


BUDGET REVIEW
SCHEDULE 2010-11 : Meetings so far - outreach to town
on
school budget, proposed capital budget
set...
- BIG WEEK COMING: First
Selectman's budget to the Board of Selectmen Tuesday, Feb. 2; Board of Education, Wednesday,
Feb. 3; Thursday the extra day - Board of Selectmen votes after
the "Speak Up" weekend - on Tuesday, Feb. 9, 2010.
- Board of Education FY'10-'11
budget meetings at the Weston Library - School Budget schedule;
- Capital
Advisory Committee in Town Hall Meeting Room EARLY in the
mornings...
- Budget Process
gets underway with Board of Education public
meeting Nov. 21, 2009,
10:30am to 12 noon at the cafetorium at WIS, about their budget and its
assumptions and what you think about these!
- First discussion of the budget FY2011 a "Tri-Board" event: "About Town" report here.
FORUM article here.
- Odds and ends from
elsewhere...budget shortfalls
around the USA. Combo finance features?
Weston First Selectman requests 1.73% budget increase
Weston FORUM
Written by Kimberly Donnelly
Wednesday, 03 February 2010 11:56
First Selectman Gayle Weinstein has proposed a town operating budget
for 2010-11 of $10,980,027, a 1.73% increase over the current year’s
budget. Ms. Weinstein said the budget “reflects the community’s
values,” by
including increases for human services, a commitment to public safety,
and “genuinely caring about the community and our neighbors.”
At the same time, Ms. Weinstein said the budget demonstrates “strong
budgetary restraint,” evidenced by the fact that the average increase
over the past five years was 3.9%.
“Justification was the key in creating these budgets... All departments
started at zero, and we built the budgets from the bottom up, based
upon agreed needs,” the first selectman said.
Unemployment
One of her motivations for keeping this year’s budget as tight as
possible are the unemployment statistics for Weston, which show a lot
of Westonites are struggling this year, Ms. Weinstein said.
Statistics show that prior to 1999, Weston’s unemployment rate ranged
from about 1.5% to 3%. In 2008, it peaked at nearly 6%. By December
2009, it had dropped to 3.9% — still higher than normal.
Projected “revenue challenges” were another reason expenditures have to
be kept in check, Ms. Weinstein said.
Revenue is expected to drop by almost $400,500, a 13.94% decrease. This
includes a $293,700 (22.7%) decrease in local revenue (town clerk fees,
building permits, interest income, etc.) and an anticipated $106,776
(9.6%) decrease in state aid (mainly education grants). To
counteract this, the first selectman has proposed raising fees for
garbage stickers from $1 to $1.50 per bag and increasing Parks and
Recreation user fees.
“While these won’t provide a direct offset to the operating budget, it
is my hope that those additional funds [from the Parks and Recreation
fees] can be used towards field replacement, which impacts our capital
budget,” Ms. Weinstein said.
Ms. Weinstein said the largest budget drivers — items that are most
responsible for budget increases — are health insurance, pension, and
OPEB (other post employment benefit) liability. The increases for these
three items total $275,127 or a 12.9% increase. The three items alone
account for 21.9% of the total proposed budget.
Election costs
Another cost increase that is beyond the town’s control is money needed
for elections and registrars. The state is no longer going to pay for
the optical scan ballots required for use in primary and general
elections.
“These ballots cost 46 cents each,” Ms. Weinstein said, meaning the
town must budget an additional $4,500 for ballots alone, given the
likelihood of primary elections this year as well as the scheduled
general election in November for state and federal seats. Overall, the
town is looking at a 21.9% increase for elections and registrars costs.
Offsetting some of the increases in the operating budget is a 9.31%
decrease in the proposed capital budget. The 2010-11 request is $75,133
less than the 2009-10 capital budget. The capital budget often
“yo-yos” from year to year, depending on what
the town chooses to fund, and what might be funded through bond issues
(see related story on page one) rather than in the capital budget. Ms.
Weinstein said she will be looking into the possibility of creating a
“sinking fund,” money set aside for periodically repaying a bond issue,
in order to mitigate the up and down nature of the capital budget.
In
While Ms. Weinstein describes the budget as “particularly lean,” she
said it’s important to note it does include money for some “important,
essential” items, including:
• An upgrade of the security monitoring system at town hall
• Upgrades at the Communication Center
• An increase in the human services budget
• An increase in the fire marshal’s hours from 17.5 hours to 19.5 hours
per week
• An increase in the legal counsel line “simply because it was not
realistic... We’re trying to make it reflect what really happens,” Ms.
Weinstein said.
Out
The first selectman said it is also important be aware of some of the
things that are not in the proposed budget. Town officials had
predicted some layoffs, but Ms. Weinstein said there
were few places she was willing to make cuts. “Staff-wise, we are as
lean as can be without truly cutting into essential town services,” she
said.
The proposed budget does eliminate a part-time library assistant and an
animal control assistant. These will likely be partly offset by
increases in overtime for other employees, however. Also, one
transfer station employee position is being reduced from full
time to part time, necessitating a reduction in hours of operation at
the transfer station.
No salary increases for union employees are budgeted at this time, but
contracts are up for negotiation in June. A general cost of living
increase of $25,000 is being budgeted to offset the possibility of
salary increases. All non-union employees agreed to salary
freezes last year; they have
been given a 1% increase in the proposed budget, plus any planned
“step” increases (scheduled salary increases based on the number of
years employed).
Budget schedule
The Board of Selectmen is scheduled to vote on the town budget proposal
and a recommendation for the school budget this Tuesday, Feb. 9. The
approved budgets then will be sent to the Board of Finance for
review. The finance board is set to review the town budget
proposal Monday, Feb. 22, and the school budget on Wednesday, Feb. 24.
A public hearing on the budget requests is scheduled for Tuesday, March
23, at 8 p.m. at Weston Middle School. On Thursday, March 25, the
finance board will deliberate and decide on a final
OUR VIEW FROM WATCHING TOWN TV:
First Selectman's Budget &
Capital
Budget, FY2011 Presentation
We stayed home to watch
Tuesday evening, Feb. 2,
2010.. As best we could figure out - it was a quick delivery -
the First Selectman's budget is up $186,637, the Capital Budget is down
at $736k, so there is a $40,563 decrease - or 1.59 cent decrease per
person - or something like that!
What we noticed: the Health District was severely punished
by the
State of CT, and this means higher costs to towns of Weston and
Westport, which the town will agree to pay. Also, Registrars of
Voters got biggest increase (lots of primaries, etc.). Unusual
cut to Library we thought, altho' the explanation was that anyone who
hadn't spent their previous budget down got it cut this year (that's
why they call it "zero based" - history is no excuse).
NOTE: overdue book fees one of the big budget surplus generators.
Discussion of Weston budget as it reflects the "rural" nature of
the
community; keeping the faith with residential character and
understanding that we are #2 in CT as MOST non-commercial town (after
Roxbury) has a cost.
It was noted by the First Selectperson that insurance (health
and other
kinds) and pension costs make up 30% of the town budget. Efforts
had been made to coordinated future dealings on the subject of payroll
functions in coordination with the Board of Education - and something
may come about in the near future with training and automating;
and there was an increase in the Grand List of 0.2%
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
REVIEWS BOARD OF
EDUCATION BUDGET FY2011
We tuned in again to
Channel 79 to watch Wednesday, Feb. 3,
2010's Board of Selectmen review of the Board of Ed budget - which was
thorough. There were many questions asked (and answered) but the
tenor of the meeting was most agreeable, with no suggestions that the
number should be reduced beyond the official 1.64% increase.
Suggestions were made and questions asked as to how the Board of
Ed was
plannning to pursuade teachers to go for H.S.A. medical plans, how they
were saving money with volunteer help, and a very interesting series of
mentions of the whole O.P.E.B. issue...when the big cost will hit, if
the Legislature is aware of the need for relief, etc. See our own
O.P.E.B. webpage here.
C A P I T A L B U D G
E T F Y 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 1


First Meeting, Capital Advisory Committee
(l); Weston Middle School Roof - isn't it really multiple roofs plural?
Weston's Capital
Advisory Committee: Budget request is $732,200
Weston FORUM
Written by Patricia Gay
Wednesday, 27 January 2010 12:01
There appears to be some good news on the horizon for the town and
school budgets. A proposed cut to items in the capital budget may
offset increases in the operating budgets. Last week, the Capital
Advisory Committee recommended a combined town and school capital
budget of $732,200, which is $471,933 less than the current capital
budget of $1,204,133.
The committee recommended 11 items, totaling $732,200, for the 2010-11
capital budget, including:
• $150,000 for the
Valley Forge Bridge grant match.
• $120,000 for wetlands mediation at Weston Middle
School.
• $77,000 for fire portable vehicle radios.
• $155,000 for the first stage of police digital
radios.
• $20,000 for work on the Revson infield.
• $27,500 for half the funding for replacement of
the Weston High School track.
• $20,000 for turf replacement fund.
• $50,000 repairs to town buildings.
• $47,700 for one and a half police cruisers. (The
town purchases one or two vehicles a year.)
• $45,000 for Public Works Department small dump
truck.
• $20,000 for an administrative vehicle to be shared
by the Land Use department.
The Capital Advisory Committee cut several items that were requested by
town and school departments, including:
• $98,000 for the
fire truck general fund replenishment.
• $125,000 for Public Works Department snow plow.
• $10,000 for a Bisceglie infield.
• $75,000 for a GIS (geographic information system).
• $69,000 for a heating upgrade at Weston Middle
School.
• $43,700 for external masonry repairs at Hurlbutt
Elementary School.
In addition, the committee advised rolling three other items into a
bond with the $3.76-million middle school roof project, rather than
including them in the capital budget.
Those items include a boiler for the middle school for $235,000, a
boiler at the high school for $144,000, and a boiler for the Weston
Public Library for $100,000.
The selectmen and the finance board met Tuesday night to approve an
approximate $4.2-million bond for the roof and boiler replacement
projects.
With a projected decrease in revenue, and increases in pension and
health care costs, the town is struggling to keep its operating budget
down. “We could not get the operating budget down to zero,” said Tom
Landry, town administrator.
He said the Capital Advisory Committee is aware of the economic
situation that residents are facing and scrutinized each capital
request. “The committee did not judge capital needs against operating
budget needs. They said if we can defer it we’ll do [that], but if we
need it, we will do it regardless.”
Capital
Advisory
Committee
meets at
7:45a.m. in the Town Hall Meeting Room
#4
CAPITAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMITTEE
MAKES FINAL CHOICES
January 20,
2010, 7:45am, Town Hall Meeting Room lasts close to two hours;
decisions made by consensus with one item still undecided* (list from
the minutes of previous meeting):
- Valley Forge Bridge - $150,000
- Middle School wetlands mediation - $120,000
- Fire Portable/vehicle radios - $77,000
- Police Digital Radios - $155,000
- Revson Infield - $20,000
- HS Track Seal (half of the requested amount) - $27,500
- Turf Replacement Fund - $20,000
- Repairs to town buildings - $50,000
- Police Cruisers (1 1/2) - $48,000
- Small dump truck* for DPW - $50,000 (First
Selectperson will discuss this item further with DPW).
- Admin/Inspection car - $20,000
___________________________________________
@$730,000 total capital budget FY2010-2011 (NOTE - this is not the
exact number - we didn't hear it clearly in the Town Hall Meeting Room
so early in the morning).
BOND ISSUE COMING
When it comes to re-roofing projects, it never is a "pay-as-you-go" job
for school buildings (they are sooooo big); bonding is always the
answer - spread it over many years is the way to go. BUT
especially if the rates are low, as low as they are now and in the next
several months.
So late in this meeting the subject came up - discussion of a bond
issue for the Middle School
Roof and possible for the Library (again, I am not certain of this -
the Town may already have put aside the $$ for the Library or some of
it)
plus boilers and other Kaestle Boos
identified projects. How would it be accomplished? The
Board of Finance is on the case! It would be dependent upon the
state of
the bond market in late April and the readiness by the Town to fully
explain why a bond issue at this time is advantageous to the
taxpayers. Refinancing issues from 2004, 2005 and 2007 can take
place not before May. Please remember
that this is an unofficial source, so check our report against official
news!
#3
CAPITAL
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE
TUESDAY, JANUARY 5, 2009 at 7:45 AM
TOWN HALL MEETING ROOM
1. Discussion/decision regarding capital budget
priorities and limits for FY 2010-2011
a) School
List-@$268,000
b) Town List- @$651,000 or so.
2. Any other items of business to be brought up for Committee
consideration/there will be off-line discussions taking place to
finalize some details during departmental; reviews (final) of Town-side
budget; at the next meeting there should be discussion of bonding
for the Library Roof, the Middle School Roof and related capital
expenses.
3. Adjourn.
#2
The second meeting of the Capital Advisory Committee took place Monday,
December 14, 2009. At this meeting the first presentation was by
the Police and Fire department representatives re: digital radio for
public emergency purposes.(Sgt. Daubert and Chief Pokorny); a
Town financial advisor (Mark Chapman) discussed the municipal bond
market. Considering the timing of interest rates and bonding,
several scenarios re: refinancing some of the Town debt were discussed,
with possible action around the time of ATBM - coincidental but not
related to next year's budget, we think. Middle School Roof seen
as numero uno project ($3.7 million est.).
Next meeting @Jan. 14, 2010 (TBA)
#1
Opening shot in the 2010-2011 Capital Budget
process: Monday, November 23, 2009 Board of Education sets out
its ideas for the coming year and discusses modification to Kaestle
Boos study; discussion of the bonding environment re:
Middle School Roof and other capital needs. NOTE: in
response to Dan Gilbert's suggestion about reprioritizing the K-B
suggestions over time, Director of Operations for the Board of
Education and the Superintendent report that this has been done and is
a work in progress as facilities age at different rates. First
Selectman notes that the original multi-millions are now lower thanks
to this process by the Board of Education. Present market and
construction industry flexibility might make the K-B numbers (from 3
years ago) change, as well
Discussion of possible bond issue in a year or two. Next meeting
set for Monday, December 14, 2009 (tent.), at the same hour (?)
Weston boards begin budget banter
Weston FORUM
Written by Patricia Gay
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 16:34
With the election over, the town’s top boards wasted no time starting
the budget process, even though the newest elected officials had yet to
be sworn in. On Monday, Nov. 9, there was a joint meeting of the
Board of Selectmen, Board of Education, and Board of Finance to discuss
preliminary issues they expect to face in the upcoming budget.
“This budget year will be one of very tough decisions that may involve
some changes. That’s what we have to explore for both the town and the
schools,” said Mike O’Brien, finance board chairman.
Tom Landry, town administrator, provided a letter to Ellen Uzenoff,
school board chairman, answering questions she had about the town’s
financial condition. On the positive side, the town’s tax
collection rate is at 51.3% and is on target where it should be at this
time of year.
The town’s fund balance is healthy at $6.8 million, and the town has
maintained its Aaa bond rating.
On the negative side, there have been 11 foreclosures in Weston since
January. Historically, there is an estimated one or two foreclosures a
year, so that number is up significantly. In addition, there are
56 mortgages reported to be in some stage of default. And the
unemployment rate in Weston is 5.4%, according to the Department of
Labor.
Education
The school board offered a PowerPoint presentation showing ways it has
saved money and cut costs in the past few years.
“Since 2007 and 2008, the district has saved approximately $3.95
million through cuts and creative savings,” said school board member
Phil Schaefer.
As one of its budget assumptions, the school board stated it plans to
continue to explore and implement opportunities to be more cost
effective, to contain costs, and to avoid costs wherever possible.
The school district will also explore cost savings through energy
initiatives and transitioning employees into a health savings account
(HSA) benefits plan.
“The fact remains that we have a challenging budget we have to put
forth. We also have to take into account what is in the best interest
of the schools, so it is a double challenge for us,” said Ms. Uzenoff.
Renegotiation
One of the topics raised was whether there could be a renegotiation of
the school board’s contract with the teachers’ union in light of the
economic downturn.
School board members said there could be gains to such a renegotiation,
but there could also be losses because when a contract is renegotiated
all its terms are up for discussion, not just salaries and benefits.
Still, the board said it would ask its legal counsel to review the
possibility of a contract renegotiation and offer an opinion.
Taking the concept of renegotiation a step further and relating it to
both the town and school budgets, Selectman-elect David Muller said,
“What we are really talking about here is renegotiating the contract
between the town and the citizens of the town.”
He said if the boards adhere to a rigorous budget approval process,
some things may need to be cut. “There is a disjoint between the
services that people want and expect, and what they are willing and
able to pay,” he said.
He added that the town does not have the flexibility of deficit
spending and must adhere to its budget. In keeping with the concept of
zero-based budgeting, he said every expense should be reviewed and
scrutinized.
First Selectman-elect Gayle Weinstein said she was encouraged by the
joint meeting. “It’s great that these three boards are working
cooperatively, and it’s important that we look at services we can
combine for the betterment of the town,” she said.
After the meeting, audience member Margaret Wirtenberg said she was
encouraged by the discussion.
“Everyone is working together and trying hard in these difficult times.
It is a good sign that everyone wants to be open,” she said.
Because public comment was limited during the meeting due to time
constraints, the school board has scheduled an open forum to further
discuss its budget on Saturday, Nov. 21, from 10:30 to noon, at the
Weston Intermediate School cafetorium. The public is encouraged to
attend.
“We need to hear from the public and we hope people will to come to us
with their suggestions. This is the time to listen and talk,” Ms.
Uzenoff said.
AN INTERESTING COLUMN
Op-Ed
Columnist
The Banks Are Not All Right
NYTIMES
By PAUL KRUGMAN
October 19, 2009
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. O.K., maybe not
literally the worst, but definitely bad. And the contrast between the
immense good fortune of a few and the continuing suffering of all too
many boded ill for the future.
I’m talking, of course, about the state of the banks.
The lucky few garnered most of the headlines, as many reacted with fury
to the spectacle of Goldman Sachs making record profits and paying huge
bonuses even as the rest of America, the victim of a slump made on Wall
Street, continues to bleed jobs.
But it’s not a simple case of flourishing banks versus ailing workers:
banks that are actually in the business of lending, as opposed to
trading, are still in trouble. Most notably, Citigroup and Bank of
America, which silenced talk of nationalization earlier this year by
claiming that they had returned to profitability, are now — you guessed
it — back to reporting losses.
Ask the people at Goldman, and they’ll tell you that it’s nobody’s
business but their own how much they earn. But as one critic recently
put it: “There is no financial institution that exists today that is
not the direct or indirect beneficiary of trillions of dollars of
taxpayer support for the financial system.” Indeed: Goldman has made a
lot of money in its trading operations, but it was only able to stay in
that game thanks to policies that put vast amounts of public money at
risk, from the bailout of A.I.G. to the guarantees extended to many of
Goldman’s bonds.
So who was this thundering bank critic? None other than Lawrence
Summers, the Obama administration’s chief economist — and one of the
architects of the administration’s bank policy, which up until now has
been to go easy on financial institutions and hope that they mend
themselves.
Why the change in tone? Administration officials are furious at the way
the financial industry, just months after receiving a gigantic taxpayer
bailout, is lobbying fiercely against serious reform. But you have to
wonder what they expected to happen. They followed a softly, softly
policy, providing aid with few strings, back when all of Wall Street
was on the ropes; this left them with very little leverage over firms
like Goldman that are now, once again, making a lot of money.
But there’s an even bigger problem: while the wheeler-dealer side of
the financial industry, a k a trading operations, is highly profitable
again, the part of banking that really matters — lending, which fuels
investment and job creation — is not. Key banks remain financially
weak, and their weakness is hurting the economy as a whole.
You may recall that earlier this year there was a big debate about how
to get the banks lending again. Some analysts, myself included, argued
that at least some major banks needed a large injection of capital from
taxpayers, and that the only way to do this was to temporarily
nationalize the most troubled banks. The debate faded out, however,
after Citigroup and Bank of America, the banking system’s weakest
links, announced surprise profits. All was well, we were told, now that
the banks were profitable again.
But a funny thing happened on the way back to a sound banking system:
last week both Citi and BofA announced losses in the third quarter.
What happened?
Part of the answer is that those earlier profits were in part a figment
of the accountants’ imaginations. More broadly, however, we’re looking
at payback from the real economy. In the first phase of the crisis,
Main Street was punished for Wall Street’s misdeeds; now broad economic
distress, especially persistent high unemployment, is leading to big
losses on mortgage loans and credit cards.
And here’s the thing: The continuing weakness of many banks is helping
to perpetuate that economic distress. Banks remain reluctant to lend,
and tight credit, especially for small businesses, stands in the way of
the strong recovery we need.
So now what? Mr. Summers still insists that the administration did the
right thing: more government provision of capital, he says, would not
“have been an availing strategy for solving problems.” Whatever. In any
case, as a political matter the moment for radical action on banks has
clearly passed.
The main thing for the time being is probably to do as much as possible
to support job growth. With luck, this will produce a virtuous circle
in which an improving economy strengthens the banks, which then become
more willing to lend.
Beyond that, we desperately need to pass effective financial reform.
For if we don’t, bankers will soon be taking even bigger risks than
they did in the run-up to this crisis. After all, the lesson from the
last few months has been very clear: When bankers gamble with other
people’s money, it’s heads they win, tails the rest of us lose.
BUDGET
PROCESS FY 2009 - 2010 OVER NOW...AND THIS CAME IN THE TAX BILL!







- CHANGE IN
DATE!!!
Board of Finance met Wednesday, April 1, 2009 at 8pm at Town Hall and
talked a long time - read story from the FORUM here!
- "Kids in
Crisis" story here.
- ABOVE: Town Seal; March
16th, Board of Education talks health
insurance - major number
in the budget increase proposed;
- workshop"
by Board of Education brings out the public; First Selectman
Woody Bliss and Boards
of Finance and Education; and link to the
Board of Selectmen's schedule for the entire budget process.
For
everything else, there
is money;
- Whidbey Island deals with financial
crisis too...
AT ATBM: WARNING ISSUED
BY ONE SPEAKER WHO PARTICIPATED IN EFFECTIVE ATTACK THIS YEAR ("zero"
increase): Next year the high school pool is on their radar as a
big budget hog (i.e. extra-curricular activities will be cut
before teachers/class size).
Prior to the events at W.H.S.,
the Board of Selectmen conducted a Special Meeting at 7pm in Town
Hall. Approved with small comment were:
date for Selectmen's Driveway Ordinance Public Hearing (May 7,
7:15pm); discussion of Stimulous Package opportunities, date for
discussion with Nature Conservancy re: Lachat; Executive Session
on contract negotiations (no vote taken after).
On to ATBM! We counted 250 or so in attendance in WHS auditorium
(including the non-voters); more came in after our count (school
budget supporters arriving in time for that vote). Prior to ATBM,
announcements: Carbon Monoxide Detector for every home in Weston
(Fire Department project); Police Commission's "Citizens of the
Year" Teri Gaberman and Betsy Pereiyne received their award to full
throated roar of approval (their latest project: getting a new Food
Pantry up and running).
The business of the meeting began @8:30pm and lasted until
@9:30pm. Town, School and Capital Budgets all approved as is for
fiscal 2010.
THEN AT THE
SELECTMEN APRIL 2...
Board of Selectmen meeting hears from Building Committee, and approves
unanimously and conditionally (until Board of Education and Board of
Finance give the
OK) feasibility study request. On the agenda also - renting
fields to
outside groups; procedure at ATBM for secret ballot, most likely
not
necessary after Finance Board's cut. The way "secret ballot" has worked
at Special Town Meetings in the past is, I believe, that the
Moderator reads the "Call" then the penalties for false voting and then
sets rules - which would include things such as "if a secret ballot on
any or all items is requested, the Registrars of Voters will at the
time explain the voting process...") e.g. Special Town Meeting May 30,
2002 purchase of 16 Parade Ground Court - http://www.lwvweston.org/townmtg.htm#may30vote

DELIBERATE DELIBERATION
"About Town" was at the Board of Finance "deliberation" meeting for a
short while @9:30pm with our cameraphone - and we figured that there
would be a cut made
when strong schools supporter on Board commented that of all the
e-mails received since the Public Hearing the previous night was a
short one from a resident who said (as best as we can recall it) he
couldn't afford it (someone who had lost his job, perhaps?) and to
please make a zero budget this year.

Finance board members Melissa Koller and
Michael Carter confer on the budget on Wednesday, April 1. —Patricia
Gay photo
When a Board of Finance member
reported on his 20% pay cut @9pm,it was clear the experienced hands
that this would be the result!
BREAKING NEWS: Weston finance board cuts
school budget request to 0% increase
Weston FORUM
Written by Patricia Gay
Thursday, April 02, 2009
BREAKING
NEWS: Weston’s Board of
Finance will send a 2009-10 budget to the taxpayers that is 0.30% less
than the current fiscal year.
After a lengthy meeting last night,
Wednesday, April 1, that ran close to midnight, the board approved a
total gross budget of $63,227,023, a total of $190,563 less than the
current fiscal year.
But with revenues expected to be
about $436,163 less than they are now, the total net budget is proposed
at $60,353,381, which amounts to a 0.41% increase.
Keeping in mind the troubled
economy, finance board members said their goal was to get the budget as
close to a 0% increase as possible.
The board voted unanimously to set
the school operating budget at $43,975,601, the same amount as the
current fiscal year, representing a 0% increase. The school capital budget was set at
$396,800, which is $21,800 more than the current fiscal year, a 5.81%
increase.
On the town side, the finance board
set the town operating budget at $10,793,490, which is $167,220 more
than the current fiscal year, a 1.57% increase. The town’s capital budget was set at
$807,333, a 20.93% decrease from the current fiscal year.
The estimated mill rate is set for
23.50. A mill is equal
to one dollar for every thousand dollars of assessed value on the grand
list. At a mill rate of 23.50, a taxpayer with property assessed at
$500,000 would pay $11,750 in taxes.
Taxpayers will have the chance to
vote on the budget at the annual town budget meeting Tuesday, April 21.
Full coverage of
the board of finance meeting, as well as of the budget public hearing
held March 31, will be in the April 9 issue of The Weston Forum.
FULL HOUSE, ALMOST, AT WMS CAFETERIA FOR
BOARD OF FINANCE
PUBLIC HEARING: 8pm -10:35
or so (2008, 30 minutes).


Click above for story about Island County, WA problems
The "silent
majority" not silent any more, as Finance Board reminded over and
over that the economic problems are not going away, everyone is half as
wealthy as before and many have lost or will lose jobs and not be able
to sell houses in this market. The "F" word as in "foreclosure"
mentioned. Meeting lasted more than an hour and a half (only 30
minutes last year). No one pointed out that a shrinking Grand
List means higher takes just to stay even with existing service levels.
FIRE
ALARM GOES OFF HALFWAY IN...NO ONE LEAVES (SHIVERING OUTSIDE,
WAITING FOR THE CHANCE TO SPEAK [AFTER ALL CLEAR]). Board of
Finance Public Hearing on the FY09-10 budget almost full
house, takes 150 minutes (5 times as long as usual) - out-of-the-box
and union contract thinking suggested....
WILL
THERE BE CUTS PRIOR TO ATBM?
A REFERENDUM? WHAT DO THE CT STATUTES SAY CAN HAPPEN?
SCHEDUE OF BUDGET PROCESS
MEETINGS FY2010
"Any other business" re: A.T.B.M.
Board of Selectmen, March 19, 2009
Just an after thought...following up on the
previous meeting's discussion of the rumblings about keeping the budget
at zero increase--on the Education side as well as the Selectmen and
Capital sections, too--March 19th saw the Selectmen discuss how the
process works to get this to happen.
The First Selectman outlined the Weston Charter process as well as
section 7-7 of the Connecticut General Statutes, which deals with this
budgetary procedure.
Our advice: go to the Town Clerk's office and ask. And/or,
attend the Board of Finance Public Hearing on the Budget for FY09-10,
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 at 8pm in the Weston Middle School
cafeteria. Be prepared to speak of your reasons for asking the
Board of Finance to cut or not to cut the budget. In the
meantime, here is some information about how to find out online about
these same matters!
WHAT DOES THE CHARTER SAY?
One publication that might inform the electorate in Weston can
be found here: http://www.weston-ct.com/media/file/westontowncharter.pdf
WHAT DO THE CONNECTICUT GENERAL
STATUTES SAY?
Here is a link to the C.G.S. pertaining to this issue:
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/pub/title7.htm
Weston for Fiscal Responsibility forms
to urge budget freeze
Weston FORUM
Thursday, March 05, 2009
Weston for Fiscal Responsibility, a community group representing
parents and retirees who are mutually concerned about rising tax rates,
has begun a petition campaign urging the Weston Board of Education to
freeze all salaries and expenses at their current level.
The group already has gathered nearly 250 signatures and expects to be
present at popular Weston locations throughout the next four weeks
leading to the Board of Finance’s public hearing on the budget,
scheduled for March 31.
According to Nina Daniel, one of the group’s founders, Weston for
Fiscal Responsibility was created “by popular demand” when it became
clear Weston residents were feeling the blows of the current economic
crises as much as anyone, including families where jobs have been lost
or reduced to part time, and retirees whose savings have been
drastically reduced.
Robert Machson, also a founder, noted that teachers’ compensation is
expected to increase more than 17% over the next three years, with
administrators’ salaries to increase by almost the same amount. “With
most taxpayers fearful of losing their jobs altogether, now is not the
time to pay large increases,” Mr. Machson said.
The group does not support any cuts that will adversely affect the
quality of education. Said another group founder, Martha Diamant, “We
hope that school employees will follow the lead of the town and agree
to freeze their salaries at the current levels.” However, she pointed
out, Weston now has the highest per pupil costs of any comparable
school district and the highest property taxes per capita.
“If the school employees aren’t willing to put a cap on their own
salaries, then our Board of Finance may have to find other ways to keep
the lid on taxes,” Ms. Diamant said.
The group may be contacted via e-mail at
WestonFiscalResponsibility@yahoo.comThis e-mail address is being
protected from spambots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it or
visit www.WestonFiscalResponsibility.com.
Members will be collecting signatures and petitions this coming weekend
at Weston Town Center and other locations.
Weston finance board examines school
budget
Weston FORUM
Written by Kimberly Donnelly
Friday, February 27, 2009
ONLINE FIRST: Teacher salaries and health insurance costs account for
the largest chunk of the Weston school budget. As such, they were also
the topics most closely examined at Wednesday night’s finance board
review of the 2009-10 school budget proposal.
“Approximately 80% of the total school operating budget can be
attributed to people,” said Jerome Belair, superintendent of schools.
“We’re a service. We are people.”
The school board approved a $45.13-million budget for the upcoming
school year, a 2.62% increase over the current budget.
Of that, more than $7 million is being allocated for employee health
insurance — a jump that translates into about $764,000 more than this
year. On Wednesday, the finance board was interested in several options
that might lower that increase.
The schools are self insured, unlike the town, which switched to a
fully funded insurance several years ago. Finance board member Michael
Carter pointed out that the town’s health insurance costs have remained
relatively flat since making the change, while the school’s insurance
costs have climbed steadily every year.
“What can we learn from their experience?” Mr. Carter asked.
Jo-Ann Keating, director of finance and operations for the schools,
said she and the other administrators are in the process of analyzing
bids from four health insurance providers — Anthem, Cigna, Aetna, and
Health Net — which include quotes on both self insured and fully
insured options. Only after that analysis is complete will the school
board be able to make a decision about the best and most economical
course of action, Dr. Keating said.
Reserve account
In the meantime, the district is looking at its internal services fund
(sometimes called the health reserve account), which was set up to
record health insurance revenues and expenses. The goal was to build
the fund to adequate levels to be able to cover all insurance claims,
she said. “We’ve been adding to it every year.”
Dr. Keating said the schools “originally agreed we would not use it to
offset the budget.”
However, the school’s insurance advisor has said the school’s estimate
of how high the reserve account should be next year may be higher than
necessary.
“They felt fairly comfortable that we could go $600,000 lower,” Dr.
Keating said.
Because of this, the Board of Selectmen strongly suggested the school
board lower the reserve account by that amount. On Feb. 12, the
selectmen voted to recommend a school budget of $44.26 million, about
$870,000 less than the schools are requesting.
Finance board members agreed that lowering the proposed $764,000 health
insurance increase by $600,000 would be a tremendous help.
Member Jerry Sargent warned, however, that if the money were simply
used to offset the budget increase, it would simply defer the problem.
“It could be a good one-time savings, but we would be dealing with this
next year,” he said.
“The idea originally was to build up the kitty until we had enough
money to absorb the conversion to fully funded insurance if we choose
to do that,” Mr. Sargent added.
Salaries
The other largest budget increase driver is teacher and administrator
salaries. Much of this increase — more than $896,000 — is due to
contractual obligations.
Several board members asked if it would be possible to re-negotiate
teacher contracts or to ask for a salary freeze, rather than just
considering laying off staff as a way to cut salary costs.
Ellen Uzenoff, school board chairman, said entering into new
negotiations (a contract was just agreed upon with the teachers’ union
a few months ago) would be “opening a whole new can of worms,” and
would likely cause more difficulties than it would solve.
“It’s important to know, we didn’t just negotiate [the new teachers
contract], we went to arbitration,” she said. “We heartily pursued some
prioritized important things for us as a school district,” and many of
those would be jeopardized if negotiations were re-opened. The
administration can’t just open portions of the contract to discussion,
it would have to open up the whole thing and start over, Ms. Uzenoff
said.
Mr. Sargent suggested that taking another look at the teachers contract
might be worthwhile nonetheless.
“It’s possible we would find the town situation and the economic
situation are a lot different” than when the initial negotiations took
place, Mr. Sargent said, garnering applause from some of the 50 or so
members of the public in attendance.
“This is clearly an issue,” said finance board member Melissa Koller.
“There’s not a family in Weston that wouldn’t be happy to freeze
[teacher] salaries.” But, she added, there must be a “decent
probability” that it would be worth re-opening negotiations, and, she
added, she doubts that exists.
Town example
Mike O’Brien, finance board chairman, said the school administration
should perhaps follow the example of town leaders, many of whom
voluntarily froze their salaries. They need to pay attention to
upcoming contract negotiations, as well, he said.
Finance board member Dave Muller agreed. “We need to ask what kind of
precedent we are setting now for any other contractual obligations we
have in the coming school year.”
Mr. Muller went on to say that he, like many in town, is taking a
salary cut this year. “I don’t like it personally, but I think it has
to be looked at across the board. But,” he added, “I’m concerned about
spending another $30,000 [in legal fees] to open up negotiations.”
Mr. O’Brien said because of state laws about arbitration, “the odds are
stacked against us 2-1 in winning out.” But, on the other hand, “we
need to stem the growth rate in salaries somehow,” he said.
Mr. Sargent said the schools must have some options, though, including
the possibility of voluntary or negotiated salary freezes. “I’d like
some commitment that we’ll look at [salaries] again... I really want to
push on that.”
TV studio
Over the course of the nearly three-hour meeting, the finance board
asked about other areas of the budget in which savings might be
realized.
One was a $35,000 request for a TV studio at Weston High School.
Superintendent Belair said the studio was part of the high school
auditorium renovation project completed in December. The space is
already built, and the Weston Education Foundation has already agreed
to help with funding, but the school “needs to live up to its
commitment,” Mr. Belair said.
Mr. Carter asked the board to find out how many Weston students go on
to be communications majors. If there are a lot, “it would be a good
investment,” he said.
“There’s no question it would be useful,” Ms. Koller said. “The
question is is this the year to do it?”
Per pupil expenditures
Board members also asked about Weston’s per pupil expenditures. Mr.
Belair calculated that at $16,256, Weston’s per pupil costs are the
highest in the District Reference Group (DRG-A), a group of comparable
socio-economic school districts.
Mr. Belair identified four main reasons why Weston’s expenditures are
so high when compared to other districts:
• In other districts, many capital projects are
bonded, so those costs are not included in the per pupil calculations,
like they are in Weston;
• Energy costs are high because Weston has several
inefficient 50-year-old boilers;
• Weston’s benefit costs are high;
• The districts relatively small size plays into the
per pupil cost, because expenses are divided among fewer students.
Tech budget
Mr. Carter questioned the schools’ technology budget, asking whether
purchasing equipment might be cheaper in the long run than leasing.
Mr. Sargent suggested looking into net books and stripped down freeware
as ways to save money.
There are about 1,200 computers throughout the district. Of those,
approximately 91% are more than three years old and about 60% are more
than five years old.
“Our purchase plan for replacement has been scaled way back,”
Superintendent Belair said, but it would not be wise to get too far
behind, he added.
The school board meets next on Monday, March 16. The finance board
rescheduled its next meeting to Thursday, March 19, so that school
administrators can return to the board with the answers to some of the
questions raised on Wednesday.
A public hearing on the school and town budget is set for Tuesday,
March 31.
Weston's
proposed budget: Some jobs eliminated, some salaries are
frozen
Weston FORUM
Written by Patricia Gay
Thursday, February 26, 2009
What a difference a year makes. Last year, most town employees received
a 3.5% salary increase.
Reflecting the troubled economy, in the proposed 2009-10 town budget,
non-union department heads will receive no wage increase. Town
employees belonging to a union are budgeted at a 2.5% salary increase
(although a new contract for 2009-10 has not yet been agreed upon), and
four part-time positions have been cut from the budget. The first
selectman has even taken a 2% salary cut.
Salary increases account for 38.6% of the $188,620 increase in the
proposed 2009-10 town operating budget.
As of July 1, four part-time jobs will be eliminated — secretary to the
fire marshal ($23,111), town hall “floater” ($17,091), benefits
coordinator ($8,222), and town treasurer ($19,713).
The treasurer’s duties will be added to those of the finance director,
adding $2,000 to the finance director’s salary; and 3.5 hours per week
will be added to the finance assistant — making it a full-time position.
The town administrator’s salary of $117,335, reflects a step increase
received in December 2008.
After the board of finance holds a public hearing and approves a final
overall budget plan, the town and school budgets will be voted on at
the Annual Town Budget Meeting on April 21.
Proposed salaries for Weston town employees in the 2009-10 budget:
Town Administrator $117,335
First Selectman $43,875
Selectmen’s Admin. Assistant $62,702
Finance Director $108,426
Payroll Accountant $58,662
Part-time Accounts Payable (.48) $23,307
Town Engineer $86,052
P&Z Admin. Assistant $48,015
General Maintenance $50,763
Tree Warden $1,000
Info. Systems Manager $72,214
Info System part-time help $7,000 (Records storage program)
Registrar (.25) $10,412 (x2)
Deputy Registrar (.05) $1,543 (x2)
Board of Finance Secretary $3,000
Tax Assessor $84,600
Assistant to Assessor (.70) $26,737
Tax Collector $71,855
Asst. to Tax Collector (.75) $35,996
Town Clerk $71,855
Asst. Town Clerk $45,222
Zoning Enforcement Officer $56,062
Land Use Director (.53) $41,343
Conservation Planner (.85) $47,540
Building Inspector $71,621
Building Admin. Asst. $43,795
Building Committee Secretary $1,200
Chief of Police $96,791
Lieutenant/Captain $2,575 salary differential*
Police Secretary $49,422
Police Sergeant $86,600 (x2)
Police Sergeant (vacant) $11,473 differential
Police Detective $79,199
Police Officer $74,017 (x10)
Police Officer $68,219
Fire Dept. Secretary $11,784
Fire Marshal (.47) $30,010
Animal Control Officer $43,526
Asst. Animal Control (.40) $17,168
Communications Center Managing Dispatcher $62,553
Senior Dispatcher $54,771
Dispatcher $52,384 (x2)
Dispatcher $49,867
Public Works Director $99,955
Foreman $69,695 (x2)
Spec. Equip. Operator Senior $63,725 (x2)
Senior Equip. Operator $63,725 (x2)
Senior Mechanic $68,842 (x2)
Maintainer $58,140
Transfer Station Operator $62,851
Transfer Station Operator $46,051
Conservation Planner (.80) $44,911
Wetlands Enforcement Officer (.20) $15,838
Recreation Director $86,005
Recreation Supervisor $53,985
Rec. Bookkeeper/Secretary $37,504
Rec. Summer Help $1,640
Parks/Fields Maintenance $37,734**
Field Employee (.50) $16,623**
Middle School Aquatics Director $41,751***
Pool technicians $1,948***
Lifeguards $18,450***
Social Worker (.73) $49,963
Part-Time Social Work Assistant (.37) $12,813
Director of Children and Youth $57,058
Program Coordinator (.75) $31,550
Senior Center Director (.64) $31,285
Senior Center Van Driver $27,721
Senior Activities Assistant (.32) $9,469
Back-up Van Driver (.10) $2,666
Library Director $74,294
Senior Librarian $53,985
Children’s Librarian $48,015
Library Assistant $37,496
Library Assistant (.16) $6,214
Library Assistant (.30) $11,243
Library Assistant (.32) $10,234
Library Pages $11,602
Positions less than full-time are designated with a decimal percentage
after the job title.
*This position is currently vacant.
**The town pays 30% and the schools pay 70% of these salaries.
***The town pays 60% and the schools pay 40% of these salaries.
OTHER SELECTMEN BUSINESS FEB.
12th...
Director of Finance introduces individual who will operate the
Custodial Agreement on G.A.S.B funds
THURSDAY, FEB. 12, 2009: Board
of Selectmen votes on the First Selectman's budget, Capital
Budget; recommends a number for Education budget and Education
capital projects.
We watched it live and in person. The room was packed with
pro-cut and pro-no cut proponents. Applause at times.
The individual Townside budget reductions
already discussed were from: Arts Commission, Veterans'
Committee, Tree Warden, Assessor, Legal representation, litigation,
Fire Department, SW Medical, Ravenwood Water System, SW Mental
Health; First Selectman reported that Town department heads
agreed to no increases or
steps; Selectmen to forego stipend and First Selectman takes a
2.5% cut.
Bottom line, we think, was a flat budget at $10,814,850; Capital
Budget number not final yet, but that is the intent there, too.
RECOMMENDATIONS ON SCHOOL BUDGET: The school budget was set by
the Board of Education at an increase of 2.62 (expected to go down to
2.5%) - or $1,154,289 more the FY09..
By Charter, the Board of Selectmen cannot touch the school budget - but
they can let their feelings be known to the Board of Finance, and they
did! The Selectmen took a whack at the school budget,
recommending the following from the request for a $1,154,289
increase: first came a suggestion to cut $600,00 (Bliss);
then the Board of Education found $51,000 to cut, making the amount,
now expressed as an increase, of
$503,289 (from the previously mentioned total over $1 million)..
At this point, everybody on the Board of Selectmen started to refer to
the cuts as "increase over this past year's budget." Why?
Because they were actually recommending a $700,000+ cut, and it looked
as if the Selectmen didn't want the viewing public to realize that
their number was so huge.
All Selectmen said to cut the $35,000 for fittings for the TV studio at
the high
school. A few more cuts here and there were suggested,
with a final agreed upon unanimously number of $44,260,000 plus
$389,832 in capital expenses (from Kaestle-Boos Report).
All three Selectpersons noted the LWV of Weston "Speak Up" crowd and
the overwhelming requests by young and old and inbetween to keep the
budget level this year ("zero" increase). NOTE: "Speak Up"
will be shown this weekend on Channel 79, hopefully beginning a
continuious run after 12 noon Saturday, Valentine's Day.

LWV of Weston SPEAK UP
2009
notes:
More than 200 in
audience at Norfield Church Parish Hall on a nice day!
Q&A: 18
questions/statements total, 14 on the economy, 10 of which were
directly noted to be school-budget related, 4 general;
other: reassessment, flag procedure, need for cemetery and air
traffic. In the order that these questions werer asked:
1.
Reval: how come
assessment
went up if nothing was done?
2. Class size: if it
increases, familites will leave town.
3. Taxes: if taxes
increase, no one will want to move here.
4. School budget:
how about zero increase? Questioned budget approach.
(Superintendant of Schools and Vice-Chair. of the Board of Education
answered; Chair. of the Board of Finance as well - pointed out
that the suggestion was actually the approach that had been taken.)
5. School budget:
zero increase or people will have to move.
6. School budget: "arrogance of
denial" by administration to financial crisis.
7. School budget:
other towns are cutting down on school expenses - can we?
8. School budget: what would it
take to get to zero increase? (Superintendent of Schools
explained the 2.62% increase - which might go down when insurance
contract bids come in - is only 0.3% for school program [$900k for
insurance at present or estimated prices and $100k or more from reduced
special education aid rate.)
9. School budget: supporter of
schools says maybe the time is right to take another look at class size?
10. School budget:
philosophic remark, well chosen words.
11. Schools: contract
negotiations-binding arbitration question: (All three Legislators
responded, with different observations--short version, "not likely.")
12. Budget general: time for
"Weston first" programs only?
13. Flag: it still flies 24/7 with
no light at night-been asking for three years); "no one seems to
care."
14. Financial melt down: general
observation of loss of wealth.
15. Cemetery: will we ever get
one in town? (First Selectman responds that he hasn't been able
to find enough volunteers for yet another try at this - asks if the
questioner would care to join...)
16. FAA-air traffic-noise: what's
happening? (First Selectman reports that 13 towns are employing
the 2nd best attorney to fight the FAA - first best attorney taken by
FAA - New York politicians are pushing the flyover routes in our
direction, but recently the FAA officials in charge of that agency have
been removed because of their bias...)
17. Economy: what will happen
when there is hyper inflation (after all the bail-out $$ kicks
in)? No answer.
18. Economy: needs v. wants -
example of Food Pantry user increase.
CLOSING STATEMENT:
Moderator ends the meeting quoting Jefferson. NOTE: More
discussion of where Weston is headed to take place, in a
land use
arena, on Feb. 26, 2009 (a Thursday) from 7:30pm to 9:30pm at Weston
High School careteria.
WEDNESDAY, FEB. 4, 2009:
Board of Selectmen goes over School Budget. We watch the first
hour...and the very end.
Presentations by Board Chair. Ellen Uzenoff, describing
how the Education budget building transpired; Superintendent of
School Belair gives full accounting of where the changes to style and
substance are; Director of Finance Keating answers questions
about insurance bid process. We watched for an hour on Town TV,
noting that when the Selectmen noted that they thought the number of
teachers in a particular grade was excessive, there was a smattering of
applause.
Resuming watching @9:50pm, I was in time to hear the Selectmen
congratulate the Director of Finance and the Superintendent on how
understandable the document was this year; a member of the audience was
permitted to speak and asked the Board of Ed and Selectmen if they had
tried exploring other ways to get the cost of insurance down.
------------------------------
TUESDAY, FEB. 3, 2009:
Play-by-play of First Selectman's budget as reviewed by the Board of
Selectmen: long, long meeting, bad night for driving...so we
stayed home and watched the action on Town TV. By the way, no
increase for Channel 79. High points:
INTRO WITH POWER POINT: Grand list growth .7%;
current budget over by $167k (snow removal); budget surplus
still@$7.5+ million. Helpful indicator of the Weston economy is
the numbers on pools, cabanas and tennis court permits - down this
year. Collection rate projected at 97.7% (down) for the coming
budget cycle. Four part-time positions eliminated by July
1. And a note: collections at 95% for the recent tax bills.
QUESTIONS: Do we have to pay for First Night? Luncheon
extras for Memorial Day? Is there money for a Referendum (on the
budget)? GIS training? Increase to legal fees?
SPECIAL MEETING ON STRATEGY: at the end of the long, long
meeting, Selectmen decided to call a Special Meeting on Thursday,
February 5, 2009 at 7:30pm in the Town Hall Meeting Room. The
reason is to hold an Executive Session on strategy on union
negotiations--since the budget document requires that salaries for next
year be reflected in tax bills to be sent out mid-year.
Meetings
held at Town Hall except for Board of Finance Public Hearing and ATBM.
Weston schedules times for new budget
review
Weston FORUM
Written by Kimberly Donnelly
Saturday, December 06, 2008
Budget packages have been sent to all department heads in
preparation
for putting together next year’s town budget. The following
budget review schedule has been approved for Weston’s 2009-10 municipal
budget. All meetings are open to the public.
Wednesday,
Dec. 17 - Departments submit budget requests to the town
administrator/finance director. (Town Charter requires this be done no
later than Jan. 14.)
Week of Jan. 5-9, 2009 -
Departments meet with town administrator, finance director and first
selectman to review budget requests.
Tuesday, Jan. 13 -
Department revisions to original requests are due.
Thursday, Jan. 22 -
First selectman submits town budget requests to Board of Selectmen.
Thursday, Jan. 29 -
Board of Education submits school budget request to Board of Selectmen.
(Town Charter requires this be done no later than Feb. 3.)
Tuesday, Feb. 3 - Board
of Selectmen reviews first selectman’s town budget request (7:30
p.m.).
Wednesday, Feb. 4 -
Board of Selectmen reviews Board of Education budget request (7:30
p.m.).
Thursday, Feb. 5 - CHANGED TO FEB. 12 -
Board
of Selectmen continues review of Board of Education request if
necessary. Board of Selectmen votes on and transmits town and school
budgets to the Board of Finance. (Town Charter requires this be done no
later than Feb. 25.) Selectmen also nominate a moderator for the Annual
Town Budget Meeting (7:30 p.m.).
Monday, Feb. 23 - Board
of Finance reviews first selectman’s town budget request (8 p.m.).
Tuesday, Feb. 24 - Board
of Finance continues review of first selectman’s town budget request if
necessary. (8 p.m.)
Wednesday, Feb. 25 -
Board of Finance reviews Board of Education’s school budget request (8
p.m.).
Thursday, Feb. 26 -
Board of Finance continues review of Board of Education’s school budget
request if necessary (8 p.m.).
Thursday, March 19 -
Notice published of budget public hearing.
Tuesday, March 31 -
Board of Finance holds public hearing on the budget request at 8 p.m.
in the Weston Middle School cafeteria.
Wednesday, April 1 -
Budget public hearing continued if necessary.
Thursday, April 2 -
Board of Finance budget deliberation meeting if necessary (8 p.m.).
Thursday, April 9 -
Notice published of Annual Town Budget Meeting.
Tuesday, April 21 -
Annual Town Budget Meeting at 8 p.m. in the Weston High School
auditorium. (Charter requires this be held no later than April 22.)
Board of Finance meets after the ATBM to set the mill rate.
Joint meeting: Weston boards cautious
about budgets
Weston FORUM
Written by Patricia Gay
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
In an era when many are suffering through hard times because of
the
bleak economy, the town of Weston’s three major boards are taking a
hard look at the upcoming 2009-10 town and school budgets.
While the selectmen and the school board talked about possible
3%
increases to next year’s budget, the finance board cautioned that even
that may be too high.
“This is a different budget year than in the past; there is
clearly a
difference this year,” said finance board member Melissa Koller.
In an effort to get an idea of how the current financial crisis
is
affecting the town and schools, members of the Board of Selectmen,
Board of Education and Board of Finance held a special joint meeting on
Tuesday, Dec. 2.
Though no direct action was taken at the meeting, the boards
left with
the understanding that it was critical to keep costs as low as possible.
“This is reality time. Everyone I talk to is asking what we are
going
to do about taxes. No one is saying don’t cut them. I have to listen to
what people are telling me,” Ms. Koller said.
Mike O’Brien, finance board chairman, opened the meeting by
asking the
selectmen where the town stood as far as tax delinquencies,
bankruptcies, and repossessions were concerned, and if unemployment was
on the increase. “We need to get a feel for these things as we plan the
budget,” he said.
Fellow finance board member Dave Muller said it would be good to
have
some kind of metric, or standard of measurement, so those economic
issues could be factored into the analysis.
But First Selectman Woody Bliss was not certain a metric could
be
devised because economic factors are difficult to calculate. For
example, he said, a notice of foreclosure on a piece of property did
not necessarily mean the house would in fact be foreclosed on.
“There are many foreclosure notices recorded on the land
records, but
only one actual foreclosure has gone through that I am aware of,” he
said.
Revenue stream is OK
As to the impact of personal economic factors on the town’s
revenue
stream, Tom Landry, town administrator, projected that the town’s
revenues would be fine despite possible foreclosure increases because
town taxes have to be brought current when the property is reconveyed.
“Foreclosures do not affect the tax collection rate,” Mr. Landry said.
Selectman Gayle Weinstein said she is more concerned about what
will
happen a year from now, and whether homeowners will have trouble paying
their taxes then. She said many banks have tax escrows set up and taxes
due in July were paid from those escrows. “It will be interesting to
see how things are in a year,” she said.
She noted that the town’s social services department is much
busier now
and has had an increase in families needing financial assistance this
year.
Town budget
Mr. Bliss said the selectmen were considering a possible 3%
increase
for the town side of the budget in 2009-10.
For a 3% hike, that would mean the town’s current budget would
increase
by $318,000.
Mr. Landry explained that the town had estimated an increase in
expenses totaling $465,650, which was $146,850 more than the 3% target.
“Cuts will have to be made in the budget just to get to 3%,” Mr.
Landry
said.
Several of the estimated increases were employee related and
include a
$146,000 payroll adjustment for salaries, $9,250 in Social Security
increases, $100,000 in health insurance increases, and $7,650 in
pension increases.
Other items include $30,000 in energy increases, $71,000 for the
Kids
in Crisis program, a $37,250 GASB liability, a $5,500 liability
insurance increase, and $97,000 for 3.5% increases in other budget
items.
The estimated increases were offset by $38,000 from a projected
workers’ compensation reduction and expiration of a planning and zoning
consulting contract.
School budget
Ellen Uzenoff, chairman of the school board, and Jo-Ann Keating,
the
schools’ finance director, said the schools were also looking at a 3%
increase in their budget for 2009-10.
Ms. Keating said the schools had already implemented some ways
to cut
costs in the current year’s budget, which would carry over into the
next fiscal year.
Finance board member Patrice Kopas asked if the schools were
looking at
the money spent on such things as conferences, and Superintendent Jerry
Belair said they were definitely taking a look at those things. “There
may be areas of cost containment, rather than savings, as well,” Mr.
Belair said.
Ms. Uzenoff said the schools were also looking at reducing
transportation costs by examining current bus routes. “Hopefully, we
can turn the octopus into a squid,” she said.
School board member Joe Fitzpatrick said it was also important
to look
carefully at capital projects and repairs. He said the middle school
roof may need to be replaced, and if so, it would be a high-ticket item.
Mill rate impact
In addition to expenditures by the town and schools, Mr. Landry
said
there were three other factors that will likely increase the mill rate
next year.
The first factor is an estimated decrease in building fees
($115,000)
and investment income ($250,000).
Mr. Landry said those decreases will be offset by an estimated
increase
in town clerk fees ($100,000), for a total of $265,000 in decreased
income.
He said the second factor is an estimated $171,000 loss in state
aid.
The third factor is a $300,000 payment for the construction of
the
Lyons Plain firehouse.
On the flip side, Mr. Landry noted there is expected to be a
decline in
the debt service, to the tune of $466,000 in savings.
The items net out at $270,000, or a 0.45% increase in the
estimated
mill rate.
Not acceptable
After listening to the town and school budget proposals, Mr.
Muller
said a 3% increase was not necessarily acceptable in light of the tough
economic times.
“Although 3% might work, you should be thinking 1%, too,” Mr.
Muller
said. He added that he didn’t want to wait until the 11th hour to tell
the boards they needed to cut their budgets further. “Prepare for it
now; that’s why we are having this meeting,” he said.
Mr. Bliss said a 1% increase in the town budget would likely
mean some
services would be eliminated.
Finance board member Michael Carter said he, too, was concerned
about
the 3% number. He cautioned the boards not to get trapped into a
certain percentage increase.
“Don’t just look at 3% or 4%. There is a mindset that
contractual
obligations are fixed, but more times than not they are not fixed
costs. We need to break the mold,” he said.
Selectman Glenn Major said if building applications were down
the town
might have to look at reducing staff that is currently manning those
departments. But Mr. Landry said he didn’t want to get employees
“whipped up” on a maybe.
The joint meeting was scheduled to start at 7:30 p.m., but
because of
two lengthy executive sessions at the beginning, it started after 9.
Although several members of the public were initially in attendance,
only two remained when the meeting started.
Absolute zero budget increase will be
required, board concludes
DAY
By Joe Wojtas
Published on 3/12/2009
Stonington - Most of the town's Board of Finance members grudgingly
agreed Wednesday night that they must cut the proposed 2009-10 budget
to a zero-increase level if they want voters to approve it.
After listening to the Board of Education answer questions and outline
its proposed $31.1 million budget, finance board Chairman Glenn
Frishman polled his members to see where they thought the board needed
to go in terms of a tax rate.
KEY BUDGET DATES
(Times and locations to be announced.)
April 8: public hearing
April 20: town meeting
April 28: referendum
Most agreed they needed to cut the overall $54.8 million budget so
there would be no increase in the current 15.1-mill tax rate.
”We have to get to zero if we want to have any hope of passing this
budget,” Frishman said.
Director of Finance Maryanna Stevens said to do that the board would
have to use a combination of revenue and cuts that total $1.8 million.
Board members agreed they should probably use $500,000 from a debt
reserve account as well as $430,000 that has accumulated in interest
and money left over from completed capital projects to partially get to
that figure.
That would mean the board would still have to cut almost $900,000.
Board members said such a cut will force them to look at laying off
town and school employees. The school board has already cut 14.7
positions when it cut $900,000 from its original proposal.
Frishman said the board should also look at reducing the money it gives
to outside agencies such as libraries and ambulance companies before it
begins to lay off employees.
The board will decide exactly what cuts it will make when it meets at
7:30 p.m. on March 18 at the Pawcatuck Middle School.
Tight money:
School Systems Around State Being Warned About Spending
The
Hartford Courant
By DON STACOM
November 11, 2008
Bracing for a potentially brutal year ahead,
municipal officials around
the state are reaching out to their school systems with an unwelcome
message: Don't count on business-as-usual spending increases.
Grim financial projections from the Capitol are
spurring local
government leaders to warn that there won't be money to fund new school
programs — and possibly not enough to maintain everything that's on the
books now.
"It's prudent for towns to plan very conservatively.
The governor
herself has tried to indicate the seriousness of the budget position,"
said Jeffrey Beckham, a spokesman for the Office of Policy and
Management. "The news has just been unremittingly bad."
State budget officials expect Connecticut's tax
revenue to drop
substantially because of the Wall Street collapse and nationwide
economic slump. They don't yet have detailed estimates of how that will
affect state aid to municipalities, but many communities are preparing
contingency plans in case the outcome is bad. Towns usually start
discussing school spending proposals in January or February, but this
year is different.
Cheshire's council and school administration met
recently to review
three possible revenue models for 2009-10, reflecting anywhere from
middle-of-the-road to dismal circumstances. One is based on a 2 percent
increase in state aid and local tax revenues, the second assumes a 7
percent drop-off and the third figures on a 12 percent decline.
"We want to get some guidance from the council about
what sort of
budget it wants," Town Manager Michael Milone said Friday. "If cuts
have to be made, the time to make them is early in the process, not at
the 11th hour."
Plainville Town Manager Robert Lee is inviting his
community's school
board and council to hear a fiscal forecast this month, and Bristol
Mayor Art Ward has begun talking money with his school system.
"We're preparing for a lean and mean budget process
this year," Ward
said Friday.
"We are running various scenarios for next year. One
is with state
revenue flat, one is with a 5 percent reduction in current services,"
Bristol Superintendent of Schools Philip Streifer said.
Pay raises, benefit costs and special education
expenses could add $5
million to $7 million to the city's $101 million school budget next
year, he said. If the state doesn't cover most of that, the schools
will have to cut back.
"It's not a pretty picture. The big money is in
staffing — you can't
make up $6 million by not buying paper," Streifer said. "If that
happens, we know we won't be able to maintain our class sizes, we know
there will be a loss of staff."
Plainville Superintendent of Schools Kathleen
Binkowski has directed
her business manager to build a spending plan with zero-based
budgeting, reviewing every expense in every school.
"I know people don't like to hear about student
activity fees,
pay-for-participation fees — but these are things the parents
suggested," she said.
From AARP
FY08-09 study, above...previously, below...
State
ranks 3rd in nation for most debt
CT
POST
ROB
VARNON
Article
Last Updated: 07/31/2008 01:15:42 AM EDT
Is
the frugal Yankee about to land on the endangered species list?
According to a new survey, he or she could be joining the polar bears,
as Connecticut ranked third in a national report on monthly credit card
debt.
Boston-based
Americans for Fairness in Lending released a report Wednesday on the
median credit card debt per borrower by state. Connecticut, with
$2,039 in median debt, ranked third behind Alaska, with $3,384, and New
Hampshire, with $2,109. Massachusetts
ranked 10th and Rhode Island was 15th. Vermont was the most frugal of
the New England states, ranking 28, with median debt of $1,619.
Incomes
somewhat correlated to the debt level as higher income states recorded
higher debt levels. Connecticut in 2006 had the third highest household
median income, with $63,422. Alaska had the seventh highest and New
Hampshire the sixth. As some pointed out, a high debt level combined
with high income isn't necessarily a sign of poor fiscal
management. Mississippi had
the lowest median income in 2006 and also the lowest credit card debt
of $1,098.
The
Americans for Fairness in Lending is a lobby established by several
consumer advocacy groups, some of which include community
lenders. The group wants
to reregulate the credit card industry — banning certain fees and
sudden jumps in interest rates. The group points to the rising level of
credit card debt in America as partial proof that lending standards
should be tightened to stop predatory lending that's leaving the most
vulnerable part of our population drowning in debt.
Jim
Campen, executive director and a doctor of economics, said lenders have
instituted a number of practices that unfairly penalize lower income
people and leave them in financial pits so deep it takes years for them
to dig out. At the same time, the banks are profiting by continually
whacking these people with higher interest rates and penalty
fees. He said many of
these borrowers shouldn't have been given these loans in the first
place.
"They're
blaming consumers, but the banks should say no," he said. Since the
banks aren't, Campen said Congress should force them to.
But
the American Bankers Association, a lobby for major banks and lenders,
including issuers of credit cards, said regulation isn't the answer, it
will just add costs at a time when the economy is vulnerable to a
slowdown. Carol Kaplan, an
ABA spokeswoman, said the free market will work things out. And if
consumers don't like the practices of a card issuer they should go to
another one. She said regulation will just increase the cost to lenders
and tighten credit even further.
Kaplan
pointed out that 40 to 50 percent of Americans pay their credit cards
off monthly, so this is not a problem for all Americans.
Local
economists said the report is out of date because debt levels have
expanded well beyond the figures cited. Edward Deak, a
Fairfield University professor of economics, said the situation will
continue to look worse and he's concerned there will be higher levels
of credit card default because people are using their cards to cover
expenses their incomes can't cover. But Deak
questioned whether it made sense to have Congress controlling spending
or consumers.
Donald
Klepper-Smith, chief economist of New Haven-based DataCorps Partners,
said today's debt levels are well past what they were in 2006. He said in 2006,
people could still take equity lines of credit on their houses, but
that line has been severed by the housing crisis. Because many houses
are worth less than the mortgages on them, homeowners cannot take out
credit against their equity. Klepper-Smith
said today's credit crisis is part of a system- wide problem with our
consumer economy, where we've spent beyond our incomes. He noted the
federal debt is so high, every man woman and child owes $30,000 on it.
"At
some point, we have to start living within our means," Klepper-Smith
said.
To
do that, it will take national leadership to focus on investment rather
than consumption, he said. That means
raising interest rates and creating an environment where it's more
attractive for people and corporations to invest in new technology and
infrastructure, the things that can drive job creation, he said.
While
that transformation will take leadership at the very heights of power,
Klepper-Smith said every American should be taking charge of his or her
finances.
If
they don't, he said, "They're living on borrowed time."
Kids in Crisis may lose funds
Greenwich TIME
By Colin Gustafson, Staff
Writer
Posted: 04/11/2009 11:16:25 PM EDT
At a time when its counseling services have grown all the more vital to
financially distressed families, Kids in Crisis is bracing for the
costly double whammy of losing state funding amid shrinking private
donations.
Under the two-year budget proposed by legislative Democrats earlier
this month, the Cos Cob-based family crisis center could lose all of
the nearly $40,000 in annual state funding for its 24-hour crisis
intervention and hotline program for families across lower Fairfield
County.
Because these funds are allocated solely for the intervention and
hotline program, the nonprofit organization won't be able to spread the
losses out to the other services it offers, such as temporary shelters
for children and one-on-one counseling, staffers said.
Compounding
these difficulties is a projected $300,000 decline in private donations
to Kids in Crisis that is expected to slice its overall budget from
$5.2 million in the fiscal year 2007-08 to $4.9 million this fiscal
year, according to Executive Director Shari Shapiro.
That's bad news for a nearly 40-year-old organization that, today,
relies on charitable giving to pay for 63 percent of its operating
budget.
"We have people who are very committed to us, but in tough economic
times they're cutting back because they have no choice," she said,
adding that the potential loss of state funds "is a blow on top of
another blow."
The budget proposal, first presented by Gov. M. Jodi Rell in February,
would also target more than $28,000 in funding for the Windham Regional
Community Council Inc., one of the only other 24-hour crisis centers in
the state. State lawmakers face a June 3 deadline to pass the budget,
though political wrangling may drag out the process.
"It's always particularly hard when we have to cut services for kids,"
said state Rep. Lile Gibbons, R-Greenwich. "(But) to be fair,
everything is on the table."
For Kids in Crisis, the loss of state funding would wipe out more than
11 percent of its roughly $350,000 budget for the hotline service and
would likely force the center to lay off one of the four crisis
counselors who answer the phones, Shapiro said. That could put a
strain on the roughly 60-person staff if employees who normally work
with children staying at the Kids in Crisis shelter are pulled away
from the job to fill the gap in the hotline service, she said.
The 24-hour hotline, she said, serves as a round-the-clock lifeline to
children across the region, from infancy to age 17, suffering crises of
abuse, neglect, homelessness and mental illness. The center has been
receiving the state funding for more than 15 years, she added.
Crisis
counselors receiving calls from children in severe distress often drive
to their homes, sometimes as far as Ridgefield, to conduct a
face-to-face "interventions" with families to resolve disputes on the
spot, Shapiro said.
When children seek refuge voluntarily, or get referred by police, state
social workers or schools, Kids in Crisis houses them in one of two
10-bed shelters, one for kids ages 12 and under, the other for teens
ages 12-17. Though headquartered in town, the center serves
Stamford,
New Canaan, Darien, Norwalk, Weston, Westport, Wilton and Ridgefield,
and works with more than 70 agencies that help troubled families.
Now,
as the economy sours and as families' anxiety over finances mounts,
Shapiro says her organization is seeing a dramatic growth in demand for
its services.
In fiscal year 2007-08, which ended in June, for example, counselors
took more than 600 emergency calls on the 24-hour hotline and conducted
nearly 200 in-person counseling sessions as follow-ups, she said. Nine
months into this fiscal year, the number of calls and visits is about
to surpass that tally. On top of that, she said, more children
are
staying longer at the shelters, where 18 of the 20 beds are now
typically filled, compared with about 15 beds, on average, that were
filled at this time last year, she said.
Part of the reason, according to Shapiro: Many of the recent arrivals
have had no place to go, having been left homeless after their families
or families' landlords were foreclosed on. With demand for
emergency
counseling on the rise, for rich and poor families, Democratic
Selectman Lin Lavery says potential funding cuts and revenue losses
would come at the worst possible time for both the center and the
community it serves.
"We already know domestic abuse is on the rise across all economic
lines," she said. "Without Kids in Crisis, there is no other place for
children to go in the middle of the night."
Stuart Adelberg, president of the United Way of Greenwich, shares those
concerns.
"The incredible value in the (24-hour) hotline is that a mental-health
crisis can be handled immediately," said Adelberg, whose organization
donated $62,168 to the center in July.
"A kid in a domestic-abuse situation does not want to be told to call
in the morning.
"Sometimes there's no guarantee they're going to call again."
Weston's grand list increases by
2.9%
Weston FORUM
Written by Kimberly Donnelly
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
The actual growth in Weston’s
taxable property was negligible this year, but because of revaluation,
the town will see a slight increase in its grand list.
The town’s net grand list has grown
by more than $73.9 million, a 2.9% increase, compared with a 1.9%
increase last year and 2% the year before.
“The increase came predominantly
from the recent revaluation of real property, which makes up about 95%
of the grand list,” said Ken Whitman, the town’s assessor.
Actual growth, Mr. Whitman said,
accounts for 0.65% in the grand list increase. The remaining 2.58% was
the result of real estate market fluctuation from 2003 to 2008,
reflected in the October 2008 revaluation.
The change in values reflected by
the recent revaluation is for the period from Oct. 1, 2003 to Oct. 1,
2008, in contrast to last year’s grand list assessment, which was based
on the October 2003 real estate market.
“From Oct. 1, 2003 to the end of
2006, the real estate market showed significant appreciation prior to
the more recent downturn,” Mr. Whitman said. “Charting the change in
real estate prices over the five-year period between revaluations,
prices peaked in late 2006 at an increase of about 21% from Oct. 1,
2003 values, then decreased in 2007 and more rapidly in 2008.”
As of Oct. 1, 2008, when state law
requires the assessor to value property, “the overall effect on values
was about a 5% increase from October 2003 levels,” Mr. Whitman said.
The net grand list, an inventory of
all taxable property in town as of Oct. 1, 2008, is $2,629,155,215.
That’s $73,970,977 more than the 2007 grand list of $2,555,184,238.
The annual mill (or tax) rate is
determined after the fiscal year’s budget is completed and all known
revenue sources are projected, with the exception of tax revenue. The
town then determines the value of a mill, which is equal to $1 for
every $1,000 of assessed value on the grand list. The mill rate is
derived by dividing the town’s grand levy (its debt) by the town’s
grand list.
The grand list is made up of real
estate, personal property and motor vehicle assessments.
Real estate
Real estate assessments make up the
bulk — about 95%, with residential real estate accounting for about 96%
of that — of Weston’s grand list and are figured at 70% of the Oct. 1,
2008, real market value.
Net real estate assessments total
$2,499,897,300, an increase of more than $78 billion or 3.23% from last
year’s total of $2,421,702,910.
Business and
personal property
Net personal property assessments
grew 2.02% from the previous grand list, less than the 5.55% growth
seen last year — which was down from a 9% increase the year before.
The business personal property
increase was “fueled mainly by an increase in the filing of Connecticut
Light & Power. Otherwise, the overall trend of the remaining
accounts was down,” Mr. Whitman said.
Personal property includes
commercial and industrial furniture, fixtures and machinery. These
assessments are generally based on 70% of depreciated acquisition costs.
Personal property assessments total
$17,789,963, which is $352,765 more than last year’s total of
$17,437,198.
Mr. Whitman said there are 287
business accounts in Weston, up slightly from last year’s 281.
Motor vehicles
“Evidence of the economic downturn
is reflected in the motor vehicle grand list, which decreased for the
first time in memory,” Mr. Whitman said.
Net motor vehicle assessments are
down 3.94%, a decrease of $4,576,178 to $111,467,952. Motor vehicle
assessments had been running just about flat in recent years, with a
0.31% increase last year, and a 0.6% increase in 2006.
This year, 9,027 vehicles were
reported by the Department of Motor Vehicles, 145 more than last year.
Motor vehicle assessments are based
on 70% of average retail value. Pricing guides provided by the National
Automobile Dealers Association are used to determine value. The state
Office of Policy Management recommends the use of these guides.
Top taxpayers
Mr. Whitman said that, as in prior
years, Weston’s top taxpayer is Connecticut Light & Power, with
real and personal property assessments totaling $11,769,182, followed
by Aspetuck Valley Country Club at $9,592,970, and Aquarion Water
Company at $7,002,090.
Revaluation and
appeals
This past year, the town, under the
direction of Mr. Whitman and the assessor’s office, Vision Appraisal
Technology of Northboro, Mass., conducted a full measure and list
revaluation of all properties in Weston.
The state mandates revaluations be
performed every five years; every 10 years, a “physical inspection” is
required, meaning that every building is visited and measured. Weston
last underwent a revaluation in 2003.
The purpose of regular revaluation
is to create an equitable distribution of the tax load. The process is
an attempt to determine accurate and equitable values for all
properties within a municipality.
Taxpayers who wish to appeal the new
assessment to the Board of Assessment Appeals must do so in writing on
the approved application form, available in the Weston assessor’s
office, or online at www.westonct.gov.
Applications must be completed in
full and received in the assessor’s office by 4:30 p.m. on March 20 to
be considered.
REVAL
ADVISORY
Weston revaluation
notices are being sent this week
Weston FORUM
Written by Kenneth Whitman, Weston
Assessor
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
The 2008 revaluation of Weston real estate is coming to
fruition.
The physical inspection and field review stages are complete, as
well
as the analysis of market sales and the establishment of preliminary
values.
Notices will be mailed shortly to each property owner showing
the
current value, based on the 2003 real estate market, and the proposed
Oct. 1, 2008 value. The 70% assessment upon which taxes are based is
also included.
Taxpayers should bear in mind these values reflect the change in
the
real estate market from October 2003 to October 2008, a period in the
market that showed significant early appreciation before the more
recent downturn since 2006-07. Therefore, over the five-year period
between revaluations, the overall effect on values is minimal.
It is also important to note that Connecticut state law requires
the
assessor to value as of Oct. 1. Sales after October are not allowed to
be used in the rigid performance-based testing required for the state
to certify the accuracy of the revaluation.
Because the real estate market has continued to decline since
Oct. 1,
these changes cannot be reflected in the 2008 revaluation figures.
Another important fact — and misconception — about revaluations
is that
they do not raise revenue for the town. Assessments of all taxable
property are simply used as a base for establishing how much each
taxpayer will pay in taxes. However, the total amount of the tax levy
(total dollars raised through taxation) is based on the budget process,
i.e., how much the town needs to fund the schools, public safety,
public works, health and sanitation, social services, library, parks
and recreation, and general government.
If the propery values increase, the tax rate will decrease, and
if the
values decrease, the tax rate will increase based on the revaluation
alone.
Finally, let me stress that the values being mailed this week
are
preliminary values. The assessor encourages each taxpayer to review the
value and the information contained in the property record for each of
their properties.
Consider this phase of the revaluation to be the “public
participation”
phase. Information on all real property in the town of Weston will be
available for perusal by all Weston taxpayers to compare and analyze.
Information on the Web site (www.westonct.gov) and how to
request an
informal meeting to discuss your property will be contained on the
valuation notice that you will receive.
After reviewing the public feedback, the assessor will carefully
re-analyze the values and methodology of the revaluation company and
issue final valuation and assessment notices, probably toward the end
of February.
An example of how the school budget process works...
E D U C A
T I O N B U D G E T
R E V I E W S C H E D U L E F
.
Y . ' 0 6
Note:
location of meetings: Town Hall Meeting Room
(televised
live) up to Board of Finance Public Hearing (taped for later
broadcast)--which
has taken place in the Weston Middle School Cafeteria,
previously.
A.T.B.M. this year (April 13, 2005) at Weston High School Gym!
THE OBSERVATIONS BELOW ARE
'ABOUT TOWN'S' OPINION AND NO ONE ELSE'S:
NOTE: Meeting at the Town Hall Meeting Room
(better sound than at Weston Library, where the Board of Education
meets for Town TV sessions): Although 'About Town' did not
attend this second workshop meeting (Wednesday, January 5, 2005), we
taped much of it and picked up printed materials. A report here
is from that part of Board of Education Workshop#2, Wednesday, January
5, 2005 (7pm in Town Hall). This meeting's observations only
cover the new 3-4-5 school, Weston Middle School and Weston High
School. Again, as in the previous workshop, text referred to in
the presentations in detail were not available to those in attendance
from the general public.
What we would
highlight from the tape is the
suggestion that the 4 schools make sure to communicate with
one-another, that all three administrators were new to us (altho' we
realize that Dr. Ribbons was and is presently Hurlbutt's
Principal). Our prediction: the Board of Finance is going
to need much more detail than what is available now to satisfy
themselves that the taxpayers are getting their money's worth.
But maybe we are wrong!
More research was done
between workshop #1 and
workshop #2 to provide "apples to apples" comparisons between Weston
and the other systems in ERG 'A' - not abvailable to the general public
yet, so we will do our own research...
NOTE:
Board of
Education Workshop #1, Tuesday, January 4, 2005 (7pm Weston Public
Library)
PROPOSED WORKING DRAFT NOT
DISTRIBUTED BECAUSE, AMONG OTHER REASONS, THE BOARD OF EDUCATION IS
CONSERVING PAPER - the information below is thus in no way to be
considered formal or accurate, and it definitely will change anyway,
because even if it were perfect, the Board of Education will not
approve it as-is (they never do give 100% approval to staff
recommendations)..."About Town" attended first budget public meeting on
overall school budget for FY '05-'06 and found out the following (what
we heard, since nothing in writing was distributed):
Total systemwide budget
proposed by staff is $38,049,656, or a 9.85% increase.
Enrollment is now 2535. For the 2005-2006 school year, for which the
new budget is being drawn up, there is expected to be an increase of 10
students, for an estimated total of 2545. This represents for 4
schools the following enrollments:
Pre-K - 2 = 581, or
plus 17
3-5 = 567, or minus 15
6-8 = 632, or minus 11
9-12 = 734, or plus
19
Over
the next 5 years it is
expected that systemwide there will be a student population decrease of
5.6%. Discussion ensued regarding how the Board of Education will
respond to the mandate that there be, with this year's budget request,
analysis explaining how Weston compares in staff-student ratio, and
administrator-teacher ratio to other school systems in the ERG 'A'
group (i.e. Wilton, Avon). Strategic School Profiles produced by
the CT DOE may show this data - but Weston's own analyses over the
years compare our budgets one to the other, and thus do not include
comparable information from other systems. An effort will be made
to produce an analytic tool that makes comparisons system to system
possible (in different configurations than the SSP provides) - in a
timely fashion for the FY'06 Board of Finance (and Selectmen).
City council, school board
debate budget: New
London officials consider combining finance departments
BY Stephen Chupaska New London Day Staff Writer
Article published Dec 15, 2009
New London - In a joint session Monday the City Council and the Board
of Education had a robust discussion on consolidating parts of the
finance department, the form of the schools' budget and improving
school maintenance.
While no formal votes were taken, both the council and the board agreed
by consent to direct City Manager Martin Berliner and Superintendent of
Schools Nicholas A. Fischer to meet and report back to both bodies on
merging parts of each side's finance department. The report would
take
three months to complete, according to Berliner and Fischer.
Mayor Rob Pero has long supported the consolidation of city and school
finance departments as a cost savings measure. But some board
members
asked that specific problems, such as the difficulties stemming from
the fact that the city and the schools use different accounting
software, be examined first, rather than move to completely merge the
departments.
"Why don't we figure out what the problems are first?" board member
Susan Connolly said.
City finance director James Lathrop said the separate systems have made
it difficult and time consuming to reconcile school finances.
Pero,
though, said finance consolidation encompasses more than just greater
efficiency.
"It's not just the information," Pero said. "It's the savings."
The council and board also tried to mend fences over the form of the
school budget. Earlier in the year, the City Council discussed filing a
Freedom of Information Act request as it wanted a "line by line" budget
from the school board. The Republican school board candidates
filed a
similar request during the campaign.
Fischer said that anyone, including elected officials or citizens, who
wants information on specific line items in the school budget to
contact his office.
If anyone requests the entire budget, Fischer said the school
administration would either copy the 800-page budget onto a disc, or
print it out at the cost of 50 cents per page. The city manager
and
the superintendent are also close to completing a proposal that would
transfer three public works employees to the school side of the ledger,
a move they say would lead to greater efficiency in school maintenance.
Fischer would not comment on the state of the report, saying only it is
"under consideration."
If it comes to fruition, the council and board could each vote on the
measure in the spring. The next joint council-board meeting will
be
held Jan. 11.
Real
estate tax dives
By NATHAN WHALEN, Whidbey News Times Reporter
Dec 11 2009, 2:54 PM
While Coupeville appears to be meeting its budget projections in most
areas, it’s falling short in real estate.
The town isn’t raking in as much money as expected from the Real Estate
Excise Tax. Officials had budgeted to receive $56,000 in 2009. However,
the amount collected through November stands at only $38,000.
Officials budgeted to collect a smaller amount in 2009 than in previous
years due to the recession. However, the amount coming in is well below
even that reduced expectation. The town collected nearly $86,000 in
2006, more than $87,000 in 2007 and approximately $54,000 in 2008.
Mayor Nancy Conard said during Tuesday’s Town Council meeting that the
lesser revenue is a reflection of the current crummy real estate
climate. She said new incentives approved by Congress to encourage
people to buy homes, which might spark an increase in the REET.
Conard said the town is required to use real estate tax money for
capital projects. Revenue is placed in a fund to help pay for future
projects.
Other funding sources for the town’s coffers have been somewhat stable.
Conard said that through November, the town collected $292,000 in sales
tax, which is close to projections.
“It looks like we will easily make the $300,000 budget mark,” the mayor
said.
The town has seen its sales tax collections decline in recent years.
From 2004 to 2007, sales tax revenue increased from $308,000 to
$476,000, helped along by several large construction projects, such as
the new Coupeville High School. Since then, collections have declined
each year to the current low.
The 2 percent Hotel/Motel Tax also showed similar stability. Although
budgeted to collect $15,000, it looks like it will be closer to
$20,000, similar to recent years.