




Changes coming for SWR delegation...
Hillary visited CT (Hartford) prior to
Primary, becoming the
first candidate to visit CT (Greenwich drop-ins don't count)!!!
Change is coming for the SWR delegation in Hartford, as
Senator Bill Nickerson and (not shown) Rep. Dolly Powers announce that
they are not
running in '08. Senator Freedman also calls it a day. Livvy
Floren and Lile Gibbons (flanking Senator Nickerson) running for
re-election unopposed. And in Weston's corner for the next two
years are Toni Boucher (taking the seat vacated by Judi Freedman in the
Senate), Senator John McKinney and Representative John Stripp (these
photos below).



Via the
Hersam Acorn Press/Wilton Bulletin website):
"...The 26th
District race was a close one and with 18 of 19 precincts reporting
Wednesday morning, Republican state Senate candidate Toni Boucher,
Wilton's current state representative for the 143rd district, was
victorious by a count of 28,323 to 25,156. John Hartwell of Westport is
her Democratic challenger.
"Ms. Boucher beat Mr. Hartwell handedly here in Wilton, with her vote
total 6,487 to his 3,434. Ms. Boucher gave a victory speech at
Republican headquarters at Old Town Hall on Tuesday night..."
NATIONAL CAMPAIGN
2008 - AS REFLECTED IN CONNECTICUT:

Link
to LWV debate schedule page
NEW FACES IN SOUTHWESTERN CT COALITION...





New faces in Southwestern legislative
coalition:
Scott Frantz
for Senator Nickerson, Fred Camillo for Dolly Powers, next, at the far
left, Terrie Wood for John Ryan of Darien; NOT MENTIONED IN THE
ARTICLE, Wilton's Peggy Reeves won in the 143rd; Hon. Rep. Toni Boucher moved up to the CT Senate (replacing
Hon. Judi Freedman, who retired from the 26th).
Committees will be facing
'hard truths': State lawmakers get their assignments for next session
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Brian Lockhart, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 12/21/2008 02:44:24 AM EST
HARTFORD - Fred Camillo, an incoming state representative from
Greenwich, hoped to garner a seat on the General Assembly's Commerce
Committee. It could have been a good fit. Camillo, who will
replace retiring Republican state Rep. Claudia "Dolly" Powers, ran a
waste disposal and recycling company for 18 years and currently works
in the mortgage banking industry. But he decided that having
spots on three other committees - appropriations, environment and
transportation - was probably enough.
"Coming from this part of the state (Republican leaders) did take into
consideration the time commitment," said Camillo, a Republican. "I
would have liked Commerce, too, but I had to be careful . . . I have to
work still, and I want to be back in the district."
With the 2009 legislative session beginning Jan. 7, the leaders of the
Republican minority in the House and Senate, along with Senate
Democrats, announced members' committee assignments late last week.
House Democrats released their list the previous week. Camillo
may wish he had fewer assignments once the Appropriations Committee
begins helping to craft the state's two-year budget for 2009-10 and
2010-11.
The group must do so while contending with the recession and an
estimated $6 billion deficit. Camillo said he was already spending time
in Hartford meeting officials and trying to learn as much as he can
about the budgets.
"In most cases - not all - there is certainly a case to be made for not
cutting their budgets," he said. "Unfortunately, we're not in that
position right now. So it's prioritizing at this point. I'm just trying
to get up to speed as quickly as possible."
Also appointed to appropriations were incoming freshman state Sen.
Scott Frantz, R-Greenwich, who replaces retiring Republican state Sen.
William Nickerson; incoming state Rep. Terrie Wood, R-Darien, who
succeeded retiring Republican state Rep. John Ryan; and incumbent state
Reps. John Hetherington, R-New Canaan, and John Stripp, R-Weston.
Frantz will be the ranking member or Republican chairman of the
Commerce Committee and serve on the Program Review and Transportation
committees.
"The newly elected General Assembly is going to have to face several
hard truths in the weeks and months ahead; chief among them is a
growing budget deficit and floundering economy," Frantz said in a
statement. "I am grateful to have been appointed to committees that
will have a direct impact on resolving these pressing challenges."
To avoid potential conflicts with his work on the Commerce and
Transportation committees, Frantz will step down from his current
position as chairman of the board of directors of Bradley International
Airport.
Wood's other assignments include the Environment and Education
committees. Hetherington is returning as ranking Republican on
the Government Administration and Elections Committee and will have a
seat on the Judiciary Committee. Stripp, who works in the banking
industry, will sit on the Commerce Committee and resume his role of
ranking Republican on the Banks Committee.
State Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, is returning as banking chairman. He
expected the committee's priority will be to oversee and, if necessary,
improve legislation passed last session to help residents through the
subprime mortgage crisis. Duff has tried in the past, without
success, to place greater regulations on the hedge fund industry.
"We'll probably look at that again a little bit, but it's a different
atmosphere now in Washington," Duff said. "So maybe there will be more
of a national policy" on hedge funds.
Though Camillo wishes he had time to serve on the Commerce Committee,
Duff gave up his seat to make more time for continuing to be vice
chairman of the Energy and Transportation committees and also serve on
the Appropriations Committee. Duff said he expected the
Transportation Committee's immediate goals will be determining how
cutbacks at the Metropolitan Transit Authority hurt Connecticut
commuters and wrestling with the ongoing upgrade of the New Haven Rail
Yard.
The project was proposed in 2005 by Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell to
provide a state-of-the-art maintenance facility for the new fleet of
train cars arriving next year. Earlier this year, Duff and state
Sen. Andrew McDonald, D-Stamford, helped make public that the rail yard
project's budget exploded over three years from $300 million to more
than $1.2 billion. Rell ordered an audit for cost savings. The
results, initially anticipated by October, are expected in the next few
days.
"The only saving grace right now for the rail yard is with a slower
economy we can get cheaper estimates and raw materials come down in
price," Duff said.
Incoming state Sen. Antonietta "Toni" Boucher, R-Westport (our
correction - WILTON), who for the past several years represented Wilton
and parts of Norwalk in the House, has been promoted from a
Transportation Committee member to the ranking Republican.
"It's a great time to be on the Transportation Committee," said
Boucher, citing the hiring of new Department of Transportation
Commissioner Joseph Marie and President-elect Barack Obama's plans to
invest in the nation's infrastructure.
"I have to give high marks to the new administration coming in and
having a bold plan to revisit our aging infrastructure," Boucher said.
She said she remains committed to making improvements to the
Metro-North Railroad's Danbury line and is expected to provide strong
opposition to Duff's continued efforts to revive the Super 7 expressway
project.
Boucher also requested moving from the Appropriations Committee to the
Finance Committee, where she said she hopes to have a greater impact on
the state's tax policies. Boucher, who was elected to replace
retiring state Sen. Judith Freedman, R-Westport, will be ranking
Republican on the Select Committee on Children and will continue
serving on the Education Committee.
In other assignments, McDonald will return as co-chairman of the
Judiciary Committee and serve on the Education, Finance and
Transportation committees.
State Senate Minority Leader John McKinney, R-Fairfield, is ranking
Republican of the Environment and Housing committees.
Assignments for returning state Rep. Livvy Floren, R-Greenwich, include
the committees on Aging, Finance and Government Administrations and
Elections.
And state Rep. Lile Gibbons, R-Greenwich, has seats on the Finance,
Human Services and Transportation committees.
Election
results for Westonites...




WINNERS OF THE 2008 CT
ELECTIONS
AFFECTING WESTON REPRESENTATION:
Above, U.S. Congress, 4th District: Jim Himes; below, CT State
Senate: John McKinney
(#28) and Toni Boucher
(#26); CT State Rep: John
Stripp
(#135)
Himes names chief of staff
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Peter Urban, Staff Writer
Posted: 12/31/2008 02:46:17 AM EST
WASHINGTON - U.S. Rep.-elect Jim Himes has turned to a veteran lobbyist
to run his Capitol Hill office when the 111th Congress opens next
week. Jason Cole, federal affairs manager at Swiss financial
giant UBS, a major employer in Stamford, will be chief of staff for the
4th District congressman.
"We feel lucky to have found a chief of staff with Jason's depth of
legislative experience and strong relationships on Capitol Hill," Himes
said in a statement.
Cole has worked for the global investment banking and securities firm
since 2003, lobbying Congress on many financial policy issues. He
previously served as legislative director for U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore,
D-Kan., a member of the House Financial Services Committee, and
prominent fiscal conservative. Himes also hired Kathleen Warner,
an attorney from Wilton, to run his in-district operations. She
will oversee his two district offices in Stamford and Bridgeport with a
combined staff of about nine. Warner most recently worked as a
finance director on Himes campaign. She previously worked for Day,
Berry & Howard and Bear Stearns.
"Kathleen's legal background and her detailed knowledge of the issues
affecting southwestern Connecticut make her a valuable asset to the
staff," Himes said.
From 2004 through 2007, UBS Americas spent $3.1 million on its
three-or-four member in-house lobbying team that also included former
Texas U.S. Sen. Phil Gramm. Some Democrats, including President-elect
Barack Obama, blame Gramm, in part, for today's mortgage crisis.
Gramm was chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and in 1999 pushed
for major reforms to Depression-era banking regulations.
During the campaign, Obama said changes were needed but complained that
a "$300 million lobbying effort that drove deregulation was more about
facilitating mergers than creating an efficient regulatory framework."
Gramm, who no longer lobbies for UBS, was general co-chairman of
Republican presidential candidate John McCain's campaign until he got
into hot water by blaming the melting economy on a "nation of whiners"
who had created a "mental recession." That flub also earned him a place
on Fortune's 2008 list of "21 Dumbest Moments in Business."
Himes is expected to focus heavily on hiring staff from the 4th
District for both Washington and his district offices.
"Jason and Kathleen will be central to hiring decisions going forward
as we build out a staff in Washington and here in Connecticut. We're
all committed to assembling an effective team whose members reflect the
geographic and cultural diversity of the 4th Congressional District,"
he said.
How about the Bridgeport numbers? Anybody recounting them?
Error in Shelton necessitates revote
Connecticut Post Staff
Updated: 11/26/2008 07:52:31 PM EST
The fallout from Shelton's Election Day miscount could have been
far more severe.
As it is, the community recently found that voters had not, as
originally thought, approved a $3 million bond to finance a downtown
redevelopment project. Now officials face a contentious process on
acquiring the necessary funding.
But the region dodged a greater
calamity. The state-mandated recount also found U.S. Rep.-elect Jim
Himes received 1,000 fewer votes in Shelton than previously thought.
His districtwide margin over outgoing 4th District Rep. Christopher
Shays was fewer than 4,000 votes, so if the mistake had been too much
larger, we could have been looking at Florida 2000 in southwestern
Connecticut.
In Shelton, though, the repercussions are serious enough. What was
originally thought to be a 267-vote victory turned out to be a defeat
of 1,800 votes. Aldermen approved the money for use on Canal Street
infrastructure improvements on the belief the money had been OK'd. They
were wrong, and now have had to rescind their vote.
The mistake has been blamed on human error, which is inevitable from
time to time.
Because the bond money was rejected, the town will lose out on matching
funds from the state and federal governments. The improvements are
considered necessary to deal with the expected influx of people and
businesses along the waterfront in coming years.
The acrimony in town is no doubt heightened by the ongoing corruption
investigation, where a developer has been indicted and top officials
are suspect. But local leadership must continue to go about the town's
business, and that likely means seeking a new referendum on the bonding
money.
The project has been singled out as key to the future of the local tax
base. But it can't go forward without infrastructure improvements. The
town needs to order another vote, and then make the case to residents
that this project is necessary.
And it wouldn't hurt to triple-check those numbers on voting day.
Is
GOP An Endangered Species In The Political Life Of New England?
DAY
By Susan Haigh , Associated Press
Published on 11/10/2008
Hartford - A generation ago the Republican Party was the dominant
political force in New England, populating the region's congressional
delegations with moderates like Connecticut's Lowell P. Weicker Jr. and
Rhode Island's John Chafee.
But today's GOP, led by a more socially conservative wing of the party,
is finding votes harder to come by.
Voters on Tuesday cast out Connecticut's veteran U.S. Rep. Chris Shays,
the last New England Republican in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Sen. John Sununu was voted out in New Hampshire, leaving that state's
Judd Gregg and Maine's Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe as the only
Republicans among the region's 12 senators.
Shays' loss to former Goldman Sachs executive Jim Himes marks the first
time since 1969 that southwestern Connecticut will be represented by a
Democrat in the House.
”I felt that we were going to win this, I really did,” Shays told
supporters. “I felt that people were so good to me, they were so nice
to me. But they were deciding they were going to go the other way.”
New England's decision to “go the other way” in recent elections is a
dramatic transformation for a region considered a Republican stronghold
a generation ago.
The Republican Party and New England have a long history together.
At their first presidential convention, in 1856, Republicans nominated
John C. Fremont on a platform of abolishing slavery in the territories
- a widely held view in the North. While Fremont lost, he carried 11
Northern states. Later, Abraham Lincoln captured the presidency by
winning 18 Northern states.
By the late 1940s, Republicans held 21 of 28 of New England's seats in
the House of Representatives. But the turning point came in 1964, when
the Republicans nominated conservative Barry Goldwater for president,
said Gary Rose, a political science professor at Sacred Heart
University in Fairfield.
Known for being fiscally conservative but more socially liberal,
Northeast moderates - dubbed the Rockefeller Republicans after the
former New York governor - started to be eclipsed by the more socially
conservative wing of the party.
”The eastern establishment got weaker and weaker,” Rose said. “Today,
there's really no eastern establishment to speak of.”
Chafee's son, Lincoln, was appointed to the Senate in 1999 after his
father's death and was elected in 2000 to a six-year term. A moderate
like his father, Chafee was the only Republican in the Senate to vote
against authorizing the use of force in Iraq. But he was defeated by a
Democrat in 2006.
That same year, Reps. Nancy Johnson and Rob Simmons of Connecticut also
were defeated by Democrats, buoyed by anti-Iraq-war and anti-President
Bush sentiment.
”There is no longer, to speak of, a moderate voice within the party,”
Rose said. “It's a party that's becoming more narrow and there's really
no sense of compromise within the party.”
Jennifer Donahue, political director of the New Hampshire Institute of
Politics at St. Anselm College, said she believes the GOP can still
come back, at least in independent-minded New Hampshire where the state
motto is “Live Free or Die.”
”It depends on the state. I don't really think you can look at it as a
regional phenomenon,” Donahue said of New England politicians trending
Democratic. “The further north you get, the colder it gets, the more
the voters look at (races) on a case-by-case basis.”
A large increase of registered Democrats factor into Sununu's loss, she
said. But those numbers can change, especially as more fiscally
conservative tax refugees migrate north from neighboring Massachusetts.
”It doesn't necessarily indicate a long term pattern coming out of
this,” she said. “New Hampshire has a uniqueness in that way. It is not
fundamentally a state that has in its essence more Democrats than
Republicans.”
Lawrence J. Cafero Jr., the Republican leader of Connecticut's House of
Representatives, blames the image of the national Republican party for
hurting the GOP in New England, where Republicans historically have
often favored fiscal responsibility, abortion rights, protection of
personal liberties and strong environmental policies.
He believes the problem worsened with the 1994 so-called “Republican
Revolution,” when midterm congressional elections added 54 Republican
seats in the House.
”They lost their way and I think more and more New England people,
especially those who were Republicans basically because of smaller
government and less government intrusion into our lives, started to see
their party led by people whose foremost issues were social issues,
religious and values and morals, etc.,” Cafero said.
”I think that turned a lot of people off in New England and they didn't
feel the party was really with them,” he added.
Carrie James, a regional press secretary with the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee, which supports Democratic
congressional candidates, said bad feelings about President Bush, the
war in Iraq and the weakened economy have helped to persuade New
England voters to support Democrats over the past eight years.
One bright spot for the GOP in New England has been their control of
governorships. Republicans are governors in Connecticut, Vermont and
Rhode Island.
”A big part of our strategy this cycle was to link Republican
incumbents with the failed policies of the Bush administration and it's
not applicable in a governor's race,” James said. “But certainly
President Bush damaged the Republican brand across the board.”
Rose said he believes Republican gubernatorial candidates in New
England will face the same challenges as GOP congressional candidates.
He said it's difficult to tell what Yankee Republicans represent and
what role they'll play in the future.
”The only reason they've been able to survive is they've acted like
Democrats,” Rose said. “They too, I think are going to become
endangered species.”
Thomas Whalen, a political historian at Boston University, said he
believes the Republican brand in New England will become even less
popular over time, especially as some national party activists tout
socially conservative Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as the future of the GOP
and the prime presidential candidate in 2012.
”I think that's going to turn off even more people (in New England),”
said Whalen, author of “A Higher Purpose: Profiles in Presidential
Courage.”
Whalen said there is now an opportunity for an independent third party
that takes populist stands to develop in New England and envelop
moderate Republicans. He said voters in Democratic-heavy states, such
as Massachusetts, are going to want a choice at the polls.
”There is no place in the GOP now for the moderates and they need to
find a home,” Whalen said. “The brand is dead in New England.”
‘Bullheaded’
and a Rhodes Scholar, and Now Headed to Capitol Hill
NYTIMES
By DAVID M. HALBFINGER
November 10, 2008
Fresh from defeating Representative Christopher Shays, the 10-term
Republican from Connecticut’s Fourth District, Jim Himes is cautioning
against expecting any miracles during his freshman term in office.
“I’m not under any misapprehension that Jim Himes is going to
unilaterally reform the health care system,” he said on Friday, in
between thanking supporters and fielding calls from reporters in Peru,
where he was born.
Then again, it was not out of an abundance of caution that Mr. Himes,
42, a Goldman Sachs investment banker-turned-financier of low-income
housing, decided to challenge Mr. Shays early last year. The district
had been carried by the Democratic presidential candidates Al Gore in
2000 and John Kerry in 2004, but Mr. Shays had fended off tough
challenges in his last two races. And no one in February 2007 was
counting on an Obama landslide.
“The consensus was that it would be hard, but not impossible,” said the
square-jawed Mr. Himes. “I thought, O.K. — hard but not impossible I’ll
do.”
His friends say that Mr. Himes, a Rhodes scholar who was captain of the
lightweight crew team at Harvard, has plenty of experience pulling off
daunting feats. There was the time when, in the Northeast blackout of
2003, he could not reach his wife and daughters. He put on a pair of
sneakers and walked home — from Union Square in Manhattan to Cos Cob,
Conn., a 31-mile trek that took nine hours.
From a safe remove, Mr. Himes tosses this off to his “bullheaded
stubbornness, mixed with a little bit of unhinged.” But Don Carlson,
who met him at Harvard and later followed him to Goldman Sachs, said he
had seen what he called Mr. Himes’s “rower’s look” several times.
On 9/11, he said, Goldman Sachs workers were told not to leave the
building, but Mr. Himes, who had volunteered in the rescue squad as a
teenager in Lawrenceville, N.J., headed out to help. “When he sets his
eyes to something and is really determined, there’s no stopping the
guy,” Mr. Carlson said.
In the same way, in his race against Mr. Shays — one that Mr. Himes
turned from a long shot into a tossup through his early fund-raising,
assiduous organizing and focused messaging — Mr. Himes “just decided he
was 5 points behind” in the final weeks, even when his aides believed
they were winning, Mr. Carlson said. “He’d never give up hope, but he’d
never stop pushing as hard as he could.”
Mr. Himes won by nearly 5 percentage points, rolling up big margins in
cities like Bridgeport and even carrying Shelton, where voters split
their tickets to vote for John McCain. Mr. Shays warned voters that Mr.
Himes would raise their taxes, but Mr. Shays’s biggest wound was
self-inflicted, when he echoed Mr. McCain’s defense of the economy as
“fundamentally sound.”
Mr. Himes was born in Lima, Peru, where his father worked for the Ford
Foundation, and spent his early childhood there and in Bogotá,
Colombia. When his parents divorced, he and his two sisters moved to
New Jersey with their mother, who worked as an administrator for
nonprofit groups like the Aspen Institute and for the State Board of
Higher Education.
Being engaged in the world was not a matter of choice for Mr. Himes,
said David Earling, a childhood friend: “That dinner table was where,
as a 10-year-old, you’d better have a view of what’s going on and what
the headlines were.”
Mr. Carlson, who wrote Mr. Himes’s recommendation for the Rhodes
Scholarship, called him “a remarkably reflective guy.” When Mr. Himes
proposed writing a college paper on homelessness, Mr. Carlson invited
him to spend a night at a shelter where he worked. “But he went out and
spent the night on the street with the homeless, and wrote a beautiful
and poetic paper that shared their perspectives.”
After his Rhodes scholar experience at Oxford, where he earned a degree
in Latin American studies, Mr. Himes said he pursued jobs at the State
Department and on Capitol Hill before Goldman lured him to join its new
Latin America group. He soon wound up crunching numbers and traveling
the world selling investors on the landmark privatization of Telmex,
the Mexican telephone company.
Goldman disbanded the group after the 1994 Mexican peso crisis. Mr.
Himes later worked in mergers and acquisitions and in a technology
group. But when the dot-com boom went bust, Mr. Himes, already rattled
by 9/11, did not like his options at the firm. “Between that, and a
newborn and 3-year-old I never saw,” he said, “I’d had enough.”
In Mexico, he had become interested in ways of fighting poverty with
business-oriented solutions. With that in mind, he found his way to the
Enterprise Foundation, a nonprofit financer of low-income housing,
which commissioned him to study personal finances and predatory
financial services in the Bronx.
“It was a real eye-opener to spend time with people you don’t often
meet at 85 Broad Street,” he said, referring to Goldman’s headquarters.
Rafael Cestero, who hired him at the Enterprise Foundation, said it was
not the first inquiry he had received from a restless Wall Streeter.
“But most of the time, they never call you back,” he said. “With Jim it
was different.”
When Mr. Cestero joined the Bloomberg administration as a senior
housing official in 2004, he named Mr. Himes to replace him. “He picked
up the business of Enterprise that takes most people years to learn in
months,” Mr. Cestero said. “Frankly he understood it better than some
of us who’d been there a long time. He’s an incredibly quick learner.”
At the foundation, Mr. Himes helped conceive a $230 million acquisition
fund to give developers of lower-income housing an edge in competing
with market-rate developers to buy scarce city land. Mr. Himes had the
insight, Mr. Cestero said, to figure out that banks would embrace it if
their risk was shared with philanthropic foundations and the city. The
fund is designed to finance purchases of enough land for 30,000 of the
165,000 units of housing that Mr. Bloomberg has promised. Mr. Cestero
said, “Jim was the leader that drove this.”
At home in Greenwich, Mr. Himes said he got involved in Democratic
politics after President Bush’s election because he saw “some pretty
awful policies” on the horizon. After helping a friend’s campaign in
town, he won a seat on the board of the housing authority, which he
helped restructure, firing consultants and hiring a new director.
It even completed four units, an accomplishment in a town where the
prevailing attitude is not Nimby, Mr. Himes said; it is “Banana — build
absolutely nothing anywhere near anything.”
Mr. Himes was a board member of the Greenwich Alliance for Education,
which supports public education, and his daughters, now 9 and 6, attend
the public schools.
Kevin Cameron, who roomed with Mr. Himes at Harvard and who lives in
Greenwich, said Mr. Himes would have credibility on environmental
issues: He drives a Prius, commuted by bike and train and keeps his
house so cold in the winter that guests know to wear sweaters.
In the campaign, Mr. Himes’s résumé proved fortunate; the
financial crisis played to his background as an investment banker who
had spent years in housing finance. His Wall Street experience also
made him a safe choice for the moneyed voters of Fairfield County, said
Art House, a Democratic leader. “They weren’t afraid of him the way
they would be of a classic liberal,” Mr. House said.
Mr. Carlson warned that Mr. Himes could turn out to surprise people,
not only in his district but in Washington. There was that time, he
said, a winter or two ago, when Mr. Himes fell through thin ice while
skating. But he had two screwdrivers in his pocket to pull himself up —
just in case.
“In the classic Jim way, he was completely prepared,” Mr. Carlson said.
“He’s confident, resourceful, but pushing the edge. He loves to push
the edge.”

Shays Unsure Of Where Loss Will
Take Him; Ponders What To Do After Losing Office He Held 21 Years
The Hartford Courant
By JESSE A. HAMILTON
December 14, 2008
WASHINGTON —
Chris Shays sits in the basement grill of the capital's Republican
club. He's receiving people here, with some papers and a couple of
cellphones on the table in front of him, an inward look on his face.
People stop as they pass by. Sorry to see you go, they tell him. That
was a tough race. You did everything you could. The congressman is
hearing the kind of tone usually reserved for funerals. He shakes hands
and thanks them. His face has a way of bursting into a smile, but it
can vanish just as quickly, as it does now, when he thinks hard about
his situation.
This is all the office he has, here in the private sanctuary of his
party, with easy-listening music overhead. After 21 years in the House
of Representatives, Shays' last moments have come.
"We all knew you can lose an election," he says, but it doesn't sound
like he had believed it. "I told people I thought we were going to win."
He's not ready to consider the next step, yet. He's still stirring the
brew of what happened Nov. 4. He talks about His District and His
Constituents as if he's not about to hand them over to the man who beat
him, Jim Himes. Shays had made plans in his head — plotting his coming
months as ranking Republican on the oversight committee. He had plans
for energy policy and health care and financial oversight.
Instead, he's trying to find jobs for his staff in a town now filling
with Democrats. His scheduler is no longer on his staff. So, sticking
near Capitol Hill in recent days as Congress prolonged its session long
past its scheduled finish, he has missed some appointments and failed
to return some calls.
And, in a final sour note, the Shays campaign is mired in a fraud
investigation. The finance people found irregularities in the books,
and sources have said campaign manager Michael Sohn is the focus of the
investigation. Shays won't say who was involved or comment, except to
call it a betrayal and to say its outcome has huge importance to him.
Meanwhile, the constant traveler — from his Peace Corps days to his
recent trips to Iraq — jokes that the biggest adjustment may come when
he next flies overseas and isn't met at the airport by an official from
the State Department who handles the arrangements. In 21 years, he's
traveled on a private vacation just once, he said.
But the most significant travel of his life, the steady back-and-forth
flights between D.C. and Connecticut, will no longer be necessary. He's
talking about consolidating his households, though he said he and his
wife, Betsi, haven't decided anything.
Lately, Shays has been helping put together Ikea furniture for his
daughter, and he gave her a hand returning books for her bar-exam
studies. The regular acts of a father.
Shays, 63, seems as engaged now in matters of home as he is in the
business of the House. There's a trace of giddiness in his voice when
he talks about his coming weekends — no-strings days off.
"It'll be a much more normal life."
A History Of Independence
Shays' history in public life is that of an individualist. In
his youth, he was a conscientious objector who entered the Peace Corps
rather than the Vietnam War (though he would later support the war in
Iraq). As a state legislator, he went to jail briefly in 1985 when he
refused to leave the witness stand in a misconduct hearing against two
lawyers. Two years later, he was in Congress, where his habits of
speaking his mind and ignoring his party's wishes meant an often
contentious road for one of the body's most moderate Republicans.
He pushed for ethics and campaign reform. He was often the most popular
Republican among environmental and pro-choice groups. He fought for
animal-protection legislation.
And he was talking about the dangers of Islamist extremism before 9/11.
His beliefs led him to relentlessly defend the war in Iraq — an issue
for which many constituents in the 4th District, in the state's
southwestern corner, couldn't forgive him.
"He was a very moderate, independent-minded Republican," said Sen. Joe
Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who — even when he was still a
Democratic senator — shared a number of positions with Shays. "Part of
why we grew friendly … was that we actually did have a generally
similar approach to issues which managed to put both of us in hot water
with our respective caucuses."
Lieberman, also a staunch supporter of the war, said of Shays, "He has
a lot to be proud of."
Shays may have been the last of the House Republicans from New England,
but he felt he could be the exception in this year's mighty electoral
swing toward the Democrats. He was confident in his record, saying, "We
did a hell of a lot." And he said he felt good about his contact with
people on the campaign trail. But on Nov. 4, he won 47.6 percent of the
vote to Himes' 51.3 percent.
Shays' election numbers in Norwalk and Stamford were tough, but it was
Bridgeport, where he won fewer than one in four votes, that kicked the
veteran politician in the guts. Bridgeport was his "top priority." He
had moved there more than a decade ago, and his adopted city surprised
him. "Bridgeport has a hard time knowing what's in its best interests."
"We thought we ran one of our best races," he said. He thinks many
people voted straight-ticket Democratic. "I'm surprised I didn't see it
coming."
His final bow on the blue carpet of the legislative chamber was an
uneasy vote against billions in loan money for the U.S. auto industry.
He cast the vote well aware of the 21 years bearing down on him, and
this vote felt like none before it.
"When you are coming back, you're very much part of a team that's
moving in a certain direction. When you're not coming back, the boat's
leaving the dock without you."
But in the traditions of the Hill, there's no gold watch, just an
urgent need to clear out the losing incumbents to make room for the new.
"Basically, they toss you out of your office in three weeks," recalls
Nancy Johnson, the longtime Republican congresswoman from Connecticut's
5th District who similarly lost an election — to Chris Murphy — two
years ago.
For Shays, packing the office meant 700 boxes. "All the old cases," he
said, "all the old letters."
Now What?
At a crossroads now, Shays is still looking back at the road
that got him here. A well-off friend advised him to take a year off
before he decides what to do with the rest of his life. But Shays
pointed out he's been an elected official for 34 years — on a
government payroll for a long time. "That's not an option that's
available to me."
So, what now? Shay's only plan: "I want my life to be a blessing. I
felt for 34 years I was doing things that mattered."
Johnson said, "This is not a man who lacks interest and knowledge. He
just has to find his way." So, she said, "he shouldn't rush it." It
took her six months to get her life reorganized. She spent some time
teaching at Harvard. Now, she works in the last environment she would
have expected: a D.C. law firm. "I'm very happy. I'm challenged all the
time. I'm working hard. And I see my grandchildren more. I see my
husband more."
And on job fulfillment: Only now that Johnson is away from Congress
does she fully realize how exhausting the pace could be and how
frustrating to work furiously but sometimes get little done. At her
firm, Baker Donelson, Johnson is a public-policy adviser working a lot
on health care issues. "You can certainly have influence on important
matters from outside Congress," she said.
Shays said he'd like to be involved in rebuilding the Republican Party,
but he's not sure how. State party Chairman Chris Healy said, "He still
has, I think, a lot to offer, whether it's in public service or private
life. … I hope he does stay active in politics in Connecticut. That's
his decision." Healy said, "We'll just have to stay tuned."
Shays had vowed on election night that he was done with elected office.
But he's not so sure now. "I'm not running for Congress again," he says
in his makeshift work space. "I wouldn't rule out the Senate or
governor, but I think it's highly unlikely." What about working in the
Obama administration? "Absolutely," he says, though he adds, "I'm not
sitting waiting for an opportunity in the administration to happen."
In fact, he says, "what I'm dealing with is not unique." He's now like
tens of thousands in his district — newly out of work.
Shays preparing for life after
Congress
CT POST
By PETER URBAN. Staff writer
Nov. 6, 2008
WASHINGTON -- Two recycling bins half-filled with discarded
documents stood outside Rep. Christopher Shays' doorway at the
Longworth House Office building Thursday, a testament to the changing
times ahead for the 11-term incumbent.
Shays lost his bid for re-election on Tuesday, and though his
term does not officially end until January, the office must be cleared
out before Thanksgiving to prepare for a new, yet-to-be determined
tenant.
While his legislative staff begins the process of cleaning
out their desks, Shays is at his desk reading through some 400 e-mails
that have come in from longtime friends and supporters.
Rep. Sam Farr, D-Calif., who like Shays served in the Peace
Corps in the 1960s, stopped by for a brief visit. He also received a
telephone call Thursday afternoon from Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. Her
husband called him Wednesday.
All this serves as a distraction to the larger question of
what to do with one's life after 34 years as an elected official --
first in the state Legislature and then in Congress. Shays gives a
blunt response when asked that question Thursday while sitting in a
cushioned leather chair inside his office.
"I don't know," he says.
Shays explains that he hasn't thought about his future --
putting any thoughts of a life beyond Congress out of his mind while he
was on the campaign trail. That kind of focus, he says, is necessary if
you want to win.
"It's Thursday and I learned Tuesday night around
9:30 that I needed to think about doing something else," he says.
There are many options open. Shays could see himself working
back in Connecticut, perhaps New York City or in D.C. In some ways it
will also depend on his wife, Betsi, who has a job at the U.S.
Department of Education. One thing for sure is that he does not plan to
run for elected office again.
"I don't see myself running for any office," he said. "I
definitely do not see myself running for Congress again."
He ruled out running for Bridgeport mayor -- a job he once
suggested he would consider -- largely because he doesn't think he
could win given his poor showing there Tuesday. He also doesn't see
himself running for governor or senator in 2010.
"I'd love to be president, but I don't want to run for it,"
Shays says.
In fact, Shays admits that had he won re-election this may
have been his final term in office.
"Betsi and I kind of hunger for some privacy," Shays says.
"We've been in politics for 34 years and have given it everything --
24/7. We don't know what a normal weekend is like."
Shays is disappointed that he lost. He expected to win. But,
he has no regrets about the campaign he ran.
"I don't think anything could have been done to change the
outcome," he says.
Shays lost the election in the district's three largest
cities, Bridgeport, Stamford and Norwalk, where there was a lot of
enthusiasm for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. He had
hoped some of them would support him, but Shays says they appear to
have voted a straight party line.
"I just look back with a tremendous amount of gratitude that
I've had this opportunity. We did a lot of important things, and I am
grateful to have been in the thick of a lot of battles."
The pinnacle of Shays' career came in 2002 when his campaign
finance reform bill was enacted into law after a grueling seven-year
battle.
He also championed government efforts to bolster national
security in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
As a senior member of the Oversight and Governmental Affairs
national security subcommittee, Shays had delved deeply into the Iraq
war. He was the first congressman to visit Iraq after Saddam Hussein's
regime was toppled in March 2003 and returned 20 times since, the last
time in August.
"I'll miss that," Shays says.
Shays will also miss his staff, which he considers a second
family, mentioning in particular his chief-of-staff Betsy Hawkins and
his administrative assistant Diana White.
The two women have worked for him for decades. They saw his
daughter Jeramy grow from a child into a young woman now out on her own
working in a D.C. law firm.
"For me, that's the hardest thing. I can't frankly imagine
saying goodbye to my staff," Shays says.
Endorsement for congress in southwestern CT
October 25, 2008
4th District: The
incumbent, Christopher Shays, stands as a rare champion these days of
Republican moderation. He faces Jim Himes, a Democrat who is a former
vice president of Goldman Sachs and now executive director of a
nonprofit community organization. Mr. Himes is an attractive candidate,
and we have not always agreed with Mr. Shays on the Iraq war and other
issues. But on matters like campaign finance reform, increasing the
minimum wage and expanding health care for children, Christopher Shays’s
record of bipartisanship makes him our choice.

New twist on "vote early, vote often" - now, becides dead
people, all parts of one person's split personality allowed to vote!
Conn.
looking into voter cards submitted by ACORN
DAY
Posted on Oct 9, 2:48 PM EDT
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- The Connecticut State Elections Enforcement
Commission says it will look into allegations that an advocacy group
submitted fraudulent voter registration cards in Bridgeport.
Joseph Borges, Bridgeport's Republican registrar of voters, filed the
complaint. He says he has found numerous problems with voter
registration cards submitted by the Association of Community
Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN.
In one instance, he says a card was filled out for a 7-year-old girl,
whose age was listed as 27 on the card.
Republicans say there are similar problems with cards filed by ACORN in
Stamford. But Nancy Nicolescu with the enforcement commission says they
have not received a formal complaint from anyone in that city.
ACORN says the complaint is part of a coordinated effort by Republicans
to discredit ACORN voter registration drives across the nation.
Minor
Party Candidates Excluded From
Congressional Debates
By MARK PAZNIOKAS | Courant Staff Writer
September 24, 2008
The only thing harder than getting on the ballot for G. Scott Deshefy
of the Green Party is getting on the stage of the Garde Arts Center.
On Oct. 7, Deshefy will be the only ballot-certified 2nd Congressional
District candidate absent from a televised debate at the Garde in New
London.
The League of Women Voters notified all minor-party candidates this
week that they are unwelcome at the league's debates in the 2nd, 4th
and 5th congressional districts. The league has no debates scheduled
for the 1st or 3rd districts.
In the league's view, none of the minor-party candidates met its
criteria of broad voter and financial support and a sufficient effort
at reaching out to voters.
"I would like to stress that we value the effort these candidates are
making to put themselves forth," said Jara Burnett, the league's
president. "It is not a repudiation of the their efforts by any stretch
of the imagination."
Tell that to Deshefy.
As the only debate scheduled for commercial broadcast, the league's New
London forum was Deshefy's best opportunity for matching his views with
the Democratic incumbent, Joe Courtney, or Republican Sean Sullivan.
Nearly every day from May 1 to Aug. 5, Deshefy said, he worked four to
six hours a day collecting the 2,450 signatures needed to qualify for
the ballot.
"I met, easily, face to face with well over 10,000 people," Deshefy
said. "None of the two major party candidates has done that. That is
the ultimate in voter outreach."
The league's decision also affects Richard Z. Duffee of the Green Party
and Libertarian Michael Anthony Carrano in the 4th and Harold H.
Burbank II, of the Green Party, and Thomas L. Winn, an Independent, in
the 5th.
Deshefy is invited to participate in four other debates, but said none
will get the exposure of the league's debate.
Burnett said the league believes that voters are best-served by a
debate the focuses attention on the major players.
In the judgment of a four-member committee, none of the minor-party
candidates made the cut this year, as has typically been the case in
past elections.
"That doesn't mean we aren't interested in having their views
broadcast," Burnett said. "All of the candidates have been invited to
submit an entry" for the league's online voters' guide.
Will
Hartford opt out of U.S. like New
Haven?
Manchester Journal Enquirer
By Chris Powell
Published: Saturday, August 9, 2008
9:54 AM EDT
Hartford soon may join New
Haven in becoming a "sanctuary city," a city where illegal aliens are
sheltered against enforcement of immigration law.
New Haven lately has become famous
for issuing city identification cards to illegal aliens, a practice
undertaken in the name of encouraging them to cooperate with police
investigating crime. But sanctuary in New Haven has been achieved less
with the ID cards than with the city police department's policy,
ordered by Mayor John DeStefano Jr., prohibiting officers from checking
into people's citizenship and from helping federal agents serve civil
immigration violation warrants -- a policy of prohibiting city police
from helping the feds apprehend violators of immigration law.
Hartford would accomplish sanctuary
with an ordinance under consideration by the City Council to restrict
the city's police as they are restricted in New Haven.
Having police check into people's
citizenship during ordinary investigations of crime is bound to reduce
the cooperation of illegal aliens. It also would be intrusive and
prejudicial. For police would single out people who merely fit their
stereotypes and people they wanted to harass.
But having police check the
citizenship of arrested people is not at all intrusive or prejudicial,
and such a practice, as it is being undertaken in certain places, as by
ordinance in Virginia's Prince William County, does seem to have the
benefit of driving illegal aliens away and thus achieving some
enforcement of immigration law at least locally. For like everyone
else, illegals settle most where they are welcomed. That is why New
Haven is not really what it pretends to be, the helpless victim of the
failure of federal immigration policy, and why the city's "sanctuary"
policy is not necessary at all. For if New Haven's policy was closer to
Prince William County's, or to the policy that may be undertaken in
Danbury, with local police trained to enforce immigration law, the city
might have many fewer illegal aliens in the first place.
Federal immigration authorities long
have not cared to enforce the law in ordinary cases where local police
have arrested an illegal alien on a local charge. The feds seem
interested only in raiding what are believed to be the largest
employers of illegal aliens, like the raid in May on a meatpacking
plant in Iowa, where nearly 400 people were detained, and in staging an
occasional community raid, like the one in June last year in New
Haven's Fair Haven section, two days after the city began issuing the
ID cards to illegals. Such raids seem meant largely to terrorize and to
create the illusion of enforcement when, in fact, enforcement is almost
completely lacking. Indeed, while New Haven's illegal population is
growing and the city continues to issue IDs to illegals, the feds have
not subpoenaed the ID program's records and seem not to have bothered
with the city at all since the raid last summer.
But by denying the feds the local
resources they ordinarily would have in any other law-enforcement
action, municipal "sanctuary" policies only encourage the feds to
pursue their scattershot and terror-inducing approach to immigration
law.
In the old days local laws and
policies contrary to national ones were defended with elaborate
rationales as "nullification" and "interposition," and at least back
then there was a claim, bogus and even hateful as it sometimes was,
that the laws and policies being resisted were unconstitutional.
Today's advocates of nullification and interposition do not argue that
the federal government lacks authority over immigration. No, they
simply disagree with national immigration policy and seek to use local
government to undermine it -- and, really, to undermine the nation
itself, since, by definition, a nation is something that controls its
borders.
Forbidding police from inquiring
about citizenship when it has no relevance to the investigation of
crime is one thing. Giving identification documents to people who are
in the country illegally, precisely to facilitate their remaining in
the country illegally, and refusing to cooperate with the national
government's enforcement of immigration law are something else --
subversive and treasonable.
With its daily murders, mayhem, and
other incidents of depravity, Hartford is, like New Haven, already a
lawless enough place. With a "sanctuary" ordinance implementing the
policies in effect in New Haven, Hartford too would seem to signify
that it wants to opt out of America when what those cities and so many
other declining cities need most is to opt back in.
OOPS

Cablevision
Democratic Party Primary Debate in 4th District catches Moderator
wearing wrong color tie...
No questions
here...we all know that only the Party folk participate in CT's
Primaries...
Big primary defeat raises questions
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Neil Vigdor, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 08/14/2008 02:56:25 AM EDT
Election officials were questioning state requirements on qualifying
for primaries after a petition candidate Tuesday earned only about 15
percent of the vote against the Democratic endorsee in the 4th
Congressional District. At some polling places, Lee Whitnum of
Greenwich got one vote.
Whitnum had forced a primary against Jim Himes, also of Greenwich, by
collecting about 4,000 signatures. But Tuesday, she received fewer than
half that number of votes. That combined with the low turnout -
it was
about 6 percent in one city - has officials asking whether such
primaries are worth the expense.
"Everybody has their right to have a primary, but they should consider
the costs and if they really statistically have a chance to win," said
Betty Bondi, Democratic registrar of voters in Norwalk, where 6.3
percent of registered Democrats voted.
Bondi said the primary will cost Norwalk taxpayers about $50,000 by the
time the bills get sorted - all that for a contest in which Himes got
899 votes and Whitnum got 70.
"In Silvermine, (Whitnum) only got one vote," Bondi said.
Excluding Redding, which had yet to report final tallies to the
secretary of the state's office in Hartford, Himes received 11,985
votes to 1,811 for Whitnum in the district. Some unofficial tallies had
Redding going to Himes, 192-15. To force the primary, Whitnum
collected about 4,000 signatures - more than the required 2,459, or 2
percent, of the registered party members in the district.
"I think many voters will sign a petition for a candidate, but it
doesn't necessarily mean they will vote for them," said Susan
Bysiewicz, the secretary of the state.
Under the old requirement, Whitnum would have had to get signatures
from 15 percent of the 288 delegates who endorsed Himes at a party
convention in May. By all accounts, that would have made it impossible
for her to get on the ballot because none of the delegates voted for
Whitnum, who boycotted the convention because she believed she wouldn't
get a chance to make her case for the endorsement.
But state election laws were changed in 2003 after Greenwich resident
Jim Campbell challenged them in a lawsuit. After that, Bysiewicz pushed
for easier ballot access. Whitnum met all the requirements for
running, Bysiewicz said.
"I very strongly believe in ballot access and I think most people agree
with that principle," Bysiewicz said. "Lee Whitnum did what the law
required. It is unfortunate that turnout was low in some areas. We can
always change the signature requirement if there is a strong sentiment
that the threshold isn't appropriate."
A message seeking comment from Whitnum was left Wednesday on her cell
phone. Stamford election officials also did not return a call.
In Greenwich, the hometown of both candidates, Whitnum mustered a lone
vote in two of the 12 polling districts, losing 1,079-74 overall. The
turnout was 14 percent. Cost estimates for the primary were not
available from the town. Sharon Vecchiolla, Democratic registrar
of
voters in Greenwich, said it could be a good idea to question the
signature requirement.
"Maybe it should be looked at," Vecchiolla said.
Himes, who had yet to receive a concession call from Whitnum as of
Wednesday afternoon, said it was not his place to say what the
eligibility requirements should be.
"I'm not going to try to second-guess the laws of the state of
Connecticut. You should take that up with somebody else," said Himes,
who will challenge U.S. Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Bridgeport, in
November.
Lopsided results and low turnouts must be put in perspective, Bysiewicz
said.
"Sometimes democracy costs money," she said.
Whitnum Feels
Primary Could Go 'Either Way'
Danbury New-Times
By John Bracchitta
Article Launched: 08/06/2008
10:00:09 AM EDT
Ask Lee Whitnum why she is running
for Connecticut's 4th Congressional District seat and she has a simple
response: "I think I can do a better job."
For Whitnum, a former
software engineer and current substitute teacher from Greenwich
who proudly advertises herself as a single woman and survivor of breast
cancer realizing that she can do better, comes from years of dealing
with a Congress whose lack of action and reliance on satisfying
lobbyists have significantly affected her life.
"I saw how an inactive Congress
changed my life, changed my career, and I've personally been affected
by politicians who are out of touch with the needs of the American
people," she said.
An example of this disconnect, she
said, can be heard in comments made by current district representative
Christopher Shays in recent weeks suggesting that the United States
take steps to recruit math and science professionals from other
countries for domestic jobs, an idea she called "insane."
"There is a 250,000-person-a-year
surplus of technical graduates from our colleges and universities who
will never find work in their field and [Shays] is talking about
bringing in more?" she asked. "Either he is in the pocket of big
business or he is in the pocket of
immigration lawyers and he is not making votes for the people of the
United States and especially not this district."
The Fight to Get on the Ballot
While Whitnum announced she was
entering the race for the Congress on Sept. 9, 2007, she explained that
a series of planning "mishaps," which she attributed to learning the
details of running a campaign, as well as a sequence of events
surrounding the Democratic 4th District Nominating Convention on May
19, complicated her campaign and resulted in her boycott of the
convention.
In the days prior to the convention,
Whitnum said she was told by the convention chairman that supporters of
Jim Himes, her Democratic opponent who went on to be nominated at the
convention, were going to deny her motion to speak at the convention.
She said she felt that Himes' supporters "conspired" to keep her from
meeting delegates as well.
"I knew if I couldn't speak to the
delegates and present my ideas and introduce myself I couldn't get [the
nomination]," she said.
Aware that the Democratic Party had
a history of "[picking] one candidate and anointing them" as its
choice, Whitnum still demanded that the Democrats hold a primary,
the first in the 4th Congressional District in more than 50 years.
After launching a petition drive and
successfully gathering 2,459 signatures from registered Democrats in
the district, Whitnum was added to the ballot in late June, forcing a
primary vote to be held Aug. 12.
The Issues
Whitnum acknowledged that while she
and Himes do agree on some issues, including their opposition of the
war in Iraq and the promotion of "green" building practices throughout
the district, she said that the two differed on many other issues, most
notably their stances on Afghanistan and the current recession.
Whitnum charged that the United
States made a "big mistake" in regard to its continued occupation of
Afghanistan and suggested that putting the country back under Taliban
rule would be the best course of action for both countries.
Referencing a July 30 article from
the Stamford Advocate in which Osama Bin Laden claimed that the 9/11
attacks were his responses to American and Israeli aggression against
Palestine and Lebanon and did not involve the Taliban, she suggested
that the United States' involvement in Afghanistan was "unnecessary."
Pointing out that Afghanistan had
almost voted in favor of a democracy in 1964, Whitnum suggested that if
the United States recognizes Afghanistan as a sovereign nation and
commits to help restore its agriculture, the country would prosper,
while also reducing the growth of poppies and marijuana in the region.
"The Taliban are Islamist and they
are fundamentalists, but they are not jihadists," she said. "Let them
evolve. It's pretty hard to keep out the outside world."
She went on to say that Himes'
recent 48-hour trip to Israel was an example of how special-interest
groups and lobbyists would dictate his opinions regarding the Middle
East and impede progress rather than bringing new ideas to the table.
"No doubt it's propaganda-building,"
Whitnum said. "It gets him funding and the gates lift and all of the
AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] members from all over
the country fund his campaign I would never put a constituent group, or
my own campaign, before the best interests of the United States of
America."
Regarding the current economic
recession, Whitnum referenced the failures of "Reaganomics" in the
1980s as the primary reason she disagreed with Himes' support of
utilizing the "trickle-down theory" to revitalize the economy.
Instead, Whitnum felt an
increased enforcement of the country's immigration laws could be
the key to improving the current state of the economy.
She suggested that if each town in
the 4th District established two police officers to primarily work on
tightening up the enforcement and usage of temporary visas among users,
some of whom she said have "high-paying, white-collar jobs," thousands
of jobs would "reappear" in Fairfield County.
"If you save the American job you
save the American economy," she said.
She added that a similar idea has
already been utilized in Danbury.
Referencing her experience as a
single woman battling cancer, Whitnum said that she had many "lean
years" economically and understood the struggles caused by the
recession, something she added that Himes could not.
"I know how hard it is to live here
firsthand. Himes represents that 2 percent of the population: the 'Wall
Street Greenwich Male.' He's had a lot of advantages and opportunities
that most people don't get," she said. "When I say I know what it's
like not to have enough money for food, you know I mean it."
When speaking of her chances in the
Aug. 12 primary, Whitnum said that it was still "hard to tell" who the
district favored because many people often vacation in July and had
still not had a chance to hear the views of both candidates. However,
she hoped that voters would recognize and support her knowledge and
continued determination that she developed throughout her life and
exemplified in her campaign.
"I really think it could go either
way at this point," she said. "Stranger things have happened than this
primary race."
State
primaries set for Aug. 12
DAY
By SUSAN HAIGH, Associated Press Writer
Posted on Jul 23, 6:15 PM EDT
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- There will be one less primary election in
Connecticut on Aug. 12.
Matthew Brennan has decided not challenge fellow Winsted resident
Michael J. Renzullo, the endorsed Democratic candidate in the 30th
state Senatorial District race, Secretary of the State Susan
Bysiewicz's office said Wednesday.
Renzullo will now face the Republican incumbent, Sen. Andrew Roraback
of Goshen, in the November election.
There are currently 21 primaries scheduled. They include a battle in
the 4th Congressional District race between endorsed Democrat Jim Himes
and Lee Whitnum, who collected enough signatures to force the primary.
The remaining 20 primaries are for state legislative races - four in
the Senate and 16 in the House of Representatives.
Some of the matchups are happening in districts where an incumbent is
not seeking re-election. For example, in the 9th House District, held
since 1999 by Rep. Christopher Stone, D-East Hartford, there are two
primaries.
Three Republicans from Manchester - Michael W. Crockett, Dennis A.
Brenner and Clifton E. Thompson, the party-endorsed candidate - are
vying for the GOP spot on the November ballot. On the Democratic side,
endorsed candidate Jason Rojas of East Hartford is facing a primary
challenge from Joseph S. Hachey of Manchester.
A number of incumbents, however, are facing challenges from fellow
party members, including Sen. John W. Fonfara, D-Hartford, Rep. Marie
Lopez Kirkley-Bey, D-Hartford, Rep. Selim G. Noujaim, R-Waterbury, Rep.
Corky Mazurek, D-Wolcott, Rep. Deborah Heinrich, D-Madison, Rep. Terry
Backer, D-Stratford, Rep. Christopher Caruso, D-Bridgeport, Rep. Andres
Ayala Jr., D-Bridgeport, and Rep. Robert T. Keeley, D-Bridgeport.
Take a
radical position and help Assembly's GOP
CT POST
KEN DIXON
Article Last Updated: 07/08/2008
02:51:48 PM EDT
Let's finish the Independence Day
weekend with a celebration of that overlooked, misunderstood and too
often-ignored minority group. Yes, we're celebrating Connecticut
Republicans. Wave the flag, honk the Klaxon on that Lexus SUV and flash
your lapel pins!
They're a vanishing breed and with
the apparent Democratic tidal wave set to get all tsunami on us this
November across America, it's looking even worse for Connecticut's
boutique version of the Grand Old Party.
Registered Republicans haven't
outnumbered Democrats in Connecticut since August 1959. Currently, the
GOP has about 427,000 and the Democrats about 710,000 with unaffiliated
voters well over 900,000. Republican Gov. Jodi Rell's record low 65
percent approval rating in the last Quinnipiac University Poll, an
11-point plunge since the end of March, is hardly a blip compared to
the rousing potential repudiation of U.S. Sen. Chris "I'm a
Presidential Candidate, Honest" Dodd (51 percent) and U.S. Sen. Joe
Lieberman, the fair-weather Democrat (45 percent).
Rell has taken some of her tactics
from the golden age of her predecessor, John "Why Should I Resign If
I've Done Nothing Wrong?" Rowland, who during the good times, ignored
his minority Republican colleagues in the General Assembly and annually
cut budget deals with Democrats.
"She has, I think, been able to
distance herself from the Republican brand," Doug Schwartz, the Q Poll
director, said last week when I asked him Connecticut's blue-state
reputation.
"Right now the Republican brand is
really hurting at the presidential level because of President Bush
being so unpopular, the war being unpopular. She has been able to
withstand that and remain popular."
Senate Minority Leader John
McKinney, R-Fairfield, and House Minority Leader Larry Cafero,
R-Norwalk, try to be fire-breathing conservatives. They're doing
whatever they can to enhance the relevancy of their caucuses, which
simply need more bodies to present any kind of weight against Democrats
in the Assembly.
And you, gentle voters, should
consider helping them out on Election Day.
The House minority of 44-107 is
verging on the sad now, nearly a year after the death of Rep. Dick
Belden, R-Shelton, and two years after the departure of Rep. Bob Ward,
R-North Branford, as minority leader to become the commissioner of the
Department of Motor Vehicles.
Cafero is exemplifying the general
thinness of the House Republican bench because he not only has retained
his former role as the Common Man pitbull of the GOP in the floor
debates, but he's also trying to display the nit-picking quality of
Belden the parliamentarian, as well as the logical good-guy persona of
Ward.
He needs a few more people in the
caucus to make Democrats — who have a half dozen above the 101 they
need to override a veto of Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell — pay more
attention to Cafero's people located on the port side of the House
chamber, but on the starboard side of our hearts and minds.
The Senate's 13-23 GOP minority is
at least viable, since it's enough to stanch a Democratic veto
override, although it didn't help last month when two GOP senators
joined Democrats in crushing Rell's attempt to kill the new minimum
wage, which will rise from its current $7.65 an hour to $8 next January
1 and $8.25 a year later.
For all the hand-wringing and
pronouncements of doom, gloom and higher unemployment offered by House
and Senate Republicans during that one-day veto session June 24, the
Quinnipiac Poll found last week that a whopping 81 percent of state
voters approve of the hike in the minimum wage.
Coincidentally, 81 percent of the
state's largest voting bloc, unaffiliated voters — whom Republicans
need in a big way if there's any hope to gain legislative seats and
Shays to keep his congressional job — support the wage hike; 92 percent
of Democrats and even 63 percent of GOP voters.
Yes, it's hard to be red in a blue
state. I couldn't blame McKinney and Cafero for trying last week, when
in a news conference in Cafero's Capitol office they called, yet again,
for another special legislative session to somehow reduce gasoline
prices.
It was a small room overflowing with
maybe 50 people, mostly a lot of Republican staffers and a handful of
elected officials including Rep. Larry Miller, R-Stratford, who were
outnumbered by reporters. Of all in attendance, maybe one dewy-eyed TV
reporter, the vacation fill-in type who needs Map Quest to find the
Capitol, thought there was more than an ice cube's chance on a hot
propane grill that the majority Democrats would finally see the light
and admit that the Republicans were right and there should be a cap on
the Gross Receipts Tax (GRT), that hidden 7-percent levy on the sale of
all petroleum products.
But the reality that Democrats would
ignore them didn't stop McKinney and Cafero from making their pitch,
which was really a kick off for the legislative-election season.
Sure, the GRT, according to the
nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Research, may bring in more than $150
million projected for the General Fund during the fiscal year that
began July 1.
If it does, then the feared
$150-million deficit won't exist. So that could be one of the few
positives coming from rising gas prices, which generally fuel the GRT.
Drive more this summer, people, and
balance the state budget! There's a battle cry you won't hear as a
public service announcement.
Yes, the GRT was supposed to be a
dedicated tax for the Special Transportation Fund and the state has
instead siphoned off close to a billion dollars for the General Fund
over the last five years.
Yes, the Republicans essentially
shamed the Democrats into calling a special legislative session on June
11 to repeal the planned 0.5-percent hike in the GRT and allow gas
dealers to offer cash discounts at the pump.
"This myth that we cut the gas tax,
is just that," Cafero said. "As a matter of fact every day the tax on
gasoline imposed by the state of Connecticut is increasing."
"Gasoline prices continue to rise,"
McKinney said. "And that fact continues to hurt the people of
Connecticut, our small businesses and the Connecticut economy."
He and Cafero described consumers as
raging. I guess that would explain the tactics of the nuts driving on
the parkways and interstates as if the speed-limit signs were a silly
suggestion for people in underpowered clunkers.
"We did not adjourn the special
session sine die," McKinney said, using the Latin phrase for without a
date. "We still can come in tomorrow, we can come in after the Fourth
of July holiday and we should take action to help the people of the
state of Connecticut." Republicans are doing what they can to seem
relevant. And remember, if Democratic New Haven Mayor John DeStefano
had beaten Rell in 2006 — she won by nearly 312,000 votes — it's safe
to say that taxes would be even higher than they are now.
So if you want to see a General
Assembly where the debate is less one-sided, in the upcoming election
friends should let friends vote Republican.
Weston Town Clerk will have absentee
ballots for
primary
Weston FORUM
Thursday, July 03, 2008
Absentee ballots will be available at the Weston Town Clerk’s office
beginning July 22 for the Democratic primary to be held Tuesday, Aug.
12.
Ballots may be picked up Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
until Monday, Aug. 11, the day before the primary.
Those able to vote in the primary are registered Democratic voters and
any unaffiliated voter who changes to the Democratic Party (by mail by
Aug. 7 or in person by Aug. 11) and any new Democratic voter.
To vote absentee
Any qualified voter may vote absentee if unable to vote Aug. 12 in
person due to:
• Illness or physical disability
• Absence from town during voting hours
• Religious beliefs which forbid secular activity on
the day of the Primary
• Active U.S. military service
No one, including spouses, may handle another person’s unexecuted
ballot. The only exception is an emergency absentee application and
ballot; call the town clerk at 222-2616 for details.
Immediate family members may return executed absentee ballots with
adequate identification. To request an application for an absentee
ballot, go to the town clerk’s office in Weston Town Hall, 56 Norfield
Road; request by mail, or download forms by going to www.westonct.gov.
The town clerk’s office must receive original applications by Aug. 12
at 8 p.m.
Those who return the application in person will be given a ballot and
may vote at that time or take the ballot and return it to the town
clerk either in person or by mail.
Completed ballots must be received by the town clerk by mail before the
polls close on Primary Day, Aug. 12; or in person by the day before the
primary, Aug. 11.
Special conditions
Those who have an unexpected illness or physical disability within six
days before the polls close on Primary Day, can still vote. Call the
town clerk (222-2616) for the proper procedure to follow or e-mail
danastasia@weston-ct.com.This e-mail address is being protected from
spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Anyone who finds he can vote in person after having voted by absentee
ballot must go to the town clerk’s office before noon on Primary Day to
request the withdrawal of his absentee ballot. The town clerk will
issue a signed statement to present to the moderator of the polling
place in order to vote in person.
Ryan
won't seek re-election to House, colleagues say
Stamford ADVOCATE
By Brian Lockhart, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 05/08/2008 01:00:00 AM EDT
HARTFORD - State Rep. John Ryan, R-Darien, is joining area Republicans
who have decided not to seek re-election in November. Ryan
yesterday would not confirm he was planning to retire, but several
House Republicans confirmed rumors Ryan had decided to leave the
General Assembly after representing Darien and the Rowayton section of
Norwalk since 1995.
"He'll be a hard fellow to replace," said state Rep. John Stripp,
R-Weston, who serves with Ryan on the legislature's Banks Committee.
"His wry sense of humor is totally unique and totally irreplaceable.
We're going to really miss that."
That humor was on display yesterday as the 2008 session crawled to a
close.
"Gosh, two bills now," Ryan said as he headed into the House chamber
for a vote at about 2:30 p.m. "We're chugging away here."
One reason for the House's early start was the two-hour round of
leave-taking that occurred in the morning, with members from both sides
of the aisle formally announcing retirements. Ryan did not join
in, but House spokesman Pat O'Neill said afterward that Ryan was
retiring.
"We leave that up to members. Some are very private about that stuff,"
said state House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk.
Ryan, an attorney, served as Norwalk's corporation counsel from 1981 to
1983. He was elected to the Darien Representative Town Meeting in
1989 and served until his successful bid for the 141st House District
seat in 1994. Cafero said he called Ryan the "freshman veteran"
because he had so much political experience before arriving in
Hartford. Ryan is one of the more low-key members of the House.
"He was helping people behind the scenes rather than being the lead
character in the play," Stripp said.
State Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, whose 25th District encompasses parts
of Norwalk and Darien, said Ryan looked out for taxpayers. The
two recently worked together on passing bipartisan legislation to
address the subprime mortgage crisis. Ryan updated constituents
on his activities through a column, "From Hartford to Here," published
in the Darien Times.
Perhaps one of Ryan's greatest legacies will be Robert Genuario's
political career. Before becoming the state's budget director in
2004, Genuario, a Norwalk resident, held Duff's state Senate
seat. Cafero managed Genuario's first campaign in 1990, and the
two turned to Ryan to help win votes in Darien.
"I was virtually unknown in Darien," Genuario said. "So John
proverbially took me under his wing, introduced me to the folks in
Darien and was probably more complimentary to them about me than I was
entitled to."
Genuario called Ryan a "good, substantive person" who while in the
state House focused on issues of law, business and commerce. In
addition to Ryan, state Sens. William Nickerson, R-Greenwich,
and Judith Freedman, R-Westport;
and state Reps. Claudia "Dolly"
Powers, R-Greenwich; and Christel
Truglia, D-Stamford, have announced they will not seek
re-election.
A spokesman for Darien Republicans could not be reached for comment,
and the town's Democratic Party did not have a candidate to announce
yesterday. Ryan ran unopposed in 2006.
Stripp said it was always challenging to find candidates to run, but
particularly those willing to drive from lower Fairfield County to the
Capitol.
"It's a three-hour round trip, which makes it very, very difficult,"
Stripp said.
He said it was often difficult for individuals trying to balance public
life with their careers.
"Once you leave for Hartford, you devote the whole day to the process,"
Stripp said.
Read this, as well...
Lieberman
Hits Dems: Onetime Loyalist Calls Party 'Hyperpartisan,' Says
McCain Reflects Kennedy Legacy
Hartford Courant
Associated Press
March 31, 2008
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman blasted the Democratic Party on Sunday as
protectionist, isolationist and hyperpartisan.
Speaking on ABC's "This Week," Lieberman, I-Conn., said it is not the
same party that made him its vice presidential candidate in 2000.
"It's not the Bill Clinton-Al Gore party, which was strong
internationalists, strong on defense, pro-trade, pro-reform in our
domestic government," he said. "It's been effectively taken over by a
small group on the left of the party that is protectionist,
isolationist and very, very hyperpartisan. So it pains me."
Lieberman, who won re-election to the Senate as an independent after
losing the 2006 Connecticut Democratic primary to anti-war candidate
Ned Lamont, still caucuses with Democrats.
But he has endorsed Republican John McCain's presidential bid, and said
Sunday that among the three presidential candidates, McCain comes
closest to reflecting the legacy of John F. Kennedy.
McCain, Lieberman said, is "a reformer, somebody who understands 'ask
not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your
country,' and remembers the other part of the Kennedy inaugural, which
said that we will bear any burden, pay any price to assure the survival
and sustenance of liberty. That's John McCain."
Lieberman also blasted Sen. Barack Obama for voting against a
resolution to label the Iranian Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist
group.
"These people are responsible for killing hundreds of American
soldiers," Lieberman said. "Sen. Obama voted against that. Now, to me,
that was an irresponsible vote. And I give Sen. Clinton credit; she
voted for it."
Lieberman says he believes McCain will be able to win the support of a
majority of independents and a lot of moderate Democrats.
Lieberman has told reporters that he will speak at the Republican
National Convention if McCain asks, but has ruled out sharing the 2008
GOP ticket with McCain.


Photo from CT POST report on Fairfield appearance by Senator
McCain. Senator Obama substituting for Senator Kennedy at the
Wesleyan graduation.
TUESDAY WAS PRESIDENTIAL
PRIMARY DAY IN CT...
Senator John McCain tells a joke...from a newspaper report:
"You know the difference between a lawyer and a catfish, he asks the
rally at Sacred Heart University, by way of introducing fellow senator
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. You see, one is a scum-sucking
bottom-dweller and the other is a fish..."
"About Town" makes one up:
Four candidates are in a rowboat that is sinking in shark-infested Long
Island Sound off the shore of Greenwich. McCain says he is not
worried. Romney speaks French to the sharks. Obama reasons
with them, saying "we are all in this together." These three are
eaten.
Hillary swims to safety. She says, upon reaching land, that her
experience in the White House has prepared her for such exigencies.
-----------------------------------------------
FROM THE L.A. TIMES online
Sunday, Feb. 3: Who's for Whom
For JOHN McCAIN
* Arnold Schwarzenegger, California governor
* Sylvester Stallone, actor
A look at Connecticut's Democratic
superdelegates
DAY
June 2, 2008
Connecticut's Democratic superdelegates and whom they're
supporting:
SUPPORTING BARACK OBAMA:
U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd
U.S. Rep. John Larson
U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney
U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro
U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy
State Senate President Donald E. Williams
State Rep. Stephen Fontana
Nancy DiNardo, state Democratic party chairwoman
Martin Dunleavy
Anthony Avallone
SUPPORTING HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON:
John Olsen, president, Connecticut AFL-CIO
Ellen Camhi
Superdelegates worry that
decision could divide Dems
New Haven REGISTER
By Gregory B. Hladky, Capitol Bureau Chief
Monday, February 18, 2008
HARTFORD — They don’t usually wear capes, aren’t
faster than speeding bullets and can’t jump over tall buildings with a
single bound. But the "superdelegates" just may decide who wins the
Democratic presidential nomination.
Connecticut will have 12 superdelegates to the Democratic National
Convention at the end of August. They are all top Democratic elected
officials or longtime party insiders who could help choose between
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton if the race were to remain tight.
At the moment, six of Connecticut’s superdelegates have endorsed Obama,
one has endorsed Clinton, four remain uncommitted, and one "at large"
delegate will be chosen in a few weeks by the other superdelegates.
But the possibility that they could become old-fashioned convention
power brokers is making at least some of this state’s superdelegates
super nervous.
"As exciting as it could be, it also concerns me that it could
divide the party," said state Democratic Chairwoman Nancy DiNardo, one
of four uncommitted members of Connecticut’s superdelegation.
Superdelegates represent about 20 percent of the votes available at the
Democratic National Convention vote. In a close race, which is what the
Democrats have right now, those votes could be decisive.
DiNardo is worried that a bitter convention fight between Clinton, a
U.S. senator from New York, and Obama, one of Illinois’ U.S. senators,
could split the party in what DiNardo believes should be a "Democratic
year." She said she would much rather have the issue decided in the
remaining primaries.
Another of Connecticut’s superdelegates, former state Sen. Anthony V.
Avallone of New Haven, agrees there is a danger for the party should
the nomination be decided by the superdelegates.
Avallone, who has already declared his support for Obama, said there
could be severe damage to the Democratic Party if the superdelegates
don’t follow the will of primary voters.
The "worst-case scenario," according to Avallone, would be if Obama
were to enter the convention with a significant lead in the popular
primary vote, but lose the nomination to Clinton because of the
superdelegates.
"If the perception is that Obama got robbed by the insiders, I believe
it would have a long-standing negative impact on the Democratic Party,"
said Avallone, who achieved his superdelegate status by virtue of his
position as a Connecticut member of the Democratic National Committee.
But the prospect of superdelegates deciding the nomination seems less
of a problem to Ellen Camhi of Stamford, who is the only Connecticut
superdelegate who has declared for Clinton.
Camhi is another member of the Democratic National Committee and she
believes superdelegates would make the right decision for the party
based on "who they think can win in November."
The superdelegate system was intended to give longtime party officials,
who tend to be more moderate than many Democratic primary voters, a
bigger say in the nomination process.
Most Democratic delegates are chosen through the primary process.
Superdelegates are seated based on the position that they hold and are
free to support any candidate. In most states, delegates are divided
between the Democratic presidential contenders according to what
percentage of the primary vote each received.
Obama won Connecticut’s Feb. 5 primary by taking 51 percent of the vote
to Clinton’s 47 percent. That outcome gave Obama 26 of the 48 regular
delegates from Connecticut available in the primary.
At one time, virtually all Democratic convention delegates were chosen
by primary voting.
Avallone said the party rules were changed because of the belief that
"liberal activists were controlling the nomination process" and
Democrats were choosing presidential candidates that "were not in the
mainstream of this country."
So the decision was made to give delegate votes to members of a state’s
congressional delegation, the state party chairman, the state’s
Democratic National Committee members and others who hold important DNC
caucus posts, and "distinguished party leaders."
Connecticut’s superdelegates include DiNardo, Avallone, Camhi, state
Rep. Stephen Fontana of North Haven and former state Democratic
Chairman John W. Olsen, both DNC members. Fontana has endorsed Obama
while Olsen is uncommitted.
All four of Connecticut’s Democratic U.S. House members are
superdelegates. U.S. Reps. John Larson, D-1, Rosa DeLauro, D-3, and
Chris Murphy, D-5, have endorsed Obama. U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2, is
uncommitted.
U.S. Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, who waged his own unsuccessful campaign
for the party’s presidential nomination, is another superdelegate who
remains uncommitted.
But Connecticut’s other U.S. senator, Joseph I. Lieberman lost his
status as a superdelegate — and the delegation loses that spot — when
he endorsed Republican John McCain for the presidency. Lieberman ran
and won a third party campaign for re-election in 2006 as an
"independent Democrat."
Until this year, the possibility that the superdelegates could make the
final nomination decision at the convention hadn’t become a real factor
because the party didn’t have two contenders as evenly matched as
Clinton and Obama.
One thing DiNardo, Avallone and Camhi all agree on is that they would
much rather have the Democratic nomination decided by the upcoming
primaries in Ohio and Texas than risk a contentious and potentially
divisive Democratic convention.
As Avallone puts it, "We don’t want the perception that the people in
the back room are making the decision."
CT
PRIMARY NOT IGNORED ANYMORE (as of Feb. 4, and see above)
State
to be shunned by major party candidates
DAY
Posted on Jan 14, 7:10 AM EST
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- Connecticut apparently won't see any of the
major party candidates running for president before the state's Feb. 5
primary.
The heads of both major parties say they don't know of any planned
visits by the candidates.
Connecticut is one of 24 states to have primaries or caucuses on that
day. The state has only a small number of delegates at stake.
There are just 60 Democratic delegates at stake in Connecticut's
Democratic presidential primary compared to California.
On the Republican side, the state has 30 GOP delegates compared with
the 173 Republican delegates available in California.
Connecticut moved its primary date to early February to have a chance
to vote before the major party nominations had been decided.

Republican not taking $$, Democrat in Senate race taking it:
opponents for seat held by long-time Senator Bill Nickerson, R-36 (not
running again) differ.
Greenwich legislature candidates lean toward public campaign financing
Greenwich TIME
By Neil Vigdor/Staff writer
Article Launched: 07/25/2008 04:49:46 PM EDT
With public funding of elections available for the first time this year
in Connecticut, four of the six candidates on the General Assembly
ballot in Greenwich are accepting taxpayer money for their campaigns
outright or are leaning toward doing so.
In the 151st House District race, both Republican Alfred Camillo and
Democrat Edward Krumeich Jr. applied for grants from the Citizens'
Election Fund.
So did Mark Diamond, the Democratic Senate hopeful in the 36th
District, which includes Greenwich and parts of Stamford and New
Canaan.
State Rep. Lile Gibbons, R-150th District, who is running unopposed for
re-election, said she will probably go the same route.
State Rep. Livvy Floren, R-149th Distict, who is also uncontested, and
36th District Republican Senate candidate L. Scott Frantz are not
accepting public funding.
Proponents of the public financing system say it will help level the
playing field in state elections, especially for challengers
hard-pressed to raise money for their campaigns. Opponents counter that
the system wastes taxpayer money on campaigns they might not support
and creates a maze of red tape.
Conn.
candidates line up for public financing
Danbury News-Times
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Article Last Updated: 07/18/2008 03:34:13 PM EDT
HARTFORD -- Barack Obama may have abandoned public financing for his
presidential campaign, but legislative candidates are lining up in
Connecticut to get campaign cash - courtesy of the state government.
About 70 percent of the Nutmeg State's candidates for General Assembly
this year are expected to sign on to a new public financing election
program, which offers hefty grants, extra money to combat opponents who
don't participate and a promise of more cash to counter negative ads
from third parties.
"Some objected to it originally, but they're happy with it now," said
state Rep. Al Adinolfi, a Republican from Cheshire. "It gives them more
time to get involved with the issues, it keeps everybody on a clean
playing field."
National advocates for public financing hope the new, voluntary
Citizens' Election Program in Connecticut, as well as similar
initiatives in Arizona and Maine, and limited programs in Vermont,
North Carolina, New Mexico and New Jersey, prove that public financing
can also on the national level for presidential and congressional
candidates.
"I think a high participation rate will show what's possible,
especially amid the collapse of the federal system," said Nick Nyhart,
co-founder and director of the Washington, D.C.-based Public Campaign,
a nonprofit group advocating for comprehensive campaign finance reform.
First-year participation in the Maine and Arizona programs was about 30
percent, said Andy Sauer, executive director of Connecticut Common
Cause, a group that pushed for the new legislation in hopes of ridding
state elections of special interest money.
"For the most part, this is exceeding our expectations," he said.
Last month, Obama reversed his earlier stance and decided to raise
millions of dollars on his own, bypassing the federal system that's
been in place since the Watergate scandal. President Bush was the first
candidate to reject public financing of primaries when he ran in 2000.
But no candidate has ignored the general election funds.
Obama said it wasn't an easy decision, but said the system is outdated.
"We face opponents who've become masters at gaming this broken system,"
he told supporters in a video message.
Republican candidate John McCain said his campaign will take public
financing. Accusing Obama of going back on a promise, the Arizona
senator said he wasn't worried about being outspent in the fall
presidential contest.
Nyhart wasn't surprised by Obama's decision.
"We're essentially asking candidates to run a 2008 campaign with a
'70s-era public financing system," he said.
"A modern design of a public financing system is going to draw
candidates in and an antiquated program is going to watch candidates
opt out," he added.
There's also hope that if Connecticut's system is successful, members
of Congress might eventually adopt a similar program to fund their
campaigns.
"I think that what I've seen so far in Connecticut is impressive. Some
other states are doing some funding as well. We'll look at all of
them," said U.S. Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., an advocate for
campaign finance reform. "In four to six years, I think we'll have a
real story to tell."
Rocked by public corruption scandals in recent years, Connecticut
passed a law in 2005 that created a voluntary system where legislative
and statewide candidates receive public funds to run their campaigns so
long as they agree to strict rules about spending and fundraising. They
must collect a specific number of small contributions - $5 to $100 -
from individuals, including many living in their districts, to qualify
for the program. Contributors cannot be lobbyists, or current or
prospective state contractors, or their family members.
A major party state representative candidate, for example, must raise
$5,000 to receive a $25,000 grant for the general election. That
candidate then agrees to spend no more than $30,000 on his or her race.
Senate candidates must raise $15,000 to receive an $85,000 grant.
Additional money is available if a nonparticipating opponent outspends
the candidate or if an independent group wages an attack campaign.
Unopposed candidates can be eligible for 30 percent of the grants and
there are tougher thresholds for minor party and petitioning candidates
before they can receive cash. Also, money is available for candidates
in primary battles.
The grants are primarily funded by unclaimed property, such as old bank
accounts and life insurance policies, that have built up over the
years.
Donations are also accepted. About $10 million is expected to be spent
on this year's race.
"It is public money, but the fact that no tax revenue was increased has
been very helpful to tell people," said Beth Rottman, director of
Connecticut's public financing program.
The Citizens Election Program will include candidates for the state's
constitutional offices, including governor, in the 2010 election. A
participating major party candidate for governor will be able to
receive $3 million for the general election.
Rottman, who previously worked with New York City's public financing
program, said legislative candidates are signing up in droves because
they saw firsthand how the system worked in several recent special
elections held to fill vacant seats.
"There was such fear in the beginning of the unknown and the loss of
control," she said, acknowledging she received a chilly reception from
some candidates. But after the special elections, Rottman said there
was a "sea-change."
"They saw that it wasn't that bad," said Rottman. "Those special
elections were really key in showing people that this could be done."
State
kicks off electronic campaign finance system
DAY
Posted on Jan 4, 7:22 AM EST
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- State election officials have launched a new
electronic campaign finance filing system for political candidates that
will give the public access to financial reports.
The new system by the State Elections Enforcement Commission, eCRIS, is
aimed at making it easier for candidates to file statements
electronically and for the public to search campaign finance
records. The system also will allow voters to review individual
campaign filings, whether for a local member of the General Assembly or
a candidate for governor.
Andy Sauer of Connecticut Common Cause, a political watchdog group,
says the new system fixes problems that plagued the old electronic
reporting site maintained by the Secretary of the State.
The Campaign Reporting Information System can be found on the SEEC Web
site at http://www.ct.gov/seec/
CONNECTICUT ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT
COMMISSION
Obama’s
Money Class
NYTIMES
By DAVID BROOKS
Published: July 1, 2008
Barack Obama sells the Democratic Party short. He talks about his
fund-raising success as if his donors were part of a spontaneous
movement of small-money enthusiasts who cohered around himself. In
fact, Democrats have spent years building their donor network. Obama’s
fund-raising base is bigger than John Kerry’s, Howard Dean’s and Al
Gore’s, but it’s not different.
As in other recent campaigns, lawyers account for the biggest chunk of
Democratic donations. They have donated about $18 million to Obama,
compared with about $5 million to John McCain, according to data
released on June 2 and available at OpenSecrets.org.
People who work at securities and investment companies have given Obama
about $8 million, compared with $4.5 for McCain. People who work in
communications and electronics have given Obama about $10 million,
compared with $2 million for McCain. Professors and other people who
work in education have given Obama roughly $7 million, compared with
$700,000 for McCain.
Real estate professionals have given Obama $5 million, compared with $4
million for McCain. Medical professionals have given Obama $7 million,
compared with $3 million for McCain. Commercial bankers have given
Obama $1.6 million, compared with $1.2 million for McCain. Hedge fund
and private equity managers have given Obama about $1.6 million,
compared with $850,000 for McCain.
When you break it out by individual companies, you find that employees
of Goldman Sachs gave more to Obama than workers of any other employer.
The Goldman Sachs geniuses are followed by employees of the University
of California, UBS, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, National Amusements,
Lehman Brothers, Harvard and Google. At many of these workplaces, Obama
has a three- or four-to-one fund-raising advantage over McCain.
When he is swept up in rhetorical fervor, Obama occasionally says that
his campaign is 90 percent funded by small donors. He has indeed had
great success with small donors, but only about 45 percent of his money
comes from donations of $200 or less.
The real core of his financial support is something else, the rising
class of information age analysts. Once, the wealthy were solidly
Republican. But the information age rewards education with money. There
are many smart high achievers who grew up in liberal suburbs around San
Francisco, L.A. and New York, went to left-leaning universities like
Harvard and Berkeley and took their values with them when they became
investment bankers, doctors and litigators.
Political analysts now notice a gap between professionals and managers.
Professionals, like lawyers and media types, tend to vote and give
Democratic. Corporate managers tend to vote and give Republican. The
former get their values from competitive universities and the media
world; the latter get theirs from churches, management seminars and the
country club.
The trends are pretty clear: rising economic sectors tend to favor
Democrats while declining economic sectors are more likely to favor
Republicans. The Democratic Party (not just Obama) has huge
fund-raising advantages among people who work in electronics,
communications, law and the catchall category of finance, insurance and
real estate. Republicans have the advantage in agribusiness, oil and
gas and transportation. Which set of sectors do you think are going to
grow most quickly in this century’s service economy?
Amazingly, Democrats have cultivated this donor base while trending
populist on trade by forsaking much of the Clinton Third Way approach
and by vowing to raise taxes on capital gains and the wealthy. If
Obama’s tax plans go through, those affluent donors could wind up
giving over 50 percent of their income to the federal government.
They’ve managed to clear these policy hurdles partly by looking out for
tort lawyers and other special groups. But mostly they have taken
advantage of the rivalry between the two American elites.
Over the past several years, the highly educated coastal rich have been
engaged in a little culture war with the inland corporate rich. This is
a war over values, leadership styles and social networks.
Socially liberal knowledge workers naturally want to see people like
themselves at the head of society, not people who used to run
Halliburton and who are supported by a vast army of evangelicals.
If the Democrats are elected, this highly educated class will have much
more say over policy than during the campaign. Undecided voters sway
campaigns, but in government, elites generally run things. Once the
Republicans are vanquished, I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for
that capital gains tax hike or serious measures to expand unionization.
Over the past few years, people from Goldman Sachs have assumed control
over large parts of the federal government. Over the next few they
might just take over the whole darn thing.
Guns, 'speculators,' and toady
legislators
Manchester Journal-Inquirer
By Chris Powell
Published: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 10:51 AM EDT
Critics of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case of the
District of Columbia's ordinance prohibiting the private possession of
firearms stress the qualifying phrase of the Second Amendment. The
right of the people to keep and bear arms, the critics of the decision
note, is premised on "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the
security of a free state."
So, the critics suggest, the right to gun ownership should depend on
whether the government for any particular jurisdiction wants to
maintain a militia on the Second Amendment's terms, and if the
government does not want to maintain a militia that way, it should be
able to deny gun rights.
The Second Amendment's premise about the militia cannot be ignored. But
it is not for ordinary legislation or ordinance to contradict or
undermine the premise. While it may seem antique or mistaken in times
that are much different from the times of the adoption of the Bill of
Rights, that premise remains part of the Constitution and can be
changed only by constitutional amendment.
That is, the "not" can be removed from "shall not be infringed" only if
another "not" is inserted in front of "being necessary to the security
of a free state," and only a constitutional amendment can do such
rewriting. No, good policy or bad, the Constitution says the people
have a right to keep and bear arms so they might be useful to a militia
drawn from people who keep and bear arms, even if that is not why most
people today want to keep and bear arms.
So as a matter of constitutional law, which is what it is supposed to
decide, even on its critics' terms the Supreme Court got it right.
* * *
Congress is blaming speculators for the sharply rising price of oil.
(The far greater speculation of recent years, in real estate and
government bonds, remains perfectly OK.) So last week the House of
Representatives voted 402-19 for a bill directing the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission to stop "excessive speculation" in the oil market.
The legislation specifies mechanisms for the CFTC to use in stopping
"excessive speculation," such as limiting the money that can be
borrowed for commodities trading. But like the legislation recently
proposed to stop "price gouging" in gasoline, the oil market
legislation never defines "speculation," much less "excessive
speculation," leaving that