TYPES OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION - EXAMPLES:  Ebey's Landing on Whidbey Island, Washington (National Historic Reserve);  as part of redevelopment plan (Hudson, N.Y.). New Hampshire mill (reuse).




IN CONNECTICUT, A RE-USE ISSUE, TOO...St. Andrew's Rectory harks to New London "Motel 6 -Ritz-Carlton" urban renewal argument ($$); a fire did not happen yet to St. Andrew's rectory, but we would almost bet that it will once it has no land use value at all (in between now and the demolition); Plainfield mill fire above, Yale & Towne story (Stamford) link.


Plan to demolish historic building prompts outcry
Kirk Lang, Klang@bcnnew.com
Published: 02:36 p.m., Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Plans for the future sometimes don't include links to Westport's past.

David Waldman, founder of David Adam Realty, a brokerage and property management company, has a grand vision for Church Lane, one that includes restaurants behind two of his properties on the Post Road, along with a courtyard and parking. He even hopes that, at some point in the future, a section of Church Lane could be set aside for pedestrians only.

"I want to create a vibrancy," Waldman said.

However, the demolition of an early-1800s Federal-style building would clear the way for Waldman and his partner Jay Bower's vision to become reality. That prospect has angered some people, who have written and e-mailed the Historic District Commission to register their displeasure with the proposal.

Janet Aley, 84, said she became aware of the impending demolition of the John Sherwood Mansion House when she drove by the historic structure and saw that a demolition notice had been defaced. The message scrawled on the sign read: "This is an obscenity."

Aley also strongly opposes demolishing the structure. "I just feel it furthers the deterioration of the quality of downtown in the name of the all-mighty buck," she said.

The demolition, however, is not a done deal.

Waldman met with the Historic District Commission last week -- which chose not to waive the waiting period for demolition -- and agreed to work with commission members and "evaluate every alternative that is brought to us."

Possible alternatives to demolishing the building, he said, include dismantling and moving the structure or restoring it in place.

HDC member Francis Henkels, an architect, checked out the building last week with Waldman and his initial investigation found that it's probably structurally feasible to save. However, Waldman said it would not be economically feasible to restore the house to its original character based on how much he and his partner could charge for rents. As such, Waldman told the Westport News that to save the building and keep it where it is, a benefactor would have to come forward, or perhaps funding from the state or another revenue source could secured for preservation.

Waldman, along with various partners, owns a number of Westport buildings that are decades old, such as the YMCA building and the Patagonia building (formerly Westport Bank and Trust), so he's not anti-historic. He believes, however, that 26-28 Church Lane is in bad repair and that in this current economic environment he can't invest the money needed to preserve the structure without outside help.

The HDC is trying to assist.

"We are investigating some grant money through the Endangered Building Fund," said Maggie Feczko, chairman of the HDC. Feczko has her fingers crossed about securing aid, because she would hate to see the building disappear.

"We have very few buildings left from that time period,' she said. "It's a beautiful example of that Federal-style architecture."

While Waldman is the contract purchaser , according to Carol Leahy, staff administrator for the HDC, the demolition permit was actually filed in July by Jay Sherwood, Kim Sherwood and Jan S. Cavanagh.

Fezcko said she is grateful Waldman is willing to work with the HDC, "and we hope we can come to a conclusion that is a win-win for both of us."

The structure, which is on the HDC's Historic Resources List, was once located on the Post Road, but was relocated in 1924 to make room for Westport Bank and Trust. It was also used as a hotel at its previous location, according to Leahy.

"The importance of this structure is not only that it's an excellent example of a Federal-style building, but it makes an essential contribution to the streetscape," she said.

Henkels added: "I think the historic character of Westport would be seriously diminished by the loss of this house." He noted the two-story building pre-dates the town's incorporation.

Bob Weingarten, a member of the Westport Historical Society, said demolition could cause the quaint street to lose its "flavor."

The HDC will likely next discuss the John Sherwood Mansion House at its Sept. 14 public hearing, when people will have an opportunity to comment.


© 2010 Hearst Communications Inc.
Hearst Newspapers



Stamford church granted approval to demolish historic rectory
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Elizabeth Kim, Staff Writer

Published: 12:27 p.m., Wednesday, January 20, 2010

STAMFORD -- A state Superior Court judge ruled today that St. Andrew's Episcopal Church may proceed with the demolition of its 136-year-old rectory on Washington Boulevard.

In a 26-page decision memo, Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro said that the testimony and evidence "simply do not support a feasible and prudent alternative that will prevent demolition."

Save Old Stamford, a preservation group, filed a lawsuit in November to stop the church from razing the rectory to pave way for a residential development on the 1.3-acre site at 1231 Washington Blvd.

After years of struggling financially, St. Andrew's last spring struck a lease-purchase agreement with developer Randy Salvatore. The deal provided the church with a monthly revenue stream of at least $20,000 for as long as eight years until Salvatore purchases the land.

Over the years, the aging rectory had deteriorated from lack of use and funding. During eight days of hearings, both sides argued how much it would cost to fix the three-story Victorian house.

The church had argued that it could not afford to maintain the building nor adapt it for its needs. In its contract with Salvatore, the church was slated to receive $850,000 that it intended to use toward building a new conference and classroom facility.

In court, Salvatore had said he would walk away from the deal should the court grant the temporary injunction. Church representatives said that losing the development would result in St. Andrew's closing its doors for good.

In her ruling, the judge concluded that the cost of restoration would "unduly burden the parish to give precedence to the restoration and maintenance of a historic building above and beyond the daily operations and necessities for the parishioners and the community."


Church attorney calls preservation gift 'drop in the bucket'
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Elizabeth Kim, Staff Writer
Published: 09:54 p.m., Friday, January 8, 2010

STAMFORD -- On the final day of a hearing that may resolve a more-than-three-decade controversy over a 136-year-old rectory owned by St. Andrew's Episcopal Church, a judge on Friday allowed a group of preservationists to enter into evidence a $100,000 contribution it said is intended for the preservation of the building.

Edward O'Hanlan, the attorney for St. Andrew's, argued that the donation to Save Old Stamford was irrelevant and that the amount was "a drop in the bucket" compared with what was needed to rescue the rectory. The church, which maintains that the building does not meet the congregation's needs, has estimated restoration costs of at least $1.6 million, while preservation group Save Old Stamford has said the building can be renovated for $500,000.

"It doesn't mean it has an impact," Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro said. "It's one of many pieces of evidence I've received."

Save Old Stamford, a grass-roots group formed in November, is suing St. Andrew's and developer RMS Construction to stop the demolition of the Victorian rectory that the church says is standing in the way of a development deal that will enable the financially strapped parish to survive.

Developer Randy Salvatore has plans to build a 94-unit apartment complex at the 1.3-acre site located on Washington Boulevard. In return, the parish is to receive at least $20,000 for eight years until the land is sold to Salvatore, and $850,000 toward a new facility that will give the church more classroom and conference space.

Joseph Conetta, president of Save Old Stamford, testified that on Thursday morning, he met with Avon Theatre owner Charles Royce and received a pledge of $100,000 to the cause of preserving the rectory. Conetta said he later received an e-mail confirming the gift from The Royce Family Fund.

Friday marked the conclusion of a tense and, at times, dramatic hearing that lasted a total of eight days and involved testimony from nine witnesses. The day before, the judge remarked that she had taken 60 pages of notes.

Her decision is expected to be filed in state Superior Court next Friday.

The judge indicated Wednesday that if she grants a temporary injunction, she may require Save Old Stamford to post a bond that addresses possible damages to the church as it awaits a trial on a permanent injunction. Salvatore has said he would walk away from the deal if the temporary injunction were granted.

Aside from Royce's gift, Save Old Stamford has said it does not have access to significant funds.

The St. Andrew's case, which is being closely watched by preservationists, is considered highly unusual, according to Helen Higgins, the executive director of the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation.

The lawsuit is among the few to be brought under the state Environmental Protection Act, which allows citizens to sue to prevent the "unreasonable" destruction of historic buildings. Moreover, unlike most of the cases, the legal action was brought by a group of individuals as opposed to the state, Higgins said.

Apart from preservationist concerns, the issue has also shed light on the tenuous state of urban churches.

The parish at St. Andrew's consists of 65 families, who are predominately black and working class. In July, more than 50 of its members packed into a conference room in the Stamford Government Center to support the church's decision before the city's Zoning Board.

At the time, Ruth Young, a parishioner since 1975, said: "We love the rectory, but we also have to be realistic. We put a lot of money into trying to hold the rectory together. But in this day and time, we are trying to help human lives and families."

Even Higgins, who said she supports saving the rectory, acknowledged that the St. Andrew's conflict was especially difficult.

"For me, realizing that this issue comes down to the finances of the church is kind of heartbreaking," she said. "Nobody wants to balance a building against a congregation."


Stamford preservationists say they have $100,000 donation to save rectory
By Elizabeth Kim, Staff Writer, Stamford ADVOCATE
Published: 09:52 p.m., Thursday, January 7, 2010 

STAMFORD -- On what was to be the final day of court testimony, a group of preservationists fighting to stop demolition of a rectory at St. Andrew's Episcopal Church announced Thursday they have received $100,000 from a benefactor -- Avon Theatre owner Charles Royce, of Greenwich.

Members of Save Old Stamford said such a donation demonstrates there is public interest in saving the rectory.

"I have been taking steps to find other alternatives," said Joseph Conetta, the group's president. "It's evidence that more funds might come in."

A November lawsuit filed by Save Old Stamford is preventing the church from demolishing the 136-year-old rectory on the 1.3-acre site as part of a lease-purchase agreement with a developer that pays the cash-strapped church at least $20,000 a month.

Royce could not be reached for comment Thursday. He is president of Royce & Associates, an investment adviser which manages $27 billion in assets. Around 2001, he purchased the then-shuttered Avon theater and helped renovate it into an art film house.

He is one of three individuals who have donated to Save Old Stamford, according to Conetta.

Glenn Gazin, the attorney for Save Old Stamford, spoke of Royce's involvement just as Judge Barbara Brazzel-Massaro was about to close the hearing Thursday. Gazin said he had found out about donation that very morning.

News of the donation in the courtroom surprised representatives of St. Andrew's and resulted in sidetracking proceedings for several hours as the judge immediately suspended the hearing before learning the amount of Royce's contribution.

Judges are not permitted to hear any information that might relate to a possible settlement agreement so as not to influence their decisions. After the issue was referred to Judge Taggart Adams, he ruled that Save Old Stamford may present the information to Brazzel-Massaro today. She will then decide whether it is relevant and admissible.

Edward O'Hanlan, the attorney for St. Andrew's, argued that the sum was only a small fraction of the amount needed to renovate the rectory and that the church would still need a place to move it.

St. Andrew's has had experts testify that restoring the rectory would cost at least $1.6 million.

An architect for Save Old Stamford testified Wednesday the building could be renovated for $500,000.

Nicholas Bros. Inc., which specializes in moving historic buildings, has estimated that moving the rectory to a location on the church's property would cost $400,000.

In the morning, St. Andrew's tried to rebut testimony about the condition of the rectory from two experts for Save Old Stamford.

Richard Bergmann, an architect representing the preservationists, said Wednesday the building appeared to be sound, adding that he saw very few cracks during a tour he took Monday.

But Peter Jennewein, an architect hired by St. Andrew's, provided the court with more than 30 photographs that he said he took only hours before the hearing began.

The images depicted numerous plaster cracks and various types of decay on different walls and ceilings in the rectory.

Jennewein said this indicates water and structural damage that suggest the building was unsafe.

"I would not want to risk the life and safety of my client," he said.

Preservation advocates hope to save old fire headquarters
By Debra Friedman, Greenwich TIME STAFF WRITER
Published: 09:26 p.m., Thursday, January 7, 2010

Calling the current fire headquarters a "landmark building and historical cultural resource," members of the Greenwich Preservation Trust say they aren't happy town officials are considering demolishing the seven-decade-old building to make room for new construction at the site.

Jo Conboy, chairman of the preservation group, which is charged with advocating for historic structures in town, said group members were surprised to read a story in Monday's Greenwich Time that the town had switched gears in its plans to finish the public safety complex. The original plan was to renovate the structure.

"This building must be preserved because demolishing it is a violation of the public trust and stewardship that is part of town leadership," wrote members of the group in a letter sent to Greenwich Time.

Initial plans envisioned renovating the old police headquarters and current fire headquarters on Mason Street to make one larger facility for the fire department without changing the outside of the structure.

But First Selectman Peter Tesei said town officials recently decided renovating the building would be too costly and inefficient as a result of new standards in public safety facilities that the current building cannot accommodate.

"Renovating would cost us somewhere in excess of 10 to 15 million (dollars) more than building a new one," said Tesei. "And even if you did that, you wouldn't have a building with a blueprint that is most efficient and effective for utilization by the fire department."

The new plan is contingent on the approval of various town bodies and securing $20 million to $24 million. Tesei said a complete renovation could cost as much as $34 million. The first selectman said he hopes to secure funding for a new building in the 2010-11 budget cycle, but officials do not have a projected completion date.

In light of the town's new stance, the Greenwich Preservation Trust said it will fight to save the building, which was built in 1937 by Joseph Bailey, a Greenwich architect. The group contends the building is the town's only Art Deco civic building, which is part of the municipal center historic district.

Members of the preservation group, which formed two years ago to save a historic home in Byram, are proposing that the town renovate the current fire house as office space and move the fire headquarters somewhere else in town. If that can't be done, members said they are skeptical that the inside cannot be professionally renovated to be like new while keeping the outside appearance essentially the same.

"You don't know what can be done until you do the studies and analysis," said Patricia Kantorski, who said the town should conduct a number of feasibility studies that are made available to the public before coming to a final decision.

While town officials have cited asbestos and sewage problems as reasons to demolish the old structure and start over, preservation members contend those problems would be addressed and corrected with a proper renovation. Although it would be more costly to renovate, Conboy said it would be a worthy investment for future generations of the town.

While viewing the building Thursday, Eric Brower, the vice chairman of the group, pointed out how the town took steps to extend marble details to the new police building and protect the integrity of the old limestone building during prior construction. Brower said it was perplexing why the town would invest in protecting the building and extending the design if it were going to ultimately knock it down.

Tesei said he felt it was "premature" to judge the new proposal without knowing all the facts that led to the change in plans.

"The town has to look first and foremost to see to it that tax dollars are invested and spent wisely and that the facility meets federal and state standards," Tesei said.

The first selectman said moving the central fire headquarters somewhere else was out of the question.

"We have already gone through decades of planning and public consideration and the site that is presently the central fire station is going to be the location," said Tesei.

Fire Chief Pete Siecienski said last week that while he understood the concerns of preserving old structures, his department needs a building that works.

"It's an outdated building that is designed for the size of a fire engine from years ago," Siecienski said.

"There's some concern about the historical significance, and we certainly want to be sensitive of that. Initial designs would incorporate a lot of features from the old building into the new one, so we would never lose sight of the historical site."

Although the two sides disagree on how to proceed with creating an updated fire headquarters, no one disputes that a change is needed.

"Everyone agrees this needs to be fixed," said Brower as he walked through the inside of the fire department seeing the less than adequate conditions firefighters have to deal with every day on the job.

"We want it fixed and we are not trying to interfere. We just think it can be done while preserving the exterior."

Conboy said she expects members to follow the proposal as it goes through various town bodies for approval to voice their opposition. The committee also wants to meet with the first selectman to discuss options for renovating the building.

"This is what we formed for," Conboy said. "If we don't fight for these buildings, then what are we here for?"




EXAMPLE FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE...
ALL OVER NEW ENGLAND, INCLUDING CT.
Can The Historic Mills Be Saved?  In Stonington, Landscape And Friendly Zoning Foster Successful Renovations
By JOE WOJTAS
Day Staff Columnist, Stonington/Mystic
Published on 11/28/2004

Stonington — In many Connecticut towns, old mill buildings pose major problems. Ill-suited for modern industrial uses, they stand vacant and begin to deteriorate. Targeted by vandals, more than a few end up being destroyed by fire.

Many of the 12 mills in this town, however, have been successfully rehabilitated, and town officials are considering proposals involving two more. If those projects proceed, just a few of the mills here would remain underused or vacant.

And that makes Stonington the envy of many eastern Connecticut towns.

Over the past decade, fires have destroyed mills in Sprague, Jewett City, Sterling, Plainfield and Norwich.

In Plainfield, the dilapidated Carvill Combing Mill is to be razed after plans to renovate it fell through. The adjacent Brunswick Mill had to be torn down after an arson fire. The InterRoyal Mill, also in Plainfield, has been damaged by fire and is scheduled to be demolished. Work to convert the long-vacant Hale Mill in Norwich into a hotel have stalled amid financial problems, and in Griswold, owners of the vacant Triangle Cable and Wire Plant owe the town $131,000 in back taxes.

With the exception of the massive Ponemah Mill, a mill-enhancement program in Norwich has had little positive effect.

Town officials and developers cite several reasons for Stonington's success stories. They say the mills in town are smaller and easier to rehabilitate than the massive complexes found in other towns. And, for the most part, those that have been rehabilitated are located amid thriving businesses or residential areas, developer James Coker of Stonington pointed out.

Developers are taken with the Stonington mills' proximity to the water or to scenic Mystic, and the mills' potential has been further enhanced by a new zoning designation that allows for them to be used for other than industrial applications. Just a month after the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the new Industrial Heritage Reuse District this summer, the town received proposals to rehabilitate two mills.

While most towns are looking for federal and state aid to fund studies and environmental cleanups of mill sites, almost all of the mill-rehabilitation work here has been funded by the private sector. The rare exception was Mystic Seaport's $12 million rehabilitation of the Rossie Mill in Mystic, which was partially funded by state and federal grants.

“I think we're doing much better than other communities in the region,” said Jason Vincent, Stonington's director of planning. “A lot of mill sites in other places have been abandoned, fallen apart or burned.”

Coker spent $2 million about six years ago to renovate the former Sirtex Mill in Old Mystic into 33,000 feet of space. Today, the space is filled by a chiropractor, a personal trainer and two firms that train people to work at nuclear power plants and develop sound-suppression systems. Coker said the site was attractive because of its location at the head of the Mystic River and bordering a nature preserve and a small village.

“And the bones of this building were very good,” he said. “It was well-built from the outset.”

The mill had remained in use until Coker's purchase of it and so had not deteriorated as many others have.

•••

The Mystic Packer Building, Acme Wire Co. and the former Lathrop Machine Co. mill in Mystic and the Old Mystic Mill feature a mix of manufacturing, commercial businesses and offices, while the Mystic Seaport has renovated one-third of the Rossie Velvet Mill into the Maritime Research and Education Center.

“Everyone who did these mills did a first-class job on them,” Coker said.

The former Monsanto mill in Stonington Harbor is being renovated into $30 million worth of luxury condominiums, homes and commercial space. The project, stalled by a July 2003 fire that destroyed the mill after work had begun, is scheduled for completion next year.

The 175,000-square-foot American Velvet Mill in Stonington Borough now contains 43 businesses, many of them artists. Other tenants include a steel fabricator, a snack food distributor and a woodworker, among others. The building had become vacant in 1999 when its owner moved to Virginia to take advantage of cheaper operating costs.

A Mystic man has proposed a $25 million luxury condominium project for the site of the now-defunct Mystic Color Lab. A New York developer has obtained one of the two zoning approvals he needs for a $15 million project to rehabilitate the northern end of the Thread Mill in Pawcatuck into condominiums and retail space. Both the color lab and Thread Mill projects are being pursued under the town's Industrial Heritage Reuse District designation, which allows developers to rehabilitate historic mills for uses other than industry.

Town officials and the Pawcatuck Revitalization Organization hope to use the zone to interest developers in remaining mill sites in Pawcatuck, including the sprawling Harris Graphics property along Mechanic Street. The site is about 60 percent occupied by businesses such as Cottrell Brewing Co. that have taken advantage of relatively inexpensive leases. Much of the space is used for warehousing.

A large portion of the adjacent Yardney mill is being used for industrial purposes but sections of it could be rehabilitated.

The other remaining sites are the Campbell Grain building that looms over Coggswell Street in downtown Pawcatuck and contains several businesses and the vacant Connecticut Casting Mill on Stillman Avenue, which is in the worst shape of all the town's mills. Its contamination problems and small size could make it unprofitable to renovate.

The Pawcatuck Revitalization Organization is working with an architectural group from Yale University to design a master plan for the mills and the downtown area, and town officials hope the millions of dollars they will soon pour into downtown Pawcatuck for streetscape improvements also will attract developers.

A New York City consulting firm's draft report on the mills says Pawcatuck's industrial mill sites “are more suited to eclectic uses that contribute to the town's quality of life and tourism sectors.

“A wide variety of spaces are available — ranging from lofts to sheds to office buildings. This variety not only invites different uses, it also invites mixed uses on the same sites,” says the report, which also recommends the town could use the mills to meet its demand for moderately priced housing.

Vincent, the town planning director, said rehabilitating the mills is an example of “smart growth” because it involves reusing existing buildings to bolster the town's grand list of taxable property without increasing sprawl and depleting open space.

“Some people are concerned we're taking away space for industrial or commercial growth but the value derived from adaptive reuse could easily surpass the industrial value (of the mills),” he said.

Vincent said the Industrial Heritage Reuse District, which requires developers to submit a master plan for approval before submitting a final site-plan application, has made the rehabilitation process more neighborhood-friendly because developers must work with residents to determine the type of project that would benefit their neighborhood.

“The community is deciding what it wants,” he said.

•••

Bob Granato, the former Planning and Zoning Commission chairman and current Pawcatuck Revitalization Organization project manager, is the champion of the Stonington mills.

A former counselor at Thames Valley Community College, he placed many workers at the Harris Graphics plant before it closed in 1990, putting 450 people out of work. In recent years, Granato has researched mills across the state and is writing a book about them called “Monuments to Misery.”

He said it was a mill fire in Sterling that set him to thinking about the fate of mills. The fire at the Monsanto property last year only highlighted the urgency that surrounds the renovation of them, he said.

“With a mill, sooner or later you get the historic end result –– collapsing roofs, vandalism and finally fire,” Granato said one recent afternoon while touring the Pawcatuck mill sites.

“For 15 years, I was saying, ‘Let's keep these mills for industry,'” he said. “God only made so much land. But we've got to recognize these sites are no longer conducive to modern industry.”

Indeed, industry demands close proximity to highways and airports, and locations where the cost of doing business is relatively low. The need for certain interior configurations and the cost involved in converting mills also scare off manufacturers, who often find it less expensive to erect new buildings.

But the large windows, high ceilings, brick facades and waterfront locations associated with mills make them attractive for conversion to apartments, condominiums, offices and shops.

With its jumble of modern steel structures and historic brick buildings, the 19-acre Harris property poses the biggest challenge for the Pawcatuck Revitalization Organization and the town. Granato envisions the overgrown, trash-strewn parking lots and an undeveloped area along the river being used for housing and a park while the main plant could contain an indoor athletic complex with a plaza and restaurant in the area between Harris Graphics and Yardney.

The New York consulting firm has said other possibilities include housing or an arts center similar to one located in a historic downtown mill complex in North Adams, Mass. Such a project would be the crown jewel of the revitalization effort.

While some businesses currently operate in sections of the Harris building, Granato said the old structure is underused. A renovated building would generate far more tax revenue.

Granato also envisions the entire area around the Campbell Grain Co. being rehabilitated and tied in with the Riverwalk project, the planned footbridge into Westerly, and improvements to Coggswell Street. He likens the effort to what was accomplished along the river in downtown Providence.

“Communities across the country have made rivers the center of their communities with art colonies and theaters that bring in people to support the local economy,” he said.



EXAMPLE FROM WHIDBEY ISLAND...More than just Ebey's Landing (National Historic Reserve)
Langley gets funds for preservation
South Whidbey RECORD
Dec 11 2009, 4:31 PM

Langley has added more money to its historic-preservation kitty.

The city council this week voted to accept $6,000 in matching funds from Island County.

The county sets aside $1 from each recording at the auditor’s office for use in historic preservation.

“It’s not being robbed from anywhere else,” said city Planning Director Larry Cort.

The grant will be added to a recent $9,000 state grant to hire a part-time person to conduct a “full-blown” survey of 60 historic properties in the city, said Councilman Bob Waterman, head of the city’s volunteer Historic Preservation Commission.