ENERGY

There is the situation in Connecticut - and then there is Alaska...

E N E R G Y L I N K S - T O D . E . E . P . O R G A N I Z E R

ENVIRONMENT AND RECREATION:
afmenagerie.html
air.html
armycorps.htm
armycorpsreport.html
audubon.html
DEP.html
deph2o.htm
effluent.htm
Feasibility.htm
futureleaders.html
dambreaks.html
fire.html
fireplainfield.html
fuelcells.html
geothermal.html
globalwarming.html
h2o.html
how97.htm
imp.html
recycling2008.html
ruralsalem.html
sky.htm
woodlandscoalition.html

RECREATION:
BIKE-PED COMMITTEE: hard at work, at Speak Up 2011, too!
bicyclesafety.htm
bicyclewpt.html
bikemapct.html

POWER:
345line.html
cross-soundveto.html
electricpc.html
highclpmap.html
lisound.html
lng.html
lngswrpa.html
power.htm
powersupply.html
TELECOM.html

GLOBAL WARMING:
bicyclewpt.html
Biodiesel.html
climatebrit.html
disaster.html
geothermal.html
fuelcells.html
GLOBALBUSINESS.html
globalwarming.html
suprect.htm
supreme.htm
supremes0708.html

Oil and natural gas
Texas tycoon, non-profit team up on state energy project
Deirdre Shesgreen, CT MIRROR
June 14, 2011

WASHINGTON -- As T. Boone Pickens lobbies Congress to enact subsidies for the natural gas industry, the Texas oil and gas tycoon also is bringing his zeal for natural gas vehicles to Connecticut in a deal involving a non-profit corporation, two taxi companies and millions in stimulus dollars.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a company founded by Pickens, will finish construction on three new natural gas fueling stations in Connecticut this summer. As part of the project, two major Connecticut taxi companies also will soon have 110 natural gas-powered vehicles each, replacing almost their entire fleets of gasoline-fueled cabs.

"This is our entry into the Connecticut market," said Mark Riley, general manager of Clean Energy's eastern region.

That entry was made possible, in large part, by $13.2 million in federal stimulus money. A Connecticut nonprofit organization, the Connecticut Clean Cities Future Fuels Project, teamed with Pickens' Clean Energy Corp. and the two taxi companies to apply for the stimulus funds.

"Once we get enough stations and infrastructure out, then the return on investment will be such that we won't need federal funding to make it work," said Lee Grannis, who helped win the federal funding and works as the coordinator for Greater New Haven Clean Cities. "But right now, we do."

Grannis hit on the crux of a fierce lobbying battle unfolding in Washington right now over legislation, sponsored by Rep. John Larson, D-1st District, and others, to subsidize the natural gas vehicle industry.

The fight has pit some of the nation's most influential conservative groups against Pickens, Larson, and more than 180 other House members, Democrats and Republicans alike, who say natural gas is America's ticket to energy independence.

"Our bill has tremendous bipartisan support because it attacks head-on the national security threat of our OPEC oil dependence and the fiscal irresponsibility of sending nearly $500 billion a year out of this country for foreign oil," said Jay Rosser, a spokesman for Pickens and the so-called "Pickens' Plan."

The other side's view?

"It's corporate welfare, plain and simple," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a fiscal watchdog group that has joined with 16 other organizations to oppose the bill.

He and others have noted that Pickens stands to benefit financially from the legislation. "Is he a big booster of natural gas? Absolutely," said Ellis. "And does he have a big financial interest in it? Absolutely."

Larson and others dismissed the conservative criticism and said it was the opponents who had a financial stake in this fight, including Charles and David Koch, wealthy brothers who own Koch Industries Inc., an oil refinery business.

"I'm shocked and appalled that we would find that the Koch brothers have been funding organizations who previously were for tax credits [and] who now, lo and behold, have had a change of heart," Larson said.

The Kochs are generous conservative donors and have funded at least one of the groups, Americans for Prosperity, that has lined up in opposition to the natural gas bill. They're trying to "pull out the stops" to kill the legislation, Larson said.

Spokesmen for both Pickens and the Kochs have said their interest in the natural gas bill is driven by political and economic philosophies, not personal financial interests.

The proposal at issue is the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act, a measure sponsored by Larson, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, and John Sullivan, an Oklahoma Republican, among others.

It would provide tax breaks for the use of natural gas as a vehicle fuel, the purchase of natural-gas vehicles, and the installation of natural-gas refueling stations. For example, consumers and businesses would get a tax break of between $7,500 to $64,000, depending on the weight of the vehicle, for buying a natural gas truck or car.

The idea is to replace diesel and regular gasoline with natural gas, making it a "bridge" fuel to wean the U.S. off foreign oil during a transition period, until policymakers put in place a more comprehensive energy policy that exploits wind, solar and other sources. Larson said the measure bill would give natural gas a boost "that provides a foundation from which to build an energy policy."

Although there are no natural gas wells in Connecticut, there are a half-dozen natural gas pumping stations in the state--and soon there will more. Clean Energy Fuels Corp., which Pickens first founded as Pickens Fuel Corp., is currently finishing work on a natural gas pumping station at Metro Taxi in West Haven and a second station Yellow Cab in Bloomfield.

The West Haven station will be done by the end of this week. Clean Energy expects to complete work on the Bloomfield station and a third pumping facility in Windsor Locks later this summer. Such projects would get a major boost if the Larson-Sullivan bill becomes law.

"We could see tremendously more penetration in the market with the incentives of the Natural Gas Act," said Riley, of Clean Energy, in which Pickens now has about a 40 percent stake. "We need the Natural Gas Act and these incentives to... assist the industry in ramping up the infrastructure and increasing the number of [natural gas] vehicles on the road gas. And once we get 5 to 7 years down the line, we'll see where we stand."

The Larson-Sullivan bill had seemed on a fast track to passage, at least in the House. But in recent weeks, conservative groups have mobilized in opposition. From the Heritage Foundation to the Club for Growth, the bill has come under attack from critics who say that Congress should not provide federal tax subsidies that benefit one particular interest in the energy sector.

Larson's bill would "provide billions of dollars in tax incentives for the production and use of natural gas vehicles," Chris Chocola, the Club for Growth's president, wrote in a recent blog item. Such tax breaks "destroy the system of free enterprise," he wrote.

"We're not against natural gas by any means," Chocola, a former Republican congressman from Indiana, said in an interview. "We just don't think you should have market-distorting credits picking winners and losers."

Ellis, of Taxpayers for Common Sense, said the bill is a slippery slope. "Right now we're all talking about trying to simply the tax code and roll back subsidies," he noted. "This goes in the exact opposite direction."

He found an irony in that Democrats like Larson, who have railed against oil industry subsidies, are pushing a fresh set of "special interest carve-outs" for the natural gas industry. And he dismissed the suggestion by natural gas officials like Riley that after a few years, they might not need the subsidies and would let them expire.

The bill is "trying to foist this natural gas vehicle market" onto the American public, and once the breaks are on the books, the industry will work to keep them there, Ellis said. "When you add some of these special-interest provisions to the tax code, they are very insidious," he said. "It's almost impossible to eliminate these."

As the Club for Growth and other groups ramped up their opposition, a handful of House Republicans who had signed onto the bill quickly withdrew their support. For example, Rep. Todd Akin, a firebrand Missouri conservative running for the Senate, said he'd taken a closer look at the legislation and decided he couldn't stomach the tax breaks.

Proponents of the bill dismiss the defections, noting only a handful of Republicans have taken their names off the legislation so far.

"Despite all this pressure from the right to get out of the bill, we've lost just four people," noted Rich Kolodziej, a spokesman for Natural Gas Vehicles for America, an industry lobby group. And other lawmakers have added their names, bringing the number of co-sponsors to 190. Kolodziej said he expects a Senate version to be introduced soon.

He said the conservative argument that the U.S. should defer to the free market when it comes to the nation's energy market is off-base.

"There is no free market for transportation fuels," Kolodziej said, noting that about 96 percent of the transportation fuel Americans now use is petroleum. "And petroleum is not a free market. It's controlled by OPEC." Letting the so-called "free market decide," he said, is essentially ceding control to OPEC.

Larson said the conservative opposition wouldn't stop the bill's momentum. He predicted that it would soon have 218 sponsors: the number needed for House passage and a threshold that could catapult it to a vote.

But Ellis said that while the legislation "looked like a juggernaut for a while" as more and more lawmakers signed on, the tide has turned against it.

"It's increasingly hard for lawmakers to defend the position that they are for eliminating wasteful spending and subsidies--and then on the other hand giving a handout to the natural gas industry," he said. "It's not going to get over the finish line."

Environmental advocate named to help with creation of DEEP
Jan Ellen Spiegel, CT MIRROR
May 3, 2011

Jessie Stratton, a long-time legislator turned environmental advocate has been named to help formulate policy as the state merges environmental and energy regulation under one department.

Monday was Stratton's first day as director of policy development for the DEP - a job she will continue with the new Department of Energy and Environment, once legislation is passed to create it.

The creation of that new department is precisely the point of her hiring.

"I am working in the commissioner's office to help him on policy integration and planning as the DEP plans how to bring the whole energy area into the department," she said as she headed home Monday evening.

Stratton said her role would be to help make that integration of energy and environment as complimentary and non-conflicting as possible across the new department's anticipated three main areas: environmental quality, environmental conservation and energy policy and then become the point person for insuring those roles stay complimentary.

DEP Commissioner Dan Esty said Stratton "is considered by many to be one of the most talented people in the state when it comes to energy and environment." He said she would have a major role in helping shape policy.

"Recognizing energy and environmental issues are deeply intertwined, they sometimes are pulled in same direction, sometimes they're in tension," he said. "How best to achieve multiple goals across a range of issues is not always easy to reconcile."

Esty said Stratton has a great capacity to connect with a wide array of parties and stakeholders on those issues -- legislators, environmental groups, the business community, clean energy groups and more.

The two met during the Malloy transition, when Stratton co-chaired the environmental policy transition team. Esty said as it became clear he would be the DEP commissioner, he began surveying people about who he ought to bring in.

"No name came to me more often than Jessie Stratton," he said.

Stratton, 64, was a state representative from Avon and Canton from 1989 through 2003 who served on the environment committee for her entire tenure, for 10 of those years as its co-chair. During that time her imprint was prominently on the energy deregulation legislation in 1998 in which she created the Clean Energy and the Energy Efficiency Funds.

She also was instrumental in the overhaul of inland wetland regulations. She helped revamp the remediation process for environmentally contaminated land. And she helped establish the first nitrogen trading program to help clean up Long Island Sound.

After leaving the legislature, she worked briefly for the Connecticut Fund for the Environment and since 2006, as director of government relations at Environment Northeast. The nexus of air quality and energy has been her advocacy passion.

Charles Rothenberger of the Connecticut Fund for the Environment, who along with other energy and environment advocates worked with Stratton often, called her a very effective advocate. He said he'd "love it if she was still on the front lines," but her new position "can only be good for the issues we all care about.

"It's a fantastic thing from my perspective," he said. "Jessie knows energy issues inside and out.

"I think it's a great having individuals inside the administration that really understand the issues, are very insightful and have a mature viewpoint."

Stratton said she was excited to be working with so many people she's known through her roles as a legislator and as an advocate for years, adding at her first meeting Monday, there was only one person in the room she hadn't already met.

"What is exciting is to take whatever experience and perspective and wisdom I gained in those two other roles and apply them here," she said. "It's a pretty cool opportunity."