



TYPES OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION -
EXAMPLES: Ebey's Landing on Whidbey Island,
Washington (National Historic Reserve); as part of redevelopment
plan (Hudson, N.Y.).
New Hampshire mill (reuse).
CHICKEN-EGG SITUATIONS: HISTORIC PRESERVATION OR THE INABILITY TO
JUSTIFY ITS ECONOMICS?






IN CONNECTICUT, A RE-USE ISSUE,
TOO...St. Andrew's Rectory harks to New London
"Motel 6 -Ritz-Carlton" urban renewal argument ($$); a question of
whether or not a parking lot is more historic for Bridgeport in the
long run than an historic building in disrepair; a fire did not
happen yet to St. Andrew's rectory, but we would almost bet that it
will once it has no land use value at all (in between now and the
demolition); Plainfield mill fire
above, Yale & Towne story
(Stamford) link. And the
"Motel 6-Ritz-Carlton" rule in Westport?

Gallaher Mansion at Cranbury Park gets
CT Trust for Historic Preservation Grant
Even in tough times, Norwalk is favored for histolric preservation
grant because of its history of working with the private sector to make
a success of preservation (Lockwood-Mathews Mansion is what has put
Norwalk on the preservation map). Photo from June 16, 2011
Norwalk HOUR online.
Friends of Cranbury Park get help to
develop master plan
By ROBERT KOCH, Hour Staff Writer
16 June 2011
The head of the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation on
Wednesday presented the city and The Friends of Cranbury Park a $20,000
check to help develop a master plan for the Gallaher Mansion at
Cranbury Park.
"On behalf of the Connecticut Trust, I want to thank the delegation
here from Norwalk," said Helen Higgins, trust executive director. "You
are giving us the opportunity to make this generous award to the
Gallaher house. It is a stunning house and this is one of many
investments we've made in Norwalk."
The grant will be combined with $20,000 in city funds and $5,000 from
The Friends of Cranbury Park to develop a master plan, including
building assessment and feasibility study, for the 80-year-old Tudor
Revival mansion.
Present for the check presentation at the mansion were Friends of
Cranbury Park President Celia Maddox and Friends of Cranbury Park
archeologist Holly Cuzzone, whose extensive research of the mansion --
once home to inventor and industrialist Edward Beach Gallaher -- landed
the structure on the state Register of Historic Places.
"Celia and I started this in 2007 when (parks Director) Mike Mocciae
asked us to do a history of Cranbury Park," Cuzzone said. "And it's
been ongoing ever since, first reconstructing the history of the house,
the architecture. We took it to the state level. It's now on the state
Register of Historic Places. ... We hope by July we'll find out if
whether we're on the national (Register) of Historic Places."
Cuzzone said having the mansion on the National Register of Historic
Places will pave the way for federal grants to restore the mansion as
laid out in the forthcoming master plan.
"The master plan is to assess all the mechanical systems and once
that's done to proceed with all repairs and restorations," Maddox told
The Hour.
Also present were Mayor Richard A. Moccia, state Sen. Bob Duff, D-25,
and state Reps. Terrie E. Wood, R-141, and Lawrence F. Cafero Jr.,
R-142. Cafero, House Republican leader, said the mansion is "a treasure
of our city." Duff said the grant is "a good jump start" to
establishing how to restore "this beautiful mansion."
Moccia said master plan will allow the city to allocate dollars in
future capital budgets for work on the mansion.
"We can plan for that as we do for other long-term projects," Moccia
said. "So this is the beginning. But without this beginning there will
be no end."
In February 2010, the Common Council approved a Master Plan for
Cranbury Park, setting the stage for improvements to the larger
220-park in which the mansion is located.
Plan to demolish historic home for parking space denied by commission
CT POST
Keila Torres, Staff Writer
Published: 11:11 p.m., Wednesday, September 8, 2010
BRIDGEPORT -- Faced with the decision to either save a rundown historic
home or allow it to be demolished and replaced with a parking lot, the
Stratfield Historic District Commission on Tuesday questioned each
property's significance to the district as a whole.
During their discussion of the Bridgeport Islamic Society's plan to
demolish the large, two family home at 1276 Fairfield Ave. and 21-23
Elmwood Place, the commissioners debated whether the property's
architectural significance was enough to warrant saving the
deteriorating structure.
"I would need someone to tell me the building needs to come down," said
Commissioner Frank Borres. "I think it's a terrible precedent to set to
suggest it should be torn down after holes were made in the roof and
windows were taken out."
The society purchased the property last year and was not aware of its
inclusion in the historic district. City officials also were not aware
of that fact and a demolition permit was granted earlier this year.
It was later revoked when Commissioner Robert Halstead informed city
officials of the property's inclusion in the Stratfield district.
Commission Chair Calvin Burwell noted that because the property lies on
the edge of the district it could either serve as a "gateway" to the
district or be considered "fringe" that detracts from the rest of the
area.
But, Burwell warned the commissioners that they are not "stewards of
individual buildings. We are stewards of the district."
Commissioner Nandy Cummings argued, however, that allowing the group's
plans to go forward would affect the public's perception of the
district. "The first thing someone will see when they come into the
district is a parking lot," she said.
Halstead said that while the structure was in bad shape for some time,
the condition had worsened within the last few months.
He proposed suggesting that a vacant property just yards away from the
mosque on Clinton Avenue that is currently facing foreclosure be used
either for parking or as a place to relocate the historic home. Both
options were dismissed because of the unknown financial and legal
factors..
Halstead then made a motion to deny the application based on the
structural stability of the structure, the architectural importance of
the building and the opinion that a parking lot on the site would
detract from the character of the district.
The vote passed 3-1, with Burwell voting against the denial.
Borres said he hopes the group can find a way to resolve its parking
issue without tearing down the historic home. "I just can't in good
conscience vote to tear down a historic home that is structurally sound
just because it benefits the applicant," he said.
It was unclear Wednesday whether mosque officials planned to appeal the
commission's decision or file a new application. Peter Gelderman, the
attorney representing the group, did not return a call for comment.
Plan to demolish historic building
prompts outcry
Kirk Lang, Klang@bcnnew.com
Published: 02:36 p.m., Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Plans for the future sometimes don't include links to Westport's past.
David Waldman, founder of David Adam Realty, a brokerage and property
management company, has a grand vision for Church Lane, one that
includes restaurants behind two of his properties on the Post Road,
along with a courtyard and parking. He even hopes that, at some point
in the future, a section of Church Lane could be set aside for
pedestrians only.
"I want to create a vibrancy," Waldman said.
However, the demolition of an early-1800s Federal-style building would
clear the way for Waldman and his partner Jay Bower's vision to become
reality. That prospect has angered some people, who have written and
e-mailed the Historic District Commission to register their displeasure
with the proposal.
Janet Aley, 84, said she became aware of the impending demolition of
the John Sherwood Mansion House when she drove by the historic
structure and saw that a demolition notice had been defaced. The
message scrawled on the sign read: "This is an obscenity."
Aley also strongly opposes demolishing the structure. "I just feel it
furthers the deterioration of the quality of downtown in the name of
the all-mighty buck," she said.
The demolition, however, is not a done deal.
Waldman met with the Historic District Commission last week -- which
chose not to waive the waiting period for demolition -- and agreed to
work with commission members and "evaluate every alternative that is
brought to us."
Possible alternatives to demolishing the building, he said, include
dismantling and moving the structure or restoring it in place.
HDC member Francis Henkels, an architect, checked out the building last
week with Waldman and his initial investigation found that it's
probably structurally feasible to save. However, Waldman said it would
not be economically feasible to restore the house to its original
character based on how much he and his partner could charge for rents.
As such, Waldman told the Westport News that to save the building and
keep it where it is, a benefactor would have to come forward, or
perhaps funding from the state or another revenue source could secured
for preservation.
Waldman, along with various partners, owns a number of Westport
buildings that are decades old, such as the YMCA building and the
Patagonia building (formerly Westport Bank and Trust), so he's not
anti-historic. He believes, however, that 26-28 Church Lane is in bad
repair and that in this current economic environment he can't invest
the money needed to preserve the structure without outside help.
The HDC is trying to assist.
"We are investigating some grant money through the Endangered Building
Fund," said Maggie Feczko, chairman of the HDC. Feczko has her fingers
crossed about securing aid, because she would hate to see the building
disappear.
"We have very few buildings left from that time period,' she said.
"It's a beautiful example of that Federal-style architecture."
While Waldman is the contract purchaser , according to Carol Leahy,
staff administrator for the HDC, the demolition permit was actually
filed in July by Jay Sherwood, Kim Sherwood and Jan S. Cavanagh.
Fezcko said she is grateful Waldman is willing to work with the HDC,
"and we hope we can come to a conclusion that is a win-win for both of
us."
The structure, which is on the HDC's Historic Resources List, was once
located on the Post Road, but was relocated in 1924 to make room for
Westport Bank and Trust. It was also used as a hotel at its previous
location, according to Leahy.
"The importance of this structure is not only that it's an excellent
example of a Federal-style building, but it makes an essential
contribution to the streetscape," she said.
Henkels added: "I think the historic character of Westport would be
seriously diminished by the loss of this house." He noted the two-story
building pre-dates the town's incorporation.
Bob Weingarten, a member of the Westport Historical Society, said
demolition could cause the quaint street to lose its "flavor."
The HDC will likely next discuss the John Sherwood Mansion House at its
Sept. 14 public hearing, when people will have an opportunity to
comment.
© 2010 Hearst Communications Inc.
Hearst Newspapers
Stamford
church granted approval to demolish historic rectory
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Elizabeth Kim, Staff Writer
Published: 12:27 p.m., Wednesday,
January 20, 2010
STAMFORD -- A state Superior Court judge ruled today that St.
Andrew's Episcopal Church may proceed with the demolition of its
136-year-old rectory on Washington Boulevard.
In a 26-page decision memo, Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro
said that the testimony and evidence "simply do not support a feasible
and prudent alternative that will prevent demolition."
Save Old Stamford, a preservation group, filed a lawsuit in
November
to stop the church from razing the rectory to pave way for a
residential development on the 1.3-acre site at 1231 Washington Blvd.
After years of struggling financially, St. Andrew's last
spring struck a lease-purchase agreement with developer Randy
Salvatore.
The deal provided the church with a monthly revenue stream of at least
$20,000 for as long as eight years until Salvatore purchases the land.
Over the years, the aging rectory had deteriorated from lack
of use
and funding. During eight days of hearings, both sides argued how much
it would cost to fix the three-story Victorian house.
The church had argued that it could not afford to maintain
the
building nor adapt it for its needs. In its contract with Salvatore,
the church was slated to receive $850,000 that it intended to use
toward building a new conference and classroom facility.
In court, Salvatore had said he would walk away from the deal
should
the court grant the temporary injunction. Church representatives said
that losing the development would result in St. Andrew's closing its
doors for good.
In her ruling, the judge concluded that the cost of
restoration
would "unduly burden the parish to give precedence to the restoration
and maintenance of a historic building above and beyond the daily
operations and necessities for the parishioners and the community."
Church
attorney calls preservation
gift 'drop in the bucket'
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Elizabeth Kim, Staff Writer
Published: 09:54 p.m., Friday, January 8, 2010
STAMFORD -- On the final day of a hearing that may resolve a
more-than-three-decade controversy over a 136-year-old rectory owned by
St. Andrew's Episcopal Church, a judge on Friday allowed a group of
preservationists to enter into evidence a $100,000 contribution it said
is intended for the preservation of the building.
Edward O'Hanlan, the attorney for St. Andrew's, argued that the
donation to Save Old Stamford was irrelevant and that the amount was "a
drop in the bucket" compared with what was needed to rescue the
rectory. The church, which maintains that the building does not meet
the congregation's needs, has estimated restoration costs of at least
$1.6 million, while preservation group Save Old Stamford has said the
building can be renovated for $500,000.
"It doesn't mean it has an impact," Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro said.
"It's one of many pieces of evidence I've received."
Save Old Stamford, a grass-roots group formed in November, is suing St.
Andrew's and developer RMS Construction to stop the demolition of the
Victorian rectory that the church says is standing in the way of a
development deal that will enable the financially strapped parish to
survive.
Developer Randy Salvatore has plans to build a 94-unit apartment
complex at the 1.3-acre site located on Washington Boulevard. In
return, the parish is to receive at least $20,000 for eight years until
the land is sold to Salvatore, and $850,000 toward a new facility that
will give the church more classroom and conference space.
Joseph Conetta, president of Save Old Stamford, testified that on
Thursday morning, he met with Avon Theatre owner Charles Royce and
received a pledge of $100,000 to the cause of preserving the rectory.
Conetta said he later received an e-mail confirming the gift from The
Royce Family Fund.
Friday marked the conclusion of a tense and, at times, dramatic hearing
that lasted a total of eight days and involved testimony from nine
witnesses. The day before, the judge remarked that she had taken 60
pages of notes.
Her decision is expected to be filed in state Superior Court next
Friday.
The judge indicated Wednesday that if she grants a temporary
injunction, she may require Save Old Stamford to post a bond that
addresses possible damages to the church as it awaits a trial on a
permanent injunction. Salvatore has said he would walk away from the
deal if the temporary injunction were granted.
Aside from Royce's gift, Save Old Stamford has said it does not have
access to significant funds.
The St. Andrew's case, which is being closely watched by
preservationists, is considered highly unusual, according to Helen
Higgins, the executive director of the Connecticut Trust for Historic
Preservation.
The lawsuit is among the few to be brought under the state
Environmental Protection Act, which allows citizens to sue to prevent
the "unreasonable" destruction of historic buildings. Moreover, unlike
most of the cases, the legal action was brought by a group of
individuals as opposed to the state, Higgins said.
Apart from preservationist concerns, the issue has also shed light on
the tenuous state of urban churches.
The parish at St. Andrew's consists of 65 families, who are
predominately black and working class. In July, more than 50 of its
members packed into a conference room in the Stamford Government Center
to support the church's decision before the city's Zoning Board.
At the time, Ruth Young, a parishioner since 1975, said: "We love the
rectory, but we also have to be realistic. We put a lot of money into
trying to hold the rectory together. But in this day and time, we are
trying to help human lives and families."
Even Higgins, who said she supports saving the rectory, acknowledged
that the St. Andrew's conflict was especially difficult.
"For me, realizing that this issue comes down to the finances of the
church is kind of heartbreaking," she said. "Nobody wants to balance a
building against a congregation."
Stamford
preservationists say they
have $100,000 donation to save rectory
By Elizabeth Kim, Staff Writer, Stamford ADVOCATE
Published: 09:52 p.m., Thursday, January 7, 2010
STAMFORD -- On what was to be the final day of court testimony, a group
of preservationists fighting to stop demolition of a rectory at St.
Andrew's Episcopal Church announced Thursday they have received
$100,000 from a benefactor -- Avon Theatre owner Charles Royce, of
Greenwich.
Members of Save Old Stamford said such a donation demonstrates there is
public interest in saving the rectory.
"I have been taking steps to find other alternatives," said Joseph
Conetta, the group's president. "It's evidence that more funds might
come in."
A November lawsuit filed by Save Old Stamford is preventing the church
from demolishing the 136-year-old rectory on the 1.3-acre site as part
of a lease-purchase agreement with a developer that pays the
cash-strapped church at least $20,000 a month.
Royce could not be reached for comment Thursday. He is president of
Royce & Associates, an investment adviser which manages $27 billion
in assets. Around 2001, he purchased the then-shuttered Avon theater
and helped renovate it into an art film house.
He is one of three individuals who have donated to Save Old Stamford,
according to Conetta.
Glenn Gazin, the attorney for Save Old Stamford, spoke of Royce's
involvement just as Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro was about to close
the hearing Thursday. Gazin said he had found out about donation that
very morning.
News of the donation in the courtroom surprised representatives of St.
Andrew's and resulted in sidetracking proceedings for several hours as
the judge immediately suspended the hearing before learning the amount
of Royce's contribution.
Judges are not permitted to hear any information that might relate to a
possible settlement agreement so as not to influence their decisions.
After the issue was referred to Judge Taggart Adams, he ruled that Save
Old Stamford may present the information to Brazzel-Massaro today. She
will then decide whether it is relevant and admissible.
Edward O'Hanlan, the attorney for St. Andrew's, argued that the sum was
only a small fraction of the amount needed to renovate the rectory and
that the church would still need a place to move it.
St. Andrew's has had experts testify that restoring the rectory would
cost at least $1.6 million.
An architect for Save Old Stamford testified Wednesday the building
could be renovated for $500,000.
Nicholas Bros. Inc., which specializes in moving historic buildings,
has estimated that moving the rectory to a location on the church's
property would cost $400,000.
In the morning, St. Andrew's tried to rebut testimony about the
condition of the rectory from two experts for Save Old Stamford.
Richard Bergmann, an architect representing the preservationists, said
Wednesday the building appeared to be sound, adding that he saw very
few cracks during a tour he took Monday.
But Peter Jennewein, an architect hired by St. Andrew's, provided the
court with more than 30 photographs that he said he took only hours
before the hearing began.
The images depicted numerous plaster cracks and various types of decay
on different walls and ceilings in the rectory.
Jennewein said this indicates water and structural damage that suggest
the building was unsafe.
"I would not want to risk the life and safety of my client," he said.
Preservation
advocates hope to save old fire headquarters
By Debra Friedman, Greenwich TIME STAFF WRITER
Published: 09:26 p.m., Thursday, January 7, 2010
Calling the current fire headquarters a "landmark building and
historical cultural resource," members of the Greenwich Preservation
Trust say they aren't happy town officials are considering demolishing
the seven-decade-old building to make room for new construction at the
site.
Jo Conboy, chairman of the preservation group, which is charged with
advocating for historic structures in town, said group members were
surprised to read a story in Monday's Greenwich Time that the town had
switched gears in its plans to finish the public safety complex. The
original plan was to renovate the structure.
"This building must be preserved because demolishing it is a violation
of the public trust and stewardship that is part of town leadership,"
wrote members of the group in a letter sent to Greenwich Time.
Initial plans envisioned renovating the old police headquarters and
current fire headquarters on Mason Street to make one larger facility
for the fire department without changing the outside of the structure.
But First Selectman Peter Tesei said town officials recently decided
renovating the building would be too costly and inefficient as a result
of new standards in public safety facilities that the current building
cannot accommodate.
"Renovating would cost us somewhere in excess of 10 to 15 million
(dollars) more than building a new one," said Tesei. "And even if you
did that, you wouldn't have a building with a blueprint that is most
efficient and effective for utilization by the fire department."
The new plan is contingent on the approval of various town bodies and
securing $20 million to $24 million. Tesei said a complete renovation
could cost as much as $34 million. The first selectman said he hopes to
secure funding for a new building in the 2010-11 budget cycle, but
officials do not have a projected completion date.
In light of the town's new stance, the Greenwich Preservation Trust
said it will fight to save the building, which was built in 1937 by
Joseph Bailey, a Greenwich architect. The group contends the building
is the town's only Art Deco civic building, which is part of the
municipal center historic district.
Members of the preservation group, which formed two years ago to save a
historic home in Byram, are proposing that the town renovate the
current fire house as office space and move the fire headquarters
somewhere else in town. If that can't be done, members said they are
skeptical that the inside cannot be professionally renovated to be like
new while keeping the outside appearance essentially the same.
"You don't know what can be done until you do the studies and
analysis," said Patricia Kantorski, who said the town should conduct a
number of feasibility studies that are made available to the public
before coming to a final decision.
While town officials have cited asbestos and sewage problems as reasons
to demolish the old structure and start over, preservation members
contend those problems would be addressed and corrected with a proper
renovation. Although it would be more costly to renovate, Conboy said
it would be a worthy investment for future generations of the town.
While viewing the building Thursday, Eric Brower, the vice chairman of
the group, pointed out how the town took steps to extend marble details
to the new police building and protect the integrity of the old
limestone building during prior construction. Brower said it was
perplexing why the town would invest in protecting the building and
extending the design if it were going to ultimately knock it down.
Tesei said he felt it was "premature" to judge the new proposal without
knowing all the facts that led to the change in plans.
"The town has to look first and foremost to see to it that tax dollars
are invested and spent wisely and that the facility meets federal and
state standards," Tesei said.
The first selectman said moving the central fire headquarters somewhere
else was out of the question.
"We have already gone through decades of planning and public
consideration and the site that is presently the central fire station
is going to be the location," said Tesei.
Fire Chief Pete Siecienski said last week that while he understood the
concerns of preserving old structures, his department needs a building
that works.
"It's an outdated building that is designed for the size of a fire
engine from years ago," Siecienski said.
"There's some concern about the historical significance, and we
certainly want to be sensitive of that. Initial designs would
incorporate a lot of features from the old building into the new one,
so we would never lose sight of the historical site."
Although the two sides disagree on how to proceed with creating an
updated fire headquarters, no one disputes that a change is needed.
"Everyone agrees this needs to be fixed," said Brower as he walked
through the inside of the fire department seeing the less than adequate
conditions firefighters have to deal with every day on the job.
"We want it fixed and we are not trying to interfere. We just think it
can be done while preserving the exterior."
Conboy said she expects members to follow the proposal as it goes
through various town bodies for approval to voice their opposition. The
committee also wants to meet with the first selectman to discuss
options for renovating the building.
"This is what we formed for," Conboy said. "If we don't fight for these
buildings, then what are we here for?"
EXAMPLE FROM
NEW HAMPSHIRE...ALL OVER NEW ENGLAND,
INCLUDING CT.
Can The
Historic Mills Be Saved? In Stonington, Landscape And Friendly
Zoning
Foster Successful Renovations
By JOE WOJTAS
Day Staff
Columnist, Stonington/Mystic
Published
on 11/28/2004
Stonington
— In many Connecticut towns, old mill buildings pose major problems.
Ill-suited
for modern industrial uses, they stand vacant and begin to deteriorate.
Targeted by vandals, more than a few end up being destroyed by fire.
Many of the
12 mills in this town, however, have been successfully rehabilitated,
and
town officials are considering proposals involving two more. If those
projects
proceed, just a few of the mills here would remain underused or vacant.
And that makes
Stonington the envy of many eastern Connecticut towns.
Over the past
decade, fires have destroyed mills in Sprague, Jewett City, Sterling,
Plainfield
and Norwich.
In Plainfield,
the dilapidated Carvill Combing Mill is to be razed after plans to
renovate
it fell through. The adjacent Brunswick Mill had to be torn down after
an arson fire. The InterRoyal Mill, also in Plainfield, has been
damaged
by fire and is scheduled to be demolished. Work to convert the
long-vacant
Hale Mill in Norwich into a hotel have stalled amid financial problems,
and in Griswold, owners of the vacant Triangle Cable and Wire Plant owe
the town $131,000 in back taxes.
With the exception
of the massive Ponemah Mill, a mill-enhancement program in Norwich has
had little positive effect.
Town officials
and developers cite several reasons for Stonington's success stories.
They
say the mills in town are smaller and easier to rehabilitate than the
massive
complexes found in other towns. And, for the most part, those that have
been rehabilitated are located amid thriving businesses or residential
areas, developer James Coker of Stonington pointed out.
Developers
are taken with the Stonington mills' proximity to the water or to
scenic
Mystic, and the mills' potential has been further enhanced by a new
zoning
designation that allows for them to be used for other than industrial
applications.
Just a month after the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the new
Industrial Heritage Reuse District this summer, the town received
proposals
to rehabilitate two mills.
While most
towns are looking for federal and state aid to fund studies and
environmental
cleanups of mill sites, almost all of the mill-rehabilitation work here
has been funded by the private sector. The rare exception was Mystic
Seaport's
$12 million rehabilitation of the Rossie Mill in Mystic, which was
partially
funded by state and federal grants.
“I think we're
doing much better than other communities in the region,” said Jason
Vincent,
Stonington's director of planning. “A lot of mill sites in other places
have been abandoned, fallen apart or burned.”
Coker spent
$2 million about six years ago to renovate the former Sirtex Mill in
Old
Mystic into 33,000 feet of space. Today, the space is filled by a
chiropractor,
a personal trainer and two firms that train people to work at nuclear
power
plants and develop sound-suppression systems. Coker said the site was
attractive
because of its location at the head of the Mystic River and bordering a
nature preserve and a small village.
“And the bones
of this building were very good,” he said. “It was well-built from the
outset.”
The mill had
remained in use until Coker's purchase of it and so had not
deteriorated
as many others have.
•••
The Mystic
Packer Building, Acme Wire Co. and the former Lathrop Machine Co. mill
in Mystic and the Old Mystic Mill feature a mix of manufacturing,
commercial
businesses and offices, while the Mystic Seaport has renovated
one-third
of the Rossie Velvet Mill into the Maritime Research and Education
Center.
“Everyone who
did these mills did a first-class job on them,” Coker said.
The former
Monsanto mill in Stonington Harbor is being renovated into $30 million
worth of luxury condominiums, homes and commercial space. The project,
stalled by a July 2003 fire that destroyed the mill after work had
begun,
is scheduled for completion next year.
The 175,000-square-foot
American Velvet Mill in Stonington Borough now contains 43 businesses,
many of them artists. Other tenants include a steel fabricator, a snack
food distributor and a woodworker, among others. The building had
become
vacant in 1999 when its owner moved to Virginia to take advantage of
cheaper
operating costs.
A Mystic man
has proposed a $25 million luxury condominium project for the site of
the
now-defunct Mystic Color Lab. A New York developer has obtained one of
the two zoning approvals he needs for a $15 million project to
rehabilitate
the northern end of the Thread Mill in Pawcatuck into condominiums and
retail space. Both the color lab and Thread Mill projects are being
pursued
under the town's Industrial Heritage Reuse District designation, which
allows developers to rehabilitate historic mills for uses other than
industry.
Town officials
and the Pawcatuck Revitalization Organization hope to use the zone to
interest
developers in remaining mill sites in Pawcatuck, including the
sprawling
Harris Graphics property along Mechanic Street. The site is about 60
percent
occupied by businesses such as Cottrell Brewing Co. that have taken
advantage
of relatively inexpensive leases. Much of the space is used for
warehousing.
A large portion
of the adjacent Yardney mill is being used for industrial purposes but
sections of it could be rehabilitated.
The other remaining
sites are the Campbell Grain building that looms over Coggswell Street
in downtown Pawcatuck and contains several businesses and the vacant
Connecticut
Casting Mill on Stillman Avenue, which is in the worst shape of all the
town's mills. Its contamination problems and small size could make it
unprofitable
to renovate.
The Pawcatuck
Revitalization Organization is working with an architectural group from
Yale University to design a master plan for the mills and the downtown
area, and town officials hope the millions of dollars they will soon
pour
into downtown Pawcatuck for streetscape improvements also will attract
developers.
A New York
City consulting firm's draft report on the mills says Pawcatuck's
industrial
mill sites “are more suited to eclectic uses that contribute to the
town's
quality of life and tourism sectors.
“A wide variety
of spaces are available — ranging from lofts to sheds to office
buildings.
This variety not only invites different uses, it also invites mixed
uses
on the same sites,” says the report, which also recommends the town
could
use the mills to meet its demand for moderately priced housing.
Vincent, the
town planning director, said rehabilitating the mills is an example of
“smart growth” because it involves reusing existing buildings to
bolster
the town's grand list of taxable property without increasing sprawl and
depleting open space.
“Some people
are concerned we're taking away space for industrial or commercial
growth
but the value derived from adaptive reuse could easily surpass the
industrial
value (of the mills),” he said.
Vincent said
the Industrial Heritage Reuse District, which requires developers to
submit
a master plan for approval before submitting a final site-plan
application,
has made the rehabilitation process more neighborhood-friendly because
developers must work with residents to determine the type of project
that
would benefit their neighborhood.
“The community
is deciding what it wants,” he said.
•••
Bob Granato,
the former Planning and Zoning Commission chairman and current
Pawcatuck
Revitalization Organization project manager, is the champion of the
Stonington
mills.
A former counselor
at Thames Valley Community College, he placed many workers at the
Harris
Graphics plant before it closed in 1990, putting 450 people out of
work.
In recent years, Granato has researched mills across the state and is
writing
a book about them called “Monuments to Misery.”
He said it
was a mill fire in Sterling that set him to thinking about the fate of
mills. The fire at the Monsanto property last year only highlighted the
urgency that surrounds the renovation of them, he said.
“With a mill,
sooner or later you get the historic end result –– collapsing roofs,
vandalism
and finally fire,” Granato said one recent afternoon while touring the
Pawcatuck mill sites.
“For 15 years,
I was saying, ‘Let's keep these mills for industry,'” he said. “God
only
made so much land. But we've got to recognize these sites are no longer
conducive to modern industry.”
Indeed, industry
demands close proximity to highways and airports, and locations where
the
cost of doing business is relatively low. The need for certain interior
configurations and the cost involved in converting mills also scare off
manufacturers, who often find it less expensive to erect new buildings.
But the large
windows, high ceilings, brick facades and waterfront locations
associated
with mills make them attractive for conversion to apartments,
condominiums,
offices and shops.
With its jumble
of modern steel structures and historic brick buildings, the 19-acre
Harris
property poses the biggest challenge for the Pawcatuck Revitalization
Organization
and the town. Granato envisions the overgrown, trash-strewn parking
lots
and an undeveloped area along the river being used for housing and a
park
while the main plant could contain an indoor athletic complex with a
plaza
and restaurant in the area between Harris Graphics and Yardney.
The New York
consulting firm has said other possibilities include housing or an arts
center similar to one located in a historic downtown mill complex in
North
Adams, Mass. Such a project would be the crown jewel of the
revitalization
effort.
While some
businesses currently operate in sections of the Harris building,
Granato
said the old structure is underused. A renovated building would
generate
far more tax revenue.
Granato also
envisions the entire area around the Campbell Grain Co. being
rehabilitated
and tied in with the Riverwalk project, the planned footbridge into
Westerly,
and improvements to Coggswell Street. He likens the effort to what was
accomplished along the river in downtown Providence.
“Communities
across the country have made rivers the center of their communities
with
art colonies and theaters that bring in people to support the local
economy,”
he said.
EXAMPLE FROM WHIDBEY ISLAND...More
than just Ebey's Landing (National Historic Reserve)
Langley gets funds for
preservation
South Whidbey RECORD
Dec 11 2009, 4:31 PM
Langley has added more money to its historic-preservation kitty.
The city council this week voted to accept $6,000 in matching funds
from Island County.
The county sets aside $1 from each recording at the auditor’s office
for use in historic preservation.
“It’s not being robbed from anywhere else,” said city Planning Director
Larry Cort.
The grant will be added to a recent $9,000 state grant to hire a
part-time person to conduct a “full-blown” survey of 60 historic
properties in the city, said Councilman Bob Waterman, head of the
city’s volunteer Historic Preservation Commission.