.

Bishop said that Van Pelt was last seen at the bridge Friday night. Park rangers reported that a red Hyundai Elantra, which was later identified as Van Pelt's car, had been parked at the bridge parking lot on the Whidbey side since about 9 p.m. Friday.

Saturday afternoon, Wallace and Bishop searched the car before it was towed to a precinct office. Bishop said no note was found.



Island County braces for possible return of Colton Harris-Moore
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Jul 28 2010, 9:20 AM · UPDATED

A small group of officials in Island County’s law and justice community recently got together to discuss how to handle a possible onslaught of media if and when Colton Harris-Moore arrives in Coupeville.

Island County Prosecutor Greg Banks said the infamous “barefoot bandit” should be headed to Island County after federal charges against him are resolved in federal court in Seattle.

“He has a lot to answer for in Island County,” Banks told county officials at a roundtable meeting Monday morning. “I think we are really next in line.”

But 19-year-old Harris-Moore could bring a media circus to little Coupeville, where Island County Superior Court is located. He’s wanted on a $500,000 arrest warrant out of Island County on 10 charges related to Camano Island burglaries, thefts, vandalism and a car chase. Banks said that other charges are pending; Harris-Moore is considered a suspect in the theft of an assault rifle from a police car parked in front of a home on Camano Island.

To brainstorm about the problems and solutions with the arrival of the barefoot burglar, Banks met with Sheriff Mark Brown, Coupeville Marshall Dave Penrod, Undersheriff Kelly Mauck, court administrator Mike Merringer and jail administrator De Dennis.

“We are concerned about a media frenzy when he shows up. We can’t plug up the courthouse,” Penrod said.

In addition, Brown said he’s concerned about the adequacy of space in the small courtrooms and parking around the county campus.

“If the news media gets here at 4 in the morning and takes up all the parking spaces, it could really be a problem,” the sheriff said.

Possible solutions discussed included a special media shuttle to and from off-site parking and a live video feed from the courtroom to another room where the media can watch.

Both Banks and Brown expressed frustration with television media following Harris-Moore’s capture in the Bahamas earlier this month. Banks didn’t mince words when he spoke with fellow officials at the Monday meeting.

“They could take up every hour of your day. They don’t care. They’re relentless,” he said, telling a story about a reporter who wouldn’t leave him alone while he was remodeling his home on vacation last week. He ultimately refused the on-camera interview.

But Banks said he had a better experience when he was interviewed for the “Today Show” and “Dateline.”

Brown refused an on-camera interview with “48 Hours” because he didn’t want to be a part of sensationalizing the barefoot-bandit story any more than it has been. He offered to do a phone interview, he said, but they wanted video of “someone in a uniform to validate the story.”

“There’s nothing I can add,” he said. “I’m sick of those kinds of questions and I don’t think they serve any purpose, especially now that he’s caught.”

Harris-Moore walked away from a halfway house in Renton in April 2008 and returned to Camano Island, where he allegedly perpetrated a string of burglaries. He moved on to other counties, and eventually other states, where his alleged crime spree included the theft of airplanes and boats. He was arrested in the Bahamas after he reportedly crash-landed a plane stolen July 4 from an Indiana airport.




State Rep. Barbara Baily seeks official opinion on Oak Harbor public meeting policies
By JUSTIN BURNETT
Whidbey News Times Staff reporter
Jul 21 2010, 10:17 AM · UPDATED

The city of Oak Harbor’s public meeting policies may soon be under the scrutiny of one of the state’s highest offices.

Following requests from the Whidbey News-Times and the city of Oak Harbor, 10th District Rep. Barbara Bailey, R-Oak Harbor, has agreed to ask the state Office of the Attorney General to issue a formal opinion on a recent ordinance the city council adopted regarding its standing committee meeting rules.

“It’s been a public issue for a long time,” Bailey said.

In an interview Monday morning, she said she agreed to make the request because both the public and the city deserve resolution on the matter. “This has been a point of contention for too long,” she said.

The issue was brought to her attention by The Whidbey News-Times. She then consulted with Oak Harbor Mayor Jim Slowik and decided to ask the attorney general’s office for a formal opinion.

Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano and chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, also expressed a willingness to look into the issue. However, Bailey, who is up for election this year, was the first to commit to asking the attorney general’s office for an opinion.

Marcia Van Dyke, publisher of the Whidbey News-Times and the South Whidbey Record, said city officials have maintained that its standing committee policies conform with state law, despite a series of news stories, editorials, and concerns from a state expert highlighting potential problems with the rules.

“It’s unfortunate the city has refused to investigate this issue further when so much uncertainty has been voiced on the matter,” Van Dyke said. “It is our hope that an official opinion from the attorney general’s office will clarify this issue once and for all.”

On June 15, the city council approved an ordinance that made the city’s four, three-member standing committee meetings – Public Works and Utilities, Public Safety, Finance, and Governmental Services – “regular” meetings of the council. The new rule made it legal for a quorum of four or more council members to attend three-member standing committee meetings without being advertised beforehand as special meetings.

Council members Bob Severns, Rick Almberg, Jim Palmer and Beth Munns all voted to approve the ordinance while Jim Campbell and Scott Dudley voted against it. Campbell and Dudley did not support the move mainly because the new rules had been repeatedly called into question by Tim Ford, an open government ombudsman for the Washington State Attorney General’s Office.

Ford has maintained for months that standing committee meetings and regular council meetings are not the same, no matter what a city calls them. If a quorum of council members attends a meeting, it has to be advertised as a “special” public meeting, he said. The city is currently advertising them simply as regular meetings of the council.

Without that distinction, the public will never really know when a quorum of the council is meeting to conduct city business, said Ford, because unlike full meetings, the ordinance does not require council members to attend standing committee meetings.

Votes can only be taken at full meetings, however.

Although considered an expert in both the Open Public Meetings Act and the Public Records Act, Ford’s comments do not carry the same weight as an official opinion from the attorney general’s office. His job is only to provide the public and local governments with information about the state’s open government and transparency rules.

The council’s decision to approve the ordinance despite the state expert’s concerns spurred leaders at the Whidbey News-Times and its ownership group, Sound Publishing, to look into the matter further by consulting Allied Law Group, an Olympia-based firm that specializes in open government rules.

“The council appears to be playing semantic games to dodge notice requirements for ‘special’ council meetings and, in so doing, violating its mandate to conduct the public’s business in an open and transparent manner,” said Sound Publishing Editorial Director Douglas Crist, in a recent letter to the firm.

Bailey said she has asked the attorney general’s office to consider issues in the past and her requests have never been refused. However, while the petitions of legislators do carry weight, she said she had no idea if it would commit to examining this issue as well. She said she planned to submit materials to the attorney general when she travels to Olympia this week.




The Slow Food movement is alive and tasty

By PATRICIA DUFF, South Whidbey Record Arts & Entertainment, Island Life
Jun 25 2010, 2:35 PM · UPDATED

Slow food is the opposite of fast food.

It’s good for you, it doesn’t kill the planet on its way to production and it tastes delicious.

The Slow Food movement brings to mind the famous morality tale in which the slow and steady tortoise ultimately beats the speedy and somewhat villainous hare to the finish. Slow Food advocates, like the well-meaning tortoise, are ever-so-slowly convincing their friends, neighbors and legislators that good, clean and fair-market food is worth fighting for in a world dominated by cheap, unhealthy and somewhat mysterious fast food. Ultimately, slow and clean beats fast and dirty.

The Greenbank Farm will sponsor the first-ever Slow Food Whidbey Island event from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. Sunday, June 27 at the farm.

The Slow Food movement is not just about eating local in-season organic food. It’s also about providing healthier food in schools, helping the poor to be able to buy food that is both affordable and nutritious and giving tax breaks to small family farmers who raise food without polluting their communities in the process.

The Slow Food movement began in Italy in the late 1980s in order to provide an alternative to the encroachment of the fast-food market in Europe.

Its mission is to show people that modern, pre-industrial-style food production methods and manufacture are viable, healthful, preferable alternatives to current food manufacturing and agribusiness practices.

The top item on the current agenda of Slow Food USA is nutritious food in school cafeterias across the country. Slow Food USA seeks to create dramatic and lasting change in the food system. It strives to reconnect Americans with the people, traditions, plants, animals, fertile soils and waters that produce a healthy national diet.

The concept for the Whidbey Island event is to teach what Slow Food means by way of tasting, smelling and seeing locally grown products cooked by island chefs.

“We’d like people to learn to appreciate real food which has been handled more by hands than machines,” said Barbara Graham, Slow Food Whidbey Island chapter chairwoman.

“The message is to show why these Whidbey growers give their crops and animals such care, time and energy to produce high-quality, nutritious products, and why these Whidbey chefs bother to buy a local product from them, instead of cheaper sources trucked in from far and wide,” she added.

The proof is in the pudding, as they say, and a gaggle of Whidbey chefs and growers will be on hand at the event to talk about slow food while everybody eats.

Tables of prepared locally grown foods will be available for guests to eat, while raw products of farmers will also be on display. Chefs and growers will talk to participants about the food and their methods for cooking and growing.

“It’s a rare opportunity to catch these chefs out of their kitchens for a chat,” Graham said.

Chefs at the event will include Scott Fraser of Fraser’s, Joe Scott of the Oystercatcher, Andreas Wurzrainer of Christopher’s, Sieb Jurriaans of Prima Bistro, Kathy Longstreet of Deception Pass Café & Grill and Jan Gunn of Whidbey Pies Café.

The growers involved are Rosehip Farm, Penn Cove Shellfish, 3 Sisters Cattle Company, Willowood Farm and Bell’s Farm.

Vintner Greg Osenbach of Langley’s Whidbey Island Winery will pour the wine and tell his story about growing grapes and making wine on Whidbey for the past 25 years. His wines and other locally-made wines may be purchased by the bottle in the Greenbank Farm Wine Shop, which will provide wine glasses for guests at the event.

The local movement began as a grassroots push to open people’s eyes to the island’s bounty.

Last August, Coupeville Mayor Nancy Conard hosted an informational potluck and meeting for Whidbey residents interested in starting a local Slow Food chapter. A small group of mostly growers, chefs and friends met for several months to discuss a vision for Slow Food on Whidbey. The group became the steering committee which fulfilled Slow Food USA requirements to become a bona-fide chapter.

The event at the Greenbank Farm will be the group’s first event for the new Slow Food Whidbey Island chapter, which seeks new members.

Tickets are $25 per person and include food and wine; adults only, please. Get tickets at the door or at Whidbey Pies Café and Greenbank Farm Wine Shop in Greenbank; the Oystercatcher, Christopher’s or Bayleaf in Coupeville; Solutions Salon in Freeland; or Prima Bistro and Whidbey Island Winery in Langley; or Deception Pass Café & Grill, Fraser’s or Bayleaf in Oak Harbor.

The event will take place in the main barn adjacent to the wine shop during the Sunday farmers market.



UPDATE | Hearing postposed after consultant collapses

By BRIAN KELLY
South Whidbey Record Editor
Apr 30 2010, 4:47 PM

LANGLEY — A public hearing on the controversial Langley Passage housing project was abruptly adjourned Wednesday evening after a consultant collapsed moments after beginning his presentation.

Quin Clements had just started a discussion of drainage issues for the proposed 20-lot project and was fielding questions from the city’s Planning Advisory Board when he suddenly fell to the floor of Fellowship Hall in Langley United Methodist Church.  It was not immediately apparent why Clements collapsed.

The dramatic moment came 90 minutes into the hearing, the third day of testimony for the single-family housing project in the Edgecliff neighborhood.  Clements, an engineer with Davido Consulting Group, had just started a slide show and was taking a pause in his presentation to answer questions from PAB members. He told board members he was having trouble understanding their questions, and then dropped the microphone.

After picking up the microphone and dropping it again, Clements began to stand up and then fell over.  The audience of nearly 30 sat surprised for a half moment, then one woman jumped to her feet and asked “Is there a doctor in the house? Is there a doctor in the house?” as other people in the crowd rushed to Clements’ side.

PAB Member Julie Buktenica pulled out a cell phone and dialed 911 as Clements remained on the floor, motionless.  People nearby said later he hit his head on a table as he collapsed.  Emergency crews arrived just after 5:30 p.m.

PAB Chairman Jim Sundberg announced the meeting would be adjourned and the hearing would continue at the board’s first meeting in May.  Paramedics said Clements was alert and responsive, and he asked not to be taken to the hospital. He said later that he was training for his first marathon and it had taken a toll.

“I think my tank was empty,” he said Friday.

The unexpected early end to the hearing overshadowed the efforts of city staff to explain why they are asking the city council to approve the controversial project.  At the last hearing, on April 14, some residents opposed to the project said it was not in the public interest, and one Langley resident asked the PAB to ignore the advice of city planners and ask the city council to reject the proposal.  In rebuttal testimony Wednesday, Larry Cort, the city’s planning director, said some people were confused about the approval process for the draft layout of the subdivision.

Cort began with a reminder that the review was centered on the preliminary plat.

“In hearing the public testimony, there seemed to be some confusion as to exactly where we are in the subdivision review,” he said.

Noting that some critics had pointed out a lack of detail in the plat proposal, Cort said state law says preliminary plats can simply be “a neat and approximate drawing of a proposed subdivision showing the general layout of streets and alleys, lots and blocks and other elements.”

The development, on 8.5 acres between Edgecliff Drive and Sandy Point Road, is planned by Whidbey Neighborhood Partners. The current plan is for 20 one- and two-story houses built on a private road that connects to Sandy Point Road.  Changes to the preliminary plat are expected before a final layout is approved by the city.

It’s a two-step approval process, Cort explained, and the actual lots in the subdivision will be finalized later.  He said lots are created only in the final plat document that is recorded with the Island County Auditor’s Office.  Cort also said the project would have to clear many hurdles if it is approved, including the regulations on subdivisions and development in Langley’s municipal code.

“Even if it’s not in the conditions of approval, if it’s in the municipal code, they apply. I think there was some confusion about this,” he said.

Likewise, the developer would also have to abide by rules protecting wetlands on the property, he said.

“Every section of the wetland ordinance or critical areas ordinance applies to this application,” he said.

City Engineer Ryan Goodman said there would be restrictions to handle surface-water runoff from the property, a prime concern of neighbors who are worried that runoff from the property will make the bluff along Edgecliff even more unstable.  Goodman said the amount of pavement and other hard surfaces that prevent stormwater from soaking into the earth had been reduced, and he noted other low-impact development techniques would be used to cut down on runoff.

“There will be 21 rain gardens built at buildout to handle every expected rainfall event,” he said.

Representatives for Whidbey Neighborhood Partners, including Gary Roth, managing partner for the development, are expected to testify when the hearing resumes on May 12.



Diking officials accuse Shepard of breaking law, sharing secrets
By BRIAN KELLY, South Whidbey Record Editor
Jan 28 2010, 8:39 AM · UPDATED

A Superior Court judge will decide next week if three is truly a crowd when it comes to official discussion of a remaining lawsuit dogging Diking District 1.

Two commissioners of the district, Steve Arnold and Ray Gabelein, are asking for the third commissioner, John Shepard, to be “disqualified” from any executive sessions or talks with the district’s lawyer as officials continue to battle the lawsuit over the district’s controversial Useless Bay pump project.

A second lawsuit against the district commissioners has been dropped.

The disqualification issue was scheduled to be heard in Island County Superior Court two weeks ago, but was pushed back. Judge Pro Tem Carolyn Cliff reset the hearing for Monday, Feb. 1, when Judge Vickie Churchill was to return to court.

Lawyers for the diking district argued that Churchill should decide the matter, since she has considered previous motions in the dispute.

The diking district board has been split for nearly a year, since Shepard — a leading critic of the pump project — was appointed to the board by county commissioners.

Shepard has continued to fight the pump project since taking a seat on the board, echoing the concerns of some in the diking district that the assessments for the pump have not been levied fairly, and that the pump itself is damaging the environment and wildlife at Useless Bay.

Shepard also has repeatedly accused his fellow commissioners of misdeeds, and has called for their resignations and a state investigation.

In court documents recently submitted in the ongoing lawsuit over the pump project, however, the other diking commissioners accuse Shepard of breaking state law by sharing secrets with Citizens in Support of Useless Bay Community (CSUBC), the group that started the lawsuit to stop the assessments on property owners who are paying for the new $430,000 pump project.

Shepard has shown an “extreme pattern of unauthorized disclosures of confidential information,” Scott Ellerby, the diking district’s attorney, claims in a request to have Shepard removed from legal discussions on the lawsuit.

In papers filed in Island County Superior Court, district officials recounted how one of Shepard’s first moves as diking commissioner in early 2009 was to gain access to all of the district’s records. He then demanded a copy of the file the district’s legal firm had kept on the diking district.

Ellerby noted that a confidential letter from the district’s lawyer that was in the file was later used by those who were suing the diking district.

“The letter had not been released by the district in response to any public record request or other request for documents, and had not been disclosed to any other individual or entity,” Diking Commissioner Steve Arnold said in court documents. “I believe that the most likely source of the inappropriate disclosure was Commissioner Shepard, who has openly disclosed communications from the district’s legal counsel.”

Arnold and Ellerby, the district’s attorney, also noted that Shepard is married to Coyla Shepard, a board member of CSUBC — the group suing the district over the pump assessments — and that the couple had helped pay for the lawsuit.

The diking district lawyer also alleges that Shepard has shared draft minutes of district meetings with Elizabeth Derrig, the attorney in another lawsuit against the district, and Shepard has also shared details on his talks with district officials.

One lawsuit dropped

Derrig, however, said that her clients were dropping their lawsuit.  The suit, filed in late October on behalf of five other property owners, focused on district commissioners Arnold and Gabelein. It also included Island County Treasurer Linda Riffe.  Derrig said dismissal of the suit would allow for a further official state investigation into allegations. State officials had told her earlier that they couldn’t investigate the issue while legal action was pending. Derrig also said the litigation “had become a money pit.”

That lawsuit — which had asked for the removal of Arnold and Gabelein from the three-member board for “breach of duty” — claimed diking commissioners acted illegally when they approved the new drainage pump and tried to collect money from property owners to pay for the project.  Meanwhile, Ellerby pointed out that state law prohibits diking commissioners — and other municipal officers — from disclosing confidential information they learn while in their positions.

“Commissioner Shepard’s conduct, and his indisputable conflict of interest, have violated his statutory duty of confidentiality to the district and placed the district and its legal counsel in an intolerable situation,” Ellerby said in a motion filed with the court to have Shepard “disqualified” from any involvement or talk of the lawsuits.

“The district and its legal counsel cannot exchange candid attorney-client communications because of the threat of unauthorized disclosure,” Ellerby said, adding that diking commissioners could also not talk in executive session without the threat that Shepard would tell others about what was said.

Early e-mails cited

As part of the motion to have Shepard removed from any participation in the district’s defense against the lawsuits, district officials included e-mails sent by Shepard and his wife to property owners in the diking district, asking for help with legal action to have the sitting commissioners removed from office.

One e-mail from the couple, dated Oct. 13, 2008, recalled a meeting of residents opposed to the diking district’s leadership and talk of hiring Derrig at an hourly rate of $180.  Shepard declined to discuss the details of the latest court action, except to say that it may not have been filed properly, since the decision to do so was not made at a public meeting.

He also said he was served notice of the latest court action in late afternoon on Christmas Eve, and that he had to scramble to find an attorney to represent him, at his own expense, and to file the required response.

“I don’t think that’s fair,” he said.

Shepard said he would have been happy to excuse himself from discussions about the lawsuits.

“I’ve been more than willing to grant them what they want,” he said. “If I were there, they could accuse me of leaking information to the other side. I certainly don’t want that.”

A long-running dispute

The controversy in Diking District 1 began in 2008 after diking commissioners ordered a new pump to handle stormwater in the district, which spans 743 acres and includes the neighborhoods of Sunlight Beach, Olympic View and Sun Vista and Useless Bay Golf & Country Club.

The $430,000 pump was installed a year ago, but only those property owners who were expected to benefit from the project — the owners of roughly 460 acres — received special assessments to pay for it.  In a declaration filed in response to the attempt to remove him from participation in district officials’ discussions of the lawsuits, Shepard disputed Arnold’s claim that the new commissioner shared sensitive information with critics of the board.

“I am mindful of my obligations as a commissioner and I take them seriously,” he said in the Jan. 8 declaration.

“I would not intentionally disclose confidential information or otherwise protected information about this litigation or anything else,” he said, adding that he disagreed with his fellow commissioners and sided with those who were suing the diking district.

Shepard acknowledged asking to see all of the diking district’s records, but also said he was concerned that the district’s files in Freeland “may have been compromised and were incomplete.” Shepard also said he was “reluctant” to review the records at the Freeland office because the diking district had accused Derrig, the attorney who filed the most recent lawsuit against district officials, of improperly gaining access to diking district documents in November 2008 and filed a complaint against her with the Washington State Bar Association.

Though Shepard denied giving any diking district documents to the law firm of Rowley & Klauser, he did acknowledge releasing records from 2008 that he thought were not confidential.  He also recounted a visit to diking district offices he made with his wife and Derrig to review records and make copies of district documents.

Shepard’s declaration also offers an echo of his earlier claims about diking officials acting in secrecy. Shepard said he brought his own tape recorder to the Dec. 3 meeting of the district, but Arnold asked him and anyone else in the room with a recorder to shut it off.

Shepard said Arnold maintained the diking board must approve any recordings of its meetings, and that Arnold tried to adjourn the meeting when Shepard refused to shut off his recorder.




Other recent events at bridge...
Oak Harbor sailor jumps from Deception Pass Bridge, body recovered
By JENNY MANNING, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Dec 30 2009, 4:21 PM · UPDATED

The 32-year-old Oak Harbor man who jumped from the Deception Pass bridge Tuesday has been identified by the Island County Coroner's office as Gary Matthew Wood, an active duty sailor with the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station.

Wood's body was recovered near Pass Island under the south span of Deception Pass bridge shortly before 1 p.m. Tuesday by the Deception Pass Park boat.

"It's being investigated as a suicide," said Island County Coroner Robert Bishop.

Police found evidence in Wood's car, parked in the lot near the bridge, that indicates Wood intentionally leapt from the bridge.

The family has be notified, Bishop said.

There were apparently no eyewitnesses; however, at least four people, including three adults and one youth, reported hearing the body make contact with the water around 12:30 p.m.

The sound was described as a loud crack, "similar to a gun shot."

The Deception Pass Park boat, a Marine Services vessel and a private boat of divers took part in the recovery. The park boat, manned by Deception Pass Park Ranger Jack Hartt and park maintenance and construction employee Mark Lunz, found the man's body and transported it to Cornet Bay.

This incident marks the fourth suicide at the Deception Pass bridge this year.




Public reacts, county delays
Whidbey News-Times (State of Washington - Whidbey Island like Weston, in many ways...)
Jesse Stensland
Dec 08 2009, 3:13 PM

The Island County commissioners put off making any decisions on $630,000 in budget cuts for a week after listening to comments from about half of the 70 people who crowded into a meeting Monday morning.  Following two hours of speeches, Budget Director Elaine Marlow requested that the commissioners table the issue until Monday, Dec. 14 because of unresolved labor negotiations. The commissioners agreed.

It’s unclear whether the verbal showdown will make any difference in the final budget. In brief comments, the commissioners, all Democrats, defended their positions and thanked the audience for participating.

“When 57.5 percent of the current expense fund goes to law and justice, that is our priority,” Commissioner Angie Homola said.

Last week, the chairman of the Island County Republican Party issued a “call to action” urging residents to attend the meeting and protest the budget cuts in the sheriff’s and prosecutor’s offices. It was apparently successful, as more than half of the folks who spoke urged — or in some cases, demanded — that the three Democratic commissioners preserve law-and-justice funding.

“I implore you to find a different way to make budget cuts...” said Sandi Peterson, state committeewoman for the county Republican party. “We cannot afford to fund goodies right now.”

“Government’s priority at all levels should be the safety and security of its citizens,” Anita Dragoo of Coupeville said.

On the other hand, a number of folks said they supported the commissioners’ decision to preserve some funding to the non-mandated programs, like WSU Extension and senior services.

“I appreciate your commitment to balancing severe budget cutting with maintaining what makes life worth living here in Island County,” said Coupeville resident Eve Parrish.

Prosecutor Greg Banks, a Democrat, was the only elected official to speak Monday. He continued to protest the proposal to cut his department by 4.5 percent, which would mean the loss of a deputy prosecutor.  While the commissioners previously heard from a room full of Extension volunteers, Banks said he wished the board could also hear from crime victims so they could understand how important prosecutors’ jobs are.

“I’m struck by all the people who came out and really do understand what we do,” Banks said about the other speakers.

The proposed cuts would leave Banks with fewer deputy prosecutors than he had when he took office in 1999. At the same time, his office deals with 40 percent more misdemeanors and 43 percent more felonies.  A number of people involved with the Impaired Driving Impact Panel also protested the commissioners’ plan to cut $2,400 of the $3,600 the group receives from the county.

In addition, speakers sparred about tax increases. A half dozen people said they would gladly pay more in taxes to support county services. Langley resident Dean Enell said the county has a “flawed business model” and should consider adopting impact fees on residential development, which stretch county services and cost current taxpayers more.

“Every county and every city around here has impact fees,” he said.

But a handful of speakers said they couldn’t afford to pay more because of the sour economy.

The county’s 2010 current expense fund was facing a $1.2 million deficit due to declining tax and interest revenues and increasing health care costs for employees. The commissioners halved the deficit by using $200,000 in reserve funds, changing to an accounting method that reimburses the general fund at a high level, and transferring an additional $100,000 in road funds to the sheriff’s office.

That left about $630,000 to cut from county departments. The cuts come after two other rounds of budget reduction in the last year. In all, the commissioners will have cut $5.2 million from the current expense budget, which will be at $21.6 million next year.

Marlow explained that 67 full-time-equivalent job will have been lost, from 2008 to 2010, in layoffs and reductions in hours. That’s 13 percent of the workforce.  County funding for WSU Extension was cut in half over the last year.

In this round of proposed reductions, a number of departments received 4 percent cuts. The prosecutor, Superior Court and public defense were cut by 4.5 percent. The sheriff faces a 5 percent reduction. The contracted animal control officers and the animal shelters run by Whidbey Animals’ Improvement Foundation were cut by 10 percent. Senior services was cut by 12 percent.

About seven part-time and full-time employees will be laid off in the current round of cuts. Island County Sheriff Mark Brown wanted to avoid laying off any more deputies, so he plans to eliminate the current director of emergency management and a records clerk. Earlier in the year, Brown eliminated three deputies.

In addition to a balanced budget, the commissioners also have to adopt next year’s current expense, county road and conservations futures levies.

The commissioners are considering increasing the current expense levy by 1 percent and using $67,000 in banked capacity. That’s a levy increase that past commissioners didn’t adopt, but they banked so it could be used in a financial emergency.

They are also looking at increasing the road levy by 1 percent and the $270,000 banked capacity.

So far, the commissioners are divided on whether to reduce the conservation future levy or increase it by 1 percent, which would require a finding of substantial need.

The commissioners must adopt the budget and the levy ordinances by the end of the year.




Island County Sheriff fights proposed 4.5 percent budget cut
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Nov 18 2009, 2:05 PM

Island County Sheriff Mark Brown is continuing his fight to minimize budget cuts in his office by taking his message to the people.

Brown's letter to the citizens of Island County, released Wednesday afternoon, protests the county commissioners' preliminary decision to reduce the funding to all law and justice agencies by 4.5 percent to fill the $1.2 million hole in the 2010 budget. For the sheriff's office, that would translate to a $188,500 reduction.

"The Board of County Commissioners cut law and justice the deepest while sparing non-mandated functions of government who rely upon our county to fund just a fraction of their budget," Brown wrote.

In a statement to the Whidbey News-Times, Island County Prosecutor Greg Banks also decried the commissioners' apparent decision to cut law-and-justice departments instead of the so-called non-mandated services.

"The board has clearly expressed its preference for using taxes to fund non-governmental functions over those that can only be performed by government," Banks wrote.

Banks and Brown were among the five elected officials who presented the commissioners with a letter demanding that they take certain actions to balance the budget, including cutting all non-mandated services first. That would include parks, WSU extension and Senior Services of Island County.  The commissioners apparently didn't follow the advice.

"I am convinced that our county commissioners have been unable to realize what our citizens and my employees already know; law and justice is the most essential functions of government which is mandated by law and should not be competing for funding with non-mandated entities or organizations," the sheriff wrote.

In addition, the Island County Patrol Deputy Guild also sent an open letter to the commissioners with essentially the same message.

"We know that this is not easy for the non-governmental groups and the holders of the private contracts. The bottom line is we need to get back to the basics and provide the core services that are required by law," wrote Darren Crownover, guild president.




Legislators share bleak outlook on state budget
By LIZ BURLINGAME, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Nov 13 2009, 2:27 PM

Tenth District state legislators gave a no-nonsense talk on the economy Friday in Coupeville, addressing issues from stimulus projects to small-scale farms.  They were candid about the tough decisions and cuts ahead as the state faces another big budget deficit.  State Rep. Barbara Bailey criticized the state’s spending, and said she can’t see a solution on the horizon to take care of the deficit.

“You see a lot of things the budget could do and a lot of things it didn’t do,” she said. “We have robbed the pension system, to where we owe the system $8 billion. This will fall heavy on local government and school districts.”

The crowd at the Coupeville Rec Hall quietly listened as Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen and Rep. Norma Smith gave similar accounts.

“It’s a tough time for elected officials because the economy isn’t turning around as fast as we hoped,” Haugen said.

Gov. Chris Gregoire will make painful cuts across the board, Haugen said, in areas such as state payroll and programs that aren’t deemed very effective.

“It’s better to cut it completely than to bleed it to death,” Haugen said.

She added that legislators are taking furloughs and that there are 10,000 fewer state employees this year.  As for small farmers, the legislators each spoke of policies they supported to help their business. Several heads nodded in approval as Bailey spoke of a new proposal to hold regulatory agencies more accountable.

“There’s a proposal for a 90-day process. If there is no resolution from an agency in 90 days, you win,” Bailey said.

In the next 60-day session starting in January, Haugen says her goal is to make sure there is no harm done to education.  Meanwhile, Bailey, who works with the Tourism Commission, is working to ensure that budget stays whole.

“This is not the time to draw back on tourism investment because of the 2010 Olympics,” she said.

Smith’s focus is to put legislation together to help small business and create more jobs.



Elected officials make budget demands
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Today, 9:59 AM · UPDATED

Six elected Island County officials signed onto a stinging open letter to the county commissioners, demanding that they take certain steps before making cuts in their departments to plug the $1.2 million shortfall in the 2010 general fund budget.  The letter insists that the commissioners cut funding for all non-mandated programs, which would include the WSU Extension Service and parks; renegotiate a large increase in the public defense contract; dip into reserve funds; and work with the unions to gain concessions.

“We are convinced, both individually and collectively, that further cuts in essential county functions will guarantee our inability to lawfully carry out our essential duties,” the letter states. “We do not believe it is an overstatement to say we are on the verge of collapse.”

Island County Sheriff Mark Brown read the letter aloud to the three commissioners during a budget session Wednesday afternoon. The commissioners appeared surprised and even hurt by the words, but had few words in response to the officials who attended the meeting.

“That helps,” Commissioner John Dean said, noting the number of elected officials who signed the letter.

Prosecutor Greg Banks, who wrote much of the letter, said he and the other officials decided to take dramatic action after a meeting about the budget deficit last Wednesday. Budget Director Elaine Marlow handed out sheets showing an 8 percent reduction in all departments, which she said was a starting point for discussions.

“We really all just came together and said this process is falling apart,” Banks said.

In an odd replay of last year’s budget process, Banks complained that elected officials and department heads didn’t learn about the problem until after their budget sessions with commissioners. He said he was told at a September meeting that his request to hold his budget at the current level was “appropriate.”

Now, the commissioners are rushed to come up with a draft of a balanced budget on Monday to meet the statutory deadline. Commissioner Helen Price Johnson complained Wednesday that she hasn’t had a chance to look at the numbers. The commissioners must approve the final budget by the end of the year.

In an interview Thursday, Marlow said she didn’t raise an alarm earlier because she hoped that the county could save about $736,000 a year by changing the county’s medical insurance, but that fell through when an agreement couldn’t be reached with the unions.  The commissioners did, however, decide to put non-represented employees on the less-expensive plan, saving about $180,000 a year.

In the letter, the officials made it clear that their departments cannot handle any more significant cuts after weathering $4 million in reductions over the last year. The recession led to a dramatic drop in revenues from sales tax, new construction, fees for service and investment interest; the revenue problem will likely continue through next year.

Brown, Banks, Assessor Dave Mattens, Auditor Sheilah Crider, Clerk Sharon Franzen and Treasurer Linda Riffe are all signatories. The letter doesn’t appear to be a partisan move. All three commissioners and four of the officials who signed the letter are Democrats.

The letter lays out four steps that the officials exhort the commissioners to take before turning to their departments for budget cuts. It states that the commissioners suspend all funding for non-mandated programs, which are those not required by state law. They include parks, the WSU Extension Service, senior services, animal shelters and an impaired driving prevention program.

The elected officials wrote that such cuts are “both inevitable and overdue.”

“Though important, these programs are not essential functions of county government, and therefore cannot compete for county funds in the current climate,” the letter states.

According to Marlow, cutting all those programs would save the county about $740,000 a year.  Next, the letter states that the commissioners should renegotiate or suspend all contracts with private entities providing services to the county.

“We have been stunned at the ease with which the board has increased outlays to private contractors while tightening the budget stranglehold on our departments,” the letter states.

The letter cites the nearly $200,000 increase in the public defense contract as one example. Banks said hiring former Planning Director Jeff Tate to do long-range planning at $150 an hour is another example of spending that wasn’t absolutely necessary; Commissioner Angie Homola voted against both the defense contract and the contract with Tate.

The third step the letter urges is for commissioners to use a portion of the fund balance. The county has a 10 percent contingency fund of $2.2 million, plus nearly $900,000 in extra cash that will be left over at the end of the year.

“It appears that there is a total of approximately $3 million in cash that the county may use to cover emergencies and still have sufficient cash to cover monthly expenditures. This is an emergency,” the officials wrote.

Lastly, the officials urged the commissioners to send a letter to the unions asking for their help in crafting a solution, stressing that a lack of cooperation would ensure the maximum number of layoffs. The elected officials wrote that the commissioners would gain credibility with the unions if they first made the other cuts, the open letter urges.

The issue of union concessions came up at a meeting last week when Human Resource Director Larry Larson complained that the labor leadership has been unwilling to discuss a proposal to move to a health insurance plan that would decrease the county’s costs.

Deputy Darren Crownover, president of the Island County patrol deputy guild, said he agrees with the letter the elected officials presented to the commissioners. He said his members wouldn’t agree to make major concessions unless county leaders first make the cuts, or make progress toward the cuts, that are outlined in the letter.  Crownover said he would be hard pressed to justify a concession after the commissioners adopted the large increase in the contract with the firm providing public defense. The commissioners approved an increase from $380,000 to more than $560,000 a year for attorney Tom Pacher’s firm.

“Where did that money come from?” Crownover asked.



Commissioner silent after conflict-of-interest claim
By ROY JACOBSON
South Whidbey Record Reporter
Oct 27 2009, 3:28 PM · UPDATED

Concerned about the appearance of a conflict of interest, Island County Commissioner Helen Price Johnson has decided to go mum about the raging dispute in Diking District 1.

The reason? Her family’s construction company is building a house for one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed this month against the diking district and the county. Diking district commissioners pointed to the project as a conflict of interest for the South End commissioner after she sided with the district’s critics just before the lawsuit was filed.  Price Johnson said there is no conflict.

“Though I do not see any actual conflict of interest,” she said in a statement released late Friday, “I believe it would be prudent to avoid even the appearance of a conflict, and to exercise an abundance of caution.”

Price Johnson said she would no longer comment on or make decisions concerning the diking district while the lawsuit is pending.  The commissioner said Monday that she reached her decision after reviewing documents and consulting with Island County Prosecuting Attorney Greg Banks.

“It’s better to excuse myself,” she said.

The development came after Price Johnson had fired off a letter to diking commissioners earlier this month, all but telling them to get their house in order.  Meanwhile, diking commissioner John Shepard ramped up his campaign against fellow commissioners Steve Arnold and Ray Gabelein.  In e-mails to the state Attorney General’s Office, Shepard accused Arnold and Gabelein of “self dealing and misuse of public funds” and called for an investigation into their “corruption.”

Arnold and Gabelein continue to deny Shepard’s long-simmering accusations, and maintain Shepard, recently named to the board of commissioners, doesn’t fully understand the workings of the district.  Those are the latest wrinkles in the contentious saga of the drainage district surrounding Deer Lagoon. The dispute was ignited by the installation late last year of a new pump to handle increased stormwater runoff.

Some residents of the district contend assessments for the $430,000 pump project are inequitable, and that the project was pushed through by the diking commissioners, the county and Useless Bay Golf & Country Club without proper notification to residents.  The subject of a possible conflict of interest regarding Price Johnson was raised in an Oct. 21 letter to her signed by Arnold, chairman of the diking commission.

Arnold was responding to Price Johnson’s own pointed letter to the diking commissioners dated Oct. 5.  Reacting to a river of complaints from disgruntled diking district residents, Price Johnson scolded the commissioners to work with state agencies and the Army Corps of Engineers to determine the correct water level for the wetlands.

“The actions of your commission have promoted unnecessary removal of surface water,” Price Johnson wrote. “It is in the public interest that better protection be afforded this precious resource.”

“It is essential that all of us strive to be good stewards of the land,” she added.

In his reply, an irritated Arnold said the diking district was following state and federal permit requirements to the letter in regard to the pumping of water.  He also questioned Price Johnson’s authority to intervene in the business of the diking district, a separate governmental entity, and demanded that she produce proof that the district is mishandling management of the wetlands, and that improprieties have occurred.  Arnold also brought up the issue of a conflict of interest, noting the county commissioner’s family firm, Price Johnson Construction, is the contractor for Robert and Judith Windquist’s house at Sunlight Beach.

Judith Windquist is listed as a plaintiff in the lawsuit filed Oct. 9 in Island County Superior Court by Citizens In Support of Useless Bay Community (CSUBC), a group of property owners within the diking district. Windquist is a director of CSUBC.  The suit demands, among other things, that collection of assessments for the pump be halted until the questions raised in the lawsuit are resolved.

As for Shepard’s latest salvo: In correspondence with Timothy Ford, assistant state attorney general for government accountability, he requested that Ford look into a conservation easement Gabelein negotiated with the nonprofit Whidbey Camano Land Trust.  Late last year, Gabelein and his family turned over 54 acres of farm land next to Dear Lagoon to the land trust, safeguarding it from future development.

Shepard also wrote Ford that diking commissioners have violated state election laws by failing to maintain correct assessment rolls and by inadequate notification to voters.  Gabelein and Arnold have for months challenged Shepard to prove his allegations.

Since he joined the board this year, Shepard and CSUBC have relentlessly pushed for ways to discredit Gabelein and Arnold, digging through past election records and other district documents that involve the county and the country club.  Shepard’s wife, Coyla, is a director of CSUBC.

In his letter to Price Johnson, Arnold rebutted point by point the contention that the district was mishandling the wetlands. And he noted that the Shepards and several other members of CSUBC are relative newcomers to the district and not familiar with its history.

“We have gone above and beyond researching the wetland area, learning its history, the nature of the flooded areas and the best and most effective ways of preventing flooding while preserving eco-wetland and water habitat,” Arnold wrote.

Arnold and Gabelein say the new pump is necessary during peak storm periods because of increased runoff caused by recent development and a swelling population in the area.  But Arnold said in his letter to Price Johnson that the water level in the ditch is the same now as it was before the pump was installed, and that the new pump itself hasn’t been turned on since March.

“We have openly and honestly looked at all avenues that would best serve Diking District 1,” Arnold wrote.




"About Town" visited Bayview in 2005.  At the right, the public restroom that is a CLIVUS-MULTRUM system - Bisceglie Park in Weston has one!

Thousands check out new grocery in Bayview
By ROY JACOBSON, South Whidbey Record Reporter
Sep 18 2009, 4:56 PM · UPDATED

South Whidbey’s newest grocery store took wing on Wednesday, drawing a huge flock of curious shoppers whose cars at times filled the parking lot and beyond.

“I’m glad we got here early,” said Sally Berry of nearby Sunlight Beach. She and her partner Klaas Zuiderbaan were the first into The Goose Community Grocer when it opened at 7 a.m.

They pulled their Subaru Outback into the empty Bayview Center parking lot at 6:45. An hour later there were more than 30 vehicles out front.  By afternoon, the store’s 158 parking spaces were full, and people were parking wherever they could find a spot nearby.  By 5 p.m., the store had so many visitors, the isles were clogged with shoppers and there was a grocery cart traffic jam at the checkout stands. A few shoppers appeared tired of waiting and left their carts in a corner without checking out.

“I couldn’t sleep all night, I was so excited,” Berry said. “It isn’t often something like this happens on South Whidbey — a brand-new grocery store.”

Berry and Zuiderbaan spent an hour or so checking out The Goose, owned by the nonprofit Goosefoot and operated by the Myers Group, a local family business.  They picked up mostly odds and ends — cereal, sweetener, bread, vinegar — and Belgian endive.

“We bought a lot of vegetables and fruit,” Berry said. “They were gorgeous.”

She said it appeared that prices were comparable to other stores on the South End, and in some cases lower.  The pair spent about $50, she said, adding: “It doesn’t take much to get to $50 these days.”

Berry’s favorite part of the store was the small café seating area, the deli and the gourmet meat counter. She also liked the fresh bakery counter.  Her least favorite part was the concrete floor, which had been stripped and sealed as a cost-saving measure during the renovation of the former Red Apple store.

“That shocked me a little, because I thought it was going to be real fancy,” Berry said. “But it doesn’t hurt anything, and it’s probably easier to maintain.”

“I guess I appreciate that they didn’t spend a whole bunch on the floor,” she added upon reflection. “It saves the customers money.”

It saved about $20,000, Goosefoot executive director Chris Hurley said of the floor, adding: “We just sealed it and called it a beautiful thing.”

Store manager Larry Hooker greeted Berry and Zuiderbaan at the door.

“We’re very excited,” Hooker said. “It’s been a long time coming.”

Shortly after, four women in whimsical hats shouted and waved as they headed for the entrance.

“I think there’s a little community excitement about this,” Hooker said. “We’re going to have a good time.”

Hurley said the store did about 2,000 transactions in its first 15 hours of operation, which she said translated into at least 4,000 customers.

“People didn’t come alone, and they were shopping, not just looking,” Hurley said.

“It was a great day.”

“The customers were courteous and happy, and the staff showed grace under pressure,” she added.

Goosefoot was formed in 1999 as a community organization to preserve the rural character of Bayview and enhance local commerce.  Its focus is restoration, low-impact development and community lending, and providing community gathering places, such as the Bayview Farmers Market.  Goosefoot purchased Bayview Center, then anchored by Casey’s Red Apple Market, in 2005.  The market got its start as Sebo’s Thriftway in 1974, but was purchased by the Myers Group four years later and renamed Casey’s.

In 1999, it was sold by Myers to Jim Springer, who also owns the Red Apple grocery at Ken’s Korner, and it was renamed Casey’s Red Apple.  Goosefoot bought Bayview Center in 2005, and for the past four years, Springer had been leasing the building until he consolidated his two stores at Ken’s Korner.  In 2007, Goosefoot began discussions on the concept of developing a community grocery with Tyler Myers of the Myers Group, which owns four grocery stores in the region and a number of small businesses.

The idea was to come up with a market reflecting Goosefoot’s philosophy. When the building his family once owned became available again, Myers agreed to oversee its operation.  Hurley said Goosefoot’s focus in renovating the 21,000-square-foot building was on reuse, recycling and energy efficiency.  All of the shelving, display cases and refrigeration equipment have been salvaged.  Hurley said all advertising will be electronic, to save printing costs, and there’s a digital bulletin board in the café seating area.

There are 253 items in an entire row of bulk bins, and Goosefoot is working with local farmers to bring in their goods, Hurley said. For the opening, The Goose managed to acquire two acres worth of locally grown corn on the cob.

“We’re trying to bring that local feeling,” Hurley said.

The store employs 35 full- and part-time people, all but one from the local area, Hurley said.  Berry and Zuiderbaan are thrilled that there’s a grocery again near their house. Berry has owned property a mile and a half away since 1943.

“We missed this store,” Zuiderbaan said.

“We go to the grocery store practically every other day,” Berry said.

“This sure beats going those extra miles.”

The Goose is open every day from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. For information, visit www.goosegrocer.com.



For what it is worth, "About Town" blames the Treasurer (who is virtually absent from his post) and the Board of the Parks District - maybe in Washington State's Island County, (home of Internet-only voting only) paypal is the as good as government! 
UPDATED | Parks’ credit card contract called illegal
By JEFF VANDERFORD, South Whidbey Record Sports, Port of S. Whidbey
Sep 05 2009, 8:00 AM

South Whidbey parks director Terri Arnold likely violated multiple state laws when she set up a new credit-card payment system for the parks district without approval, Island County Treasurer Linda Riffe said Wednesday.  Arnold signed a contract for Merchant Choice Payment Solutions to handle the parks district’s credit card services on July 10.

Riffe said the parks district then gave sensitive data — the county treasurer’s bank routing number and other account information — to Merchant Choice. The illegal move, she said, compromised the treasurer’s bank account and put public money at risk.  Riffe has contacted the Washington State Auditor’s Office to warn officials of the problem. She also shut down the account, which is also used by 24 other taxing districts in Island County beyond the South Whidbey Parks & Recreation District.

County officials discovered the problem when unauthorized charges started appearing on the county’s account with Whidbey Island Bank.  At a special parks board meeting Wednesday, Riffe appeared with her two assistants to address the board directly.  Parks Commissioner Jim Porter said it was obvious there had been violations.  But he also said officials in the treasurer’s office should have said something sooner, when Peggy Hockett, office manager for the parks district, called the county to get its account number.

“When Peggy first asked for the account number, that should have raised a red flag, and the staff person might have said, ‘You can’t do that,’” Porter said.

Ana Maria Nunez, Riffe’s assistant, said that the day Hockett first called, she asked for the bank account but did not say what it was for.

“If I’d known then, I would not have let it go by,” Nunez said. “I am sorry it has come to this.”

Arnold ended the discussion by saying she didn’t blame anyone for what happened, but did not accept responsibility for any action by parks staff.

“We’re all very sorry this happened,” Arnold said.

E-mails and other public records obtained by the Record, however, show there was little time for the county to stop parks district officials at the time of the Hockett phone call. The contract was signed the same day.  Public records also show increasingly acrimonious contacts between the parks district and the county after the trouble was found.  Arnold tried to shift blame for the problem when it was discovered by county officials on Aug. 21.

In an e-mail to Riffe on Aug. 27, Arnold said the treasurer’s office should have alerted junior taxing districts, such as the parks district, of the process used by the treasurer’s office when accepting credit-card systems.  Arnold closed by writing: “This experience has made me very sad and disappointed in our local government partner.”

The e-mail brought a pointed response.  Riffe, in her reply said Arnold should know the laws that govern the operations of park districts.

“Even without knowing the statutes, you are not a signator on the [county] treasurer’s bank account and had no authority to give the bank routing and account number out. Even without knowing the statutes, you should have known that.

“We have an excellent working relationship with all of our junior taxing districts, and they often call us with questions or request assistance, which we are happy to provide,” Riffe added.

“I am sorry that did not happen in this instance and that you chose a path of yelling at me on the telephone and blaming others rather than accepting responsibility and moving on toward correcting the problem.”

Riffe also recounted what she was told by the Washington State Auditor’s Office. She listed the state laws that had been broken:

“Giving out an account number that was not yours to give; allowing, through contract, debits to the treasurer’s account; allowing PayPal to be a credit card vendor, which is not sanctioned by state government; signing a contract with a company that uses an out-of-state bank for processing.”

Riffe notified parks commissioners of the problem on Aug. 26, taking the unusual step of sending a letter to the home of each parks commissioner, as well as to the district office.  Parks officials said they decided to pick a new credit- card company for a good reason: to save money.  Hockett, the district’s office manager, was searching for ways to save money and zeroed in on the 3- to 4-percent fee charged by credit-card companies for people who signed up for one of the many programs the district offers.  In June, she was approached by a saleswoman from Merchant’s Choice Payment Solutions in Coupeville with an offer to provide services at a lower fee than currently available from Whidbey Island Bank.

“I did not know that I was doing something wrong,” Hockett said. “When Tony at the treasurer’s office asked me, I faxed the letter of acceptance with Merchant’s Choice and e-mailed all transactions since we opened the account. There was no conversation about switching, which I believed then was OK.”

Riffe, however, said such a move takes more than talk.

“Remember, all public monies flow through the county treasurer,” Riffe said. “It is my paramount responsibility to strictly adhere to statutory requirements. No one has the authority to change banks without my express authorization.”

“The system we have in place at the county level is needed to prove oversight of the various districts,” Riffe noted. “Someone has to maintain checks and balances over public money, and that’s me. I’m the gatekeeper.”

Riffe said that nothing like this has ever happened before during her eight years in office.

“We have good relationships with our districts and do all we can to keep them out of trouble,” Riffe said. “But the parks director never called me — she’s been around long enough to understand basic procedures — and apparently did not even tell her board of directors they were doing this.”

Arnold did not seek the park board’s approval on the contract with Merchant Choice.  Parks board member Matt Simms, who serves as treasurer, did not attend Wednesday’s meeting. Simms has missed every regular park meeting since March, though he attended a special meeting in June.  Arnold said Thursday the board has previously given her permission to sign vouchers and construction documents on park improvement projects.

“I believed, at the time, that I had the authority to sign the contract and neglected to read all the statutes involved,” Arnold said.

She also acknowledged her role in the problem.

“I guess, when you strip it all away, it’s laid at my feet,” Arnold said.

After the county’s account was compromised, officials began working with Whidbey Island Bank to set up a new one. New deposit books and stamps must also be printed, and a temporary account has been set up for deposits before the new books are printed.  The process of getting a new account established will cost $1,800. The bill for roughly $1,200 of that amount will be sent to the parks district.  Arnold said she and Hockett plan to meet with Riffe to discuss finding better ways to streamline the district’s financial operations.

“Legally,” Arnold noted.

Listed below are the 24 taxing districts in Island County whose deposit accounts were closed by Island County Treasurer Linda Riffe when the parks district provided their deposit account number to a third party:

Admiral's Cove Water District, Bayview Beach Water District, Camano Annex, Camano Vista Water District, Cemetary District 1, Clinton Water District, Crocket Lake Water District, Fire District 1, Fire District 2, Freeland Water District, Holmes Harbor Sewer District, Island County Fair, Juniper Beach Water District, Lagoon Point Water District, Ledgewood Water District, Mainstreet Sewer District, Penn Cove Water/Sewer District, Port of Coupeville, Port of South Whidbey, Rhodena Beach Water District, Saratoga Water District, Scatchet Head Water District, South Whidbey School District and South Whidbey Parks & Recreation.





Ecoterrorists suspected in towers' destruction
KRKO radio towers toppled; group claims responsibility
By Debra Smith, Jackson Holtz and Andy Rathbun, Herald Writers
Published: Saturday, September 5, 2009

SNOHOMISH — A ringing phone jolted Andy Skotdal awake early Friday morning.  His father was scheduled for bypass surgery and for a moment the radio station manager thought the worst.  It turned out to be bad news of a different sort.  Around 3:30 a.m., someone toppled two radio towers owned by his family's Everett radio station, KRKO 1380-AM.

“When I heard it wasn't him, I was thrilled,” Skotdal said. “Now we're concentrating on putting the pieces back together.”

That won't happen quickly.  Federal agents still are investigating, but it appears someone stole an excavator on the site and used the massive earth mover to knock down the towers, located along Short School Road south of Snohomish.  Within hours, a group that engages in ecoterrorism laid claim to the act.  The damage could be in millions of dollars and it will likely take several months to fix, Skotdal said. Meanwhile, the 50,000-watt AM sports station will continue to broadcast using a backup transmitter site.

The toppled towers were among four built last summer in the Snohomish River valley. Located adjacent to farmland and homes, they have drawn controversy for years. Many neighbors, concerned about potential health effects and aesthetics, tried to stop the project in court but lost. The towers knocked down Friday have been in use since July 2008.

“It has been a long legal battle and I'm upset to see this kind of violence happen here,” said Lee Bennett Jr., president of Citizens to Preserve the Upper Snohomish River Valley. “This is not the way to handle it.”

Two more broadcast towers were expected to be built by the end of this year, bringing the total to six. The new towers have been planned as 200-foot tall AM structures capable of transmitting a new signal. Friday's damage will only serve to speed up the project, Skotdal said.  Friday morning, the toppled towers looked like a toddler pummeled a gigantic Erector Set. The claw of the track hoe excavator was still tangled in the steel of one of the towers. About 50 yards away, a cloth banner hung on a fence with a spray-painted message: “Wassup? Sno Cty? ELF.”

The sign also featured a hand-drawn heart and appeared to include the message: “P.S. Skotdal Abandon This...”

ELF is the acronym for the Earth Liberation Front.  What did Skotdal think of the message?

“Other than the fact they don't know how to spell?” he said.

Skotdal said he is offering a $25,000 reward and is confident those responsible will be caught.

“We're going to find these people and we'll use our airwaves to do it too,” he said.

A neighbor called 911 early Friday morning to report that someone appeared to be using heavy equipment to knock the radio towers over, Snohomish County sheriff's spokeswoman Rebecca Hover said.  Deputies arrived to find a 349-foot tower and a 200-foot tower toppled. A police dog was used without success to try to track those responsible, Hover said.

The deputies “found some other evidence at the scene,” she said. “That's something that only the suspect or suspects would have information about.”

The FBI is taking the lead in the investigation.

“We certainly have reason to at least consider ELF a suspect in the incident,” FBI spokesman Marty Prewett said.

ELF itself has provided reasons for scrutiny in the case, Prewett said. Intentionally interrupting communications can be prosecuted under federal laws.  The Web site of the North American Earth Liberation Front posted a story about the radio towers' toppling.

“We have every indication to believe that it is in fact a legitimate ELF action,” said Jason Crawford, a spokesman for the ELF press office in Washington, D.C.

Crawford said he didn't know who was responsible, nor had he heard directly from those claiming responsibility. Still, the action had the trademarks of his group, he said.

“When all other legal channels of opposition have been exhausted, concerned citizens have to take action into their own hands to protect life and the planet,” Crawford said.

Ecoterrorists have a history of targeting property in Snohomish County. They are blamed for the multimillion-dollar fire that destroyed the Street of Dreams development near Echo Lake in 2008.  It doesn't matter if the people responsible for the radio tower vandalism were directly linked to ELF, said Gary Perlstein, a professor emeritus at Portland State University who has studied the domestic terrorism group.

“If it goes along with their philosophy, then they will claim responsibility,” Perlstein said.

Friday's action appears to be consistent with ELF's effort to curb urban sprawl, he said. Like other ELF acts, it appears well executed and likely was coordinated weeks in advance, Perlstein said.

“These are not spontaneous acts,” he said. “They're planned.”

While ELF typically doesn't condone violence against people, communiques have said ELF members “wouldn't hesitate to pick up the gun,” Perlstein said.

That Skotdal apparently was named on the sign that was left behind is a reason for concern, the professor said.

“I hope the police are watching his home,” Perlstein said.

Friday morning, the crime scene drew curious opponents of the towers such as Elizabeth Grant, who has lived in the valley for 12 years.

“I just don't know what to think,” she said. “It is hard to say who would really be responsible for this. It just goes to show people did not want this to happen in the valley.”


Battles have long raged over radio towers
Opponents cite studies that have found adverse effects on health and wildlife habitat.

Everett HERALD
By Debra Smith and Andy Rathbun, Herald Writers
Published: Saturday, September 5, 2009


SNOHOMISH — Christine Goff doesn’t approve of the vandalism that toppled two radio towers in the Snohomish River Valley.  Still, she’s not exactly sad to see them flattened.  Their lights glared into her nearby home. On the phone she could hear sports programming from the towers’ radio station. She worried about potential effects on wildlife and human health.

“These towers don’t belong here,” she said.

On Friday, some living in the valley condemned the tactics of the people who stole an excavator and used it to topple two of four towers owned by KRKO (1380 AM).  They also expressed frustration over a project many vehemently opposed — and still do.  Family-owned KRKO spent nearly a decade fighting in the courts.  The latest legal rulings cleared the way for construction of two more towers at the site.  In August, a King County Superior Court Judge upheld a land-use decision by the Snohomish County Council that gives the owners of KRKO approval to build two 200-foot towers. The antennae will transmit a new, stronger signal at 1520 AM.

Tower opponents cited a range of studies claiming that AM radio waves have negative effects on people and wildlife — including increased rates of childhood leukemia and destruction of bird habitat. In the neighborhood above the towers near the Kenwanda Golf Course, signs opposing the tower are still pounded into yards.  The tallest tower poked like an red and white exclamation mark above the trees in front of Albert Highberger’s home. Over nine years he attended hundreds of meetings networking with others who opposed the towers.

Just last week, Highberger said, Citizens to Preserve the Upper Snohomish River Valley decided against appealing the latest ruling in favor of tower construction.

“We tried to do this by legal means,” he said. “Everything is a political decision.”


Toasty temperatures expected across Puget Sound today
By ROY JACOBSON
South Whidbey Record Reporter
Jul 29 2009, 8:00 AM

Get ready for some sizzling weather today and Thursday.

Record temperatures of 100 degrees or more are forecast for parts of the Puget Sound region, according to the National Weather Service in Seattle.  Temperatures on Whidbey Island aren’t expected to be as high as in Seattle, Tacoma and Olympia, thanks to the marine air and offshore breezes, but mid-90s wouldn’t be a surprise, said meteorologist Jim Prange.

Edmonds is expected to reach a high of 98 degrees, and Everett a high of 97, according to forecasters.  A high of 92 is expected today in Oak Harbor, where temperatures are recorded near the water at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

“Either way, it’s going to be hot,” Prange said. “Once you get away from the water, it’s going to warm up dramatically.”

An upper-level ridge is producing hot, dry conditions across the region all week, with record highs likely through Thursday, the weather service said.  Slightly cooler temperatures are expected later in the week and on the weekend, but they will still be above average.  Seattle’s record-high temperature for the day is 100 degrees. Today’s high temperature in the city is expected to equal that, and may reach as high a 104, Prange said.

Thursday’s temperature is also expected to reach 100 in the city.  Although thunderstorms and rain occurred in the evening on Whidbey late last week, no precipitation is forecast for the coming days.

The current weather pattern is similar to two other record-breaking hot spells in the region. In August 1981 there were five consecutive days with highs in the 90s, and in August 1977 there were 15 consecutive days of highs above 80.

This week’s hot streak continues a pattern of recent high temperatures on the island. The highest temperatures this past week were on Central Whidbey and the North End: 86 degrees at Crockett Lake and 85 degrees at Polnell Point, according to the WSU Island County Extension Service.



Floridian offered Island County planning director position
By NATHAN WHALEN
Whidbey News Times Reporter
Jul 10 2009, 4:11 PM · UPDATED

A man from the land of gators and sunshine could soon head planning in Island County.

The Board of Island County Commissioners voted unanimously Friday morning to offer the planning director position to Robert Pederson, who is the Manatee County, Fla., community planning administrator.

Pederson does have planning experience in Washington state. From 1993 to 1996, he served as deputy planning director for San Juan County. He also gained planning experience working for municipalities in Alaska and the Virgin Islands. His career started in 1978 as a planning technician for Yakima County. He holds a master’s degree in regional planning from the University of North Carolina.

“I believe he has the skills to achieve what we need to in Island County,” Commissioner Helen Price Johnson said during the Friday morning special session where the commissioners agreed to offer Pederson the job.

Approximately 40 people from across the country applied for the position, which was listed at a base salary of $72,000 a year. Those applicants were eventually pared down to four finalists who were invited to interviews in front of a panel consisting of the three commissioners, Public Works Director Bill Oakes, Interim Planning Director Keith Higman and Chief Civil Deputy Prosecutor Dave Jamieson. The finalist list was winnowed down to two and one of those candidates withdrew from consideration.

Commissioner John Dean said Higman, who is the Health Department director, took over the planning department on an interim basis in March. Jeff Tate had earlier quit the position for family reasons.

The commissioners did not disclose the names of the other applicants despite protests by the Whidbey News-Times. Dean said staff is researching the legality of disclosing the finalists’ names. He said the finalists were concerned about their current positions if it became public knowledge about their attempts to find a new position.

He did comment about a recent editorial in the Whidbey News-Times which criticized the process and lack of public involvement in finding Tate’s replacement. He said the commissioners tried to find a replacement with a proven track record.

“This board attempted to steer clear of any perception that this was a political appointment,” Dean said.

The News-Times argued, in part, that the public can hardly judge if the right candidate was picked if it didn’t know any of the other applicants.

County officials contacted Pederson Friday to notify him he was selected for the position. Pederson accepted the position later in the day and he will start no later than Sept. 1.



A house burns at Useless Bay early Sunday morning. No one was home at the time of the fire, but the house was gutted.
Jon Beck photo


Victims of fire question response time

South Whidbey RECORD
Jul 01 2009, 8:00 AM

Two brothers who lost nearly all their possessions early Sunday morning when a fire gutted their rental house at Useless Bay are frustrated with the fire department’s response time.  Joshua Pitts, 27, and his brother Tom, 26, were not at home at the time of the fire, and there were no injuries reported.

“Everything anyone could possibly have, we lost,” Joshua Pitts said Monday. “We lost computers, televisions, furniture, everything.”

“I don’t care about the computers or the TVs,” he added, “but you can’t replace the memorabilia.”

He said most troubling was the loss of family photographs and keepsakes that had belonged to his grandparents.  Flames had enveloped the two-story, three-bedroom house on Melendy Drive near Highway 525 by the time firefighters arrived after 3 a.m., Island County Fire District 3 Deputy Chief Jon Beck said Monday.  He said about 45 South Whidbey firefighters responded, and the crews knocked down the flames in about half an hour.  Beck said the alarm was called in by a neighbor, who reported the rear porch on fire.

Pitts was angry about what he called a delayed response on the part of the fire department.

“They were slow,” he said. “They didn’t show up for about 20 minutes. If they would have showed up sooner, we might have been able to save some of the things in the house.”

“The people themselves were good,” Pitts added. “It’s the slack time that could have been improved.”

Pitts said he may file a complaint.  Beck said an Island County sheriff’s deputy was the first to arrive on the scene, followed quickly by five fire engines, three water tenders, four support vehicles and three medical responders.  Beck added that a fire truck was on the scene and firefighters were laying hose within 12 minutes of the initial call, according to fire district log entries.

“We had a great response, but every room was involved in flames when we arrived,” Beck said.

“He must be looking at some other numbers,” Beck added of Pitts.

“I understand he’s trying to find something, and I sympathize.  I wish we could have done more.”

The house, estimated to be about 20 years old, sustained an estimated $250,000 loss, Beck said.  Pitts said the house belongs to Jennifer Pan, of Seattle, who's managing it for her parents, who lived there before leaving the island.  Beck said the fire appears to have started under the house at the rear. He said the fire investigation continues, but that suspicious circumstances have been ruled out.

Joshua Pitts said he was in Oak Harbor Saturday night for a triple feature at a drive-in movie theater and arrived home to find his house ablaze. He said his brother was visiting his girlfriend at the time.

Pitts, a local landscaper, said he had rented the house two months ago and that his brother had recently arrived and currently is helping him do landscaping.  Joshua Pitts said he plans to be married in September, and that the house was to be their first home together.  He said he had intended to obtain renter’s insurance, but had none at the time of the fire.

He said he’s staying with his fiancé “until we figure out what to do next.”

Beck said firefighters spent a total of 11 hours at the scene.


Stimulus jobs hard to fill
By JENNY MANNING, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Jun 16 2009, 4:05 PM · UPDATED

In a down economy, you’d think young people would be fighting for jobs. But in Oak Harbor, that’s far from the case.

The first Oak Harbor stimulus-funded employee reported to duty Tuesday, but the city still has 18 positions available, paid for by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Mayor Jim Slowik made a public plea to local youth to apply for the temporary summer jobs during his closing remarks at a recent City Council meeting.

To date, only two of the 20 temporary summer jobs are filled.

“Many of the applicants don’t qualify, or they’re not interested in that type of work,” said Gerri Garcia of WorkSource Whidbey. “We’ve kind of been struggling.”

Applicants must be between the ages of 18 and 24, live in Island County, have a current Washington state driver’s license and meet specific low-income requirements.

WorkSouce advertised the positions in the classified section, but many respondents lacked a valid driver’s license or didn’t like the job description, she said.

“It’s coming slowly, but we’re moving,” she said of filling the vacant positions.

Oak Harbor needs 18 young adults to work in the parks, marina and engineering departments, including tasks that range from mapping and survey work to maintenance and repairs.

For more information, call Gerri Garcia at 279-4990, or email ggarcia@nwpic.bellingham.wa.us.

Planning director finalists not named
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Jun 12 2009

Four finalists for the Island County planning director position will be grilled during a closed-door, executive session June 18.

Larry Larson, the county human resources director, said the commissioners originally picked six applications to go through the interview process, but two dropped out.

More than 40 people from across the country applied for the job, which has a base salary of just over $72,000 a year. Larson said he couldn’t name the finalists, but he did say that three of them have ties to the Puget Sound region.

A panel of county officials will interview the candidates. The panel will consist of the three commissioners, Larson, interim Planning Director Keith Higman, Public Works Director Bill Oakes and Chief Civil Prosecutor Dave Jamieson.

Larson said he doesn’t expect the commissioners to make a choice any earlier than June 22.

South Whidbey resident John McFarland volunteered his time to help with the candidate search and develop questions for the interviews. Larson said McFarland is the former Tukwila city administrator and a recognized expert in recruitment.

“I don’t know where we would be without him,” Larson said.

Jeff Tate announced his resignation as planning director Jan. 22. Higman, the health department director, took on the temporary role as leader of both departments in March.


State asks South Whidbey parks to take over lakes
By JEFF VANDERFORD
South Whidbey Record Sports, Port of S. Whidbey
May 21 2009, 3:43 PM · UPDATED

Representatives from the state and Island County told an audience of 50 residents Thursday that access to three prime South Whidbey freshwater lakes may be restricted due to lack of funds.  The state's 25-year maintenance-and-operations contract with the county expires next month for Goss and Lone lakes in Langley, and in February for Deer Lake in Clinton.

"Unless we find some agency willing to take responsibility, the lakes will revert to a more primitive state," said Kye Iris of the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, which owns the properties. "Swimming in Goss Lake would be restricted, the picnic tables would be moved elsewhere and the restrooms closed."

Island County parks director Steve Marx added that he is unable to keep the lakes at their current level of upkeep because his department's budget has been slashed.  Both told the South Whidbey Parks & Recreation board that they are willing to negotiate an agreement should the parks district be willing to take on the responsibility of picking up trash, emptying portable restrooms, sweeping, cutting vegetation and other essential tasks.

"Basically, I'm asking if you would take them over," Marx said to parks commissioners.

Neither Iris or Marx provided a financial breakdown.  More important, South Whidbey parks director Terri Arnold said, was knowing how much money the district will need to maintain the properties.

"A rough estimate is $170,000 to go mobile, including new hires, trucks, mowers, time, fuel and fertilizer," she said.

Parks district officials are hoping the public will offer guidance on the takeover proposal.

"The public will drive the process from here in terms of how much they want to see us expand our scope of work," Arnold said.




Deputy saves jumper

By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
May 12 2009, 4:51 PM · UPDATED

A suicidal man had climbed over the railing of Deception Pass Bridge and was on his way to near-certain death when a quick-thinking deputy reached out and pulled him back from the brink.

Monday, Island County Sheriff Mark Brown recognized Deputy Dan Waggoner with a lifesaving medal for his heroic actions. Waggoner couldn’t attend the packed county commissioner meeting because he was at a call, dealing with a teenager who was threatening family members with a knife.  Brown briefly described the dramatic March 14 incident, leaving no doubt that Waggoner saved the man’s life and risked his own.

“I’m extremely proud of Deputy Waggoner, as we should all be,” the sheriff said.

In an interview, Waggoner explained that the incident occurred when he was driving across the bridge to Whidbey to start his shift at about 9 p.m. He noticed a car parked oddly, as well as scattered beer cans, at the lot on the Whidbey side of the bridge.

The deputy rolled down his window and asked the 30-something driver if he was OK. The man seemed dazed, Waggoner said, and ignored his inquiries. Waggoner quickly got out of his car and followed as the man “speed walked” onto the bridge walkway.  Just as they got over the water, which is about a 180-foot drop, the man turned around a gave Waggoner an odd, blank look. Then the man put his leg over the railing and started to roll over.

“The share of his body weight was over the railing,” Waggoner explained. “He was gone.”

But not quite. Waggoner said he just grabbed the guy and pulled. The man fought, grasping and pulling to go back over.

“It was a good thing he was a smaller guy,” Waggoner said. He’s not sure if his feet ever left the ground during the tussle or how close they came to going over together.

“I just didn’t think about it,” he said.

The deputy finally got the man onto the ground and wrestled with him for a few minutes before getting him into a hold and handcuffs. Waggoner said the man suddenly became limp and started to shake all over, possibly from a seizure. The despondent man had apparently mixed alcohol and pills, the deputy said.  The paramedics soon arrived and transported the man to the hospital. He’s now fine, at least physically.

“The only thing that we could get out of him was that he was in extreme debt,” the deputy indicated.

Waggoner said he still worries about the man and wishes him the best in his life.

“He’s certainly alive today because of Deputy Waggoner’s efforts,” Brown said.


Woman sold for 30,000 pesos
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
May 04 2009, 5:26 PM · UPDATED


Island County prosecutors are handling a difficult and disturbing case involving an allegation of attempted rape, a rare indigenous language, and what a deputy prosecutor called “slavery.”

An 18-year-old Coupeville woman who is the mother of two small children reported to police April 10 that her husband, 23-year-old Miguel De Jesus, had assaulted her, court documents state.

During an investigation, Deputy Robert Mirabal with the Coupeville Marshal’s Office discovered a history of domestic and sexual abuse perpetrated by De Jesus, the police report states.

Shockingly, the young woman said her father had sold her to De Jesus two years ago in her Mexican hometown. De Jesus paid 30,000 pesos for her, which is just over $2,000.

“It’s slavery. It’s 100 percent slavery,” Deputy Prosecutor Eric Ohme said.

“I think it’s more common than we suspect,” he added.

Ohme explained that De Jesus and his wife are Trique, who are indigenous people from the Mexican state of Oaxaca. The practice of dowries and teenaged marriages are part of their customs, though many sources about the Trique culture indicate that the girl must consent.

But in this case, the young woman’s opinion apparently wasn’t taken into consideration. Mirabal wrote that she was worried she would eventually have to go back to De Jesus because her father couldn’t return the 30,000 pesos. She said she didn’t want to go back to him.

“She has nowhere to go,” Ohme said. “If she went back home she would be in danger because she’s gone against the tradition.”

De Jesus won’t face any charges for allegedly purchasing his wife, but he probably won’t be free anytime soon. Ohme charged De Jesus in Island County Superior Court April 20 with attempted rape in the second degree, a domestic violence charge. Judge Alan Hancock set his bail at $125,000.

Also, Ohme said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has a hold on De Jesus, presumably because he’s in the country illegally. The deputy prosecutor said he doesn’t know what the victim’s citizenship status is and he doubts the agency will go after her or her children.

De Jesus speaks Trique, Ohme said, which is a rare language in the United States. He said there’s only a couple of people in the state who can translate the language, which could make the case much more difficult and expensive. A translator is scheduled to be in court Monday at De Jesus’ arraignment.

According to court documents, Mirabal and a state trooper responded to a trailer park on Terry Road in the early morning on April 10. They found the alleged victim at a neighbor’s house. She was crying and told the officer, through a translator, that De Jesus had hit her, kicked her and tried to rape her, Mirabal wrote.

The woman also detailed past abuses, the report states.

Ohme said the woman is receiving help from Citizens Against Domestic and Sexual Abuse. According to court documents, she’s concerned about being able to pay rent without her husband.

“I’m sure she’s very confused and scared,” he said.



Marijuana banner flies from Deception Pass Bridge
By JENNY MANNING, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Apr 21 2009, 5:00 PM · UPDATED

A state crew Tuesday morning removed a large, white banner with the image of a cannabis leaf that was hanging from the south arch of the Deception Pass bridge.

Pranksters had risked injury -- or worse -- sometime Sunday night to display the banner in anticipation of a holiday known among pot smokers as "420."

"What they did was very dangerous and we hope that it's not repeated," Dave Chesson, Washington state Department of Transportation Communications said.

Banners are allowed to hang from Washington state bridges as long as WSDOT issues a permit and the flag is safely attached to the bridge, he said.

According to Chesson, removal of the weed-depicting banner that read "Smoke buds! Happy B-day 420," in addition to several initials, took about 20 minutes and cost WSDOT $1,096.

A heavy blanket of fog delayed the crew's banner-removal work by more than an hour and half Tuesday morning.

John Weida, Washington state bridge supervisor, was among the five-person, banner-removal crew.

"This doesn't happen too often," he said of the unofficial posting of non-peritted banners on Washington bridges.


Langley still looking for a drugstore
By ROY JACOBSON, South Whidbey Record Reporter
Apr 12 2009, 8:00 AM

Discussions are continuing for a new pharmacy in town, Langley Mayor Paul Samuelson told the city council at its meeting this week.

“We’re still moving forward,” Samuelson said. “We had a walk-around looking at all the potential sites.”

He declined to identify those interested, but said they were in the pharmacy business and had met with the Langley Clinic and Whidbey General Hospital officials, and with members of the local healthcare community.

The city lost its only pharmacy last month when Linds Langley Drug closed. The nearest pharmacies are now at Ken’s Korner in Clinton and the expanded Linds in Freeland.

Linds’ building next to the Langley Clinic remains empty. Owner Ron Lind said prior to closing the business after 39 years as the city’s only drugstore that he planned to sell or lease the space.

Samuelson said he has made luring a new pharmacy to town one of his top priorities.

“Healthcare should be an economic driver for Langley,” he said.




"Ready for my close-up, Mr. DeMille" is from "Sunset Blvd" (1950) Gloria Swanson, William Holden, Eric Von Strohein, and lots of others including Cecil B. DeMille himself!

Freeland sunbather is The Clyde’s alpha dog
By ROY JACOBSON
South Whidbey Record Reporter
Mar 04 2009, 10:55 AM · UPDATED

Woof, Mr. DeMille. She’s ready for her close-up.

Little Miss, a 9-year-old miniature American Eskimo dog, took the folding seat of honor in the balcony Saturday after being selected from among 116 entries to become The Clyde Theatre’s 2009 Top Dog.

“We had a heck of a time choosing,” said Lynn Willeford, owner of the Langley movie house with her husband, Blake. “With the help of staff, we were able to get it down to a dozen or so finalists, but then someone would point out yet another cool dog, and the list would grow again.”

“We finally just chose the dog who seemed to indicate the most Clyde-like attitude,” Willeford said.

Little Miss, all goggles and smiles, belongs to Susan and Dale Hanzelka of Freeland. At 5 p.m. Saturday, Susan Hanzelka and her four-legged theater companion settled into their seats in the balcony of The Clyde to watch the first showing of the movie “Hotel for Dogs.”

“It was amazing,” Hanzelka said. “She got her own seat, and was even heavy enough to hold it down. I gave her some pieces of popcorn, and she sat there the whole time.”

“She was very well-behaved,” Hanzelka added. “When there were dog sounds from the movie, she would sit up and listen.”

Willeford said she got the idea for the contest after noticing the number of new movies featuring dogs or with the word dog in the title. Participants were asked to drop off flattering photos of their dogs to The Clyde or Myken’s Pet Boutique on First Street in downtown Langley.  More than 100 people responded. The entry photos remain on display in the lobby of The Clyde.  Hanzelka received a $25 gift certificate for toys and treats from Myken’s, five passes to The Clyde and a signed copy of Jeanie Schick-Jacobowitz’s comic little gift book, ‘You’re My Friend ... Be Paws.”

The photo of Little Miss submitted for the contest shows her lounging in a swimming pool and wearing nothing but a pair of swim goggles.

“She looked so stylish,” Hanzelka said. “Whenever she would see the pool, she would just jump right in. She doesn’t swim much, but she really likes to float.”

Little Miss shares her Freeland household with Hanzelka daughters Christy, Cady and Lizzy, and a golden retriever named Ted. Ted has to watch his dog movies on television.

“I thought it was great, a fun thing for them to do,” Hanzelka said of the contest. “I bet they had a tough time picking. What a job.”

It was so difficult, in fact, that Willeford came up with additional categories, to spread around the kudos.  The Top Puppy award went to Bing, who lives with Marty and Peggy Fernandez-Moe of Langley. The Most Inspirational Award went to Diego, who hangs out with Helma Lucker and her family in Clinton, and who gets around with the aid of a two-wheeled cart supporting his hind quarters.

And the prize for Best Reason to Rescue a Dog went to Quigley, adopted from the pound by Diana Putney of Langley.

“I think everyone’s had a great time with it,” Willeford said of the contest.

“I don’t know what I was thinking when I came up with the idea. Who can choose the greatest dog without meeting them all personally?”

It is yet to be determined if there will be a 2010 Top Dog Contest.

“As Blake said, why would I want 115 people mad at me?” Willeford said. “But it’s been a hoot nonetheless, and a great testament to dog love.”



County finds banks wary
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Feb 23 2009, 1:05 PM · UPDATED

At the heart of Island County’s latest $1 million budget hole crisis is Treasurer Linda Riffe’s inability to find banks willing to deal with the county, mainly because of a 1969 state law that few people were aware of before the economic crisis.

With no banks bidding on the county’s investments, Riffe was forced to put the county’s money into the Local Government Investment Pool. She said the interest rate is pretty lousy, currently below 1 percent, so the county’s investment income will be $1 million less than anticipated this year.

“I had expected an uptick in the third quarter, but now I don’t think that will happen until 2010,” she said.

Jack Wagner, president of Whidbey Island Bank, said the bank used to bid on all of the county’s certificates of deposits, partly as a way to support the local treasurer. The return was usually more than 2 percent. But Whidbey Island Bank officials recently let Riffe know that they couldn’t do that anymore.

“It’s not a risk we’re willing to take,” said Rick Shields, vice president and chief financial officer of Whidbey Island Bank.

A hidden problem came to light when the Bank of Clark County in Vancouver, Wash., was shut down earlier this year. The bank had $15 million in uncollateralized public deposits, which are investments from public entities that weren’t backed up with collateral in the form of securities.  It turned out that the other banks with public investments were on the hook for the $15 million, under the state’s Public Deposit Protection Act. Wagner said nobody was really aware of the law, which had never been applied before.

Under the law, the other banks had to pay the $15 million. The bill for each bank was based on a percentage of deposits in public investments over a year-long period.  For Whidbey Island Bank, the bill was $138,000.  With the possibility of more bank failures‚ and more large bills‚ Whidbey Island Bank and other financial institutions in the state are getting out of the business of taking investments from local governments.

“It’s not a good result for anyone,” Shields said.

Wagner said state officials are talking about requiring that banks have to collateralize 100 percent of all public funds, instead of the current 10 percent requirement. The majority of the other states require 100 percent collateral.

“We could do that, but other banks around the state are really struggling,” Wagner said.

A requirement for 100-percent collateral would discourage most banks from taking on public deposits, Shields said, because they either don’t have enough cash for collateral or don’t want to tie up their money.

“It’s a real crisis,” Wagner said. “I’m not really sure what’s going to happen. It’s a bad situation for banks as well as treasurers.”

Nonetheless, Whidbey Island Bank remains one of the most profitable among banks based in the state. Washington Banking Company, the holding company for Whidbey Island Bank, reported a profitable fourth quarter of 2008, while most other banks lost money. Washington Banking earned $1.7 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, in the quarter compared to $1.9 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter a year ago. In 2008, net income was $8.3 million compared to $9.4 million in 2007.

In January, the bank received $26.38 million from the federal government Capital Purchase Program, which is part of the controversial $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Shields said a small amount of the money went into investments that can be used as collateral for public funds, but most of the money will be loaned out, as it was intended.  Shields said the bank is dealing with a lot of borrowers in trouble because of the economy, but bank officials are doing everything they can to work with the clients.

“We don’t want to foreclose on a home,” Shields said. “That’s our last option.”



Stimulus benefits ferries, schools
South Whidbey Record Reporter
By ROY JACOBSON
Feb 18 2009, 8:00 AM


Ferries will get a little piece of the federal stimulus pie, U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen said Friday.

He said $60 million will be invested in state ferry projects as part of the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which cleared the House Friday by a vote of 246-183.

“I fought alongside my Washington state colleagues to make sure that funding for ferries was included,” Larsen said. “This is one of the great stories of the bill.”

The Everett Democrat from the 2nd District said the money would go to upgrade terminals and other facilities. It can’t be used for ferry construction, however, because of the state stipulation that Washington ferries must be built in Washington, he said.

The Washington state Department of Transportation recently submitted a long-range ferry plan to the state Legislature that would invest from $1.3 billion to $3.5 billion in the next 22 years.

The various provisions for legislators to consider include an increasingly unpopular reservation system which would be phased in over two years on the Clinton-Mukilteo run.

Vehicle usage on that route is expected to increase 24 percent by 2030, the DOT said.

The DOT said it will go ahead with one new high-speed ferry for the Keystone-Port Townsend route. It had originally put out a bid for two, at a projected cost of $84.5 million.

Todd Pacific Shipyards of Seattle, in conjunction with Nichols Brothers Boat Builders of Freeland, submitted the only bid, $65.5 million for one ferry and $124.4 million for two.

Meanwhile, the stimulus package was approved by the Senate Friday night. President Obama signed the bill Tuesday.

The bill includes $739 million for Washington state to modernize roads, bridges, transit and water infrastructure.

“This investment will create good-paying jobs and help get our economy moving again,” Larsen said.

The bill provides $492 million for roads, bridges and highways in the state, $179 million for transportation projects and $68 million for water infrastructure, Larsen said.

Local projects long in the works may be eligible for the program, including Whidbey General Hospital’s new South End health services center at Bayview, expected to cost about $10 million, and a Freeland sewer system for the downtown core, expected to cost about $15 million.

The package would also fund a 13-percent increase in the former food-stamp program, which is being replaced by a debit-card system. The increase would benefit 630,000 state residents who use the program, Larsen said.

And it provides $150 million for food banks nationwide. Larsen said his staff plans to meet soon with South Whidbey’s Good Cheer Food Bank to explain the options.

The package also provides $1.4 billion for school districts in Washington state, including $44 million for those in the 2nd District, Larsen said.

That includes a major federal investment in school modernization, he said, including $609,000 for the South Whidbey School District.

The legislation also provides $100 million for “impact aid” to help school districts across the country, including Oak Harbor, that serve a large number of military families, Larsen said.

He said 2nd District schools also are eligible for resources from the $1 billion in state stabilization funds the recovery package provides for Washington state.

The recovery act also includes $3.25 billion in borrowing capacity for Bonneville Power Administration to build a new transmission grid to bring along renewable energy sources such as windmills and solar, Larsen said.

He said that, overall, the stimulus package is designed to create 3.5 million new jobs, to help those hurt most by the recession and to set a foundation for economic recovery and long-term growth.

“The cost of doing nothing is far greater than the cost of the debt we’re going to incur,” Larsen said. “The acceleration of the recession surprised everybody.”

As for Republican criticism that the package is just another massive tax-and-spend proposal, Larsen said:

“When you lose 1.5 million jobs over the past month, it’s well past time to act. We’ll be judged on whether we did something. We may take our lumps later, but at least we’re going to act.”




New budget shortfall in Island County means more staff cuts
By BRIAN KELLY
South Whidbey Record Editor
Today, 10:47 AM · UPDATED

Island County is facing a budget shortfall of roughly $1 million due to falling investment earnings, and more staff cuts are likely in Coupeville, according to county officials.  The grim news was announced Tuesday afternoon at a staff session for Island County commissioners.  Commissioner John Dean, chairman of the board of commissioners, said the shortfall could mean the loss of roughly 20 positions.  Staff reductions could happen as early as June.

County officials said the size of the shortfall is still not certain.

"While it's preliminary, we do want people in our courthouse to know that this may be lying ahead," Dean said.

The $1 million shortfall follows a $2 million budget gap from late last year.

The county cut 31 positions in December to fill the $2 million hole in the 2009 budget. The cuts included jobs that were left unfilled and positions that were removed by attrition, and a total of 18 workers actually lost jobs. Eleven of those employees were full-time workers, while seven were part-time.  Dean said the impending cuts likely will include a noticeable loss in county services. Public hours for county offices may be cut. County Treasurer Linda Riffe has already requested a reduction in the hours her office is open to the public.

"I would predict people are going to see a reduction of public service, not because we're lazy or hiding behind the doors, but because we have limited staff," Dean said.

"The courthouse is staffed from 8 to 4:30; the office hours for the public may be something like 10 to 3, 9 to 3, but we haven't decided that yet," Dean said.

"We want it to be consistent through the whole courthouse; that's another discussion we're having," he said.

Cuts in service may happen by March 1, Dean said.  The county is not looking at across-the-board cuts. Instead, commissioners are asking department heads to identify the priorities in their departments, and officials will also look at ways for county departments to work together.

With the impending departure of Planning Director Jeff Tate, who is resigning effective March 2, Dean said the county has decided to make Keith Higman, the county's health department director, interim director of the planning department. Higman will continue to oversee the health department, as well.

Commissioners are expected to talk about the budget problem at a commissioners' retreat on Feb. 13 in Coupeville.



Earthquake shakes Puget Sound
South Whidbey Record
Today (Friday, Jan. 30), 7:13 AM · UPDATED

A 4.5-magnitude earthquake rocked Puget Sound early Friday morning.

The earthquake was centered about three miles southwest of Kingston and roughly 14 miles northwest of Seattle.

According to a preliminary earthquake report from the University of Washington's Department of Earth and Space Sciences, the earthquake occurred at 5:25 a.m., at a depth of about 36 miles.



Troopers clear rockslide at Deception Pass
By JESSIE STENSLAND, Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Jan 29 2009, 2:47 PM · UPDATED

Troopers with the Washington State Patrol quickly cleared a small rockslide off of Highway 20 at Deception Pass Thursday afternoon.

Lt. Jason Longoria said troopers closed the northbound lane of Highway 20, on the Fidalgo Island side of Deception Pass bridge, for about 15 minutes. They managed to push the rocks off the road while they were waiting for a plow from the state Department of Transportation to arrive.

The largest of the rocks, Longoria said, was the size of a "Lazy Boy," but troopers were able to kick it apart into smaller pieces that they rolled off the highway.

A DOT truck eventually arrived and pushed the rocks over further onto the shoulder.

Longoria said he wasn't surprised that the rocks peeled off the sheer wall, given the recent freezing-then-thawing weather. Fortunately, nobody was injured.

"If it would have come down when a car was going by, it would have been a bad situation," he said.



DISPATCHES FROM WASHINGTON | The new president
By BRIAN KELLY
South Whidbey Record Editor
Jan 16 2009, 8:49 PM · UPDATED

Record editor Brian Kelly is in Washington, D.C. with others from the Evergreen State for the inauguration of Barack Obama. He will file regular reports through Inauguration Day.

WASHINGTON, D.C. With just four days left before America’s 44th president takes office, Barack Obama is everywhere.

At Union Station, outside the Making History store, people posed next to two life-size cardboard cutouts of the next president. One Obama cutout was fitted with a T-shirt that read “I (heart) Michelle Obama.” No one stopped to pose next to a cardboard cutout of Vice President-elect Joe Biden, however.

Inside the store, customers poured over stacks of souvenirs, from Obama shirts, hats, key chains, coloring books, posters, postcards and small bottles of Obama hot sauce (labeled with the motto, “Heat we can believe in”).

Hillary Clinton souvenirs could be found on two shelves at the back of the store, with a sign proclaiming “50 percent off.”

Though maneuvering through the store was difficult because of the crowd, a clerk said they were expecting the big crush in the coming days.

Curbside salesmen greeted commuters and tourists as soon as they stepped outside Union Station; some offering Obama T-shirts, others buttons. Another vendor waved small booklets filled with Obama speeches at passersby. A T-shirt cost $12; a button with a smiling Obama next to Spiderman, $3.

Throughout the capital, preparations were well underway for Tuesday’s inauguration, which is expected to draw a crowd of more than a million.

Signs directing ticket holders were being raised along Constitution Avenue, based on the color-coded areas where viewers would watch; yellow, orange, purple, blue, silver. Delivery trucks were double-parked outside venues hosting inaugural balls as men unloaded tall stacks of bottled beverages; concrete barriers were placed temporarily on sidewalks until they would be moved into the street as barricades; the sound of police sirens could be heard everywhere. A crowd gathered on a sidewalk outside the Russell Senate Office Building when a police-escorted limousine came to a halt, and two SUVs filled with police stopped and officers piled out, each dressed in camouflage fatigues and holding M-16 rifles at the ready.

“Is it Obama?” someone asked.

“Isn’t he on a train somewhere?” another in the crowd replied.

One woman in the crowd finally stepped forward and asked a member of the security detail who they were waiting for and got a blunt response. “You don’t need to know!” he barked. The limo quickly pulled away and the crowd dispersed without an answer.

Massive banners adorned the fronts of buildings throughout the capital.

“Change we believe in” read the black banner on the Teamsters building. On the Canadian embassy, banners written in English and French read “Canada salutes President Obama.”

In the early afternoon, a crew checked the sound system for the swearing-in ceremony. A technician read a long passage from the Dr. Seuss book “Horton Hears a Who!” in front of thousands of empty metal folding chairs.

Much of the area for the swearing-in ceremony was closed off by Capitol Police; people gathered at the fence along the perimeter and asked strangers to take their picture with the flag- and bunting-draped Capitol in the background.

A television crew from a Japanese TV station stopped people to ask them to stand next to a “Change” meter, where they were asked, through an interpreter, to turn a dial-and-arrow device to one side that said “Yes” or the other side that said “No” if they thought Obama would bring change. Some were also asked to describe Obama using one word.

A crowd gathered around to watch, and some laughed when a man who answered “no” described Obama as “charismatic,” but didn’t know how to spell the word when asked by the television reporter.



Homola, Price Johnson sworn into office
By JENNY MANNING, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Jan 06 2009, 4:15 PM · UPDATED

Friday, Jan. 2, marked the dawn of a new day in Island County government.  In a room full of supporters and county employees, Judge Alan Hancock swore County Commissioners Angie Homola and Helen Price Johnson into office.  There wasn’t an empty seat. People lined the walls and spilled into the hallway before the ceremony, waiting, in anticipation for the historic officiation.

“This is the start of what some consider a new era in Island County government,” Commissioner John Dean said.

To put the day’s significance into perspective, he said, Price Johnson is the first woman to serve on the Island County Board of Commissioners; the addition of Homola marks the first time in the county’s history that two women fill commissioner seats; and the ceremony marks the first-ever, all-Democrat Island County Board of Commissioners.

Price Johnson started her job after the election was certified in November, because she defeated an appointed commissioner.  Republican Mac McDowell, a veteran 16-year commissioner, lost by a 60-vote margin to Homola, and Commissioner Phil Bakke, also a Republican, lost the November race to Price Johnson.

“Last year I was the minority. This year I’m a minority,” Dean quipped. Last year he was the only Democrat, this year he’s the only male.

Homola’s 15-year-old daughter, Kira, sang “The Star Spangled Banner.” Her performance was followed by a raucous round of applause, which repeated time and again as each woman addressed the crowd, promising a new future for Island County.  Price Johnson expressed her excitement “to look ahead as we create a new future for Island County,” and Homola called for a “new, open government.”

“Your ideas are encouraged and welcomed,” she said. “I look to the future with a wide angle lens,” reiterating her open door policy and encouraging public input.

Following the ceremony, the new commissioners talked with attendees, most of whom congratulated the women for their political victories. Others wasted no time in voicing specific concerns and changes they’d like to see in the county.  Nancy Zaretzke of Greenbank, who describes herself as fairly new to the county, thought the change was “about time.”

“This is just amazing to me,” she said of the political atmosphere surrounding the most recent county election results.

But, Zaretzke thinks the change will come gradually.

“In this economy, their hands are going to be pretty tied,” she said, referring to the county’s tight budget.

As Homola told the crowd, she’s ready to roll up her sleeves and get to work.  She sees the economic situation as a challenge that will require some creativity. But the down economy doesn’t particularly bother her.

“It’s tough to be broke,” she said. “But we’ll just look in places that may not have been considered before.”


Second Keystone ferry hopes fade
By NATHAN WHALEN, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Jan 02 2009, 2:10 PM · UPDATED


Unless plans change, single boat service at the Keystone to Port Townsend ferry route may become permanent.

There is language in a draft of the Washington State Ferry System long-range plan to scrap the second vehicle ferry that in recent years had served the route during the busy spring and summer months.

The ferry system’s draft long range plan basically outlines two options for officials to consider. “Plan A” would assume the state would continue its current role as the primary provider of ferry services in the Puget Sound region and maintain the current level of service. However, the ferry system admits it doesn’t have the money in its budget to maintain such service. Plan A has a significant budget shortfall and the ferry system would have to find more money.

“Plan B” reduces the ferry system’s role where it takes responsibility of the core marine highway system while other entities would develop a new marine transit system. The current draft of Plan B currently calls for keeping one vessel on the Keystone route. This plan also has a financial shortfall but it is less severe than Plan A.

“I think that’s the more realistic option,” said State Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano Island, said Wednesday of Plan B. She is the chair of the Senate Transportation committee. She said the ferry system can’t find enough money to make up the shortfall.

However, she said it’s a high priority to get a second boat to serve the route during the summer months. She noted the route was helped by the reservation system instituted on the route in mid-2008.

The Port Townsend to Keystone route has had limited service since November 2007. That’s when ferry officials pulled the Steel Electric ferries from service due to safety concerns surrounding its hulls. Those four, 80-year-old vessels were the only ones in the ferry system capable of navigating through Keystone Harbor. Since then, a combination of passenger-only service and a small boat leased from Pierce County, the Steilacoom II, has been providing service.

Construction is starting on one Island Home class vessel that will serve Keystone. The Island Home will cost $65 million and is scheduled to be complete in spring 2010.

Starting Monday, passenger-only ferry service will return to the route for the next four weeks while the Steilacoom II undergoes U.S. Coast Guard required maintenance and inspection.

Haugen said there are studies being developed stating the ferry system could benefit from having several more of the Island Home class vessels built instead of larger 144-car ferries. That study, conducted by the Cedar River Group, indicates the ferry system should build three of the Island Home class ferries for use throughout the system. The final draft of the Cedar River Group’s study goes before the Joint Transportation Commission Tuesday in Olympia.

The ferry system’s draft long-range plan outlines the vessels that will be replaced over the next 18 years. Plans call for replacing five vessels over that time span.

Another aspect of the second option could effect Whidbey Island. According to the draft, Plan B would eliminate the extra summer weekend service on the Mukilteo to Clinton route beginning in 2013.

Haugen said it’s going to be difficult to prevent that proposal from becoming a reality. She said the ferry route could also benefit from a reservation system, which could prevent long backups from taking place if motorists know they have a guaranteed spot on a ferry.

She said there will be a number of legislative challenges to resolve in the coming session.

“It’s going to be a challenging session not only for ferries, but for transportation,” Haugen said. In addition to the ferry long-term plans, the policy of requiring ferries to be built in Washington state will also be debated in the coming session.


 
Alexander Toney pulls his sled up a hill Sunday morning in Oak Harbor. More snow blew through Whidbey Island over the weekend, leaving slick roads, fallen trees and burst pipes. More snow is forecast Tuesday night.

Island prepares for a white Christmas
By NATHAN WHALEN, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Today, 10:18 AM · UPDATED (Dec. 23)


Another weekend of snow falling on Whidbey Island means more slick driving conditions for residents, and more winter fun for children.

And most importantly, it looks like it will be a white Christmas with more snowfall expected today.  City and county road crews remained busy over the weekend trying to stay ahead of the snow and residents seemed to be trying to stay off the roads.  Nearly a week’s worth of snow created treacherous driving conditions, wreaking havoc for motorists on island roadways, both big and small. At least a foot of the cold, white stuff accumulated on North Whidbey.

Police received multiple reports of naughty snowmen blocking roadways, as well as trees falling and frozen water pipes breaking open. The city received reports of about 20 broken pipes leaking on Monday alone.

Rhonda Haines, the city’s utility services coordinator, said that people should keep a steady trickle of water running in their homes and wrap exposed pipes. More tips can be found at oakharbor.org.  A water pipe supplying North Whidbey Middle School’s sprinkler system burst Monday morning. Oak Harbor School District spokesman Joe Hunt said custodians were fortunately in the building at the time of the accident. Firefighters shut the system down until repairs were made. Hunt said the gym floor was flooded but didn’t sustain any damage.

Oak Harbor and Island County Police and Fire worked through the weekend, responding to calls from stranded vehicles and minor fender benders despite snow crew’s best plowing and sanding efforts.

“Most are minor, non-injury calls,” North Whidbey Fire Chief Marv Koorn said.

City and county police closed Goldie Road at 12:30 p.m. on Saturday following a natural gas leak caused by a Toyota pickup truck that rolled over and landed on top of a natural gas riser.  Cascade Natural Gas fixed the leak later that day and the road was re-opened, said Koorn.  Clear, icy weather made for slick conditions Friday, which contributed to a collision at Highway 20 and SW Erie Street.

“This is a hot spot for accidents,” Officer Cedric Niro said of the location, even in the best of conditions.

Drivers heading southbound on Highway 20 often slow to allow northbound traffic onto Erie Street. On the two-lane road, this kind of “good Samaritan” driving is dangerous, he said, and often results in an accident.

Rich Tyhuis, operations manager for the Oak Harbor Public Works department, said three plows are clearing roads in the city. He said Monday morning that the loose snow was plowed off the main streets and crews were starting to plow the residential streets. They are also spot-sanding at intersections and on hills, he said, adding that crews worked all day Sunday and into the early morning Monday.

Like in Oak Harbor, public works employees were busy clearing roads in Coupeville. Mayor Nancy Conard said the town has two snow plows in operation and the main roads will remain clear because they ensure access to Whidbey General Hospital, the courts and fire department.

“It’s tough when you have a small department and a prolonged weather event,” Conard said. She complimented the maintenance crew on the job they’ve been doing plowing and sanding roads.

In the county, every available piece of equipment is in use to maintain the roads, especially since temperatures are about to rise.

“We’re working hard to get roads clear while the snow is melting,” said Bill Oakes, Island County Public Works director.

Road crews are ramping up their efforts to clear the pavement as forecasters call for more snow on Whidbey Island. As of press time Monday, there is a 60 percent chance of snow Tuesday evening, Oakes said.

Joe Biller, chief of Central Whidbey Fire and Rescue, said it looks like many people are avoiding the slick roads by staying off of them.

“The good news is that people are heeding advice and hunkering down,” Biller said. He added that firefighters in Central Whidbey responded to reports of broken power lines and people who’ve slipped and fallen, but there haven’t been reports of fires or major accidents.

Unfortunately, the department’s Santa Mobile is cancelled because of heavy snow. Candy canes normally dispersed to residents will be donated to Gifts from the Heart food bank.  There were scattered power outages reported Monday morning. Most of those outages happened on the south end of the island. Roger Thompson, a spokesperson for Puget Sound Energy, said there were fewer than 1,000 outages reported on Whidbey Island Monday morning. It’s been difficult for crews to restore power to affected homes because the snow is so deep.

The snow that has fallen, and stayed on Whidbey Island, hasn’t dampened holiday spirits.  The Coupeville Historic Waterfront Association held its first-ever, Red Ticket drawing Sunday afternoon in front of a crowd of several hundred people. Coupeville resident Penny Holland won the $1,000 cash drawing.

“We were kind of nervous because of the weather,” said Mary Sterling of the Waterfront Association, but was pleased that so many people came out for the event.

Sterling said that people enjoyed hot chocolate, music and stayed hours after the drawing to shop local stores.

“It was a little get-together,” Sterling said. “People just stayed around and chatted.”

Likewise, shoppers continued with their holiday shopping in downtown Oak Harbor. Although a handful of Pioneer Way businesses posted temporary winter-weather closure notices in their windows, others enjoyed an influx of last-minute holiday shoppers, unable to safely travel to mainland malls and chain stores.


Hand recount finalized: Homola is winner in Island County
South Whidbey RECORD
Dec 08 2008, 4:49 PM · UPDATED

No surprise here: Democrat Angie Homola is the winner in the hand recount in the Island County commissioner's race in District 2.

Homola, an Oak Harbor architect, beat 16-year Republican Mac McDowell for the seat on the three-member board of commissioners. Homola was named the winner by 60 votes when the race was certified as official on Nov. 25, and the recount was certified by the county canvassing board this afternoon.

The canvassing board met for roughly an hour Monday to decide the status of eight questionable ballots, said Deputy Auditor Michele Reagan.

In the final tally, Homola won by 62 votes; Homola had 19,218 votes to McDowell's 19,156.

The new commissioner will take the oath of office in early January. She will serve with Helen Price Johnson of Clinton and John Dean of Camano Island, and the board will be controlled for the first time in county history by three Democrats.


Wetland regulations substantially upheld
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Nov 25 2008, 1:38 PM · UPDATED

A South Whidbey environmental group’s challenge to Island County’s new wetland regulations was successful on three issues that must be fixed in the next 90 days.

Nevertheless, members of Whidbey Environmental Action Network, known as WEAN, aren’t thrilled with the 89-page decision from the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, which found in favor of the county on 10 other issues...read full story here.



Homola certified as winner, recount begins
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Nov 25 2008, 4:00 PM · UPDATED

The Island County Auditor's Office is finished with the regular round of ballot counting that began on election day, but a manual recount in an extremely tight commissioners' race starts Monday.

Angie Homola has a 50-votes lead over incumbent Commissioner Mac McDowell. Homola received 19,222 and McDowell has 19,162 votes. The 50-vote difference is 0.13 percent of the votes cast for the two candidates.

Under state law, a manual recount is triggered by a difference of less than one-quarter of one percent when the gap between the two candidates is less than 150 votes.

"I continue to be hopeful, but I'm not declaring a victory," Homola said.

Democrat Homola is vying against the longtime Republican commissioner for the District 2 seat, which represents a large area of North Whidbey.

A hand recount is an arduous task that may take a week or more. First, the counters have to group the ballots by precinct.

Auditor Sheilah Crider said the teams of two people will count the ballots, with each person making their own counts and comparing results with the other. At the end, the total number of ballots counted must match the number in the original count, or the process will start over again.

The hand tabulations will be watched closely. Marshall Goldberg, chair of the Island County Democrats, said 37 Democratic volunteers attended training at the elections office this week to learn how to observe, while only three Republicans showed.

"This is history in the making," Goldberg said, referring to the fact that the first female commissioners were elected to a board that will be the first all-Democratic board. "There's a lot of enthusiasm out there."

In other races, Helen Price Johnson beat Phil Bakke for the District 1 commissioner seat, which covers South and Central Whidbey. Since Bakke had been appointed to the position, Price Johnson was sworn in Tuesday following the vote certification.

Price Johnson, a Democrat, won 20,367 votes and Bakke garnered 18,576.

Auditor Sheilah Crider, who was originally appointed to the position, was also sworn in Tuesday, having won against fellow Republican Jim Palmer. She had 18,506 and Palmer had 15,791 ballots cast in his favor.

In District 10, the race for state representative, position 1, was close, but not close enough to require a recount. Republican Norma Smith won with 34,026, or 50.35 percent. Democrat Tim Knue received 33,553 votes, or 49.65 percent.

Two years ago, Knue was close behind Rep. Barbara Bailey, R-Oak Harbor, by 23,982 to 25,479.

This year, Bailey easily beat Patricia Terry, D-Camano, by nearly 11 percent — 37,057 to 29,828 votes.

During the campaign season, the Republican party aggressively took on longtime state Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano, but the effort didn't pay off. Haugen beat Oak Harbor resident Linda Haddon, a Republican, by 36,829 to 31,905, which is a 7 percent difference.

Beyond the candidates, Island County voters overwhelmingly turned down a series of local measures. A proposed levy lift for North Whidbey Fire and Rescue went down in flames by a margin of 5,673 votes in support to 2,890 votes against.

A proposal to form a public utility district lost by 20,047 "no" votes to 10,102 "yes" votes.

A property tax levy for the Port of Coupeville was opposed by 4,318 to 1,717 votes. A similar levy for the Port of South Whidbey was also defeated by 6,986 to 3,301.

A proposed $15.2 million bond for South Whidbey Parks and Recreation District lost by 6,396 to 4,060.


McDowell still has a chance
Whidbey News Times Editor
By JIM LARSEN
Nov 11 2008, 5:58 PM · UPDATED

With an estimated 700 votes left to count, Island County Commissioner Mac McDowell must overcome a 62-vote lead by challenger Angie Homola or he will find himself without a government job for the first time in 16 years.

Meanwhile, in the other close Island County election, appointed 10th District State Rep. Norma Smith forged ahead of her challenger, Tim Knue. Although Knue was ahead on the election night count Nov. 4, Smith steadily gained ground. She finally took the lead Friday, and Monday’s district-wide total gave her a 450-vote advantage.

With county and state offices closed Tuesday for Veterans Day, the election drama will continue this afternoon, Nov. 12. The Island County Auditor’s Office plans another vote tally announcement by 6 p.m.

Homola, a Democratic newcomer to elective politics, was a ahead of Republican McDowell by 848 votes on election night. Since then another 9,405 votes have been counted, with McDowell gaining 378 votes over that span. At that rate, he would gain only 29 more votes in the final 700 ballots, but elections are more complicated than simple math.

McDowell theorized Tuesday that the late votes have favored him because of a controversy that arose in the press over Homola’s history as a county employee. Some poor job performance reviews made headlines on South Whidbey and North Whidbey, and McDowell said that likely helped him. But many voters mailed in their ballots before the controversy broke out.

Depending on the outcome of the final vote count, an automatic recount may be required because of the closeness of the race between McDowell and Homola. A recount is require when there is less than one half of one percent difference and if the gap is less than 2,000 votes. As of Monday, there was only two-tenths of one percent difference in the vote totals.

Nevertheless, McDowell said he expects the count today to be decisive.

“I’ve seen a couple of recounts over the years. There’s no reason to think it will change the outcome,” he said.


Bakke, McDowell losing
By JESSIE STENSLAND
Whidbey News Times Assistant editor
Today, 8:47 AM · UPDATED Wenesday, Nov. 5

It looks like history was made in Island County on election day with two big upsets.

In a county that’s never had a female county commissioner or an all-Democratic board of commissioners, two Democratic women are leading in races for two separate commissioner seats.

Oak Harbor resident Angie Homola is ahead of incumbent Island County Commissioner Mac McDowell, a Republican, by 14,749 to 13,900 votes. That’s a margin of 51.5 percent to 48.5 percent with 31,201 ballots counted and an estimated 6,500 left to tally.

Helen Price Johnson is outpacing Phil Bakke, the appointed county commissioner, by more than seven percent. Price Johnson won 15,550 votes while Bakke had 13,484 ballots cast in his favor.

If the women’s leads hold, all three commissioners will be Democrats. They will join Commissioner John Dean of Camano Island.

Homola and McDowell are Oak Harbor residents vying for a district that represents much of North Whidbey. Price Johnson and Bakke are competing in a district that covers South and Central Whidbey.

In another possible upset, Democrat Tim Knue is ahead of appointed state Rep. Norma Smith in the District 10 race by 20,141 to 19,550.

But Rep. Barbara Bailey, R-Oak Harbor, has a solid lead over Democratic rival Patricia Terry of Camano Island. Bailey earned 20,963 votes and Terry has 18,434.

In other big race, Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano, is ahead of Republican Linda Haddon, an Oak Harbor resident, by a healthy margin of 54 percent to 46 percent. In District 10, Haugen has 21,901 votes and Haddon has 18,439.

Island County Auditor Sheilah Crider, who was appointed early this year, appears to be safe from a challenge by fellow Republican Jim Palmer. Crider is ahead by 13,870 to 11,670.

Three local measures also went down in flames. A proposal to form a Public Utility District on the island is losing badly with 15,045 voters casting ballots against it and only 7,554 in favor.

A request by the Port of Coupeville to increase its property tax levy was also shot down by 3,439 “no” votes and 1,362 “yes” votes.

The proposed North Whidbey Fire and Rescue property tax levy lift was turned down by a margin of 4,156 to 2,074 votes.

The majority of Island County voters favored Barack Obama, the next president of the United States. Nearly 54 percent of those who voted for a president cast a ballot for Obama.


ALL NEWS STORIES FROM BEFORE 2008 ELECTION DAY TO NOVEMBER 2004 MOVED TO THIS LOCATION: http://www.aboutweston.com/whidbeypress.html